Dodge: Durango News

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 06-11-2010, 05:53 AM
  #81  
Burning Brakes
 
Shift_Acura's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Vancouver, BC
Posts: 1,030
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
If it looks like the new Ram then
Old 07-22-2010, 11:04 AM
  #82  
I shoot people
 
is300eater's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Vancouver BC
Posts: 22,349
Received 2,785 Likes on 1,409 Posts
2012 Dodge Durango (or is it Magnum?) revealed on Twitter





http://www.autoblog.com/2010/07/22/2...ed-on-twitter/
Old 07-22-2010, 11:10 AM
  #83  
The Third Ball
 
Sarlacc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Los Angeles, Ca
Age: 45
Posts: 49,124
Received 4,824 Likes on 2,571 Posts
Hmm, I kinda like it.

I wonder if its the new SRT....the size/shape looks pretty similar to the new Jeep Grand Cherokee. But the underspoiler looks like the previous gen Jeep SRT.

I drove the new GC yesterday...that thing is freaking nice. Probably one of the nicest SUVs on the market right now, when its fully loaded.
Old 07-22-2010, 11:48 AM
  #84  
Corn-Fed Mule
 
jim165's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: All Up In Dat AZZ...Beotch!
Posts: 224
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Wow, these Chrysler products are starting to look pretty appealing! I'm digging that Durango. Saw the review of the Grand Cherokee on Motorweek and it's a damn nice vehicle...very upscale looking. I'd consider one for sure...
Old 07-22-2010, 11:56 AM
  #85  
Registered Member
 
MyCarIsntInMyWifesName's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Posts: 1,752
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Sarlacc
Hmm, I kinda like it.

I wonder if its the new SRT....the size/shape looks pretty similar to the new Jeep Grand Cherokee. But the underspoiler looks like the previous gen Jeep SRT.

I drove the new GC yesterday...that thing is freaking nice. Probably one of the nicest SUVs on the market right now, when its fully loaded.
I merely saw a new black loaded GC earlier this week at a light. Next to it was a GX470 and behind the GC was a Touareg V8. Let me say that without the badges on all of those vehicles the Jeep gives up nothing in rugged class to those vehicles.

But this new Dodge is supposed to be much larger like the 2004-2009 model to suit those who might be looking at a Traverse or Expedition. And I don't think any SRT version will materialize, not for a big SUV.

Originally Posted by jim165
Wow, these Chrysler products are starting to look pretty appealing! I'm digging that Durango. Saw the review of the Grand Cherokee on Motorweek and it's a damn nice vehicle...very upscale looking. I'd consider one for sure...
MotorTrend said it drove better than most Land Rovers! Initial reviews are singing high praise for this truck.

Chrysler just needs to move quicker. New Sebring, new 300, new volume and more affordable vehicles!
Old 07-22-2010, 12:02 PM
  #86  
The Third Ball
 
Sarlacc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Los Angeles, Ca
Age: 45
Posts: 49,124
Received 4,824 Likes on 2,571 Posts
I drove a Grand Cherokee limited yesterday with the V8.

It was SUPER nice. Drove like a dream, interior design was clean and easy. Exterior was classy.

I think its a home run and I hope sales take off.
Old 07-22-2010, 12:04 PM
  #87  
The Third Ball
 
Sarlacc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Los Angeles, Ca
Age: 45
Posts: 49,124
Received 4,824 Likes on 2,571 Posts
Originally Posted by MyCarIsntInMyWifesName
But this new Dodge is supposed to be much larger like the 2004-2009 model to suit those who might be looking at a Traverse or Expedition. And I don't think any SRT version will materialize, not for a big SUV.
Could be...but right now that pic looks smaller.
Old 07-22-2010, 12:17 PM
  #88  
Corn-Fed Mule
 
jim165's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: All Up In Dat AZZ...Beotch!
Posts: 224
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by MyCarIsntInMyWifesName
I merely saw a new black loaded GC earlier this week at a light. Next to it was a GX470 and behind the GC was a Touareg V8. Let me say that without the badges on all of those vehicles the Jeep gives up nothing in rugged class to those vehicles.

