Audi: A3, S3, RS3 News

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 04-22-2009, 02:32 PM
  #241  
Chloe @ 17mo
 
AsianRage's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Snohomish, WA
Posts: 3,931
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Moog-Type-S
2.0t > 3.2 v6

Meh, fact is that the V6 models were just so much more expensive than their 4-cyl counterparts.
Old 04-22-2009, 03:30 PM
  #242  
Team Owner
iTrader: (1)
 
Sly Raskal's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Fontana, California
Age: 47
Posts: 30,991
Received 582 Likes on 346 Posts
Originally Posted by Moog-Type-S
2.0t > 3.2 v6
Originally Posted by AsianRage
Meh, fact is that the V6 models were just so much more expensive than their 4-cyl counterparts.
x 2. Both points are valid. The price hike to go to a 3.2 just isn't justified based on the increased amount of power (<50hp) and decreased fuel economy.

Especially now with the new 2.0T putting out over 250 lb-ft of torque, who needs the 3.2.
Old 04-22-2009, 03:40 PM
  #243  
_____ like a rabbit
 
stangg172004's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Edgewater, Chicago, IL
Age: 36
Posts: 8,594
Received 12 Likes on 10 Posts
if the rabbit was offered as a TDI variant id be driving an oil burner
Old 04-22-2009, 06:21 PM
  #244  
I drive a Subata.
iTrader: (1)
 
JS + XES's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Socal
Age: 39
Posts: 20,301
Received 2,603 Likes on 1,571 Posts
Woooah. The new 2.0T produces more than 250 tq?? The one coming out with the new GTI late this year??
Old 04-22-2009, 06:47 PM
  #245  
Team Owner
iTrader: (1)
 
Sly Raskal's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Fontana, California
Age: 47
Posts: 30,991
Received 582 Likes on 346 Posts
Originally Posted by JS + TL
Woooah. The new 2.0T produces more than 250 tq?? The one coming out with the new GTI late this year??
The 2.0T in the '09 A3 is currently producing the same power as last year, approx 200hp, 207 lb-ft., and the same as what's in my '08 A4 Avant.

The 2.0T in the '09 A4 however is producing 211hp, 258 lb-ft.

They are both listed as TFSI motors, my guess is they are keeping the power down in the A3 to prevent decreased sales of the A4 since it has more power.
Old 04-22-2009, 07:34 PM
  #246  
fap fap fap
 
Infamous425's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Kirkland
Age: 43
Posts: 4,239
Received 7 Likes on 7 Posts
Originally Posted by stangg172004
if the rabbit was offered as a TDI variant id be driving an oil burner
MKVI golf will be coming out with a TDI variant this fall
Old 04-22-2009, 07:55 PM
  #247  
I drive a Subata.
iTrader: (1)
 
JS + XES's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Socal
Age: 39
Posts: 20,301
Received 2,603 Likes on 1,571 Posts
Originally Posted by Sly Raskal
The 2.0T in the '09 A3 is currently producing the same power as last year, approx 200hp, 207 lb-ft., and the same as what's in my '08 A4 Avant.

The 2.0T in the '09 A4 however is producing 211hp, 258 lb-ft.

They are both listed as TFSI motors, my guess is they are keeping the power down in the A3 to prevent decreased sales of the A4 since it has more power.
Got it.

Completely agree on your last claim.
Old 04-22-2009, 09:29 PM
  #248  
Senior Moderator
 
Crazy Bimmer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Chicago Burbs
Age: 43
Posts: 34,937
Received 638 Likes on 276 Posts
Funny that Audi is dropping the V6 for those cars and yet Acura is now going to offer a V6 on the TSX.

Either Audi is making a bad move or Acura is always one step behind on everything.

Granted TSX has no turbo..
Old 04-22-2009, 09:42 PM
  #249  
Fahrvergnügen'd
 
charliemike's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Maryland
Age: 52
Posts: 13,494
Received 1,568 Likes on 985 Posts
Originally Posted by Crazy Acura
Funny that Audi is dropping the V6 for those cars and yet Acura is now going to offer a V6 on the TSX.

Either Audi is making a bad move or Acura is always one step behind on everything.

Granted TSX has no turbo..
Audi's point is if we can just get over ourselves for a minute and compare a 2.0TFSI in the A4 against the 3.2 V6, we get similar performance and slightly better economy from the 2.0T.

