Honda: Civic News

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 12-11-2015, 07:25 PM
  #4201  
Team Owner
 
TacoBello's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2014
Location: In an igloo
Posts: 30,487
Received 4,416 Likes on 3,322 Posts
Originally Posted by SSFTSX
What so special with RWD?. Put heavy all season tires on Bmw 320i. It will handle worse than Civic and performance gap will be greater. my TSX rear view camera is super reliable after 7 years. I expect Civic has the new Tech and LED headlights. Highest safety rankings . Civic Si will beat 328i almost to level of 340i with summer performance tires.
Only a person who has never driven a RWD car would ask what's so special about it.

A Civic Si will run with a 340i?

I like how SSFTSX always says "just mod this Honda product and it will keep up with anything". Um, yeah, that's true about ANY car out there.
Old 12-12-2015, 01:21 AM
  #4202  
Safety Car
 
SSFTSX's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 4,581
Received 64 Likes on 59 Posts
Originally Posted by oonowindoo
What is so special with RWD? It is magical.

It already has Heavy or maybe even Heavier runflats. Why don't you put some heavy bricks in the Civic and it will handle worse than the 320 with heavy all season tires.

Whose backup camera is not reliable?

so give me the specs of the civic Si and let us be the judge.
i have driven. i cant find that special with all season tires.

The point is newer civic is lower, wider. so it is far more aerodynamic. if it gets 240bhp turbo engine. It will surely blast BMW 328i sport. Honda bhp is so much more.



2012 Civic Sedan Si 0-120 mph 25 second. 0.88g on 215 wide tires
http://media.caranddriver.com/files/...si-sedan-1.pdf


2016 BMW 328i with sport. 0-120mph in 21.7 second. 0.93g on 255 wide rear tire
http://media.caranddriver.com/files/...mw328i2016.pdf
Old 12-14-2015, 08:43 PM
  #4203  
Team Owner
 
oonowindoo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 23,362
Received 4,273 Likes on 3,050 Posts
do you know how big of a difference 3-4 secs are at 120 mph?

Or you can put 255 tires on the 2012 Si to see if it is any faster or handles better? My guess is it will be slower and have more understeer.

Honda can have the best 5 diamond stars rated BHP, if it does not get to the ground, it is all useless.
Old 12-15-2015, 01:31 AM
  #4204  
Safety Car
 
SSFTSX's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 4,581
Received 64 Likes on 59 Posts
Civic Si was 201bhp while 328i is 240bhp. its 20% more power.

deduct 20% time from 25 sec. you get it at 20 second if you put 240bhp engine in Civic Si.
Old 12-15-2015, 09:51 AM
  #4205  
Burning Brakes
 
Booya4139's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2012
Age: 43
Posts: 847
Received 123 Likes on 100 Posts
Originally Posted by oonowindoo
do you know how big of a difference 3-4 secs are at 120 mph?

Or you can put 255 tires on the 2012 Si to see if it is any faster or handles better? My guess is it will be slower and have more understeer.

Honda can have the best 5 diamond stars rated BHP, if it does not get to the ground, it is all useless.
My 08 Si had a K20 with 201hp and they would dyno stock in the 170's WHP. Pretty decent drivetrain efficiency. Also had a pretty good LSD. With intake, header, exhaust and a good tune they would dyno 195-210WHP. Plenty of power to have fun on the street as the car was so light, clutch super light, shifter very precise. Just a great car to drive.

I've driven a few late 2000's 3 series MT beamers and those are also very nice to drive. Si was more raw, 3's were more refined. both alot of fun.

255 tires would be overkill on an Si. stock wheels were 7 inches wide and had 215's... people would go 17x8 and put on 235's, or 245's. Understeer is a product of a number of things which can be mitigated to a degree.
Old 12-15-2015, 11:04 AM
  #4206  
Team Owner
 
oonowindoo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 23,362
Received 4,273 Likes on 3,050 Posts
Originally Posted by Booya4139
My 08 Si had a K20 with 201hp and they would dyno stock in the 170's WHP. Pretty decent drivetrain efficiency. Also had a pretty good LSD. With intake, header, exhaust and a good tune they would dyno 195-210WHP. Plenty of power to have fun on the street as the car was so light, clutch super light, shifter very precise. Just a great car to drive.

I've driven a few late 2000's 3 series MT beamers and those are also very nice to drive. Si was more raw, 3's were more refined. both alot of fun.

255 tires would be overkill on an Si. stock wheels were 7 inches wide and had 215's... people would go 17x8 and put on 235's, or 245's. Understeer is a product of a number of things which can be mitigated to a degree.
I know what K20 is capable of. But just FYI 328 is dynoed (varies on type of Dyno) anywhere from 220 to 240 RWHP... not mention the torque.