But this new Dodge is supposed to be much larger like the 2004-2009 model to suit those who might be looking at a Traverse or Expedition. And I don't think any SRT version will materialize, not for a big SUV.



MotorTrend said it drove better than most Land Rovers! Initial reviews are singing high praise for this truck.

Chrysler just needs to move quicker. New Sebring, new 300, new volume and more affordable vehicles!
I wouldn't doubt it since it's hard to drive a Land Rover when it's on a mechanic's lift being fixed...
Old 07-22-2010, 01:11 PM
  #89  
The sizzle in the Steak
 
Moog-Type-S's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Southern California
Posts: 71,436
Received 1,877 Likes on 1,297 Posts
Interesting....looks promising
Old 07-22-2010, 02:49 PM
  #90  
Burning Brakes
 
Shift_Acura's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Vancouver, BC
Posts: 1,030
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
I Like what I see so far...Chrysler's finally coming around...only thing holding them back right now is the Sebring really
Old 07-26-2010, 03:20 PM
  #91  
Intermediate
 
xoneatom's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: SoCal
Posts: 30
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
that is a very good looking SUV
Old 07-31-2010, 02:37 AM
  #92  
Three Wheelin'
 
Type34's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: SoCal
Posts: 1,282
Received 168 Likes on 101 Posts
They better not call it Magnum

I understand they do extensive brand equity studies, but I can't imagine the "Durango" name has lost that much equity among its primary audience. IMO, American car companies abandon names too quickly and then have to pay large amounts of marketing funds to introduce a new name.

Ford learned that the hard way when they axed "Taurus" for "Five Hundred" and then of course switched back.

If you build it (right), they will come...
Old 07-31-2010, 09:37 AM
  #93  
The Third Ball
 
Sarlacc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Los Angeles, Ca
Age: 45
Posts: 49,124
Received 4,824 Likes on 2,571 Posts
Originally Posted by Type34
They better not call it Magnum

I understand they do extensive brand equity studies, but I can't imagine the "Durango" name has lost that much equity among its primary audience. IMO, American car companies abandon names too quickly and then have to pay large amounts of marketing funds to introduce a new name.

Ford learned that the hard way when they axed "Taurus" for "Five Hundred" and then of course switched back.

If you build it (right), they will come...
I dont think it should carry either name.

The durgano doesnt have quality and reliability associated with it.

And magnum makes people think of the wagon (which I liked, but most didnt)

It needs a new a name or a revival name such as the RAM Charger.


And it IS going to be built on the new GC platform...but stretched, so it will be bigger.
Old 08-05-2010, 08:12 PM
  #94  
GO DAWGS!! SICK'EM!!
 
TL1999's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: UGA DAWGS COUNTRY
Posts: 2,601
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
looks a lot better
Old 09-05-2010, 10:11 PM
  #95  
I shoot people
 
is300eater's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Vancouver BC
Posts: 22,349
Received 2,785 Likes on 1,409 Posts








more pics here:
http://www.autoblog.com/photos/2011-...rango/#3324700
Old 09-05-2010, 10:17 PM
  #96  
Registered Member
 
MyCarIsntInMyWifesName's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Posts: 1,752
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
That thing looks great! Wow.
Old 09-05-2010, 10:20 PM
  #97  
Pinky all stinky
 
phile's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 20,663
Received 189 Likes on 117 Posts
I want to dislike it because I think it's too blingy, but I can't. I think it looks a lot better than the current model too.
Old 09-05-2010, 10:35 PM
  #98  
Burning Brakes
 
Shift_Acura's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Vancouver, BC
Posts: 1,030
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
This looks better than the new Explorer.
Old 09-05-2010, 10:59 PM
  #99  
אני עומד עם ישראל
 
Hapa DC5's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Los Gatos, CA
Posts: 9,860
Received 810 Likes on 522 Posts
It looks really good.
Old 09-06-2010, 12:22 AM
  #100  
Senior Moderator
 
Crazy Bimmer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Chicago Burbs
Age: 43
Posts: 34,937
Received 638 Likes on 276 Posts
The tailights annoy me. Not only do they remind me of the odessy but they are too close to looking like Jeeps. Couldnt they are least design the rear more so it didnt have the same design cues!?

