Nissan: 370Z News
#201
Suzuka Master
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Age: 45
Posts: 7,083
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
The racing Z above has to look like that in order to meet Japanese racing regulations. They had to extend the body which lead to the strange font and rear bumpers.
#202
Suzuka Master
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Age: 45
Posts: 7,083
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I think the Z is a classic design. It has a few rough edges (door handles), but it feels timeless to me similar to the 911 design. I'm not saying the Z is anywhere near the 911, but just that both have nice clean designs which are not overly trendy and will last
#206
Senior Moderator
...after reading about the Nismo R34 GTR Z-Tune, Z S-tune=
#207
Senior Moderator
looks like an armadillo
the modded one looks even worse
the modded one looks even worse
#208
Moderator Alumnus
Thread Starter
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Washington DC (NOVA)
Age: 52
Posts: 16,399
Likes: 0
Received 8 Likes
on
8 Posts
Nissan: 370Z news **2014 NISMO Version Revealed (page 19)**
Nissan Raises Stakes On Z-car - - Source; Autoexpress
Demand for Nissan's 350Z has never been greater, but that hasn't stopped the firm from thinking about its next generation of sports cars. As well as preparing a facelifted 350Z Roadster for launch early next year, the company has revealed plans for its replacement, due in 2009.
The former, pictured in this week's mag, is mechanically identical to the current car, but will get new-look headlamps, LED tail-lights, a revised front bumper and increased specification for no extra cost.
But it's the latter news which will really excite enthusiasts. The new car will take the current 350Z and add a more involving chassis and punchier engine. Olivier Paturet, chief product specialist at Nissan, told Auto Express he wanted the next Z to be a more hardcore machine, targeted squarely at Porsche buyers.
"We've seen what Porsche is doing with the Cayman, and I would like our new car to have more power, less weight and be more driver-focused," he said. "There's certainly a market in Europe for such a machine - it's simply a matter of convincing our US and Japanese divisions that this is the way forward."
The former, pictured in this week's mag, is mechanically identical to the current car, but will get new-look headlamps, LED tail-lights, a revised front bumper and increased specification for no extra cost.
But it's the latter news which will really excite enthusiasts. The new car will take the current 350Z and add a more involving chassis and punchier engine. Olivier Paturet, chief product specialist at Nissan, told Auto Express he wanted the next Z to be a more hardcore machine, targeted squarely at Porsche buyers.
"We've seen what Porsche is doing with the Cayman, and I would like our new car to have more power, less weight and be more driver-focused," he said. "There's certainly a market in Europe for such a machine - it's simply a matter of convincing our US and Japanese divisions that this is the way forward."
#209
Moderator Alumnus
Thread Starter
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Washington DC (NOVA)
Age: 52
Posts: 16,399
Likes: 0
Received 8 Likes
on
8 Posts
In my opinion what should happen to the Z line (even now) is that there should be an "R" version, or an S version which would be more targeted for hard core enthusiasts. The Track version is not hard core enough currently. The "softer" cars should remain. They will probably continue being the volume leaders.
#211
Suzuka Master
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Age: 45
Posts: 7,083
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
There is nothing soft about the current Z... Sometimes I actually wish my suspension was a bit softer driving over bad roads.
There already are the Nismo S and R tunes, but until they can get off the FM platform, the car can't really be more involving as the suspension weights too much to be significantly lighter.
There already are the Nismo S and R tunes, but until they can get off the FM platform, the car can't really be more involving as the suspension weights too much to be significantly lighter.
#212
Moderator Alumnus
Thread Starter
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Washington DC (NOVA)
Age: 52
Posts: 16,399
Likes: 0
Received 8 Likes
on
8 Posts
Originally Posted by M TYPE X
The "Track" edition isn't hardcore-enough Z?
It needs to be more powerful (and lighter ultimately) with even sharper steering and handling.
#213
Moderator Alumnus
Thread Starter
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Washington DC (NOVA)
Age: 52
Posts: 16,399
Likes: 0
Received 8 Likes
on
8 Posts
Originally Posted by cusdaddy
There is nothing soft about the current Z... Sometimes I actually wish my suspension was a bit softer driving over bad roads.
There already are the Nismo S and R tunes, but until they can get off the FM platform, the car can't really be more involving as the suspension weights too much to be significantly lighter.
There already are the Nismo S and R tunes, but until they can get off the FM platform, the car can't really be more involving as the suspension weights too much to be significantly lighter.
