Consumer Guide Report

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 07-19-2003 | 08:51 PM
  #1  
98AccordEx's Avatar
Thread Starter
Racer
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 374
Likes: 0
From: New York
Consumer Guide Report

Fair review but lousy acceleration numbers (7.9sec ofr manual)??


http://auto.consumerguide.com/auto/n...09.htm#ratings
Old 07-19-2003 | 09:56 PM
  #2  
larchmont's Avatar
More On
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 4,388
Likes: 0
From: Larchmont, NY
An earlier version (I think it was an earlier version) of this was posted on "the other side."

As I noted over there, this is WAY BETTER than a "fair" review; if you're familiar with their rating scale and what kinds of scores other cars get, THIS WAS AN EXTRAORDINARY REVIEW.

You have to understand that scores above 6 or 7 in any given category are rare -- although there are anomalies, because CG has some odd tastes. For example, Camry gets lots of high scores and winds up somewhere in the low 70's (and Accord gets pretty close to that). But besides rare instances like that, the scores make pretty good sense.

I know that a total score of 62 out of 100 doesn't sound like much, and if you look at what they say about the TSX in each category, none of it looks very special. BUT, just compare it to any of its competitors. Whatever you want -- BMW 3, Saab 9-3, Lexus IS300, even Jags, even NSX (I'm not kidding) -- you'll see that the TSX fares better than most of these, and on a par with any of them.

This was an extraordinary review.
Old 07-20-2003 | 02:09 AM
  #3  
fdl's Avatar
fdl
Senior Moderator
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 21,672
Likes: 1
From: Toronto
Re: Consumer Guide Report

Originally posted by 98AccordEx
Fair review but lousy acceleration numbers (7.9sec ofr manual)??


http://auto.consumerguide.com/auto/n...09.htm#ratings
I"m not that familiar with CG but perhaps the 7.9 they got was from a "normal" launch, in which case its not that bad. Its all relative anyways...they got a 7.8 in an RSX type-S.
Old 07-20-2003 | 08:34 AM
  #4  
Bear Trap's Avatar
Racer
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 262
Likes: 0
From: San Antonio, Texas
It was a great review. It scored a total of 62 points and the highest score in the near luxury class was 62 points!!! The TSX outscored all others in this category - and rightfully so.
Old 07-20-2003 | 10:01 AM
  #5  
larchmont's Avatar
More On
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 4,388
Likes: 0
From: Larchmont, NY
Originally posted by Bear Trap
It was a great review. It scored a total of 62 points and the highest score in the near luxury class was 62 points!!! The TSX outscored all others in this category - and rightfully so.
Exactly, BT. It's so easy to misunderstand it if you're not really familiar with the rating scale and the frame of reference, because "62 out of 100" just doesn't SOUND like a good total score, and 6 or 7 out of 10 sounds pretty mediocre.

The thing is, they really use THE WHOLE SCALE, so as to achieve the greatest possible separation between different cars. It's not like 65 is "passing" -- where in effect you're using only a 35 point scale, not 100, and you can't do as much.

Some cars get only 1 or 2 out of 10 on some categories, and the total scores can be as low as the 20's. Anything over 50 is decent, over 60 is truly terrific. I was pleasantly surprised the see the TSX get such a high score. I would have just hoped for something like 58 or better, which would have put it right in the running with those main competitors.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
012TL-GLM
5G TLX (2015-2020)
4
10-05-2015 06:32 AM
dirleton
2G RDX (2013-2018)
6
09-29-2015 08:26 AM
5 Acuras
2G RDX (2013-2018)
42
09-10-2015 12:33 PM



Quick Reply: Consumer Guide Report



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:03 AM.