Nissan: 370Z News

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 06-25-2005, 08:34 AM
  #201  
Suzuka Master
 
cusdaddy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Age: 45
Posts: 7,083
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The racing Z above has to look like that in order to meet Japanese racing regulations. They had to extend the body which lead to the strange font and rear bumpers.
Old 06-25-2005, 08:35 AM
  #202  
Suzuka Master
 
cusdaddy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Age: 45
Posts: 7,083
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I think the Z is a classic design. It has a few rough edges (door handles), but it feels timeless to me similar to the 911 design. I'm not saying the Z is anywhere near the 911, but just that both have nice clean designs which are not overly trendy and will last
Old 06-25-2005, 10:49 AM
  #203  
Moderator Alumnus
Thread Starter
 
gavriil's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Washington DC (NOVA)
Age: 52
Posts: 16,399
Likes: 0
Received 8 Likes on 8 Posts
This NISMO 350Z S-tune GT should be in its own thread. Hence splitting accordingly.
Old 06-25-2005, 08:34 PM
  #204  
My M45 loves to eat rice
 
MattT516's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Brooklyn, NY
Age: 37
Posts: 1,327
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Looks like a bad imitation of a Porsche.
Old 06-25-2005, 09:05 PM
  #205  
Safety Car
 
heyitsme's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: philly
Posts: 4,426
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I dunno, the Z is another car that I've liked from original introduction to present 350.

Old 06-25-2005, 09:32 PM
  #206  
Senior Moderator
 
F23A4's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Age: 55
Posts: 17,886
Received 1,659 Likes on 926 Posts
...after reading about the Nismo R34 GTR Z-Tune, Z S-tune=
Old 06-25-2005, 10:33 PM
  #207  
Senior Moderator
 
srika's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Chicago
Posts: 58,048
Received 9,964 Likes on 5,137 Posts
looks like an armadillo

the modded one looks even worse
Old 06-26-2005, 07:06 PM
  #208  
Moderator Alumnus
Thread Starter
 
gavriil's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Washington DC (NOVA)
Age: 52
Posts: 16,399
Likes: 0
Received 8 Likes on 8 Posts
Nissan: 370Z news **2014 NISMO Version Revealed (page 19)**

Nissan Raises Stakes On Z-car - - Source; Autoexpress

Demand for Nissan's 350Z has never been greater, but that hasn't stopped the firm from thinking about its next generation of sports cars. As well as preparing a facelifted 350Z Roadster for launch early next year, the company has revealed plans for its replacement, due in 2009.

The former, pictured in this week's mag, is mechanically identical to the current car, but will get new-look headlamps, LED tail-lights, a revised front bumper and increased specification for no extra cost.

But it's the latter news which will really excite enthusiasts. The new car will take the current 350Z and add a more involving chassis and punchier engine. Olivier Paturet, chief product specialist at Nissan, told Auto Express he wanted the next Z to be a more hardcore machine, targeted squarely at Porsche buyers.

"We've seen what Porsche is doing with the Cayman, and I would like our new car to have more power, less weight and be more driver-focused," he said. "There's certainly a market in Europe for such a machine - it's simply a matter of convincing our US and Japanese divisions that this is the way forward."

Old 06-26-2005, 07:07 PM
  #209  
Moderator Alumnus
Thread Starter
 
gavriil's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Washington DC (NOVA)
Age: 52
Posts: 16,399
Likes: 0
Received 8 Likes on 8 Posts
In my opinion what should happen to the Z line (even now) is that there should be an "R" version, or an S version which would be more targeted for hard core enthusiasts. The Track version is not hard core enough currently. The "softer" cars should remain. They will probably continue being the volume leaders.
Old 06-26-2005, 08:05 PM
  #210  
Banned
 
M TYPE X's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Champaign, Illinois
Age: 41
Posts: 7,309
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The "Track" edition isn't hardcore-enough Z?
Old 06-26-2005, 08:30 PM
  #211  
Suzuka Master
 
cusdaddy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Age: 45
Posts: 7,083
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
There is nothing soft about the current Z... Sometimes I actually wish my suspension was a bit softer driving over bad roads.

