Mazda: CX-70 News

Old 12-26-2023, 11:53 AM
  #1  
Moderator
Thread Starter
 
00TL-P3.2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Spring, TX
Age: 38
Posts: 25,658
Received 5,292 Likes on 3,626 Posts
Mazda: CX-70 News

https://www.motor1.com/news/701858/2...ine-documents/


Mazda was supposed to launch the CX-70 before the end of this year, but it changed its mind and decided to release the new SUV at some point next year. In October, the company hinted the engine range might mirror that of the CX-90, and now we have stronger evidence that this could be the case.

Filings with the California Air Resources Board (CARB), first unearthed by AutoGuide, reveal the CX-70 will be offered with the same powertrains as its larger brother. This move makes sense considering the CX-70 will ride on the same platform that underpins the CX-90. The main difference between the two will be the number of seats – whereas the CX-90 has seven, the CX-70 will have a two-row layout.

The seven-seat SUV is sold with a 3.3-liter electrified inline-six engine generating 340 horsepower and 369 pound-feet of torque. There’s also a 2.5-liter plug-in hybrid engine with 323 hp and 369 lb-ft of twist. All-wheel drive is standard for both engines and the CARB documents suggest the same will also apply to the CX-70.

Mazda has yet to confirm the launch date of the CX-70 in the United States. The model is expected to become an integral part of the brand’s lineup as it aims to deliver around 500,000 vehicles in the country by the middle of the decade. For 2023, the plan is for 350,000 cars to be sold in the US.
Old 01-05-2024, 10:14 AM
  #2  
Senior Moderator
 
Chief F1 Fan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Western New York
Age: 64
Posts: 24,849
Received 6,860 Likes on 3,480 Posts
I looked at CX-50's while at the dealer a couple of weeks ago. I like the shape of it but it's too small for me, anxious to see this CX-70. Hoping to keep my CX9 for a few more years.
Old 01-05-2024, 10:39 AM
  #3  
Moderator
Thread Starter
 
00TL-P3.2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Spring, TX
Age: 38
Posts: 25,658
Received 5,292 Likes on 3,626 Posts
CX-90 not an option?
I really liked how the CX-50 looks, but the $ jump over my Explorer was more than I wanted to spend.
Old 01-05-2024, 11:37 AM
  #4  
2024 Honda Civic Type R
 
RPhilMan1's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Chicago, IL
Age: 37
Posts: 4,033
Received 1,454 Likes on 923 Posts
I love the widebody look of the CX-50. I think Mazda is doing really well with their styling. If I was in the crossover market I'd definitely look at one.

Give me a Turbo Premium Plus in Polymetal Gray Metallic and I'm set!

The engine options for the CX-70 look very strong.
The following users liked this post:
Chief F1 Fan (01-31-2024)
Old 01-30-2024, 10:40 AM
  #5  
Race Director
 
biker's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Alexandria, VA
Posts: 14,304
Received 623 Likes on 502 Posts
If you're struggling to tell how the 2025 Mazda CX-70 is different from the existing CX-90, give yourself a break. The CX-70 has a slightly different bumper and grille insert, plus the availability of gloss black exterior trim. Mazda didn't reveal dimensions, but they should be identical to the CX-90's apart from a whisker of an inch on account of that different bumper. The biggest difference is that the CX-70 is a two-row SUV. The CX-90 has three rows. That's it. Both the turbo inline-size and plug-in-hybrid powertrains will be available, and the interior design is identical. What you're looking at here is basically a two-row CX-90.

OK, so how on Earth does that warrant a whole other name? A marketing person wasn't on hand to confirm this guess during our sneak preview, but logically it seems like it's easier to sell a CX-70 than a "CX-90 Two-Row" or "CX-90 S." Smaller name number = fewer seats. Simple, understandable.


OK, so why would anyone want a two-row CX-90? Three-row midsize crossovers are wildly more popular than their two-row counterparts -- the Honda Passport sold 53,133 units to the Honda Pilot's 143,062 back in 2021, the last full model and calendar year both SUVs belonged to the same generation. And as much as the Passport can be dismissed as a shortened, two-row Pilot, the similarities are vast compared to the CX-70 and CX-90.

Mazda says that there is indeed an admittedly small subset of buyers not interested in three-rows, and who would rather have some extra cargo versatility. This would be empty nesters or DINKs. It would also be more premium/luxury-minded customers, which explains why the CX-70 will only be available in upper trim levels and therefore start at a higher price (which is still TBA, BTW). While the CX-90 straddles the line between mainstream and luxury segments, the CX-70's needle is pinged more to the fancy end. Think Lexus RX rather than Honda Passport or Chevy Blazer here.

OK, so why would a luxury-minded customer want the car with the lower number? That's a question still to be answered. It's also important to note that you don't add that much cargo versatility.



