Ford: Mustang News

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 11-18-2008, 07:58 AM
  #761  
Photography Nerd
 
Dan Martin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Toronto
Age: 43
Posts: 21,489
Likes: 0
Received 11 Likes on 7 Posts
Do not want.

The interior materials still look really cheap.
Old 11-18-2008, 08:15 AM
  #762  
how handsome I am
 
agranado's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Miami, FL
Age: 39
Posts: 12,983
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
sad... the camaro is going to eat this thing for breakfast
Old 11-18-2008, 08:18 AM
  #763  
I disagree with unanimity
iTrader: (2)
 
sho_nuff1997's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: WI
Age: 46
Posts: 14,035
Received 27 Likes on 20 Posts
Still no 6spd?
Old 11-18-2008, 09:33 AM
  #764  
Oderint dum metuant.
 
chill_dog's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Lake Wylie
Age: 46
Posts: 12,496
Likes: 0
Received 534 Likes on 446 Posts
I'm mixed on it, but I'm sure the things I don't like about the exterior (grille, grey trim) can be fixed. Taillights are ok. Overall, it's not bad. Love the wheels on the red one.
Old 11-18-2008, 09:38 AM
  #765  
What Would Don Draper Do?
 
JediMindTricks's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Houston
Age: 43
Posts: 22,223
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
yea i like it...a lot.
Old 11-18-2008, 10:52 AM
  #766  
The sizzle in the Steak
 
Moog-Type-S's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Southern California
Posts: 71,436
Received 1,877 Likes on 1,297 Posts
Improved? I like it more than the current.

The interior is better, but still "cheap"...that center stack is

It's no mind-blower, but it is nice.
Old 11-18-2008, 11:35 AM
  #767  
Senior Moderator
 
fsttyms1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Appleton WI
Age: 49
Posts: 81,383
Received 3,063 Likes on 2,119 Posts
Interior still looks hard and cheap. Ill reserve final till i can get in and touch, but if its any thing like what its replacing no thanks. The camaro looks better any way
Old 11-18-2008, 11:47 AM
  #768  
Senior Moderator
 
Crazy Bimmer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Chicago Burbs
Age: 43
Posts: 34,937
Received 638 Likes on 276 Posts
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gNpw5QaQbsI
Old 11-18-2008, 12:46 PM
  #769  
Oderint dum metuant.
 
chill_dog's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Lake Wylie
Age: 46
Posts: 12,496
Likes: 0
Received 534 Likes on 446 Posts
From InsideLine...

http://www.edmunds.com/insideline/do...hotopanel..1.*

Remember when we were all talking about the return of the muscle-car wars? You know, the 2010 Chevrolet Camaro, 2009 Dodge Challenger and 2010 Ford Mustang locked in a V8-powered, testosterone-saturated, mustache-stroking, smack-talking, bitch-slappin', patch-laying death match? That was great. Good times. Way better than the housing/financial/automotive apocalypse that's now upon us.

Well, put your troubles behind you, brother, because the new Camaro and the updated Mustang are just around the corner and the Challenger is waiting for them. We're going to party like it's 1929! Or 1969. Or, whatever.

Now Angrier
Anyway, there's a new Mustang in town and it's 28 percent meaner-looking.

From 40 paces, the 2010 Ford Mustang looks a lot like the retro-inflected 'Stang that we've been seeing for about four years now. The rough size of the car is the same and so is the styling silhouette, since it's built on the same underpinnings as the current car.

From 20 paces, though, it's obvious that every panel (apart from the roof) has been changed in advance of this car's coming-out party at the Los Angeles auto show. (The 2010 Mustang actually goes on sale early next year, around the same time as the Camaro.) And despite a new retro-inspired haunch over the rear wheels, the overall effect of the restyled look is much more modern. Why exactly the buying public loves angry-looking cars we'll leave to the head-shrinkers.

The 2010 Ford Mustang looks leaner, although it actually gains a few pounds. It looks lower, although it's not. With headlights trimmed in black chrome (at least on the GT model) and a squatter, all-black grille, the look is sinister. Even the pony mounted to the center of the grille is finished in black chrome.

