Acura: TSX News

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 02-04-2005, 05:27 PM
  #241  
Instructor
 
emperuman's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 122
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by srika
the only thing I was saying is, anything is possible. you said there is "no way" a TSX Turbo will happen, I'm saying yes, it could happen. Anything can happen. Nobody ever thought the EVO would come to the USA... was just a ricer's fantasy for many many years.
Once again u read me wrong. I was not saying there is no way a Turbo TSX will happen. I was saying there is no way a Turbo-TSX with SH-AWD will happen, bec. Acura has already said that SH-AWD requires V6 engines.
Old 02-04-2005, 05:29 PM
  #242  
Suzuka Master
 
ClutchPerformer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Age: 43
Posts: 5,449
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by emperuman
....Acura has already said that SH-AWD requires V6 engines.
What was the reasoning for that?
Old 02-04-2005, 05:38 PM
  #243  
Senior Moderator
 
srika's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Chicago
Posts: 58,045
Received 9,953 Likes on 5,135 Posts
Originally Posted by emperuman
Once again u read me wrong. I was not saying there is no way a Turbo TSX will happen. I was saying there is no way a Turbo-TSX with SH-AWD will happen, bec. Acura has already said that SH-AWD requires V6 engines.
When I said "Turbo TSX" I meant TSX SH-AWD Turbo but I didn't wanna type all that out, but I guess I should have because look at what I am having to do here now...
Old 02-04-2005, 05:38 PM
  #244  
Senior Moderator
 
srika's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Chicago
Posts: 58,045
Received 9,953 Likes on 5,135 Posts
Originally Posted by emperuman
...Acura has already said that SH-AWD requires V6 engines.
yeah I'm with you ClutchPerformer..... what the hell does this mean??!?!??!

Old 02-04-2005, 06:03 PM
  #245  
Moderator Alumnus
 
gavriil's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Washington DC (NOVA)
Age: 52
Posts: 16,399
Likes: 0
Received 8 Likes on 8 Posts
Originally Posted by emperuman
There is no way the TSX is gonna get a SH-AWD with I4-Turbo. Acura has already said that SH-AWD needs a V6 configuration. The TSX would probably get the AWD from the CRV.
True. I am changing the subject to AWD. Thanks.
Old 02-04-2005, 06:05 PM
  #246  
Moderator Alumnus
 
gavriil's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Washington DC (NOVA)
Age: 52
Posts: 16,399
Likes: 0
Received 8 Likes on 8 Posts
Originally Posted by emperuman
There is no way the TSX is gonna get a SH-AWD with I4-Turbo. Acura has already said that SH-AWD needs a V6 configuration. The TSX would probably get the AWD from the CRV.

As long as the TSX comes in two configurations... base with 200HP, as it currently is, and then the TypeS/A-Spec version with 240HP/AWD/Turbo, I think Acura has it covered. If u want more HP than that, go buy a TL. Another opinion I would venture is that when the TSX gets an AWD, I would bet so would the TL.

Just my .02
I am pretty sure that we will see IMA and AWD in the TL which will up it to 300HP. Same for the RL. We'll see 330+ on the IMA RL.
Old 02-04-2005, 06:08 PM
  #247  
Safety Car
 
heyitsme's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: philly
Posts: 4,426
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by srika
yeah I'm with you ClutchPerformer..... what the hell does this mean??!?!??!

I'd like to see the article. Have a feeling its a case of a story being told so many times that its now a new story.
Old 02-04-2005, 06:10 PM
  #248  
Moderator Alumnus
 
gavriil's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Washington DC (NOVA)
Age: 52
Posts: 16,399
Likes: 0
Received 8 Likes on 8 Posts
Originally Posted by Zapata
Yes def....finally. Still though....I want Acura to put the 3 series in its place
That wont happen with FWD nor AWD.
Old 02-04-2005, 06:40 PM
  #249  
Certified Lurker
 
Collective27's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: East Hanover NJ
Age: 39
Posts: 1,366
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by srika
isn't it surprising that Honda has never done a turbo from the factory??? I mean, why? Like pretty much every other car company has done something with turbos...

turbos =

They already have a turbo from the factory the honda waverunner the F12-x and R12-X have turbos from the factory....not a car but still from the honda factory
Old 02-04-2005, 06:42 PM
  #250  
Pinky all stinky
 
phile's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 20,663
Received 189 Likes on 117 Posts
Originally Posted by gavriil
That wont happen with FWD nor AWD.
LOL and even RWD won't guarantee it. Just look at certain RWD cars from certain Japanese brands that have tried dethroning the 3-Series.
Old 02-04-2005, 06:48 PM
  #251  
101 years of heartache...
 
gocubsgo55's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Chicago's North Side/Champaign, IL
Age: 36
Posts: 3,076
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Realistically, the IS300 can't compete as it is right now with the 3. Even the G35C 6MT can't touch the beautiful handling of a 330ci.