If you wanna talk about tune, a $500 JB4 and a $700 DP will bring 328 at 300WHP+
Old 12-15-2015, 11:08 AM
  #4207  
Team Owner
 
oonowindoo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 23,362
Received 4,273 Likes on 3,050 Posts
Originally Posted by SSFTSX
Civic Si was 201bhp while 328i is 240bhp. its 20% more power.

deduct 20% time from 25 sec. you get it at 20 second if you put 240bhp engine in Civic Si.
Is that how car's performance is measured?

So you are saying if i put a 1000hp engine in the Si, it will get to 120mph in negative times?
The following users liked this post:
charliemike (12-15-2015)
Old 12-15-2015, 01:27 PM
  #4208  
GEEZER
 
1killercls's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Dunedin, Fla.
Posts: 44,441
Received 2,214 Likes on 1,418 Posts
If I put a 1000 HP Motor in my Audi...will I be able to burn all four tires off? Ugh boy.
Old 12-15-2015, 01:53 PM
  #4209  
Team Owner
 
oonowindoo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 23,362
Received 4,273 Likes on 3,050 Posts
You will unless you get some upgraded tires...

Actually it is probably true in this case
The following users liked this post:
1killercls (12-15-2015)
Old 12-15-2015, 02:01 PM
  #4210  
GEEZER
 
1killercls's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Dunedin, Fla.
Posts: 44,441
Received 2,214 Likes on 1,418 Posts
Old 12-15-2015, 08:42 PM
  #4211  
Safety Car
 
SSFTSX's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 4,581
Received 64 Likes on 59 Posts
Originally Posted by oonowindoo
Is that how car's performance is measured?

So you are saying if i put a 1000hp engine in the Si, it will get to 120mph in negative times?
it depends how much aerodynamics and correct tires.

290bhp 0-130mph in 24s second for TLX. i am sure performance tires will imporve the performance by couple of seconds.

http://media.caranddriver.com/files/...lx-35l-fwd.pdf
Old 12-15-2015, 09:25 PM
  #4212  
Team Owner
 
oonowindoo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 23,362
Received 4,273 Likes on 3,050 Posts
So you were talking about Civic first, then Civic Si, then the imaginary Civic Si and now TLX....

you just proved to yourself that a 290hp TLX with all season tires is the same as a 328 with 240hp with all season RUN FLATS.

TLX should be 20% faster than 328 since it has 20% more superior Honda BHP
Old 12-15-2015, 09:29 PM
  #4213  
Safety Car
 
SSFTSX's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 4,581
Received 64 Likes on 59 Posts
328i is with Pilot supersport. it took 27.2 seconds to reach 0-130mph.

http://media.caranddriver.com/files/...mw328i2016.pdf


Imagine Pilot Supersport on TLX. that gap will be atleast 7 seconds. TLX is simply on different level at higherspeed performance and aerodynamics.
TLX is also alot quieter.
Old 12-15-2015, 09:44 PM
  #4214  
Team Owner
 
oonowindoo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 23,362
Received 4,273 Likes on 3,050 Posts
yah it also used 89 gas

There is no fucking way that a TLX is 7 faster than the 328... especially when 328 is faster than TLX to get to 60. Oh yah i forgot TLX has the Vtec kicked in yo feature.. that will make up the difference and + 7 secs on top of that....

here is the realistic # for you

2015 Acura TLX 3.5 V-6 FWD Test ? Review ? Car and Driver

C/D TEST RESULTS:
Zero to 60 mph: 5.7 sec
Zero to 100 mph: 13.3 sec
Zero to 130 mph: 24.2 sec
Rolling start, 5-60 mph: 5.8 sec
Top gear, 30-50 mph: 3.1 sec
Top gear, 50-70 mph: 3.7 sec
Standing ¼-mile: 14.2 sec @ 103 mph
Top speed (governor limited): 134 mph
Braking, 70-0 mph: 182 ft
Roadholding, 300-ft-dia skidpad*: 0.83 g

2012 F30 328i with RUNFLAT ALL SEASON 225 square yes 225....
Zero to 60 mph: 5.6 sec
Zero to 100 mph: 14.2 sec
Zero to 130 mph: 26.6 sec
Rolling start, 5-60 mph: 6.7 sec
Top gear, 30-50 mph: 9.9 sec
Top gear, 50-70 mph: 7.6 sec
Standing ¼-mile: 14.2 sec @ 100 mph
Top speed (governor limited): 153 mph
Braking, 70-0 mph: 165 ft
Roadholding, 300-ft-dia skidpad: 0.88 g