A sharply defined power dome on the hood of both the GT and the V6 models suggests a massive increase in the force beneath. This is merely styling, though; there's really no more power offered. The flank of the new Mustang is more carefully sculpted than the previous car, as the body appears to be shrink-wrapped over a skeleton. The new haunch adds some visual weight to the rear of the car. From certain angles, there's a bit of a suggestion of the Nissan GT-R's rear flank in the new Ford, too.

Now Cleaner
Ford has also replaced the horridly cheap, plastic-clad Dumbo-ear outside mirrors of the current Mustang with nicer-looking mirrors with body-color caps. Although your eye might not pick it up, airflow likes the new shape better. Ford tells us that the 2010 Mustang V6 has 4 percent less aerodynamic drag than before, while the additional use of a belly pan beneath the engine bay of the Mustang GT produces 7 percent less drag than before. In addition, the 2010 Mustang GT has 23 percent less aerodynamic lift over the front wheels than the current car.

Tucking the windshield wipers under the hood and moving the antenna to the rear of the car helps make it look less cheap, we think. Wind noise is down 12 percent, according to the Ford engineers. Also, the designers managed to remove the windshield-washer squirt nozzles from the surface of the hood. Judging by how many times company representatives referred to them as "ugly warts," we're guessing they're particularly proud of this move. It should at least make it easier to apply hood stripes.

Now Less Cheesy
The Ford guys have always hated hearing that the interior of the Mustang felt and looked cheap. This is because they knew it was true.

As a result, a fair amount of effort has been devoted to improving the interior by using better-quality materials. In particular, the instrument panel looks nicer, with a new one-piece design that Ford says has reduced squeaks and rattles by 33 percent (and here we didn't even know that you could quantify squeaks and rattles so precisely).

They've redesigned the center console also, giving it a smooth, attractive arc.

Two different interior upgrade packages will be available with the 2010 Ford Mustang. The Premium package brings leather upholstery, a leather-wrapped steering wheel with aluminum spokes, bright aluminum trim for the dash and ribbed door-panel inserts. The Premier package adds higher-grade leather, an aluminum shift knob for the lever of the manual transmission, and the choice of red, blue or "Cashmere" accent colors to go with the black interior. A navigation system will be optional, as will the Sync 2.0 entertainment and information system (using an 8-inch screen), a power-adjustable driver seat, aluminum pedals and even a rearview camera.

Dirty Bits
If you're wondering why we've waited this long in the story to mention mechanical upgrades to the Mustang, it's because they are considerably less substantial than the body and interior improvements.

Both the V6 and GT get bigger wheels and tires. The V6 comes with 215/60R17 BFGoodrich tires on 17-inch wheels as standard equipment and 235/50R18 Pirellis on 18s are optional. The GT comes with the Pirellis and 18s as standard equipment, while 245/45R19 Pirelli tires on 19s are optional. Later in the 2010 model year, Ford will offer a performance package that'll come with 19-inch summer tires and will carry unique suspension tuning and a 3.73:1 rear-axle ratio (previously available only on the Bullitt model).

Ford engineers reckon that a GT with the all-season 19s will generate 0.90g on the skid pad. The 19-inch summer tires are supposed to be good for 0.93g. Every Mustang GT with 19-inch wheels also comes with a strut-tower brace.

Ford hasn't made any radical changes to the basic suspension setup (i.e., there will be no independent rear suspension). Nevertheless, new front suspension struts come with bigger pistons for more precise damping control, the springs are stiffer and the antiroll bars are different. Ford claims the combination of the new chassis setup and the new tires offers better grip in both the dry and the wet, a more neutral handling balance, less body roll in the corners and improved braking. We'll see soon enough, when we get our butts in the seat.

All 2010 Ford Mustangs will come standard with traction and stability control systems. The GT has an intermediate sport setting that should allow for some modest tail-wagging fun.