I have a feeling the new IS will be a huge step towards dethroning the 3.
Old 02-04-2005, 07:05 PM
  #252  
I spend 2 much time here
 
jiggaman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: MA
Age: 44
Posts: 7,115
Received 103 Likes on 67 Posts
Originally Posted by Collective27
They already have a turbo from the factory the honda waverunner the F12-x and R12-X have turbos from the factory....not a car but still from the honda factory

no shit huh, i never really thought about that. goddamn jetskis get hooked up but not their cars. that's not cool.
Old 02-04-2005, 07:58 PM
  #253  
Safety Car
 
heyitsme's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: philly
Posts: 4,426
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by gocubsgo55
Realistically, the IS300 can't compete as it is right now with the 3. Even the G35C 6MT can't touch the beautiful handling of a 330ci.

I have a feeling the new IS will be a huge step towards dethroning the 3.

Think the is300 and g35 both beat the 3-series in the rags once upon a time. I think once the new is300 comes out and when infiniti redoes the g and even when the cts gets redone the 3-series will have its hands full just like the 5-series will in a few months.
Old 02-04-2005, 08:24 PM
  #254  
Cost Drivers!!!!
 
Zapata's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: burbs of philly
Age: 46
Posts: 19,392
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
3 series has done well because the competition has sucked ass. G35 is too heavy and BMW already taking to steps to lighten the load so to speak. IS300.....contender but so for lexus hasn't decided to throw anything more than i6 that can barely inch out honda's i4.

TSX chasis is strong. SHAWD and boost of power will really make the car come alive. Remember large portion is about marketing.....Acura is pushing the performance and percision. SHAWD meets both themes. TSX is selling very very well. I'd say they are taking buyers away from the lower end 3 series....of course the loyal fan base will stay loyal but new buyers.....is a different story.
Old 02-05-2005, 10:14 AM
  #255  
Moderator Alumnus
 
gavriil's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Washington DC (NOVA)
Age: 52
Posts: 16,399
Likes: 0
Received 8 Likes on 8 Posts
Originally Posted by phile
LOL and even RWD won't guarantee it. Just look at certain RWD cars from certain Japanese brands that have tried dethroning the 3-Series.
True. Like Panke told me with 100% confidence. One cannot copy another.
Old 02-05-2005, 10:15 AM
  #256  
Moderator Alumnus
 
gavriil's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Washington DC (NOVA)
Age: 52
Posts: 16,399
Likes: 0
Received 8 Likes on 8 Posts
Originally Posted by gocubsgo55
Realistically, the IS300 can't compete as it is right now with the 3. Even the G35C 6MT can't touch the beautiful handling of a 330ci.

I have a feeling the new IS will be a huge step towards dethroning the 3.
No one came closer than the G35C though.
Old 02-05-2005, 10:17 AM
  #257  
Moderator Alumnus
 
gavriil's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Washington DC (NOVA)
Age: 52
Posts: 16,399
Likes: 0
Received 8 Likes on 8 Posts
Originally Posted by Zapata
3 series has done well because the competition has sucked ass. G35 is too heavy and BMW already taking to steps to lighten the load so to speak. IS300.....contender but so for lexus hasn't decided to throw anything more than i6 that can barely inch out honda's i4.

TSX chasis is strong. SHAWD and boost of power will really make the car come alive. Remember large portion is about marketing.....Acura is pushing the performance and percision. SHAWD meets both themes. TSX is selling very very well. I'd say they are taking buyers away from the lower end 3 series....of course the loyal fan base will stay loyal but new buyers.....is a different story.
Nice post Zap.
Old 02-05-2005, 12:10 PM
  #258  
Liquid Ice
 
LiQiCE's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Northern Virginia, USA
Posts: 2,909
Received 89 Likes on 48 Posts
These are obviously just all rumors and speculation right now ... There's no credible source talking about this stuff. But here's what I've heard ...

Back last summer, a Moderator on ClubRSX went to Japan to visit his family. He claimed his grandfather is a retired executive from Honda and that he was getting a special VIP tour of Honda's HQ. He had pictures from his trip to Japan, including some cool modded cars and some pictures of Honda's historical "museum" at their HQ. What he also said was that he was given the opportunity to test drive a JDM Honda Accord 6 speed with a 2.4L Turbocharged engine and VTM-4 (the AWD system available in the CRX). He said it was a test mule and they were trying to determine how it performed. The claim was for 250hp from the 2.4L Turbo.

From what I understand, the JDM/EU Accord / USDM TSX platform already supports VTM-4 AWD, and Honda has made Turbos in the past just not in the United States. The Euro Accord Diesel Turbo is an example.

Obviously this again is pure speculation, but the rumor of an AWD Turbocharged TSX has been floating around for awhile. Who knows if this time its just a rehash of the old rumor or if it in fact gives the rumor more credibility. I would imagine if we saw anything like that happen, it would be for MY07 (September 2006) when the TSX should be getting a refresh.

Personally, when I'm looking to replace my '03 TL-S in a few years I'd put an AWD Turbo TSX at the top of my list if it were available.