I dont know. The two Zs I drove never gave me the impression they are hard-core. Hard core is what Porshce is doing with the Cayman.
They should follow the exact same principles that GM followed with the Z06 cars. Coupe only, lighter and more power, better handling, etc. Leave the base Z, or Zs as is/are. Those are the volume leaders but to be taken even more seriously have a hard core enthusiast version.
#214
Engineer
yeah i agree... look at how they have the EVO and then the EVO MR with a even tighter suspension and other additional mods to make it more hardcore...
#215
The sizzle in the Steak
This news sounds great to me!
#216
Suzuka Master
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Age: 45
Posts: 7,083
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by gavriil
I dont know. The two Zs I drove never gave me the impression they are hard-core. Hard core is what Porshce is doing with the Cayman.
They should follow the exact same principles that GM followed with the Z06 cars. Coupe only, lighter and more power, better handling, etc. Leave the base Z, or Zs as is/are. Those are the volume leaders but to be taken even more seriously have a hard core enthusiast version.
They should follow the exact same principles that GM followed with the Z06 cars. Coupe only, lighter and more power, better handling, etc. Leave the base Z, or Zs as is/are. Those are the volume leaders but to be taken even more seriously have a hard core enthusiast version.
Until they can redesign the entire chasis, the car will be pretty heavy for what it is. The suspension can't get much firmer, the ultimate issue is weight though, not suspension setup.
#217
Safety Car
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: New Orleans
Posts: 4,411
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
^ I disagree. It's just the opposite. The JDM Skyline (G35) came out first, followed very closely by the Fairlady (Z). The FM is designed for rigidity and proper weight balnce, putting the engine behind the front axle. It's a good platform for the Z. The FX came later, after the success of the first too, which is why it's so acclaimed (for it's road handling ability).
#218
Originally Posted by srika
looks like an armadillo
the modded one looks even worse
the modded one looks even worse
But can't knock it, it sells well and really got enthusiasts back into NIssan cars.
#219
Moderator Alumnus
Thread Starter
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Washington DC (NOVA)
Age: 52
Posts: 16,399
Likes: 0
Received 8 Likes
on
8 Posts
Nissan extends warranty for 350Z tire wear issue
Car News briefs: Nissan extends warranty for 350Z tire wear issue - - Source: Autoweek
Nissan, responding to continuing customer concerns over irregular front tire wear issues with its 2003 and 2004 350Z models, has announced plans to further extend the front wheel alignment warranty extension for owners of affected vehicles.
In April of 2004, owners of 2003 350Z vehicles were first notified by Nissan that it would extend the warranties to cover an irregular tread wear pattern which was occurring on the inner edge of the front tires. Customers with 2004 350Z cars were not included at that time.
After monitoring the situation, Nissan believed it had corrected the problem with the majority of vehicles, but not all had been fixed to customer satisfaction and some 2004 350Z owners also began experiencing the same problem. After investigating the issue further, Nissan identified that, in addition to correcting the front-end alignment, a new tire with a slightly modified tread pattern, more resistant to “heel-toe” wear together with correct alignment, virtually eliminated the issue. Vehicles equipped with these tires have experienced virtually no incidents of tire noise.
Nissan is extending the warranty for front-end alignment due to tire noise until 36 months from the in-service date or October 31, 2005 (whichever is later) and unlimited mileage for 2003 350Z models, and to 36 months and unlimited mileage on 2004 350Z models. Nissan says the warranty extension ensures all owners will receive an effective repair, including in some circumstances replacement of their front tires with the new tire design, if they experience tire noise during the extended warranty period. Customer notifications are being sent out starting this week.
In April of 2004, owners of 2003 350Z vehicles were first notified by Nissan that it would extend the warranties to cover an irregular tread wear pattern which was occurring on the inner edge of the front tires. Customers with 2004 350Z cars were not included at that time.
After monitoring the situation, Nissan believed it had corrected the problem with the majority of vehicles, but not all had been fixed to customer satisfaction and some 2004 350Z owners also began experiencing the same problem. After investigating the issue further, Nissan identified that, in addition to correcting the front-end alignment, a new tire with a slightly modified tread pattern, more resistant to “heel-toe” wear together with correct alignment, virtually eliminated the issue. Vehicles equipped with these tires have experienced virtually no incidents of tire noise.