Ford says the weight of the GT increases by only 15 pounds and the V6 is up only 35 pounds. And Ford hastens to add that the Mustang is still very much lighter than "our new competitors." Judging by the last Mustang Bullitt we had on our scales, we reckon the '10 Mustang will weigh about 3,500 pounds. This makes it about 500 pounds lighter than a Dodge Challenger R/T and about 400 less than a Chevy Camaro SS. Still, the R/T and particularly the SS will have much better power-to-weight ratios.

And that's because....

Powertrain
The GT's 24-valve, SOHC 4.6-liter V8 gets just a small boost from 300 horsepower to 315 hp and a bump in torque from 320 pound-feet to 325 lb-ft. This is thanks to a new cold-air intake system. Redline also rises to 6,500 rpm from 6,250 rpm. If these numbers sound familiar, it's because they are the same numbers that the '09 Mustang Bullitt makes.

If that's not enough juice for you, Ford Racing will offer a dealer-installed supercharger package that will push power above 400 hp. You can go ahead and forget about the so-called 6.0-liter Boss V8. According to our sources, using this motor would have required some heavy modifications to the Mustang's front end. A twin-turbocharged V6 that makes more than 350 hp is in the works for the Mustang's future, we're told.

Meanwhile, the standard Mustang carries the same iron-block 4.0-liter V6 as before and it makes a frankly pitiful 210 hp, at least 90 hp less than the Camaro V6. The five-speed manual transmissions are carry-overs for both the V6 and GT.

The Deal
Don't expect the price of the 2010 Ford Mustang to rise much above that of the '09 version, especially because Chevrolet has been surprisingly aggressive in pricing the 2010 Camaro (a base V6 starts at $22,995). The 2009 Mustang V6 starts at $20,790, and the 2010 model should continue to undercut the Camaro by a couple thousand dollars. (It's going to need to, considering the performance differential between the two.) We wouldn't expect the price of the 2010 Mustang GT to go much over the $27,570 base price of the current car. At $28,000, the GT would be roughly $3,000 cheaper than the 422-hp Camaro.

The 2010 Ford Mustang will be available in coupe, convertible and sunroof-equipped versions from the start of production. The Camaro will not, of course. Also, the Mustang comes standard with turn signals that light sequentially like the 1968-'70 Shelby Mustangs. So, there's that.

Camaro > Mustang...thanks for coming out, Ford.
Old 11-18-2008, 12:54 PM
  #770  
Be Strong AND Courageous!
iTrader: (1)
 
DarkSithCL's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Joshua 1:1-9
Age: 58
Posts: 9,305
Received 43 Likes on 34 Posts
Originally Posted by Sarlacc
Center stack is a bit boring though...could have broken it up a bit more.
The look like the ran out of cash rite there... the big 3 still need sooooooo much help on teh interiors!!!!

Plus... I will have to see this in the flesh, like the new Camaro... but my money is on teh Chevy rite now.
Old 11-18-2008, 12:57 PM
  #771  
Senior Moderator
 
LuvMyTSX's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: NY
Age: 44
Posts: 14,667
Received 13 Likes on 11 Posts
Originally Posted by Dan Martin
Do not want.

The interior materials still look really cheap.


Plus, I just don't like the retro styling. I don't care for the Camaro or Challenger either. At least this Mustang's exterior looks a little bit better than the last gen.
Old 11-18-2008, 01:22 PM
  #772  
dom
Senior Moderator
 
dom's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Toronto, Canada
Age: 47
Posts: 47,710
Received 801 Likes on 662 Posts
Meh to the 15HP increase. And the fact that their still offering that 4L is mind blowing.
Old 11-18-2008, 01:32 PM
  #773  
The sizzle in the Steak
 
Moog-Type-S's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Southern California
Posts: 71,436
Received 1,877 Likes on 1,297 Posts
Originally Posted by DarkSithCL
The look like the ran out of cash rite there... the big 3 still need sooooooo much help on teh interiors!!!!