There already are the Nismo S and R tunes, but until they can get off the FM platform, the car can't really be more involving as the suspension weights too much to be significantly lighter.
Old 06-26-2005, 08:45 PM
  #212  
Moderator Alumnus
Thread Starter
 
gavriil's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Washington DC (NOVA)
Age: 52
Posts: 16,399
Likes: 0
Received 8 Likes on 8 Posts
Originally Posted by M TYPE X
The "Track" edition isn't hardcore-enough Z?
No.

It needs to be more powerful (and lighter ultimately) with even sharper steering and handling.
Old 06-26-2005, 08:47 PM
  #213  
Moderator Alumnus
Thread Starter
 
gavriil's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Washington DC (NOVA)
Age: 52
Posts: 16,399
Likes: 0
Received 8 Likes on 8 Posts
Originally Posted by cusdaddy
There is nothing soft about the current Z... Sometimes I actually wish my suspension was a bit softer driving over bad roads.

There already are the Nismo S and R tunes, but until they can get off the FM platform, the car can't really be more involving as the suspension weights too much to be significantly lighter.

I dont know. The two Zs I drove never gave me the impression they are hard-core. Hard core is what Porshce is doing with the Cayman.

They should follow the exact same principles that GM followed with the Z06 cars. Coupe only, lighter and more power, better handling, etc. Leave the base Z, or Zs as is/are. Those are the volume leaders but to be taken even more seriously have a hard core enthusiast version.
Old 06-27-2005, 11:26 AM
  #214  
Engineer
 
savage's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Boston
Age: 41
Posts: 4,525
Received 76 Likes on 53 Posts
yeah i agree... look at how they have the EVO and then the EVO MR with a even tighter suspension and other additional mods to make it more hardcore...
Old 06-27-2005, 12:17 PM
  #215  
The sizzle in the Steak
 
Moog-Type-S's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Southern California
Posts: 71,436
Received 1,877 Likes on 1,297 Posts
This news sounds great to me!
Old 06-27-2005, 04:43 PM
  #216  
Suzuka Master
 
cusdaddy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Age: 45
Posts: 7,083
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by gavriil
I dont know. The two Zs I drove never gave me the impression they are hard-core. Hard core is what Porshce is doing with the Cayman.

They should follow the exact same principles that GM followed with the Z06 cars. Coupe only, lighter and more power, better handling, etc. Leave the base Z, or Zs as is/are. Those are the volume leaders but to be taken even more seriously have a hard core enthusiast version.
As I mentioned earlier, that would be great, but not possible. The Z uses the FM chasis to cut costs. The FM chasis is overly heavy-duty for a car like the Z as it's also used in the FX35/45, but it ultimately helps to keep costs down.

Until they can redesign the entire chasis, the car will be pretty heavy for what it is. The suspension can't get much firmer, the ultimate issue is weight though, not suspension setup.
Old 06-28-2005, 09:26 AM
  #217  
Safety Car
 
titan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: New Orleans
Posts: 4,411
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
^ I disagree. It's just the opposite. The JDM Skyline (G35) came out first, followed very closely by the Fairlady (Z). The FM is designed for rigidity and proper weight balnce, putting the engine behind the front axle. It's a good platform for the Z. The FX came later, after the success of the first too, which is why it's so acclaimed (for it's road handling ability).
Old 06-29-2005, 10:01 AM
  #218  
Racer
 
AcuraGT-3's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Age: 53
Posts: 259
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by srika
looks like an armadillo

the modded one looks even worse
I've seen a "frog taking a dump" as a description before....

But can't knock it, it sells well and really got enthusiasts back into NIssan cars.
Old 08-09-2005, 10:22 AM
  #219  
Moderator Alumnus
Thread Starter
 
gavriil's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Washington DC (NOVA)
Age: 52
Posts: 16,399
Likes: 0
Received 8 Likes on 8 Posts
Nissan extends warranty for 350Z tire wear issue

Car News briefs: Nissan extends warranty for 350Z tire wear issue - - Source: Autoweek

Nissan, responding to continuing customer concerns over irregular front tire wear issues with its 2003 and 2004 350Z models, has announced plans to further extend the front wheel alignment warranty extension for owners of affected vehicles.