Will Americans accept the idea that displacement doesn't determine a car's value?
Old 04-23-2009, 03:20 AM
  #250  
Race Director
 
biker's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Alexandria, VA
Posts: 14,305
Received 624 Likes on 503 Posts
Originally Posted by charliemike
Will Americans accept the idea that displacement doesn't determine a car's value?
...or the number of cylinders.
Old 04-23-2009, 06:41 AM
  #251  
Fahrvergnügen'd
 
charliemike's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Maryland
Age: 52
Posts: 13,494
Received 1,568 Likes on 985 Posts
Originally Posted by biker
...or the number of cylinders.
Well that too
Old 04-23-2009, 10:49 AM
  #252  
The sizzle in the Steak
 
Moog-Type-S's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Southern California
Posts: 71,436
Received 1,877 Likes on 1,297 Posts
Originally Posted by Crazy Acura
Funny that Audi is dropping the V6 for those cars and yet Acura is now going to offer a V6 on the TSX.

Either Audi is making a bad move or Acura is always one step behind on everything.

Granted TSX has no turbo..
Ding-ding!

Sure they are apples and oranges....but the 2.0T direct injection engine that produces 211hp, 258 lb-ft.....with better mpg than the Acura V6...is the best of both worlds...power and efficient. Sure it may not have the top-end bhp...but the torque numbers far outweigh that deficiency.

Now if Honda would put a turbo 4 in one of their vehicles....
Old 04-23-2009, 10:56 AM
  #253  
Team Owner
iTrader: (1)
 
Sly Raskal's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Fontana, California
Age: 47
Posts: 30,991
Received 582 Likes on 346 Posts
Originally Posted by charliemike
Will Americans accept the idea that displacement doesn't determine a car's value?
Originally Posted by biker
...or the number of cylinders.
x 2.

I can't tell you how many times I had to explain to people why I wanted to go from a v6 to the i4 in the Avant as well as buy an integra that also has an i4. They just didn't get it.

The media has brainwashed people into thinking v6/v8 good, high horsepower good. Now we're on the same downward brainwashing trend with econoboxes and hybrids.
Old 04-23-2009, 03:34 PM
  #254  
Senior Moderator
 
Crazy Bimmer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Chicago Burbs
Age: 43
Posts: 34,937
Received 638 Likes on 276 Posts
Originally Posted by Moog-Type-S
Ding-ding!

Sure they are apples and oranges....but the 2.0T direct injection engine that produces 211hp, 258 lb-ft.....with better mpg than the Acura V6...is the best of both worlds...power and efficient. Sure it may not have the top-end bhp...but the torque numbers far outweigh that deficiency.

Now if Honda would put a turbo 4 in one of their vehicles....
Ding-ding!! That was my point

I guess Audi is dropping the V6 from their A5 as well....
Old 05-07-2009, 12:32 AM
  #255  
Senior Moderator
 
Yumcha's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Posts: 167,208
Received 22,632 Likes on 13,881 Posts
Post Report: Audi A3 hybrid coming in 2012

From Motor Authority...

Hybrid versions of all sorts of cars - even sports cars like the Nissan 370Z - are in the works or on their way, and now Audi is adding to the list with reports of an A3 hybrid confirmed for production. The hybrid hatch is expected to use an Audi-adapted version of Volkswagen's TwinDrive hybrid powertrain.

The TwinDrive project will be at the heart of a future hybrid Golf, and is also being trialled in a Seat Leon plug-in as well. The TwinDrive system produces about 40hp (30kW) - half the power of the TwinDrive system in the concept Golf revealed last year, and meager by U.S. standards, but the system, once depleted, is backed up by either small petrol or diesel four-cylinders rated at a more typical 105hp (78kW) or more, according to Autocar. Top speed will reach about 105mph (168km/h).

Inside the TwinDrive system lies a 12kWh battery pack of lithium-ion batteries that should be enough to give the car a 30mi (48km) electric-only range. That's enough to rival the Volt plug-in hybrid, and at the Audi's higher market point, hints at a price closer to $50,000.

Efficiency for the combo will be very high, with estimates placing the car's combined electric and regular operating at more than 113mpg. The car is expected to reach commercial buyers in 2012 with retail sales sometime after that, though Audi hasn't yet confirmed any dates.
http://www.motorauthority.com/report...g-in-2012.html
Old 05-07-2009, 09:17 AM
  #256  
What Would Don Draper Do?
 