Nissan is extending the warranty for front-end alignment due to tire noise until 36 months from the in-service date or October 31, 2005 (whichever is later) and unlimited mileage for 2003 350Z models, and to 36 months and unlimited mileage on 2004 350Z models. Nissan says the warranty extension ensures all owners will receive an effective repair, including in some circumstances replacement of their front tires with the new tire design, if they experience tire noise during the extended warranty period. Customer notifications are being sent out starting this week.
#220
Originally Posted by gavriil
#221
Suzuka Master
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Age: 45
Posts: 7,083
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Cool.. I got a free set of front tires at about 14k miles on my 2003 Z and it looks like I'll get another set as they are starting to wear a bit again
#222
Photography Nerd
I don't understand how changing the tire is a solution? If the tires are wearing unevenly, it's got to be a suspension/alignment issue. Probably too much toe would be my guess.
Does anyone have more info on this? I'm curious to read more.
Does anyone have more info on this? I'm curious to read more.
#223
Suzuka Master
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Age: 45
Posts: 7,083
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Dan Martin
I don't understand how changing the tire is a solution? If the tires are wearing unevenly, it's got to be a suspension/alignment issue. Probably too much toe would be my guess.
Does anyone have more info on this? I'm curious to read more.
Does anyone have more info on this? I'm curious to read more.
I tracked this issue a while back (not recently) and what was known at the time is that it was a combination of the suspension settings in the 2003 and early 2004 Z's as well as the tread pattern of the stock Bridgestone tires. I know that those replaced their tires with other models such as Pilots didn't experience the issue as badly as the stock Bridgestone's.
Nissan redesigned the suspension in mid 2004 which seemed to fix the issue, but the 2003-early 2004's still have the issue.
#224
Photography Nerd
Originally Posted by cusdaddy
When they replaced my tires the first time, they did an alignment, but on most 2003 and early 2004 Z's reoccurs again over time.
I tracked this issue a while back (not recently) and what was known at the time is that it was a combination of the suspension settings in the 2003 and early 2004 Z's as well as the tread pattern of the stock Bridgestone tires. I know that those replaced their tires with other models such as Pilots didn't experience the issue as badly as the stock Bridgestone's.
Nissan redesigned the suspension in mid 2004 which seemed to fix the issue, but the 2003-early 2004's still have the issue.
I tracked this issue a while back (not recently) and what was known at the time is that it was a combination of the suspension settings in the 2003 and early 2004 Z's as well as the tread pattern of the stock Bridgestone tires. I know that those replaced their tires with other models such as Pilots didn't experience the issue as badly as the stock Bridgestone's.
Nissan redesigned the suspension in mid 2004 which seemed to fix the issue, but the 2003-early 2004's still have the issue.
That would be a very tricky fix without swapping out a lot of components.
#225
Moderator Alumnus
Thread Starter
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Washington DC (NOVA)
Age: 52
Posts: 16,399
Likes: 0
Received 8 Likes
on
8 Posts
Updated 2006 Nissan 350Z Debuts
Updated 2006 Nissan 350Z Debuts - - Source: Edmunds.com
SYRACUSE, N.Y. — The 2006 Nissan 350Z made its first public appearance this week at the annual Z Club gathering. More than 500 Z owners are attending the event, which runs until August 19.
The 2006 model year marks the first time that changes have been made to the 350Z since its 2002 debut in the U.S. New features include a revised front end, enhanced interior, LED taillights and speed-sensitive power steering.
Among the other revisions for 2006 are a new Grand Touring Coupe model, featuring 18-inch front and 19-inch rear wheels, Brembo brakes, front and rear spoiler and vehicle dynamic control. All six-speed manual transmission models now receive the 300-horsepower tuning of the Z's standard 3.5-liter DOHC V6. Models equipped with the five-speed automatic transmission are rated at 287 hp.
The 2006 350Z also includes standard bi-xenon headlights, added MP3 CD capability for the optional Bose audio system and three new exterior paint colors, including silver alloy and magnetic black.
The 2006 model year marks the first time that changes have been made to the 350Z since its 2002 debut in the U.S. New features include a revised front end, enhanced interior, LED taillights and speed-sensitive power steering.
Among the other revisions for 2006 are a new Grand Touring Coupe model, featuring 18-inch front and 19-inch rear wheels, Brembo brakes, front and rear spoiler and vehicle dynamic control. All six-speed manual transmission models now receive the 300-horsepower tuning of the Z's standard 3.5-liter DOHC V6. Models equipped with the five-speed automatic transmission are rated at 287 hp.
The 2006 350Z also includes standard bi-xenon headlights, added MP3 CD capability for the optional Bose audio system and three new exterior paint colors, including silver alloy and magnetic black.