In April of 2004, owners of 2003 350Z vehicles were first notified by Nissan that it would extend the warranties to cover an irregular tread wear pattern which was occurring on the inner edge of the front tires. Customers with 2004 350Z cars were not included at that time.

After monitoring the situation, Nissan believed it had corrected the problem with the majority of vehicles, but not all had been fixed to customer satisfaction and some 2004 350Z owners also began experiencing the same problem. After investigating the issue further, Nissan identified that, in addition to correcting the front-end alignment, a new tire with a slightly modified tread pattern, more resistant to “heel-toe” wear together with correct alignment, virtually eliminated the issue. Vehicles equipped with these tires have experienced virtually no incidents of tire noise.

Nissan is extending the warranty for front-end alignment due to tire noise until 36 months from the in-service date or October 31, 2005 (whichever is later) and unlimited mileage for 2003 350Z models, and to 36 months and unlimited mileage on 2004 350Z models. Nissan says the warranty extension ensures all owners will receive an effective repair, including in some circumstances replacement of their front tires with the new tire design, if they experience tire noise during the extended warranty period. Customer notifications are being sent out starting this week.
Old 08-09-2005, 11:09 AM
  #220  
Race Director
 
zeroday's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Posts: 17,921
Received 15 Likes on 4 Posts
people that bought aftermarket rims/tires are still screwed.
Old 08-09-2005, 04:59 PM
  #221  
Suzuka Master
 
cusdaddy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Age: 45
Posts: 7,083
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Cool.. I got a free set of front tires at about 14k miles on my 2003 Z and it looks like I'll get another set as they are starting to wear a bit again
Old 08-09-2005, 05:07 PM
  #222  
Photography Nerd
 
Dan Martin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Toronto
Age: 43
Posts: 21,489
Likes: 0
Received 11 Likes on 7 Posts
I don't understand how changing the tire is a solution? If the tires are wearing unevenly, it's got to be a suspension/alignment issue. Probably too much toe would be my guess.

Does anyone have more info on this? I'm curious to read more.
Old 08-09-2005, 06:19 PM
  #223  
Suzuka Master
 
cusdaddy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Age: 45
Posts: 7,083
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Dan Martin
I don't understand how changing the tire is a solution? If the tires are wearing unevenly, it's got to be a suspension/alignment issue. Probably too much toe would be my guess.

Does anyone have more info on this? I'm curious to read more.
When they replaced my tires the first time, they did an alignment, but on most 2003 and early 2004 Z's reoccurs again over time.

I tracked this issue a while back (not recently) and what was known at the time is that it was a combination of the suspension settings in the 2003 and early 2004 Z's as well as the tread pattern of the stock Bridgestone tires. I know that those replaced their tires with other models such as Pilots didn't experience the issue as badly as the stock Bridgestone's.

Nissan redesigned the suspension in mid 2004 which seemed to fix the issue, but the 2003-early 2004's still have the issue.
Old 08-10-2005, 12:01 AM
  #224  
Photography Nerd
 
Dan Martin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Toronto
Age: 43
Posts: 21,489
Likes: 0
Received 11 Likes on 7 Posts
Originally Posted by cusdaddy
When they replaced my tires the first time, they did an alignment, but on most 2003 and early 2004 Z's reoccurs again over time.

I tracked this issue a while back (not recently) and what was known at the time is that it was a combination of the suspension settings in the 2003 and early 2004 Z's as well as the tread pattern of the stock Bridgestone tires. I know that those replaced their tires with other models such as Pilots didn't experience the issue as badly as the stock Bridgestone's.

Nissan redesigned the suspension in mid 2004 which seemed to fix the issue, but the 2003-early 2004's still have the issue.
Tires are pretty simple devices, keep them flat on the road and pointing straight and they'll last a long time. If the alignment is good, it's possible that poor suspension geometry could cause toe to change under load which would cause premature wear.