Last edited by oonowindoo; 12-15-2015 at 09:50 PM.
Old 12-16-2015, 01:16 AM
  #4215  
Safety Car
 
SSFTSX's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 4,581
Received 64 Likes on 59 Posts
Originally Posted by oonowindoo
yah it also used 89 gas

There is no fucking way that a TLX is 7 faster than the 328... especially when 328 is faster than TLX to get to 60. Oh yah i forgot TLX has the Vtec kicked in yo feature.. that will make up the difference and + 7 secs on top of that....

here is the realistic # for you

2015 Acura TLX 3.5 V-6 FWD Test ? Review ? Car and Driver

C/D TEST RESULTS:
Zero to 60 mph: 5.7 sec
Zero to 100 mph: 13.3 sec
Zero to 130 mph: 24.2 sec
Rolling start, 5-60 mph: 5.8 sec
Top gear, 30-50 mph: 3.1 sec
Top gear, 50-70 mph: 3.7 sec
Standing ¼-mile: 14.2 sec @ 103 mph
Top speed (governor limited): 134 mph
Braking, 70-0 mph: 182 ft
Roadholding, 300-ft-dia skidpad*: 0.83 g

2012 F30 328i with RUNFLAT ALL SEASON 225 square yes 225....
Zero to 60 mph: 5.6 sec
Zero to 100 mph: 14.2 sec
Zero to 130 mph: 26.6 sec
Rolling start, 5-60 mph: 6.7 sec
Top gear, 30-50 mph: 9.9 sec
Top gear, 50-70 mph: 7.6 sec
Standing ¼-mile: 14.2 sec @ 100 mph
Top speed (governor limited): 153 mph
Braking, 70-0 mph: 165 ft
Roadholding, 300-ft-dia skidpad: 0.88 g
from where you pulling your data for 2012 F30?

0-130mph in 28.1 seconds with 0.87g. Full 4 second slower than TLX.
TLX tires are larger x-section 225/50/18 vs 225/45/18 for BMW.

http://media.caranddriver.com/files/...test-sheet.pdf
Old 12-16-2015, 02:50 AM
  #4216  
Team Owner
 
oonowindoo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 23,362
Received 4,273 Likes on 3,050 Posts
Originally Posted by SSFTSX
from where you pulling your data for 2012 F30?

0-130mph in 28.1 seconds with 0.87g. Full 4 second slower than TLX.
TLX tires are larger x-section 225/50/18 vs 225/45/18 for BMW.

http://media.caranddriver.com/files/...test-sheet.pdf
From your favorite Car and Driver:

2012 BMW 328i Sport Line Manual Long-Term Test Wrap-Up ? Review ? Car and Driver

and show me how are 45 series tires any different from 50 series in a straight line 0-130mph run? If anything 50 series should have the advantage due to bigger overall diameter.
Old 12-16-2015, 09:52 AM
  #4217  
Team Owner
 
TacoBello's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2014
Location: In an igloo
Posts: 30,487
Received 4,416 Likes on 3,322 Posts
Originally Posted by SSFTSX
Civic Si was 201bhp while 328i is 240bhp. its 20% more power.

deduct 20% time from 25 sec. you get it at 20 second if you put 240bhp engine in Civic Si.
WTF? Physics doesn't work like that

Oonowin, why do you even bother with this guy?
Old 12-16-2015, 10:19 AM
  #4218  
Suzuka Master
iTrader: (4)
 
myron's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Edmonton, Canada
Age: 39
Posts: 8,205
Received 269 Likes on 229 Posts
Originally Posted by SSFTSX
Civic Si was 201bhp while 328i is 240bhp. its 20% more power.

deduct 20% time from 25 sec. you get it at 20 second if you put 240bhp engine in Civic Si.
wow I sure hope you're not an engineer of any sort
The following users liked this post:
VR1 (12-16-2015)
Old 12-16-2015, 10:46 AM
  #4219  
Safety Car
 
SSFTSX's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 4,581
Received 64 Likes on 59 Posts
Originally Posted by oonowindoo
From your favorite Car and Driver:

2012 BMW 328i Sport Line Manual Long-Term Test Wrap-Up ? Review ? Car and Driver

and show me how are 45 series tires any different from 50 series in a straight line 0-130mph run? If anything 50 series should have the advantage due to bigger overall diameter.
Your manual car is 200lbs lighter than TLX. Put auto vs auto and the gap is 4 second. I am sure light weight TLX 6MT will maintain that gap.
Old 12-16-2015, 11:02 AM
  #4220  
Team Owner
 
oonowindoo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 23,362
Received 4,273 Likes on 3,050 Posts
Originally Posted by TacoBello
WTF? Physics doesn't work like that

