Ford: GT News
12-21-2004, 10:52 AM
#165
The anti-misshift
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Canton, Michigan
Age: 45
Posts: 664
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Not only potential cracking in a suspension control arm. Also Ford is quietly contact individually and instruct them not to drive their vehicle under any circumstance do to the fuel system. Link
12-21-2004, 11:07 PM
#166
That's Racist
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: San Diego native. UCLA resident. =)
Age: 38
Posts: 5,634
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by CCType-S
Not only potential cracking in a suspension control arm. Also Ford is quietly contact individually and instruct them not to drive their vehicle under any circumstance do to the fuel system. Link
Wow. Individually contacted about getting a new fuel tank. Sucks to be a GT owner.
12-23-2004, 09:16 PM
#167
Parting out 02 Type S :(
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: LA,CA
Age: 74
Posts: 1,299
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Time For Sleeep
Wow. Individually contacted about getting a new fuel tank. Sucks to be a GT owner.
12-23-2004, 09:39 PM
#168
Safety Car
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: philly
Posts: 4,426
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Black CL-S 4-Life
Typical Ford.
12-24-2004, 12:45 AM
#169
Moderator Alumnus
Well I'd say none of you know anyone who owns a expensive Ferrari... plain and simple.
They break ALL the time... my friends dad owned 12. They were always in the shop. He drove a domestic to work because he got stranded too many times. They are his weekend warriors.
Your just expected to eat the cost on the bad manufacturing /w high end vehicles... Europe does not have the same regulations we have. (athough they are catching up)
example:
A major flaw /w Lamborghini is if you get on the brakes too hard in a new vehicles the system can cause the car to start on fire. Has happened 5-6 time that I know of. Granted lamborghini did purchase the drivers new cars... i think someone even posted pics of one of them on here awhile back.
So easy to pick on companies that do make their problems public.... (im not saying the problems aren't big issues)
While it'd be nice to get a perfect product, not 100% of all problems can be predicted without road time.
They break ALL the time... my friends dad owned 12. They were always in the shop. He drove a domestic to work because he got stranded too many times. They are his weekend warriors.
Your just expected to eat the cost on the bad manufacturing /w high end vehicles... Europe does not have the same regulations we have. (athough they are catching up)
example:
A major flaw /w Lamborghini is if you get on the brakes too hard in a new vehicles the system can cause the car to start on fire. Has happened 5-6 time that I know of. Granted lamborghini did purchase the drivers new cars... i think someone even posted pics of one of them on here awhile back.
So easy to pick on companies that do make their problems public.... (im not saying the problems aren't big issues)
While it'd be nice to get a perfect product, not 100% of all problems can be predicted without road time.
12-24-2004, 04:59 AM
#170
goldmemberererer
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: West Hills, CA
Posts: 1,736
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
A two ton conglomerate of metal and carbon fibre does not naturally go 200 miles per hour. When you do the unnatural for a thrill, things will occasionally blow up and bad stuff will ensue. I don't know why people expect that fact to change.
If this happened to a Civic, I can see the "OMG!" reaction. But it's not as fitting here. I wish exotics were as practical and as extensively debugged as a Camry, but then they wouldn't be exotic, now would they?
If this happened to a Civic, I can see the "OMG!" reaction. But it's not as fitting here. I wish exotics were as practical and as extensively debugged as a Camry, but then they wouldn't be exotic, now would they?
12-24-2004, 10:04 AM
#171
Suzuka Master
Originally Posted by goldmemberer
.. I wish exotics were as practical and as extensively debugged as a Camry, but then they wouldn't be exotic, now would they?
12-24-2004, 10:19 AM
#172
Moderator Alumnus
Thread Starter
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Washington DC (NOVA)
Age: 52
Posts: 16,399
Likes: 0
Received 8 Likes
on
8 Posts
Originally Posted by SiGGy
Well I'd say none of you know anyone who owns a expensive Ferrari... plain and simple.
They break ALL the time... my friends dad owned 12. They were always in the shop. He drove a domestic to work because he got stranded too many times. They are his weekend warriors.
Your just expected to eat the cost on the bad manufacturing /w high end vehicles... Europe does not have the same regulations we have. (athough they are catching up)
example:
A major flaw /w Lamborghini is if you get on the brakes too hard in a new vehicles the system can cause the car to start on fire. Has happened 5-6 time that I know of. Granted lamborghini did purchase the drivers new cars... i think someone even posted pics of one of them on here awhile back.
So easy to pick on companies that do make their problems public.... (im not saying the problems aren't big issues)
While it'd be nice to get a perfect product, not 100% of all problems can be predicted without road time.