Plus... I will have to see this in the flesh, like the new Camaro... but my money is on teh Chevy rite now.
GM is making real nice interiors lately.
Ford is hit and miss.
Chrysler is miss.
Old 11-18-2008, 01:46 PM
  #774  
fap fap fap
 
Infamous425's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Kirkland
Age: 43
Posts: 4,239
Received 7 Likes on 7 Posts
i love it except for the center stack and weaksauce engines (compared to competitors)
Old 11-18-2008, 06:48 PM
  #775  
Suzuka Master
 
Maximized's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Chicago Suburbs
Age: 43
Posts: 5,579
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I love how people say the interior looks cheap going by pictures. I think Ford did a nice job on the interior over the 05-09. This is a mid 20's car, not a BMW.
Old 11-18-2008, 07:57 PM
  #776  
Photography Nerd
 
Dan Martin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Toronto
Age: 43
Posts: 21,489
Likes: 0
Received 11 Likes on 7 Posts
There are many cars in the mid-$20's that have far better interior materials, you don't need to go to BMW. Even a bottom-basement City Golf uses better quality materials than most Fords.
Old 11-18-2008, 08:20 PM
  #777  
I disagree with unanimity
iTrader: (2)
 
sho_nuff1997's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: WI
Age: 46
Posts: 14,035
Received 27 Likes on 20 Posts
Originally Posted by dom
Meh to the 15HP increase. And the fact that their still offering that 4L is mind blowing.
Maybe it's enough to beat the horse.
Old 11-18-2008, 08:41 PM
  #778  
fap fap fap
 
Infamous425's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Kirkland
Age: 43
Posts: 4,239
Received 7 Likes on 7 Posts
Originally Posted by Maximized
I love how people say the interior looks cheap going by pictures. I think Ford did a nice job on the interior over the 05-09. This is a mid 20's car, not a BMW.
the current mustang interior looks cheap in pictures and in person. the materials are no better than in my scion.

however i do like this new updated interior
Old 11-18-2008, 09:15 PM
  #779  
Punk Rocker
 
majin ssj eric's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: St Simons Island, GA
Age: 45
Posts: 3,579
Received 79 Likes on 57 Posts
Originally Posted by I Go To Costco
Is this even different???
Old 11-18-2008, 09:26 PM
  #780  
Pro
 
NJSGTI's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Key West, FL
Age: 38
Posts: 609
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
I think that the interior is a big improvement and the front is good too. Im not too sure about the rear end yet though.
Old 11-18-2008, 10:13 PM
  #781  
Suzuka Master
 
Maximized's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Chicago Suburbs
Age: 43
Posts: 5,579
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Dan Martin
There are many cars in the mid-$20's that have far better interior materials, you don't need to go to BMW. Even a bottom-basement City Golf uses better quality materials than most Fords.
And the Golf is seconds slower down the 1/4 mile and slower on a road course. I don't get people knocking the car for the interior. It's a performance car and you won't find anything close without paying a lot more coin. Show me a low 13s car in the mid 20's brand new with a warranty.
Old 11-18-2008, 10:19 PM
  #782  
The Third Ball
 
Sarlacc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Los Angeles, Ca
Age: 45
Posts: 49,124
Received 4,824 Likes on 2,571 Posts
Originally Posted by Maximized
And the Golf is seconds slower down the 1/4 mile and slower on a road course. I don't get people knocking the car for the interior. It's a performance car and you won't find anything close without paying a lot more coin. Show me a low 13s car in the mid 20's brand new with a warranty.
Camaro which will come out about the same time as this gen stang.
Old 11-18-2008, 10:43 PM
  #783  
Suzuka Master
 
Maximized's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Chicago Suburbs
Age: 43
Posts: 5,579
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Sarlacc
Camaro which will come out about the same time as this gen stang.
The Camaro SS is 3-4K more expensive
Old 11-18-2008, 10:53 PM
  #784  
I disagree with unanimity
iTrader: (2)
 
sho_nuff1997's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: WI
Age: 46
Posts: 14,035
Received 27 Likes on 20 Posts
Originally Posted by Maximized
And the Golf is seconds slower down the 1/4 mile and slower on a road course. I don't get people knocking the car for the interior. It's a performance car and you won't find anything close without paying a lot more coin. Show me a low 13s car in the mid 20's brand new with a warranty.