Oonowin, why do you even bother with this guy?
Not a lot of new activities lately, so just trying to find something to do.
The following users liked this post:
RPhilMan1 (12-16-2015)
Old 12-16-2015, 11:19 AM
  #4221  
Team Owner
 
oonowindoo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 23,362
Received 4,273 Likes on 3,050 Posts
Originally Posted by SSFTSX
Your manual car is 200lbs lighter than TLX. Put auto vs auto and the gap is 4 second. I am sure light weight TLX 6MT will maintain that gap.
I am also sure a light weight TLX 6mt + 4 turbos + upgraded tires and other imaginary things will be faster than M3.

But go find me a light weight TLX 6mt first and while you are at it, you still owe me the Specs for the Turbo Civic Si.
Old 12-16-2015, 12:21 PM
  #4222  
You'll Never Walk Alone
iTrader: (1)
 
iforyou's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Vancouver, BC, Canada
Age: 37
Posts: 9,492
Received 834 Likes on 518 Posts
Originally Posted by oonowindoo
From your favorite Car and Driver:

2012 BMW 328i Sport Line Manual Long-Term Test Wrap-Up ? Review ? Car and Driver

and show me how are 45 series tires any different from 50 series in a straight line 0-130mph run? If anything 50 series should have the advantage due to bigger overall diameter.
Actually 50 series would be at a disadvantage:
- Larger diameter means more material. This translates to more weight.
- Larger diameter also means more weight away from the center, which means increased moment of inertia. That ultimately means more energy is needed to move.

Granted, the difference is probably pretty small...lol...


Anyways, you guys can keep going
Old 12-16-2015, 01:14 PM
  #4223  
Safety Car
 
SSFTSX's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 4,581
Received 64 Likes on 59 Posts
Originally Posted by oonowindoo
I am also sure a light weight TLX 6mt + 4 turbos + upgraded tires and other imaginary things will be faster than M3.

But go find me a light weight TLX 6mt first and while you are at it, you still owe me the Specs for the Turbo Civic Si.
There is auto 328i already tested. so no need to bring manual 328i.
Putting pilot super sport is not big deal on TLX along with light weight rims. TLX is nothing less than 340i.
Old 12-16-2015, 01:49 PM
  #4224  
Team Owner
 
oonowindoo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 23,362
Received 4,273 Likes on 3,050 Posts
Ok I am getting busy now...

No more magazine racing with you.
Old 12-16-2015, 02:51 PM
  #4225  
2024 Honda Civic Type R
 
RPhilMan1's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Chicago, IL
Age: 37
Posts: 4,033
Received 1,454 Likes on 923 Posts
Originally Posted by SSFTSX
I am sure light weight TLX 6MT will maintain that gap.
If only... Honda hattes us.
Old 12-16-2015, 03:00 PM
  #4226  
Team Owner
 
oonowindoo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 23,362
Received 4,273 Likes on 3,050 Posts
Acura wont even give you exhaust tips.... let alone 6mt...
Old 12-16-2015, 03:05 PM
  #4227  
Team Owner
 
TacoBello's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2014
Location: In an igloo
Posts: 30,487
Received 4,416 Likes on 3,322 Posts
let alone light weight rims and Pilot Super Sports.

All he keeps saying is that he can modify a Honda to be as fast as anything else. THAT'S TRUE FOR EVERY CAR OUT IN THE MARKET.
Old 12-16-2015, 11:21 PM
  #4228  
Safety Car
 
SSFTSX's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 4,581
Received 64 Likes on 59 Posts
Originally Posted by TacoBello
let alone light weight rims and Pilot Super Sports.

All he keeps saying is that he can modify a Honda to be as fast as anything else. THAT'S TRUE FOR EVERY CAR OUT IN THE MARKET.
The accesory rims are on sale. tires+rims will be about $2500 investment.
Parts Manager Specials

TL FWD advance prices are around $37k with advance package. add to that $2500. At about $40k. you get a car that is as fast as $55k BMW 340i.
Old 12-17-2015, 09:36 AM
  #4229  
Team Owner
 
TacoBello's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2014
Location: In an igloo
Posts: 30,487
Received 4,416 Likes on 3,322 Posts
um, no. quit bench racing.
Old 12-17-2015, 12:04 PM
  #4230  
I drive a Subata.
iTrader: (1)
 