#229
Its interesting that Nissan does this when most companies would just pretend its the same power loss between the two.
"All six-speed manual transmission models now receive the 300-horsepower tuning of the Z's standard 3.5-liter DOHC V6. Models equipped with the five-speed automatic transmission are rated at 287 hp."
"All six-speed manual transmission models now receive the 300-horsepower tuning of the Z's standard 3.5-liter DOHC V6. Models equipped with the five-speed automatic transmission are rated at 287 hp."
#230
Photography Nerd
Originally Posted by heyitsme
Its interesting that Nissan does this when most companies would just pretend its the same power loss between the two.
"All six-speed manual transmission models now receive the 300-horsepower tuning of the Z's standard 3.5-liter DOHC V6. Models equipped with the five-speed automatic transmission are rated at 287 hp."
"All six-speed manual transmission models now receive the 300-horsepower tuning of the Z's standard 3.5-liter DOHC V6. Models equipped with the five-speed automatic transmission are rated at 287 hp."
#231
Suzuka Master
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Age: 45
Posts: 7,083
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by heyitsme
Its interesting that Nissan does this when most companies would just pretend its the same power loss between the two.
"All six-speed manual transmission models now receive the 300-horsepower tuning of the Z's standard 3.5-liter DOHC V6. Models equipped with the five-speed automatic transmission are rated at 287 hp."
"All six-speed manual transmission models now receive the 300-horsepower tuning of the Z's standard 3.5-liter DOHC V6. Models equipped with the five-speed automatic transmission are rated at 287 hp."
The 287hp version is the old version in the older Z's. In 2005, only the Track and 30th Anniversary model had the 300hp version, but now it is the same across the board.
What I've read is that both engines have essentially the same acceleration (the extra HP is offset by less torque), but the 300hp version is nicer due to the higher redline and smoother nature.
#233
I don't really agree with a more 'hardcore' Z model so to speak - refining the Z line in handling, steering, weight reduction, and centering the cockpit around the driver is definately what should happen to making it a more enjoyable car to drive.
I think the market though for some track built car is just so limited to begin with that it wouldn't be worth the sales. Making an R-tune suspension more ready available at the dealer would be the better route imo for those who plan to track the car.
I think the market though for some track built car is just so limited to begin with that it wouldn't be worth the sales. Making an R-tune suspension more ready available at the dealer would be the better route imo for those who plan to track the car.
#234
Fahrvergnügen'd
Originally Posted by heyitsme
I don't really agree with a more 'hardcore' Z model so to speak - refining the Z line in handling, steering, weight reduction, and centering the cockpit around the driver is definately what should happen to making it a more enjoyable car to drive.
I think the market though for some track built car is just so limited to begin with that it wouldn't be worth the sales. Making an R-tune suspension more ready available at the dealer would be the better route imo for those who plan to track the car.
I think the market though for some track built car is just so limited to begin with that it wouldn't be worth the sales. Making an R-tune suspension more ready available at the dealer would be the better route imo for those who plan to track the car.
325hp and 3000lbs for S-Tune (.88G and 125ft from 60mph) for $27-35k
335hp and 2900lbs for R-Tune (.93G and 117ft from 60mph) for $38k
#235
Senior Moderator
#236
_____ like a rabbit
Nissan may be readying 450Z to compete with Porsche, Maserati
Nissan is planning a Z sports coupe slotted above the current Nissan 350Z called the Nissan 450Z. The upgraded model will feature a 4.5 liter V8 engine which would likely be a tuned up version of the VK45DE from the Infiniti M45. The VK45DE makes 340hp currently, but Left Lane News reports the final product will feature 430hp. Of course, all that crazy power requires all-wheel drive, so that will be standard as well.
Nissan plans to pitch this new Nissan 450Z against the Porsche Carrera 911 and the Maserati 4.2.
Nissan plans to pitch this new Nissan 450Z against the Porsche Carrera 911 and the Maserati 4.2.
#237
The Third Ball
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Los Angeles, Ca
Age: 45
Posts: 49,124
Received 4,824 Likes
on
2,571 Posts
is this a "hold me over" til the skyline finally hits?
#239
Safety Car
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: New Orleans
Posts: 4,411
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Jack_n_Coke
I dont care what it is, i like it .
#240
Safety Car
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: New Orleans
Posts: 4,411
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by The Sarlacc
is this a "hold me over" til the skyline finally hits?