Where do you get low 13s? This is the same car as the Bullitt. The Bullitt did 13.8 @ 102. Ford is aiming at an affordable sports car, but for ~$3K more you can have over 400hp in the Camaro and 360hp in the G8. Both which have much better interiors.
Old 11-18-2008, 10:58 PM
  #785  
Suzuka Master
 
Maximized's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Chicago Suburbs
Age: 43
Posts: 5,579
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by sho_nuff1997
Where do you get low 13s? This is the same car as the Bullitt. The Bullitt did 13.8 @ 102. Ford is aiming at an affordable sports car, but for ~$3K more you can have over 400hp in the Camaro and 360hp in the G8. Both which have much better interiors.
Those are mag times, which are always slow. I am going by owner times at a prepped track.
Old 11-18-2008, 11:09 PM
  #786  
The Third Ball
 
Sarlacc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Los Angeles, Ca
Age: 45
Posts: 49,124
Received 4,824 Likes on 2,571 Posts
Originally Posted by Maximized
The Camaro SS is 3-4K more expensive
Yes but the V6 is going to make just about as much HP as the Mustang GT. The SS is almost in a league over the GT.

Not hating on the stang, just saying.
Old 11-18-2008, 11:29 PM
  #787  
Suzuka Master
 
Maximized's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Chicago Suburbs
Age: 43
Posts: 5,579
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Sarlacc
Yes but the V6 is going to make just about as much HP as the Mustang GT. The SS is almost in a league over the GT.

Not hating on the stang, just saying.
The Mustang is about 400lbs lighter though. It's all about HP to weight. The SS will be faster in 2010, but in 2011 it should be interesting. Ford is working on a 400+hp 5.0L 4V engine.
Old 11-18-2008, 11:32 PM
  #788  
The Third Ball
 
Sarlacc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Los Angeles, Ca
Age: 45
Posts: 49,124
Received 4,824 Likes on 2,571 Posts
Originally Posted by Maximized
The Mustang is about 400lbs lighter though. It's all about HP to weight. The SS will be faster in 2010, but in 2011 it should be interesting. Ford is working on a 400+hp 5.0L 4V engine.
suspension, too. Camaro is going to own both the stang and challenger in the cornering dept.
Old 11-19-2008, 10:26 AM
  #789  
Suzuka Master
 
Maximized's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Chicago Suburbs
Age: 43
Posts: 5,579
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I would agree that the 2010 Camaro SS will be faster around a road course. Ford does have a nice factory package that will be released:

GT Track Package II (manual only, late availability)
Performance front/rear brake pads
GT500 Sta-Bars and rear lower control arms
Retuned struts and shocks
19-inch Pirelli Summer tires
3.73 axle ratio with carbon plates in the differential
Recalibrated AdvanceTrac®, traction control and anti-lock brakes

Like I said, in 2011 the Mustang GT will get a new 400+ 5.0L 4 valve VVT engine couple with a Tremec 6 speed. Add this “GT Track Package II” to the 2011 GT and you might be surprised at how the two stack up. The biggest downfall of the current car in terms of track handling is the all-season 235 tires and factory brakes. Remember, the Camaro SS is 400+ lbs heavier than the Mustang.
Old 11-19-2008, 10:30 AM
  #790  
Senior Moderator
 
Crazy Bimmer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Chicago Burbs
Age: 43
Posts: 34,937
Received 638 Likes on 276 Posts
And the rivalry begins.

Rather have a camaro, always have and always will.
Old 11-19-2008, 10:31 AM
  #791  
99 TL, 06 E350
 
Black Tire's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Toronto
Age: 44
Posts: 5,030
Received 164 Likes on 110 Posts
Sheeezzzz...you'd think Ford would be concentrating on smaller cars considering their situation.
Old 11-20-2008, 02:00 AM
  #792  
Moderator
 
Costco's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 29,869
Received 3,489 Likes on 2,089 Posts
Time for the real Camaro Z28.... LS7, lightened up track machine just like the Z28 from the 60's.

