Chrysler: Recall news

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 12-30-2007, 11:14 PM
  #41  
Race Director
iTrader: (1)
 
Trackruner228's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Charlotte(home) /Raleigh (school), NC
Age: 35
Posts: 11,395
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by LuvMyTSX
I agree. The TSX makes 205 HP with a 4 banger. Also, maybe you didn't see it, but the Odyssey recently took #1 in minivan sales, I think.

Chrysler needs to get its shit together or survival of the fittest will take one more victim....lol.
Oh well good for Honda there is no question the Odyssey is the better car, heck the Sennia is a better car if it wasnt for fleet sales I really cant picture that thing selling much at all. I looked up the number and while the Odyseey is ahead its not by that much and I am sure Chrysler is going to do its best to keep its spot for the years sale, they will probably just sell a ton to fleet sales and then they can still claim "best selling minivan"
Old 05-14-2010, 12:23 PM
  #42  
The sizzle in the Steak
 
Moog-Type-S's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Southern California
Posts: 71,436
Received 1,877 Likes on 1,297 Posts
Chrysler: Recall news

Chrysler notified the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration on May 6th of a potentially faulty wireless ignition module found on just over 40,000 Chrysler, Dodge and Jeep branded 2010 model year vehicles. Today, NHTSA announced an official recall for the included models, with the official repairs set to begin in July.

According to NHTSA, Chrysler has determined a wireless ignition module that can potentially exhibit unwanted binding of the solenoid latch, and the safety agency has announced an official safety recall as a result.

Chrysler says that its 300 sedan, the Dodge Challenger, Charger and Ram, as well as the Jeep Commander and Grand Cherokee are all included in the recall. The defect is only found on certain 2010 model year examples of these vehicles. The problem lies in a binding solenoid latch which may allow drivers to remove the key from the ignition prior to the vehicle’s shifter being placed in ‘Park.’

The safety problem lies in the fact that the vehicle could move forward without driver’s input, potentially resulting in a crash.

Chrysler dealers will begin inspecting and replacing faulty wireless ignition modules in July, 2010.
http://www.leftlanenews.com/chrysler...tml#more-30442
Old 10-04-2011, 01:55 PM
  #43  
Race Director
 
biker's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Alexandria, VA
Posts: 14,345
Received 629 Likes on 506 Posts
http://content.usatoday.com/communit...-new-engine-/1

Chrysler is recalling 667 of its 2012 vehicles with the 3.6-liter Pentastar V-6 for a manufacturing problem that could cause connecting rod bearing failure and engine seizure, according to Chrysler's defect report.

The recall will begin this month and Chrysler will replace the engines. The 2012 vehicles affected include: the Chrysler 200 and Town & Country; the Dodge Charger, Durango, Grand Caravan and Journey; and Jeep Grand Cherokee.

The suspect engines were built from Aug. 25 through Sept. 5 at Chrysler's Saltillo, Mexico, engine plant. Chrysler says the blocks were not properly cleaned and "hard debris" left in the block could damage the bearings and lead to engine seizing while running. Chrysler said it has no reports of crashes as a result of the this.
Old 10-04-2011, 01:56 PM
  #44  
Race Director
 
biker's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Alexandria, VA
Posts: 14,345
Received 629 Likes on 506 Posts
Can't remember the last recall involving the replacement of the whole engine.
Old 10-04-2011, 01:57 PM
  #45  
Moderator
 
ttribe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Phoenix, AZ
Posts: 15,298
Received 5,920 Likes on 2,918 Posts
Originally Posted by biker
Can't remember the last recall involving the replacement of the whole engine.
Wow! That's going to be an ugly one.
Old 10-04-2011, 05:15 PM
  #46  
I got the Shifts
iTrader: (5)
 
phee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Age: 35
Posts: 14,203
Received 230 Likes on 163 Posts
i think its cool that the went straight to a recall for this. most people wouldnt mind getting a new engine.
Old 10-04-2011, 05:40 PM
  #47  
The sizzle in the Steak
 
Moog-Type-S's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Southern California
Posts: 71,436
Received 1,877 Likes on 1,297 Posts
^^ I would!!! I'd be pissed if I just bought a new car, and now some kid at the dealership is going to have to do an engine swap?!?!?!

No way!
Old 10-04-2011, 05:46 PM
  #48  
Race Director
iTrader: (7)
 
crazyasiantl's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Clovis CA
Age: 36
Posts: 12,594
Received 596 Likes on 430 Posts
Originally Posted by Moog-Type-S
^^ I would!!! I'd be pissed if I just bought a new car, and now some kid at the dealership is going to have to do an engine swap?!?!?!