Above you can see the difference between the CX-70 and Passport's cargo areas since they are similar in concept. The Passport keeps the Pilot's useful underfloor bin adjacent to the liftgate and relocates the spare tire from down below the car to inside just behind the back seat. This is because the shorter Passport has less space behind the wheels. The CX-70 has effectively the same body, so its spare tire remains in the same spot: inside, and below that large plastic piece adjacent to the liftgate. The Mazda's bins are entirely where the third-row would be, which is difficult to access. I question how often someone would actually use these spaces, and if it really would be used more frequently than a third row, even by those who don't really see themselves needing one.

Ultimately, though, it's hard to get too worked up about what is a very low lift on Mazda's part. Really, why not? The subset of people who do want a two-row SUV really does exist, even if smaller than those who want three rows. Honda would probably say that moving 53,133 Passports out the door was better than zero. Mazda also made the point that it currently lacks a midsize SUV and that it sees the segment growing. Perhaps no one will buy it, but at least Mazda didn't dump loads of resources into something no one wants. Or maybe loads of people will buy it, and the ROI will be tremendous. Again, why not?
​​​​​​​2025 Mazda CX-70 Preview: Sure, why not? Small niche, small effort - Autoblog
Old 01-30-2024, 11:39 AM
  #6  
Moderator
Thread Starter
 
00TL-P3.2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Spring, TX
Age: 38
Posts: 25,658
Received 5,292 Likes on 3,626 Posts
https://www.netcarshow.com/mazda/2025-cx-70/


Mazda North American Operations announced the first-ever 2025 Mazda CX-70. Utilizing Mazda's most advanced powertrains that offer responsive and electrified performance, CX-70 provides intuitive handling that keeps the driver engaged and in control, whether driving around the city or engaging in lifestyle activities.

As expected of a Mazda vehicle, CX-70 is designed with drivers in mind, with an emphasis on superb driving dynamics, elegant yet sporty design cues, and a focus on generous cabin and cargo space to encourage owners to pursue their passions and hobbies.

Built on Mazda's large platform, CX-70 has been engineered from the outset with electrification in mind, with all CX-70 powertrains featuring some form of electrification. Customers can choose from an e-SkyActiv G 3.3L Inline 6 Turbo engine with M-Hybrid Boost, or an e-SkyActiv G PHEV, which provides customers with the best of both worlds in performance and efficiency.

Design is a clear point of pride with Mazda CX-70. The natural, athletic posture bestowed by the large platform is further enhanced with thoroughly modern and sporty touches. CX-70's aggressive appearance is immediately noticed with the wide and low front fascia and chiseled front end. Mazda further emphasized Mazda CX-70's dynamic look with contrasting black accents throughout the exterior, and available black metal and machine cut finished 21-inch wheels, giving the vehicle a great stance, even when parked.

Just as striking as the exterior is the meticulously sculpted interior, which feels wide and open, yet personable and comfortable. An expressive, varied interior color palette is complemented by high quality materials and finishes, such as the contrast gray metallic inlays, which all work harmoniously to create a timeless, yet sporty ambiance. The available red Nappa leather is coupled with red stitch detailing throughout the cabin and is inspired by the 100th Anniversary Special Edition MX-5, offering a distinctly sporty theme.

Effortlessly blending the ideas of function and form, Mazda CX-70 implements several new features to Mazda, all designed to improve everyday utility and encourage our customers to engage with their active lifestyles and improve the driving experience. This includes remote-folding rear seats, which allows for easier loading into the rear of the vehicle, as well as a rear cargo area that has been optimized for storage with additional compartments, hooks for bags and other equipment. Along with that is a unique sub-trunk design that allows CX-70 owners to stow valuables and other small items out of sight.

Mazda CX-70's sense of utility and functionality to the driver is further enhanced with several new assistance technologies. One of these is an addition to Cruising & Traffic Support, called Unresponsive Driver Support, that adds an emergency-only system to automatically decelerate and stop the vehicle if the system detects the driver is unresponsive to escalating alerts. There is also the integration of Alexa, which allows the driver to make hands-free commands for prompts like changing the temperature, or radio station, to controlling their smart home devices. CX-70 is the first Mazda crossover to feature Alexa, with the goal of reducing driver distraction and improving ease of use. Mazda's purposeful approach in designing CX-70 for its customers elevates CX-70 to a higher standard.








The following users liked this post:
RPhilMan1 (01-30-2024)
Old 01-30-2024, 11:47 AM
  #7  
Moderator
Thread Starter
 
00TL-P3.2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Spring, TX
Age: 38
Posts: 25,658
Received 5,292 Likes on 3,626 Posts
Looks great, IMO. An improvement over the slightly awkward look of the CX-90.
Will be interested to see these start hitting dealers & see what the pricing looks like & how much different it is compared to the CX-50 [size-wise]
CX-50 starts at $31k & CX-90 starts at $40k. I'd expect the 70's starting price to be in the middle, but closer to the $36-37k mark.
Loaded up the CX-50 runs up to $46k for a optioned Turbo Premium Plus
Loaded up the CX-90 runs up to $66k for a optioned Turbo S Premium Plus
So, my guess is around $58-60k for a loaded CX-70