That would be a very tricky fix without swapping out a lot of components.
Old 08-18-2005, 05:30 PM
  #225  
Moderator Alumnus
Thread Starter
 
gavriil's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Washington DC (NOVA)
Age: 52
Posts: 16,399
Likes: 0
Received 8 Likes on 8 Posts
Updated 2006 Nissan 350Z Debuts

Updated 2006 Nissan 350Z Debuts - - Source: Edmunds.com

SYRACUSE, N.Y. — The 2006 Nissan 350Z made its first public appearance this week at the annual Z Club gathering. More than 500 Z owners are attending the event, which runs until August 19.

The 2006 model year marks the first time that changes have been made to the 350Z since its 2002 debut in the U.S. New features include a revised front end, enhanced interior, LED taillights and speed-sensitive power steering.

Among the other revisions for 2006 are a new Grand Touring Coupe model, featuring 18-inch front and 19-inch rear wheels, Brembo brakes, front and rear spoiler and vehicle dynamic control. All six-speed manual transmission models now receive the 300-horsepower tuning of the Z's standard 3.5-liter DOHC V6. Models equipped with the five-speed automatic transmission are rated at 287 hp.

The 2006 350Z also includes standard bi-xenon headlights, added MP3 CD capability for the optional Bose audio system and three new exterior paint colors, including silver alloy and magnetic black.
Old 08-18-2005, 05:37 PM
  #226  
Moderator Alumnus
Thread Starter
 
gavriil's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Washington DC (NOVA)
Age: 52
Posts: 16,399
Likes: 0
Received 8 Likes on 8 Posts
Bi-xenon headlights sounds great.
Old 08-18-2005, 06:05 PM
  #227  
Team Owner
iTrader: (1)
 
CGTSX2004's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Beach Cities, CA
Posts: 24,299
Received 378 Likes on 198 Posts
Wonder how much of a price difference there will be?
Old 08-18-2005, 06:30 PM
  #228  
Moderator Alumnus
Thread Starter
 
gavriil's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Washington DC (NOVA)
Age: 52
Posts: 16,399
Likes: 0
Received 8 Likes on 8 Posts
Probably very little.
Old 08-18-2005, 07:03 PM
  #229  
Safety Car
 
heyitsme's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: philly
Posts: 4,426
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Its interesting that Nissan does this when most companies would just pretend its the same power loss between the two.

"All six-speed manual transmission models now receive the 300-horsepower tuning of the Z's standard 3.5-liter DOHC V6. Models equipped with the five-speed automatic transmission are rated at 287 hp."
Old 08-18-2005, 07:12 PM
  #230  
Photography Nerd
 
Dan Martin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Toronto
Age: 43
Posts: 21,489
Likes: 0
Received 11 Likes on 7 Posts
Originally Posted by heyitsme
Its interesting that Nissan does this when most companies would just pretend its the same power loss between the two.

"All six-speed manual transmission models now receive the 300-horsepower tuning of the Z's standard 3.5-liter DOHC V6. Models equipped with the five-speed automatic transmission are rated at 287 hp."
What makes you think that's wheel horsepower? Perhaps they detune the AT model.
Old 08-18-2005, 10:58 PM
  #231  
Suzuka Master
 
cusdaddy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Age: 45
Posts: 7,083
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by heyitsme
Its interesting that Nissan does this when most companies would just pretend its the same power loss between the two.

"All six-speed manual transmission models now receive the 300-horsepower tuning of the Z's standard 3.5-liter DOHC V6. Models equipped with the five-speed automatic transmission are rated at 287 hp."
It is a different version of the VQ. The 300hp version has significant internal changes and a 500rpm higher redline, but loses 15 or so lb/ft of torque.

The 287hp version is the old version in the older Z's. In 2005, only the Track and 30th Anniversary model had the 300hp version, but now it is the same across the board.