JediMindTricks's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Houston
Age: 43
Posts: 22,223
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
pardon my ignorance, but other than external features (like LEDs), what difference is there between the A3 and GTI? i love the GTI's interior, so even if the audi has a "better" looking interior or quality, i think it's a wash. but in terms of engine and/or performance....
Old 05-07-2009, 10:00 AM
  #257  
Fahrvergnügen'd
 
charliemike's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Maryland
Age: 52
Posts: 13,494
Received 1,568 Likes on 985 Posts
Originally Posted by JediMindTricks
pardon my ignorance, but other than external features (like LEDs), what difference is there between the A3 and GTI? i love the GTI's interior, so even if the audi has a "better" looking interior or quality, i think it's a wash. but in terms of engine and/or performance....
Honestly, now that VW is offering free maintenance and Audi isn't, I'm not really sure where the value from the A3 comes from ... Quattro, maybe?

The Audi probably has a nicer interior and quattro. Other than that, I'm not sure what the difference is ... Other than about $10k in MSRP when fully loaded. Unless I'm missing something, I'd have a hard time paying the premium for AWD no matter how much I hate FWD.

My Audi bias shows through, yet again.
Old 05-07-2009, 10:17 AM
  #258  
What Would Don Draper Do?
 
JediMindTricks's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Houston
Age: 43
Posts: 22,223
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
thanks.
Old 05-07-2009, 10:41 AM
  #259  
Moto Enthusiast
 
taitando's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Sacramento, CA
Age: 46
Posts: 596
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by JediMindTricks
pardon my ignorance, but other than external features (like LEDs), what difference is there between the A3 and GTI? i love the GTI's interior, so even if the audi has a "better" looking interior or quality, i think it's a wash. but in terms of engine and/or performance....
To me, aside from Quattro (which wasn't available in the 2.0T till now), there really isn't much difference. Definitely not worth the price jump in my opinion. The A3 might have the nicer interior, but the GTI with the Autobahn package isn't bad either. If I had to choose between a 4 door GTI and an A3, I'd probably opt for the GTI. Then I'd use the money saved to get some upgrades (chip, suspension, etc...).

Now if you're talking R32 vs. A3, I'd definitely go A3.
Old 05-07-2009, 10:46 AM
  #260  
What Would Don Draper Do?
 
JediMindTricks's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Houston
Age: 43
Posts: 22,223
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
see, i love the interior of the GTI, so other than, maybe, quality of the parts in the audi, the interior is a wash between the two.

thanks. i was just curious as to what justifies the extra $ for the A3.
Old 05-07-2009, 12:41 PM
  #261  
Team Owner
iTrader: (1)
 
Sly Raskal's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Fontana, California
Age: 47
Posts: 30,991
Received 582 Likes on 346 Posts
As some of you know, we almost purchased the A3, but moved on the A4 instead, mostly because you couldn't get quattro, and moving up to the A4 there's the boost in storage space.

Aside from those two factor's, if I had to choose, I think I still would have purchased an A3 simply compared to the GTI simply because I loved the exterior look of the A3 more than the GTI. But I certainly wouldn't complain if I owned a GTI 5 door.

Perhaps that could be the wifey's next car.
Old 09-03-2009, 04:55 PM
  #262  
The sizzle in the Steak
 
Moog-Type-S's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Southern California
Posts: 71,436
Received 1,877 Likes on 1,297 Posts
Audi announces diesel A3 TDI for U.S. market

Audi says it’s bringing another diesel-powered 50-state model to the United States later this year – this time it’s a 2.0-liter TDI-equipped A3 hatchback. Audi announced the new model earlier today at the North American International Auto Show in Detroit and the automaker says that U.S. sales will begin early in 2010.

The A3 TDI is powered by a 2.0-liter clean diesel – the same motor under the hood of the VW Jetta TDI – hooked up to Audi’s S tronic dual-clutch transmission. It’ll only be available with front-wheel-drive. The 2.0 TDI puts out 140-horsepower and 236 lb-ft. of torque.

Audi says the A3 TDI’s 2.0-liter doesn’t require any after-treatment system and that it’ll be capable of over 40 mpg on the highway.