This reminds me of the time when the SVT Cobra came out.... I read in a Muscle Mustangs magazine and they were gushing about how IRS was so much better than the solid axle of the Camaro.
Old 11-20-2008, 09:01 AM
  #793  
Race Director
 
Mokos23's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Illinois
Age: 44
Posts: 10,741
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I like the refresh, I wish they would get rid of the retro gauges though. It looks out of place in a 2010 car.
Old 11-21-2008, 09:00 AM
  #794  
'Big Daddy Diggler'
 
bigman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Yonkers NY
Age: 42
Posts: 11,016
Received 4 Likes on 3 Posts
Although the Stang looks a little better, the Camaro and Challenger will shit on this thing. But at the end of the day, Ford will sell more Mustangs than the Camaro and Challenger combined.
Old 11-21-2008, 11:12 AM
  #795  
The Third Ball
 
Sarlacc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Los Angeles, Ca
Age: 45
Posts: 49,124
Received 4,824 Likes on 2,571 Posts
I dont think anyone noticed but they stuck this new stang into last weeks episode of knight rider for a about a minute.
Old 11-21-2008, 01:08 PM
  #796  
I shoot people
 
is300eater's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Vancouver BC
Posts: 22,349
Received 2,785 Likes on 1,409 Posts
Originally Posted by majin ssj eric
Is this even different???
that's exactly what I was thinking
Old 11-21-2008, 03:14 PM
  #797  
an asshole from florida
 
invisiblewar's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: GO GATORS!
Age: 34
Posts: 9,405
Received 17 Likes on 15 Posts
i see the differences. its enough to keep it around for a while longer. the stang doesnt drastically change ever four years, they usually keep the same lines around for about a decade and then do a complete makeover. I dont mind it, im not a ford fan tho
Old 01-21-2009, 08:15 AM
  #798  
dom
Senior Moderator
 
dom's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Toronto, Canada
Age: 47
Posts: 47,710
Received 801 Likes on 662 Posts
2011 Ford Mustang GT to feature 5.0L V8?


The Ford Mustang is still tops in the sports car segment, but with new competition from the likes of the Dodge Challenger and the Chevrolet Camaro, the Mustang is starting to look over its shoulder. To ensure the Mustang doesn’t lose out in the latest round of the pony car wars, Ford is reportedly readying a new powerplant for the 2011 car.

With the Dodge Challenger R/T kicking out 372 horsepower and the Chevrolet Camaro SS producing upwards of 422 horsepower, the 2010 Mustang GT is a bit underpowered at only 315. To remedy that shortcoming, Ford is preparing to wedge a new 5.0L V8 underneath the hood of the 2011 Mustang.

Code-named ‘coyote’, the new 32-valve powerplant will be shared with the 2011 Ford F-150. In F-150 guise, the coyote powerplant will be producing upwards of 400 horsepower and 400 lb-ft of torque, so expect the 2011 GT to at least match those figures.

With the 2010 Mustang not hitting the market until this spring, we suspect Ford will keep the 5.0L Mustang under wraps for at least the next few months. However, with more powerful versions of the competition on the market, we’re sure Ford will be chomping at the bit to get the new ‘Stang to market.
Return of the 5.0?
Old 01-21-2009, 09:34 AM
  #799  
Oderint dum metuant.
 
chill_dog's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Lake Wylie
Age: 46
Posts: 12,496
Likes: 0
Received 534 Likes on 446 Posts
I have to admit, I'm starting to get impressed with Ford. I still see quality as an issue, but technology-wise/market-wise, they seem to be getting it. If GM can get it together, I guess Ford can, too.
Old 01-21-2009, 09:52 AM
  #800  
dom
Senior Moderator
 
dom's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Toronto, Canada
Age: 47
Posts: 47,710
Received 801 Likes on 662 Posts
Originally Posted by chill_dog
I have to admit, I'm starting to get impressed with Ford. I still see quality as an issue, but technology-wise/market-wise, they seem to be getting it. If GM can get it together, I guess Ford can, too.
With the new EcoBoost 4's and 6's and now this 5.0L V8 their engines are not only competitive but just as or more powerful than the competition. Add 6 speed AT's and dual-clutch and they are ahead of many.

But I agree. Still somewhat worried about quality.


Quick Reply: Ford: Mustang News



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:59 PM.