They break ALL the time... my friends dad owned 12. They were always in the shop. He drove a domestic to work because he got stranded too many times. They are his weekend warriors.
Your just expected to eat the cost on the bad manufacturing /w high end vehicles... Europe does not have the same regulations we have. (athough they are catching up)
example:
A major flaw /w Lamborghini is if you get on the brakes too hard in a new vehicles the system can cause the car to start on fire. Has happened 5-6 time that I know of. Granted lamborghini did purchase the drivers new cars... i think someone even posted pics of one of them on here awhile back.
So easy to pick on companies that do make their problems public.... (im not saying the problems aren't big issues)
While it'd be nice to get a perfect product, not 100% of all problems can be predicted without road time.
True. IN general, all Italian manufacturers suck in reliability. I believe Ferraris break not only because I have heard about it before but becase they are owned by Fiat and as they say, it starts from the top. Fiat has been terrible with reliability in the past decades. They are getting better as you said, but still lag behind. Same with ALfa. I used to own an Alfa in Europe. Great fun, terrible reliability. I am sure Maserati is the same. I know Lancia is terrible too.
02-28-2005, 09:36 AM
#173
Moderator Alumnus
Thread Starter
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Washington DC (NOVA)
Age: 52
Posts: 16,399
Likes: 0
Received 8 Likes
on
8 Posts
Oil leak is new glitch for Ford GT; automaker resurrects 'Speedi-Sleeve' to address rare problem - - By AMY WILSON | Automotive News - - Source; Autoweek
DETROIT -- Ford Motor Co. is using a time-tested but unusual repair method to fix an engine oil leak in its flagship GT sports car. It is telling dealership mechanics to install a "Speedi-Sleeve" to stop oil from leaking from the crankshaft rear seal. It is one of several fixes being prescribed for the GT when the car goes into the shop for a major suspension recall.
The sleeves have been used for decades, largely on older, high-mileage cars or those undergoing an overhaul. It's extremely unusual for them to be used by a manufacturer on a new car, sources say.
"They work, but, gosh, it shouldn't happen," one Ford dealer says. "It's highly unusual. If I were the owner of a $150,000 race car, I wouldn't be happy about it."
The engine oil leak, which is caused by an improper finish on the crankshaft, isn't a problem in all cars, Ford spokeswoman Kristen Kinley says. The crankshaft finish has been fixed for cars in production.
For vehicles with the problem, the Speedi-Sleeve will close any gaps that might allow engine oil to leak. The device is a metal band that fits over the end of the crankshaft, increasing its diameter and making a tighter fit against the seal. The Speedi-Sleeve itself is a low-cost part but requires several hours of labor to install.
Until the GT, the sleeves hadn't been used by Ford, at least in recent years, Kinley says. She says it's uncommon because Ford hasn't experienced this type of leak during that period.
While all GTs will get new suspension control arms, not all of the cars are expected to need the other repairs. In addition to two recalls, Ford has issued nine technical service bulletins and one special service message on the GT. Problems range from the leaking crankshaft seal and blemishes on seat belt webbing to a rattle in the upper steering column and leaking power steering fluid.
"All of our customers are important, but (with) this one, we're really giving them the white-glove treatment," Kinley says. "We had an issue with the control arm. We don't want to take the chance we're going to have an issue with anything else."
Ford recalled the vehicle Dec. 16, ordering owners not to drive it after a crack was discovered in a test vehicle's control arm. A recall for a fuel tank vapor leak that affected about 45 cars was issued at the same time.
Ford assembled 448 cars before the recall; 111 were in owners' possession. Thirty-five cars have been repaired. Ford resumed limited GT assembly the week of Feb. 7. Ford aims to complete the suspension recall during the next few weeks. Eight control arms in each car are being swapped out from a cast part to a forged part.
The other service advisories are expected to affect a much smaller number of cars.
The sleeves have been used for decades, largely on older, high-mileage cars or those undergoing an overhaul. It's extremely unusual for them to be used by a manufacturer on a new car, sources say.
"They work, but, gosh, it shouldn't happen," one Ford dealer says. "It's highly unusual. If I were the owner of a $150,000 race car, I wouldn't be happy about it."
The engine oil leak, which is caused by an improper finish on the crankshaft, isn't a problem in all cars, Ford spokeswoman Kristen Kinley says. The crankshaft finish has been fixed for cars in production.