JS + XES's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Socal
Age: 39
Posts: 20,301
Received 2,603 Likes on 1,571 Posts
Originally Posted by SSFTSX
Civic Si was 201bhp while 328i is 240bhp. its 20% more power.

deduct 20% time from 25 sec. you get it at 20 second if you put 240bhp engine in Civic Si.
Old 12-17-2015, 12:21 PM
  #4231  
Burning Brakes
 
Booya4139's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2012
Age: 43
Posts: 847
Received 123 Likes on 100 Posts
It isn't a power issue as much as its a traction issue. Which is why bench racing is highly inaccurate
Old 12-18-2015, 02:31 AM
  #4232  
Team Owner
 
oonowindoo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 23,362
Received 4,273 Likes on 3,050 Posts
Originally Posted by SSFTSX
The accesory rims are on sale. tires+rims will be about $2500 investment.
Parts Manager Specials

TL FWD advance prices are around $37k with advance package. add to that $2500. At about $40k. you get a car that is as fast as $55k BMW 340i.
And a $30k Mustang GT can smoke both... what is your point?

or a $1000 Civic + $5000 in mods can run circles around anyone of them.
Old 12-18-2015, 09:58 AM
  #4233  
Team Owner
 
TacoBello's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2014
Location: In an igloo
Posts: 30,487
Received 4,416 Likes on 3,322 Posts
Originally Posted by oonowindoo
And a $30k Mustang GT can smoke both... what is your point?

or a $1000 Civic + $5000 in mods can run circles around anyone of them.
Yup pretty sure I said that five times in this thread already but ssftsx just won't clue in
Old 12-18-2015, 11:54 AM
  #4234  
Safety Car
 
SSFTSX's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 4,581
Received 64 Likes on 59 Posts
Originally Posted by oonowindoo
And a $30k Mustang GT can smoke both... what is your point?

or a $1000 Civic + $5000 in mods can run circles around anyone of them.
Mustang does not have luxury and quietness of TLX and certainly not built for long life like TLX. TLX will still hold 15 years. even year 2000 accords are selling for $4000.
Old 12-18-2015, 01:07 PM
  #4235  
Team Owner
 
oonowindoo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 23,362
Received 4,273 Likes on 3,050 Posts
So first you were talking about 0-130mph and you lost
then you started talking about the imaginary cars and option list for Honda/Acura, and you lost

now you are talking about Quietness and resale value...

Hey every car on the road is good at something.... but it does not make it a good car.

I can compare a 2005 Corolla and a 2015 TLX.... The 2005 Corolla is cheaper to fix than the TLX = Win for the Corolla. Then it must be a better car.
Old 12-18-2015, 01:18 PM
  #4236  
Safety Car
 
SSFTSX's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 4,581
Received 64 Likes on 59 Posts
I am talking about overall value of the car. A TLX cannot be surpassed in overall performance, comfort, reliability, refinement, equipment (there is no ventilated seats or hifi music system in corrolla), safety.
Old 12-18-2015, 01:28 PM
  #4237  
Team Owner
 
TacoBello's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2014
Location: In an igloo
Posts: 30,487
Received 4,416 Likes on 3,322 Posts
The next time I have to go to an Acura or Honda dealership, I want to take the same drugs SSFTSX is on so that I too can be in a delusional state of mind and see all the rainbows he does surrounding both car makers
Old 12-18-2015, 01:46 PM
  #4238  
Safety Car
 
SSFTSX's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 4,581
Received 64 Likes on 59 Posts
It is the overall value of the vehicles. The whole is more than sum of parts.

Performance-Tested Tank - 2016 Honda Pilot Long-Term Road Test
The Pilot wasn't designed with track performance in mind, yet it remains one of the most competent vehicles in its class when pushed.
Old 12-18-2015, 01:47 PM
  #4239  
Team Owner
 
TacoBello's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2014
Location: In an igloo
Posts: 30,487
Received 4,416 Likes on 3,322 Posts
Oh SSFTSX, you're just aimlessly grabbing at straws, hoping it get lucky eventually...
Old 12-18-2015, 02:09 PM
  #4240  
Team Owner
 
oonowindoo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 23,362
Received 4,273 Likes on 3,050 Posts
Originally Posted by SSFTSX
I am talking about overall value of the car. A TLX cannot be surpassed in overall performance, comfort, reliability, refinement, equipment (there is no ventilated seats or hifi music system in corrolla), safety.
too bad not a lot of buyers seem to care about the car that has the best overall value that cannot be surpassed by anyone.


Quick Reply: Honda: Civic News



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:07 AM.