Jeep


Dodge
Old 09-06-2010, 01:13 AM
  #101  
Team Owner
iTrader: (1)
 
Sly Raskal's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Fontana, California
Age: 47
Posts: 30,991
Received 582 Likes on 346 Posts
Agree with

The front doesn't look bad, much improved over previous designs. Still a little too much chrome for my tastes though.
Old 09-06-2010, 01:16 AM
  #102  
I shoot people
 
is300eater's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Vancouver BC
Posts: 22,349
Received 2,785 Likes on 1,409 Posts
^^^yeah, the first thing I'd do, would be blacking out that chrome
Old 09-06-2010, 01:19 AM
  #103  
fap fap fap
 
Infamous425's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Kirkland
Age: 43
Posts: 4,239
Received 7 Likes on 7 Posts
looks better than the jeep, i like it alot. but yeah they should've done something different with the rear end.
Old 09-06-2010, 01:21 AM
  #104  
אני עומד עם ישראל
 
Hapa DC5's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Los Gatos, CA
Posts: 9,860
Received 810 Likes on 522 Posts
The Jeep and this look good. Maybe too much of a family resemblance though. We need to pour more tax dollars into the design budget.
Old 09-06-2010, 09:52 PM
  #105  
The Third Ball
 
Sarlacc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Los Angeles, Ca
Age: 45
Posts: 49,124
Received 4,824 Likes on 2,571 Posts
I dont like the wheels and rear is too jeep-ish as pointed out.

But I really like it overall. I would definitely consider it for a family vehicle (and with third row seating and twins on the way...it might be a consideration.)

I just want real interior pics. Ive only see the peek at the steering wheel.

PS: Im surprised it took this long to get this on here, I saw them days ago
Old 09-07-2010, 10:33 AM
  #106  
The sizzle in the Steak
 
Moog-Type-S's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Southern California
Posts: 71,436
Received 1,877 Likes on 1,297 Posts
MUCH improved.

Front end is a bit much...but otherwise a great change for a previously horrid looking vehicle.
Old 09-07-2010, 10:33 AM
  #107  
Pro
 
vybzkartel's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: nyc
Age: 49
Posts: 679
Received 18 Likes on 14 Posts
Originally Posted by Shift_Acura
This looks better than the new Explorer.
I beg to differ!

It does look better than the version it's replacing, though!
Old 09-07-2010, 11:40 AM
  #108  
I'm the Firestarter
 
Belzebutt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Ottawa
Posts: 11,981
Received 641 Likes on 395 Posts
Looks like the lovechild of an X5 and a Charger.
Old 10-07-2010, 02:32 PM
  #109  
The sizzle in the Steak
 
Moog-Type-S's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Southern California
Posts: 71,436
Received 1,877 Likes on 1,297 Posts
Could it be?!?!? Chrysler designed a great interior?!?!?!

They finally did!
Old 10-07-2010, 02:34 PM
  #110  
The sizzle in the Steak
 
Moog-Type-S's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Southern California
Posts: 71,436
Received 1,877 Likes on 1,297 Posts
It's pretty much the Grand Cherokee interior.
Old 10-07-2010, 02:53 PM
  #111  
Oderint dum metuant.
 
chill_dog's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Lake Wylie
Age: 46
Posts: 12,496
Likes: 0
Received 534 Likes on 446 Posts
I like the exterior, save the abundance of chrome; it's much better than the Jeep and the Explorer. The interior is impressive. Dodge came to prepared with this one.
Old 10-16-2010, 01:46 PM
  #112  
The Third Ball
 
Sarlacc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Los Angeles, Ca
Age: 45
Posts: 49,124
Received 4,824 Likes on 2,571 Posts
I saw one on the road this morning while I was having breakfast. Looks really good.
Old 10-18-2010, 04:46 PM
  #113  
The sizzle in the Steak
 
Moog-Type-S's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Southern California
Posts: 71,436
Received 1,877 Likes on 1,297 Posts
Originally Posted by Sarlacc
I saw one on the road this morning while I was having breakfast. Looks really good.
You should not eat breakfast while driving....it's unsafe...and will ruin that Prius interior.
Old 10-18-2010, 06:54 PM
  #114  
The Third Ball
 