For vehicles with the problem, the Speedi-Sleeve will close any gaps that might allow engine oil to leak. The device is a metal band that fits over the end of the crankshaft, increasing its diameter and making a tighter fit against the seal. The Speedi-Sleeve itself is a low-cost part but requires several hours of labor to install.
Until the GT, the sleeves hadn't been used by Ford, at least in recent years, Kinley says. She says it's uncommon because Ford hasn't experienced this type of leak during that period.
While all GTs will get new suspension control arms, not all of the cars are expected to need the other repairs. In addition to two recalls, Ford has issued nine technical service bulletins and one special service message on the GT. Problems range from the leaking crankshaft seal and blemishes on seat belt webbing to a rattle in the upper steering column and leaking power steering fluid.
"All of our customers are important, but (with) this one, we're really giving them the white-glove treatment," Kinley says. "We had an issue with the control arm. We don't want to take the chance we're going to have an issue with anything else."
Ford recalled the vehicle Dec. 16, ordering owners not to drive it after a crack was discovered in a test vehicle's control arm. A recall for a fuel tank vapor leak that affected about 45 cars was issued at the same time.
Ford assembled 448 cars before the recall; 111 were in owners' possession. Thirty-five cars have been repaired. Ford resumed limited GT assembly the week of Feb. 7. Ford aims to complete the suspension recall during the next few weeks. Eight control arms in each car are being swapped out from a cast part to a forged part.
The other service advisories are expected to affect a much smaller number of cars.
03-28-2005, 11:41 AM
#175
Senior Moderator
2006 Ford GT Tungsten
Man, that's so pretty...I want one. BAD. 
=================
2006 Ford GT Tungsten
Source: RSportscars.com
To commemorate the 40th Anniversary of the Ford's first win at Le Mans, the 2006 Ford GT will be offered in a limited-edition Tungsten Silver, which replaces Quick Silver on the Ford GT's color palette. A Quick Silver racing stripe can be added to the Tungsten Silver package.
Tungsten Silver was developed for the 2004 North American International Auto Show Ford "Performance Trilogy" show cars - the Ford GT, the Shelby Cobra roadster concept and the new 2005 Mustang GT. Customer demand was so overwhelming that the color was added to the production palette.
"There's good contrast between the colors," says Camilo Pardo, chief designer of the Ford GT. "But it's a discreet contrast. In Tungsten Silver, the Ford GT is really dressy, like a fine suit. It looks mature.
"This dark silver color also brings out all the design features and the subtleties of the car," he adds. "In fact, people who've seen it thought we'd added a feature line around the side of the car. It's always been there, but you may not notice it in the car's other colors. The Tungsten Silver really brings it out."
Pardo notes that in the design studio, clay models are covered with "Dynoc" material that is a similar hue to Tungsten silver. The color is specifically designed to enhance the vehicle design details for evaluation.
"We use silver to evaluate our designs throughout the whole process," he says. "It brings out the subtleties, the returns and the negatives, the differences between horizontal and vertical surfaces."
Specifications
Engine
Type: V8, Supercharged
Displacement cu in (cc): 330 (5410)
Power bhp (kW) at RPM: 500(367) / 6000
Torque lb-ft (Nm) at RPM: 500(678) / 4500
Redline at RPM: 6500
Brakes & Tires
Brakes F/R: ABS, vented disc/vented disc
Tires F-R: 235/45 ZR18 - 315/40 ZR19
Driveline: Rear Wheel Drive
Exterior Dimensions & Weight
Length × Width × Height in: 182.8 × 76.9 × 44.3
Weight lb (kg): 3350 (1521)
Performance
Acceleration 0-62 mph s: n.a.
Top Speed mph (km/h): n.a.
Fuel Economy EPA city/highway mpg (l/100 km): 13/21 (n.a.)
=================
2006 Ford GT Tungsten
Source: RSportscars.com
To commemorate the 40th Anniversary of the Ford's first win at Le Mans, the 2006 Ford GT will be offered in a limited-edition Tungsten Silver, which replaces Quick Silver on the Ford GT's color palette. A Quick Silver racing stripe can be added to the Tungsten Silver package.
Tungsten Silver was developed for the 2004 North American International Auto Show Ford "Performance Trilogy" show cars - the Ford GT, the Shelby Cobra roadster concept and the new 2005 Mustang GT. Customer demand was so overwhelming that the color was added to the production palette.
"There's good contrast between the colors," says Camilo Pardo, chief designer of the Ford GT. "But it's a discreet contrast. In Tungsten Silver, the Ford GT is really dressy, like a fine suit. It looks mature.