More of a comparison to the CX-90, but a loaded Explorer Platinum is a touch over $60k
Old 01-30-2024, 01:07 PM
  #8  
2024 Honda Civic Type R
 
RPhilMan1's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Chicago, IL
Age: 37
Posts: 4,033
Received 1,454 Likes on 923 Posts
Very handsome! Excellent styling.
Old 02-01-2024, 01:43 PM
  #9  
Q('.')=O
iTrader: (1)
 
imj0257's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: DFW, TX
Age: 40
Posts: 23,506
Received 720 Likes on 520 Posts
I would go for this over the CX-90 because I ... maybe once in 5 years.. have used the third row in our Q7. I'm all for extra cargo space.
The following users liked this post:
Chief F1 Fan (02-02-2024)
Old 02-01-2024, 01:59 PM
  #10  
Moderator
Thread Starter
 
00TL-P3.2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Spring, TX
Age: 38
Posts: 25,658
Received 5,292 Likes on 3,626 Posts

The 3rd row in my Explorer is typically stowed, and we have the bus [Exped Max] when we need room.
But, I believe the CX-70 is shorter in length, so I don't know that you really gain much space, and may actually lose some over the CX-90
Old 02-01-2024, 03:40 PM
  #11  
Ex-OEM King
 
SamDoe1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: Minnesnowta
Posts: 15,882
Received 5,827 Likes on 3,849 Posts
We use the third row all the time when family is in town. Don't think we can go without one at this point.
Old 02-01-2024, 03:48 PM
  #12  
Moderator
Thread Starter
 
00TL-P3.2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Spring, TX
Age: 38
Posts: 25,658
Received 5,292 Likes on 3,626 Posts
Having 3 kids, the 3rd row of the Max is often used. But in mine, it's rarely
Old 02-02-2024, 05:35 PM
  #13  
Senior Moderator
 
Chief F1 Fan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Western New York
Age: 64
Posts: 24,849
Received 6,860 Likes on 3,480 Posts
No kids, used 3rd row once in 6 years and can definitely live without it. I would like to see captain's chairs in the second row but not a deal killer. I love my CX9 (except the brakes and infotainment system) but still would buy another Mazda product without hesitation.
Old 02-03-2024, 12:01 PM
  #14  
Moderator
Thread Starter
 
00TL-P3.2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Spring, TX
Age: 38
Posts: 25,658
Received 5,292 Likes on 3,626 Posts
Not sure I've ever seen a 2-row SUV [outside of some exotics, like maybe the Urus or Purosangue types] with captain's chairs.
For those that don't 'need' t he bench, it would be interesting, but also makes it a 4-seater which isn't overly practical.
Old 02-06-2024, 07:09 AM
  #15  
Drifting
 
ELIN's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2020
Posts: 3,250
Received 1,201 Likes on 861 Posts
Originally Posted by 00TL-P3.2
Not sure I've ever seen a 2-row SUV [outside of some exotics, like maybe the Urus or Purosangue types] with captain's chairs.
For those that don't 'need' t he bench, it would be interesting, but also makes it a 4-seater which isn't overly practical.
If you're buying the CX70 and the CX90 exists, I'm pretty sure being practical is not a high priority!
Old 02-06-2024, 08:21 AM
  #16  
Moderator
Thread Starter
 
00TL-P3.2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Spring, TX
Age: 38
Posts: 25,658
Received 5,292 Likes on 3,626 Posts

I have a bus of an Expedition, so I'd lean more on the CX-70 over the -90
Old 02-06-2024, 02:36 PM
  #17  
My first Avatar....
 
pttl's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: NJ
Posts: 23,891
Received 5,806 Likes on 3,726 Posts
If you don't need 3 rows, why spend the $$$ to get them?

Also, if practicality reigns supreme, get a mini-van, nothing beats them for hauling stuff and humans.

Last edited by pttl; 02-06-2024 at 02:38 PM.
The following 2 users liked this post by pttl:
00TL-P3.2 (02-06-2024), imj0257 (02-08-2024)
Old 02-07-2024, 09:15 AM
  #18  
Ex-OEM King
 
SamDoe1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: Minnesnowta
Posts: 15,882
Received 5,827 Likes on 3,849 Posts
Originally Posted by pttl
If you don't need 3 rows, why spend the $$$ to get them?

Also, if practicality reigns supreme, get a mini-van, nothing beats them for hauling stuff and humans.
You don't know what the price difference is...

And totally agreed with your second comment. Issue is that there's only one choice with AWD and none of them can tow much if that's important.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Yumcha
Automotive News
33
01-06-2024 08:25 PM
kurtatx
Automotive News
3
02-09-2022 05:57 AM
gavriil
Automotive News
12
06-05-2006 09:21 PM
gavriil
Automotive News
6
10-06-2003 08:19 AM


Thread Tools
Search this Thread
Quick Reply: Mazda: CX-70 News



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:20 PM.