The A3 TDI will be well equipped – Sirius satellite radio, leather seats and 17-inch alloy wheels will be standard. Expect pricing to be a bit higher than a similarly-equipped A3 2.0T gas-engine model.
http://www.leftlanenews.com/audi-ann...tml#more-20880

more diesels
Old 09-03-2009, 05:50 PM
  #263  
Team Owner
iTrader: (1)
 
Sly Raskal's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Fontana, California
Age: 47
Posts: 30,991
Received 582 Likes on 346 Posts
mmmm, 236 lb-ft of torque in that little thing and 40mpg to boot.
Old 09-03-2009, 06:19 PM
  #264  
The sizzle in the Steak
 
Moog-Type-S's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Southern California
Posts: 71,436
Received 1,877 Likes on 1,297 Posts
^^ having your cake...and eating it too
Old 09-03-2009, 09:21 PM
  #265  
Fahrvergnügen'd
 
charliemike's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Maryland
Age: 52
Posts: 13,494
Received 1,568 Likes on 985 Posts
Originally Posted by Sly Raskal
mmmm, 236 lb-ft of torque in that little thing and 40mpg to boot.
OH my ... and only a $1200 premium over the 2.0T FWD. It's up on Audi's site right now. Shows a 2.0TDi with FWD for $31,950 for a Premium Plus.

But if the quattro is like $34k and you get the sport, comfort, convenience, cold weather, and next think you know you have a $40k A3.

Bonkers.
Old 09-03-2009, 09:57 PM
  #266  
Team Owner
iTrader: (1)
 
Sly Raskal's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Fontana, California
Age: 47
Posts: 30,991
Received 582 Likes on 346 Posts
Originally Posted by charliemike
OH my ... and only a $1200 premium over the 2.0T FWD. It's up on Audi's site right now. Shows a 2.0TDi with FWD for $31,950 for a Premium Plus.

But if the quattro is like $34k and you get the sport, comfort, convenience, cold weather, and next think you know you have a $40k A3.

Bonkers.
I'm confused at what your reference to the quattro has to do with the TDI? I thought the TDI was only going to be offered in FWD configuration?
Old 09-03-2009, 10:12 PM
  #267  
Fahrvergnügen'd
 
charliemike's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Maryland
Age: 52
Posts: 13,494
Received 1,568 Likes on 985 Posts
Originally Posted by Sly Raskal
I'm confused at what your reference to the quattro has to do with the TDI? I thought the TDI was only going to be offered in FWD configuration?
It's been a long day and I'm still working.

I fucked that up

Yes, it's only FWD (which sucks). So a 2.0TDi with Titanium Sport, Nav, Cold, Comfort, Convenience is like $40k.

Would buy that instead of a Volt 10k over.
Old 09-03-2009, 10:27 PM
  #268  
Team Owner
iTrader: (1)
 
Sly Raskal's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Fontana, California
Age: 47
Posts: 30,991
Received 582 Likes on 346 Posts
Originally Posted by charliemike
It's been a long day and I'm still working.

I fucked that up

Yes, it's only FWD (which sucks). So a 2.0TDi with Titanium Sport, Nav, Cold, Comfort, Convenience is like $40k.

Would buy that instead of a Volt 10k over.


And yea, sucks it's only FWD. It's just like when lots of people asked for the 2.0T with quattro. So Audi delivered, but then took away the 6spd configuration on that trim.
Old 09-03-2009, 11:23 PM
  #269  
Nom-nom-nom!!!
 
TSX_831's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: CALI
Posts: 188
Received 21 Likes on 18 Posts
Audi needs to bring the A3 Sedan soon; I'd buy one in a heartbeat.
Old 09-03-2009, 11:31 PM
  #270  
Team Owner
iTrader: (1)
 
Sly Raskal's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Fontana, California
Age: 47
Posts: 30,991
Received 582 Likes on 346 Posts
Originally Posted by TSX_831
Audi needs to bring the A3 Sedan soon; I'd buy one in a heartbeat.
an A3 sedan would be an awesome entry level vehicle for Audi. With the Jetta being offered at $17K base right now, a $24K base price for an A3 sedan would be perfect step up. And if it looks as good as the B8 (which has grown on me a lot now that I've seen more of them on the road), it'll sell. The A3 already sells damn well in the U.S. considering the U.S. isn't a big wagon market in the first place.
Old 09-06-2009, 02:33 AM
  #271  
Fahrvergnügen'd
 
charliemike's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Maryland
Age: 52
Posts: 13,494
Received 1,568 Likes on 985 Posts
Originally Posted by Audi
Efficient Downsizing: Audi A3 and A3 Sportback 1.2 TFSI

Downsizing is an element of Audi’s efficiency strategy to which it is absolutely committed. The A3 model line will soon introduce yet another turbocharged petrol engine featuring lower displacement. It unites maximum performance with minimum consumption.

Designed from scratch, the new 1.2 TFSI generates 105PS from a displacement of 1,197 cm3. And as is typical of Audi, turbocharging and direct petrol injection once again work in harmony to maximize efficiency. Thanks to an aluminum crankcase, this four-cylinder engine weighs just 89.5 kilograms; this remarkably low weight also boosts its efficiency.