"This dark silver color also brings out all the design features and the subtleties of the car," he adds. "In fact, people who've seen it thought we'd added a feature line around the side of the car. It's always been there, but you may not notice it in the car's other colors. The Tungsten Silver really brings it out."
Pardo notes that in the design studio, clay models are covered with "Dynoc" material that is a similar hue to Tungsten silver. The color is specifically designed to enhance the vehicle design details for evaluation.
"We use silver to evaluate our designs throughout the whole process," he says. "It brings out the subtleties, the returns and the negatives, the differences between horizontal and vertical surfaces."
Specifications
Engine
Type: V8, Supercharged
Displacement cu in (cc): 330 (5410)
Power bhp (kW) at RPM: 500(367) / 6000
Torque lb-ft (Nm) at RPM: 500(678) / 4500
Redline at RPM: 6500
Brakes & Tires
Brakes F/R: ABS, vented disc/vented disc
Tires F-R: 235/45 ZR18 - 315/40 ZR19
Driveline: Rear Wheel Drive
Exterior Dimensions & Weight
Length × Width × Height in: 182.8 × 76.9 × 44.3
Weight lb (kg): 3350 (1521)
Performance
Acceleration 0-62 mph s: n.a.
Top Speed mph (km/h): n.a.
Fuel Economy EPA city/highway mpg (l/100 km): 13/21 (n.a.)
03-28-2005, 12:42 PM
#176
Moderator
Regional Coordinator (Southeast)
Regional Coordinator (Southeast)
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Mooresville, NC
Age: 37
Posts: 43,474
Received 3,661 Likes
on
2,494 Posts
I want one too. 
03-28-2005, 01:45 PM
#178
The sizzle in the Steak
Great Color Scheme!
03-28-2005, 02:29 PM
#179
Senior Moderator
Originally Posted by ClutchPerformer
Not a fan of the Ford GT series?
03-29-2005, 02:11 PM
#184
Suzuka Master
Join Date: Jul 2003
Age: 43
Posts: 5,449
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Yumchah
Clutch, don't you have a wall to...Oh, nevermind...
Not a fan of the Ford GT series?
Not a fan of the Ford GT series?
But all this is talking about is a new color option... WTF is the big deal?!
The color does look good, but as news it's
03-29-2005, 02:26 PM
#185
Senior Moderator
Originally Posted by ClutchPerformer
Actually, I am a fan. I'm very surprised that they actually made the car. I sat in one at the Society of Automotive Engineers conference last year. Very nice.
But all this is talking about is a new color option... WTF is the big deal?!
The color does look good, but as news it's
But all this is talking about is a new color option... WTF is the big deal?!
The color does look good, but as news it's
03-29-2005, 02:36 PM
#186
Moderator Alumnus
Thread Starter
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Washington DC (NOVA)
Age: 52
Posts: 16,399
Likes: 0
Received 8 Likes
on
8 Posts
Originally Posted by DownUnder
Yea, manufacture’s rating is 550HP, which is grossly underrated.
I am sure there is at least 590HP under that GT's "bonnet".
03-29-2005, 03:55 PM
#187
Drifting
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Sunshine State
Posts: 2,054
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by gavriil
Well, isnt the manufacturer claiming 500HP in the above post stating the specs? Where are these claims coming from?
I am sure there is at least 590HP under that GT's "bonnet".
I am sure there is at least 590HP under that GT's "bonnet".
BTW, these guys claim that the Ford GT has put down 565HP at the wheels!
05-02-2005, 09:07 PM
#188
Moderator Alumnus
Thread Starter
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Washington DC (NOVA)
Age: 52
Posts: 16,399
Likes: 0
Received 8 Likes
on
8 Posts
In the latest MT mag edition, the GT ran:
3.6 for the 60
11.6 @ 126.2 mph for the 1/4 mile
60-0 = 109 feet
100-0 = 297 feet
Passing 45-65 mph = 1.5 seconds
Base price $143,345
As tested $155,845
05-02-2005, 09:53 PM
#189
Suzuka Master
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Chicago Suburbs
Age: 43
Posts: 5,579
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by gavriil
In the latest MT mag edition, the GT ran:
3.6 for the 60
11.6 @ 126.2 mph for the 1/4 mile
60-0 = 109 feet
100-0 = 297 feet
Passing 45-65 mph = 1.5 seconds
Base price $143,345
As tested $155,845
05-02-2005, 10:38 PM
#190
Drifting
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Sunshine State
Posts: 2,054
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Not the best mag time for the GT but it's OK. Can’t remember which mag it was but they compared the Ford GT, to the Enzo and Carrera GT. The Ford GT ran a 11.2s @ 131MPH in the 1/4-mile and it was only .1s and .2s slower in the 1/4 then the Carrera GT and Enzo.