No way!
+1, at that point, i would want them to buy it back.
Old 10-04-2011, 05:47 PM
  #49  
Moderator
 
ttribe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Phoenix, AZ
Posts: 15,298
Received 5,920 Likes on 2,918 Posts
Originally Posted by phee
i think its cool that the went straight to a recall for this. most people wouldnt mind getting a new engine.
I'm guessing there was a gov't role in this solution.
Old 10-04-2011, 06:25 PM
  #50  
The sizzle in the Steak
 
Moog-Type-S's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Southern California
Posts: 71,436
Received 1,877 Likes on 1,297 Posts
Originally Posted by crazyasiantl
+1, at that point, i would want them to buy it back.
No doubt!
Old 10-04-2011, 06:53 PM
  #51  
Coal
 
05TLdcc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Freaking everywhere
Age: 31
Posts: 7,363
Received 137 Likes on 91 Posts
Originally Posted by crazyasiantl
+1, at that point, i would want them to buy it back.
+1
Old 10-04-2011, 06:54 PM
  #52  
Race Director
iTrader: (7)
 
crazyasiantl's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Clovis CA
Age: 36
Posts: 12,594
Received 596 Likes on 430 Posts
Originally Posted by crazyasiantl
+1, at that point, i would want them to buy it back.
not that i would buy a chrysler in the first place
Old 10-05-2011, 06:23 AM
  #53  
Race Director
 
biker's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Alexandria, VA
Posts: 14,345
Received 629 Likes on 506 Posts
I'm wondering - what "hard debris" could one leave behind in an engine and how did they find out?
Old 10-05-2011, 09:13 AM
  #54  
My first Avatar....
 
pttl's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: NJ
Posts: 24,540
Received 6,172 Likes on 3,962 Posts
At least ChryCo is doing the right thing, by trying to take care of their customers. Complete engine replacements will not be cheap.

I don't think a "kid" will be taking care of the engine replacements.
Old 10-05-2011, 09:50 AM
  #55  
Moderator
 
Costco's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 29,869
Received 3,489 Likes on 2,089 Posts
Originally Posted by pttl
At least ChryCo is doing the right thing, by trying to take care of their customers. Complete engine replacements will not be cheap.

I don't think a "kid" will be taking care of the engine replacements.


At least from what I've seen (know a few dealership service writers/advisors) the apprentices basically do a ton of oil changes and other minor jobs for a long time until they get to do other work.

The good thing about the recall is that it sounds like it isn't a design issue. Possibly a batch of conrod assemblies got some leftover machining debris stuck in between the bearing and rod bore itself. Or between the wrist pin and the bearing itself? There's not much that could get stuck in there and ruin something IIRC. The tolerances are very tight, but a paper-thin, nail quick-sized metal shaving somehow wedged in there could score the bearing over time and eventually cause failure. I'd assume the rod bearings are press-fit so there's no way to check one the connecting rod assembly is in.

Just an educated guess, I could be wrong. I can't think of any other "hard debris" that would be left in there accidentally. It's not easy to overlook something larger than a metal shaving.

In the bigger picture, 667 vehicles out of however many dozens (or hundreds?) of thousands of vehicles they sell a year is a very small sample. Not trying to downplay this recall but still..... just some perspective. A potential bad batch likely caused by someone not paying attention.
Old 10-05-2011, 10:15 AM
  #56  
Race Director
 
biker's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Alexandria, VA
Posts: 14,345
Received 629 Likes on 506 Posts
^ And Chryco could have tried the cheap way out and ask the owners to come in for a "free oil change" during which they'd pull the pan and hope to get everything out.
Old 10-05-2011, 10:19 AM
  #57  
Moderator
 
Costco's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 29,869
Received 3,489 Likes on 2,089 Posts
I'm fairly confident that they would have figured something like that out, were it so easy. It most likely isn't, as a "new engine" probably means putting in new internals.

at least, I'd hope
Old 07-22-2014, 03:42 PM
  #58  
Moderator
 
ttribe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Phoenix, AZ
Posts: 15,298
Received 5,920 Likes on 2,918 Posts
Chrysler recalls 792,000 older SUVs for ignition problems


Chrysler is recalling up to 792,300 older Jeep SUVs worldwide because the ignition switches could cause engine stalling.

Tuesday's recall covers 2005-2007 Grand Cherokees and 2006-2007 Commanders.

Chrysler says it's not sure exactly how many will be recalled. The company says an outside force such as a driver's knee can knock switches out of the "run" position, shutting off the engine. This disables power-assisted steering and braking and the front air bags might not inflate.

Engineers are working on a fix. Chrysler says it knows of no injuries and only one accident. The company says only a few complaints have been filed. Owners should keep clearance between their knees and keys until repairs are made.

The recall comes as U.S. safety regulators investigate ignition switch problems across the auto industry.
Source: http://www.cnbc.com/id/101846544
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
knight rider
Car Talk
9
03-04-2016 08:59 AM
thegipper
3G TL (2004-2008)
5
09-28-2015 01:01 PM



Quick Reply: Chrysler: Recall news



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:41 PM.