The 1.2 TFSI has been optimized to minimize friction. Eight valves are actuated by a single camshaft. A common-rail system injects the fuel. An electric control valve operates the turbocharger’s wastegate valve; boost pressure builds up spontaneously and scavenging losses drop.

This compact engine generates 175 Nm (129.07 lb.-ft.) of torque between just 1,500 and 3,500 rpm. It propels the three-door A3 1.2 TFSI from 0 to 62mph in 11.1 seconds; the Sportback, in 11.3 seconds. Both versions reach a top speed of 118mph and can return up to 51.3mpg (combined cycle), while emitting just 127 grams of CO2 per kilometer. The new engine will initially be paired with front-wheel drive and a six-speed manual transmission
This is only 103hp and 127lb-ft of torque. It's not going to be quick by anyone's measure but at 51mpg, it's probably the same as a Prius/Insight without batteries.
Old 02-08-2010, 07:46 PM
  #272  
I'm the Firestarter
 
Belzebutt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Ottawa
Posts: 11,981
Received 641 Likes on 395 Posts
Audi A3 TDI Superbowl ad:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Wq58zS4_jvM
Old 02-09-2010, 06:12 AM
  #273  
Race Director
 
biker's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Alexandria, VA
Posts: 14,305
Received 624 Likes on 503 Posts
^ that was pretty funny and have the tree huggers up in arms.
Old 06-22-2010, 05:20 PM
  #274  
I love me some Curry...!
 
wassystyle's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Murrieta CA.. but Brooklyn is in the soul..
Age: 42
Posts: 795
Received 14 Likes on 9 Posts
Audi RS3

The next generation Audi RS3 is coming, it's just a matter of when. But the bigger question is what's going to power Audi's hottest hatch when it arrives on European shores.

Considering that the A3 on which it's based shares the same platform (PQ35) as the TT RS, there's a good chance that Audi could swap the coupe's turbocharged 2.5-liter FSI inline-five into the engine bay. Unchanged, the five-pot would put out 335 horsepower and 332 pound-feet of torque to either a six-speed manual or S Tronic dual-clutch gearbox, and naturally, power will be delivered to all four wheels with a similar 40:60 front-to-rear torque split.


Our recent batch of spy shots show a slightly modified A3, complete with a RS-ified fascia, lower stance and massive brakes front and rear, although the single, twin-tipped exhaust (and grilled-mounted badge) could be mistaken for a standard S3. More interestingly is the rear wing, which remained fixed during part of the RS3's 'Ring run, but was canted upwards around another section. It could be some kind of adaptive air brake or it could've just come undone while whipping around the track.

Regardless, since Audi doesn't offer an S3 in the U.S., there's little chance of the RS3 making it to the States anytime soon













Old 06-22-2010, 05:22 PM
  #275  
I love me some Curry...!
 
wassystyle's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Murrieta CA.. but Brooklyn is in the soul..
Age: 42
Posts: 795
Received 14 Likes on 9 Posts






Old 06-22-2010, 05:23 PM
  #276  
I love me some Curry...!
 
wassystyle's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Murrieta CA.. but Brooklyn is in the soul..
Age: 42
Posts: 795
Received 14 Likes on 9 Posts
MOD not sure if this was posted already I didnt see it also here is the site... http://www.autoblog.com/photos/spy-s...i-rs3/#3107529
Old 06-25-2010, 11:54 AM
  #277  
I'm the Firestarter
 
Belzebutt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Ottawa
Posts: 11,981
Received 641 Likes on 395 Posts
Why would they put out a new RS3 now when there's a brand new A3 coming out next year or so?
Old 06-25-2010, 12:04 PM
  #278  
I disagree with unanimity
iTrader: (2)
 
sho_nuff1997's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: WI
Age: 46
Posts: 14,035
Received 27 Likes on 20 Posts
It will come out when the next gen A3 is released. The car in the pics above is just a mule.
Old 06-25-2010, 12:05 PM
  #279  
Senior Moderator
 
fsttyms1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Appleton WI
Age: 49
Posts: 81,383
Received 3,063 Likes on 2,119 Posts
Old 06-25-2010, 12:14 PM
  #280  
I drive a Subata.
iTrader: (1)
 
JS + XES's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Socal
Age: 39
Posts: 20,301
Received 2,603 Likes on 1,571 Posts


Quick Reply: Audi: A3, S3, RS3 News



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:08 PM.