05-03-2005, 10:12 AM
#191
Moderator Alumnus
Thread Starter
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Washington DC (NOVA)
Age: 52
Posts: 16,399
Likes: 0
Received 8 Likes
on
8 Posts
Originally Posted by Maximized
126 mph traps are good for 10s. This car traps 4 mph higher than the F430. Traction is definetly a problem.
05-03-2005, 10:28 AM
#193
Senior Moderator
Originally Posted by gavriil
It was a comparo of the GT vs. the new F430.
So which wins?
Can't wait to get my MT, looks like a great issue. Too bad we'll get in a couple of weeks up here.
Thanks for spoiling it for me gav
05-03-2005, 10:34 AM
#194
Moderator Alumnus
Thread Starter
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Washington DC (NOVA)
Age: 52
Posts: 16,399
Likes: 0
Received 8 Likes
on
8 Posts
Originally Posted by domn
So which wins?
Can't wait to get my MT, looks like a great issue. Too bad we'll get in a couple of weeks up here.
Thanks for spoiling it for me gav
Can't wait to get my MT, looks like a great issue. Too bad we'll get in a couple of weeks up here.
Thanks for spoiling it for me gav
Which one wins, as in, which one was quicker/faster? If yes, I posted the numbers for the F430, the GT was faster/quicker.
If you mean overall, the mag liked the F430 better. To quote the last sentence:
"The Ford returns to Michigan with its head held high- but without an overall victory"
05-03-2005, 10:37 AM
#195
Senior Moderator
Originally Posted by gavriil
Which one wins, as in, which one was quicker/faster? If yes, I posted the numbers for the F430, the GT was faster/quicker.
If you mean overall, the mag liked the F430 better. To quote the last sentence:
"The Ford returns to Michigan with its head held high- but without an overall victory"
If you mean overall, the mag liked the F430 better. To quote the last sentence:
"The Ford returns to Michigan with its head held high- but without an overall victory"
Ya I meant overall. No surprise that the F430 lost the acceleration tests but anyone that buys a GT over an 430 because its faster doesn't deserve the 430 to begin with.
430 > *
05-03-2005, 04:27 PM
#196
Senior Moderator
Originally Posted by DownUnder
Not the best mag time for the GT but it's OK. Can’t remember which mag it was but they compared the Ford GT, to the Enzo and Carrera GT. The Ford GT ran a 11.2s @ 131MPH in the 1/4-mile and it was only .1s and .2s slower in the 1/4 then the Carrera GT and Enzo.
http://www.stangbangers.com/05_FordG...GT_Article.htm
ok... I am going to be bold and say something here. I would take the Ford GT over the F430.
for looks, power, for everything. sure the interior is Ford and probably Ford quality, but I'd deal with it.I think the GT looks better. a lot better.
yeah, I said it.
Last edited by srika; 05-03-2005 at 04:30 PM.
05-03-2005, 05:39 PM
#197
Drifting
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Sunshine State
Posts: 2,054
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by srika
http://www.stangbangers.com/05_FordG...GT_Article.htm
ok... I am going to be bold and say something here. I would take the Ford GT over the F430.
for looks, power, for everything. sure the interior is Ford and probably Ford quality, but I'd deal with it.I think the GT looks better. a lot better.
yeah, I said it.
05-04-2005, 08:32 AM
#198
Senior Moderator
Originally Posted by srika
http://www.stangbangers.com/05_FordG...GT_Article.htm
ok... I am going to be bold and say something here. I would take the Ford GT over the F430.
for looks, power, for everything. sure the interior is Ford and probably Ford quality, but I'd deal with it.I think the GT looks better. a lot better.
yeah, I said it.
05-04-2005, 11:52 AM
#199
Senior Moderator
umm... I just looked at the F430 Spider in the other thread... umm... I umm... think I was smoking something when I said I would take the GT over the F430... I'll take the F430 Spider plzthx. And.. a regular one too. I think. 
I'll take the F430 Spider plzthx. And.. a regular one too. I think.
05-04-2005, 11:56 AM
#200
Senior Moderator
Originally Posted by srika
umm... I just looked at the F430 Spider in the other thread... umm... I umm... think I was smoking something when I said I would take the GT over the F430... I'll take the F430 Spider plzthx. And.. a regular one too. I think.
I'll take the F430 Spider plzthx. And.. a regular one too. I think. Looks like you came to your senses.