What I've read is that both engines have essentially the same acceleration (the extra HP is offset by less torque), but the 300hp version is nicer due to the higher redline and smoother nature.
Old 10-19-2005, 11:31 AM
  #232  
Senior Moderator
 
synth19's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Chicago, IL
Posts: 16,424
Received 719 Likes on 201 Posts
at least my Z will look current until 2009!
Old 10-19-2005, 01:06 PM
  #233  
Safety Car
 
heyitsme's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: philly
Posts: 4,426
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I don't really agree with a more 'hardcore' Z model so to speak - refining the Z line in handling, steering, weight reduction, and centering the cockpit around the driver is definately what should happen to making it a more enjoyable car to drive.

I think the market though for some track built car is just so limited to begin with that it wouldn't be worth the sales. Making an R-tune suspension more ready available at the dealer would be the better route imo for those who plan to track the car.
Old 10-19-2005, 01:46 PM
  #234  
Fahrvergnügen'd
 
charliemike's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Maryland
Age: 52
Posts: 13,494
Received 1,568 Likes on 985 Posts
Originally Posted by heyitsme
I don't really agree with a more 'hardcore' Z model so to speak - refining the Z line in handling, steering, weight reduction, and centering the cockpit around the driver is definately what should happen to making it a more enjoyable car to drive.

I think the market though for some track built car is just so limited to begin with that it wouldn't be worth the sales. Making an R-tune suspension more ready available at the dealer would be the better route imo for those who plan to track the car.
They need to make the Z a sub-3000lb sports car ... Then they can make two versions: soft damping for the street (350Z S-Tune) and a more aggressive, lighter weight version (350Z R-Tune). The R-Tune would be the highest priced trim in the lineup. They wouldn't even need to use separate engines.

325hp and 3000lbs for S-Tune (.88G and 125ft from 60mph) for $27-35k
335hp and 2900lbs for R-Tune (.93G and 117ft from 60mph) for $38k
Old 10-19-2005, 01:49 PM
  #235  
Senior Moderator
 
srika's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Chicago
Posts: 58,048
Received 9,964 Likes on 5,137 Posts
Old 10-29-2005, 08:45 PM
  #236  
_____ like a rabbit
 
stangg172004's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Edgewater, Chicago, IL
Age: 36
Posts: 8,594
Received 12 Likes on 10 Posts
Nissan may be readying 450Z to compete with Porsche, Maserati



Nissan is planning a Z sports coupe slotted above the current Nissan 350Z called the Nissan 450Z. The upgraded model will feature a 4.5 liter V8 engine which would likely be a tuned up version of the VK45DE from the Infiniti M45. The VK45DE makes 340hp currently, but Left Lane News reports the final product will feature 430hp. Of course, all that crazy power requires all-wheel drive, so that will be standard as well.

Nissan plans to pitch this new Nissan 450Z against the Porsche Carrera 911 and the Maserati 4.2.
Old 10-29-2005, 09:11 PM
  #237  
The Third Ball
 
Sarlacc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Los Angeles, Ca
Age: 45
Posts: 49,124
Received 4,824 Likes on 2,571 Posts
is this a "hold me over" til the skyline finally hits?
Old 10-29-2005, 09:14 PM
  #238  
JnC
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (12)
 
JnC's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Bedford, MA
Age: 44
Posts: 6,961
Received 351 Likes on 227 Posts
I dont care what it is, i like it .
Old 10-29-2005, 09:37 PM
  #239  
Safety Car
 
titan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: New Orleans
Posts: 4,411
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Jack_n_Coke
I dont care what it is, i like it .
Yess, yess, that shit is tight. Bring it on. I new the VK45DE had more power in it, but 90HP more? Damnnn... I hope the next Q gets a bump too to around 4390-400HP.
Old 10-29-2005, 09:39 PM
  #240  
Safety Car
 
titan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: New Orleans
Posts: 4,411
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by The Sarlacc
is this a "hold me over" til the skyline finally hits?
Good question. If this model comes over and is successfull, Nissan will make it last. So, the GTR would most probably be an Infiniti. The question is, is there room for both cars (though the GTR would still be more expensive and more exclusive), and would it have more power. If this car gets 430HP, the GTR would get atleast 500HP and handle even more dynamically than the 450Z, IMO.


Quick Reply: Nissan: 370Z News



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:47 PM.