Sarlacc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Los Angeles, Ca
Age: 45
Posts: 49,124
Received 4,824 Likes on 2,571 Posts
Originally Posted by Moog-Type-S
You should not eat breakfast while driving....it's unsafe...and will ruin that Prius interior.
The Prius is in LA...I was sitting outside at a diner in Detroit...
Old 10-18-2010, 07:21 PM
  #115  
Senior Moderator
 
West6MT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Toronto
Age: 41
Posts: 9,219
Received 165 Likes on 127 Posts
Wow, that looks pretty good.
Old 10-18-2010, 07:50 PM
  #116  
Pinky all stinky
 
phile's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 20,663
Received 189 Likes on 117 Posts
Originally Posted by Moog-Type-S
Could it be?!?!? Chrysler designed a great interior?!?!?!

They finally did!
I like the GC's interior better

Old 08-17-2011, 09:55 PM
  #117  
The Third Ball
 
Sarlacc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Los Angeles, Ca
Age: 45
Posts: 49,124
Received 4,824 Likes on 2,571 Posts
Just spent the last two weeks driving around the DC/NoVa area with one of these as my rental.

Avis rents the Crew trim...with is about in the middle...but its still pretty loaded, back up cam, keyless start/entry/auto lift gate, climate control, etc.

I freaking loved this thing. I only had the V6. It could feel a tad anemic at times...but honestly it got the job done and quite well. 290hp, 300tq...I had plenty of go, and using the auto stick, I always had plenty of passing power.

I also ALWAYS had the AC blowing super cold on the LO setting because of the humidity and heat.

With all that I averaged 20 mpg combined driving. An estimated tank with get you about 500 miles according to the computer...I got about 305 miles with 3/4 tank left at my first fill up...and mind you I usually had my wife and two car seats with me...at times, I also had 3 other passengers...even with a FULLY LOADED car...I still had good driving power and only dropped down to about 18-19mpg. I was pretty impressed.

Its a very comfortable vehicle. I had previously driven a citadel v8 model on a closed course for about about 60 secs....The handling is nice and tight with great steering feedback, with the new improvements dodge has made with all the suspensions in their vehicles, the steering ratio is better than my 2010 challenger.

I was in this SUV a lot. Well over 1000 miles in two weeks. I really really liked it. If I could afford another new vehicle, I would seriously get one. Of course I would want a higher trim level and the 5.7 Hemi...but as a family hauler for twins...this thing was awesome, and really fun to drive.
Old 08-17-2011, 11:11 PM
  #118  
Burning Brakes
 
Shift_Acura's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Vancouver, BC
Posts: 1,030
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
It looks good with the RT package...but the base model looks awfully plain. IMO after seeing it in person The Explorer just looks much better inside/out and has better power-train options.
Old 08-17-2011, 11:24 PM
  #119  
Moderator
 
Costco's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 29,869
Received 3,489 Likes on 2,089 Posts
Originally Posted by Shift_Acura
It looks good with the RT package...but the base model looks awfully plain. IMO after seeing it in person The Explorer just looks much better inside/out and has better power-train options.


How so?

And I think the Durango compares more with the likes of the Expedition.
Old 08-17-2011, 11:24 PM
  #120  
The Third Ball
 
Sarlacc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Los Angeles, Ca
Age: 45
Posts: 49,124
Received 4,824 Likes on 2,571 Posts
Originally Posted by Shift_Acura
It looks good with the RT package...but the base model looks awfully plain. IMO after seeing it in person The Explorer just looks much better inside/out and has better power-train options.
I think the rear area of the car is much more sublet/plain. The front of the car very much owns the muscle car look.

I very much like the explorer as well, but its a whole different look. Its a much more futuristic design. The interior is VERY nice in them as well. I really dig the "touch" active buttons.

But they are in two different classes. The Durango is much larger than the Explorer. The Flex is more on par size wise (ride height/suspension being the biggest difference.)

I had initially reserved a minivan (was interested in driving around a caravan with the new 3.6 engine) but when I got to avis I saw they had Flex's and I got excited and said I would take that....But THEN I saw the Durango hiding behind another car and said...OK...gotta go with that.

At some point I would still love to try the Flex.


Quick Reply: Dodge: Durango News



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:24 PM.