Oh, there's also a rumor of a 2.4L Civic Type R putting out 240hp NA. So its always possible for the refreshed TSX to get a 2.4L 240hp NA engine too. I can only dream of Honda putting the new 2.4L Civic Type R engine *and* Turboing it. Would be way too much to ask I think

Last edited by LiQiCE; 02-05-2005 at 12:13 PM.
Old 02-05-2005, 01:34 PM
  #259  
Cost Drivers!!!!
 
Zapata's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: burbs of philly
Age: 46
Posts: 19,392
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Don't get me wrong. 3 series is a performer without a doubt. BMW hasn't stagnated in the evolution of the car. There is a true commitment to success which is evident by the car's continued success but when Planke says one can not copy another.....i don't buy it. It can easily be done and moreover can be done better. Product evolution is about innovation and invention. 3 series has alot to offer but also has baggage. If lexus would wake up and offer more of a performance oriented engine in the is300 line the consumer would have performance and reliability.
Old 02-05-2005, 01:46 PM
  #260  
Safety Car
 
heyitsme's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: philly
Posts: 4,426
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Zapata
3 series has done well because the competition has sucked ass. G35 is too heavy and BMW already taking to steps to lighten the load so to speak. IS300.....contender but so for lexus hasn't decided to throw anything more than i6 that can barely inch out honda's i4.
I agree up until recently the 3-series was best because there was no other. Now its a fine line and mostly opinion that seperates the best cars. A lot of people still consider the 3 to be best due to the marketing of "ultimate driving machine" be pushed into their heads for so long or because one car might have rwd even though a fwd competitor is right up there and others think another brand is best because they are sick of bmw, etc. But considering in the past no car really topped the bmw3 and today cars have topped its performance, I think its hard to say the bmw3 is 'the best', they are 'one of the best' now.

There also seems to be a quote from motortrend march05 floating around "In the same way the Infiniti G35 targeted and surpassed 3 Series in driving dynamics and value for dollar" - some will agree some won't, but again the 3 can't really be best if its so debatable which car actually is the best performing luxury sedan.

As far as weights, can't say its fair to compare cts/g35/tl weights to the 330 because the 330 is practically the size of a civic where the others are clearly larger cars, like comparing a tsx to a tl, and the new 3 may have components in it to lighten the load but I don't think the car is any lighter.
Old 02-05-2005, 04:19 PM
  #261  
Cost Drivers!!!!
 
Zapata's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: burbs of philly
Age: 46
Posts: 19,392
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
welp put.

Originally Posted by heyitsme
I agree up until recently the 3-series was best because there was no other. Now its a fine line and mostly opinion that seperates the best cars. A lot of people still consider the 3 to be best due to the marketing of "ultimate driving machine" be pushed into their heads for so long or because one car might have rwd even though a fwd competitor is right up there and others think another brand is best because they are sick of bmw, etc. But considering in the past no car really topped the bmw3 and today cars have topped its performance, I think its hard to say the bmw3 is 'the best', they are 'one of the best' now.

There also seems to be a quote from motortrend march05 floating around "In the same way the Infiniti G35 targeted and surpassed 3 Series in driving dynamics and value for dollar" - some will agree some won't, but again the 3 can't really be best if its so debatable which car actually is the best performing luxury sedan.

As far as weights, can't say its fair to compare cts/g35/tl weights to the 330 because the 330 is practically the size of a civic where the others are clearly larger cars, like comparing a tsx to a tl, and the new 3 may have components in it to lighten the load but I don't think the car is any lighter.
Old 02-05-2005, 09:46 PM
  #262  
Moderator Alumnus
 
gavriil's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Washington DC (NOVA)
Age: 52
Posts: 16,399
Likes: 0
Received 8 Likes on 8 Posts
Originally Posted by LiQiCE
What he also said was that he was given the opportunity to test drive a JDM Honda Accord 6 speed with a 2.4L Turbocharged engine and VTM-4 (the AWD system available in the CRX).
You mean in the MDX?
Old 02-05-2005, 09:48 PM
  #263  
Moderator Alumnus
 
gavriil's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Washington DC (NOVA)
Age: 52
Posts: 16,399
Likes: 0
Received 8 Likes on 8 Posts
Originally Posted by LiQiCE
From what I understand, the JDM/EU Accord / USDM TSX platform already supports VTM-4 AWD, and Honda has made Turbos in the past just not in the United States. The Euro Accord Diesel Turbo is an example.
Other than the diesel example, where turbocharging is pretty much necessary these days, I dont remember of any other turbo honda mass produced engine offered for the European market. Do you?
Old 02-05-2005, 09:50 PM
  #264  
Moderator Alumnus
 
gavriil's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Washington DC (NOVA)
Age: 52
Posts: 16,399
Likes: 0
Received 8 Likes on 8 Posts
Originally Posted by LiQiCE
Oh, there's also a rumor of a 2.4L Civic Type R putting out 240hp NA. So its always possible for the refreshed TSX to get a 2.4L 240hp NA engine too. I can only dream of Honda putting the new 2.4L Civic Type R engine *and* Turboing it. Would be way too much to ask I think

For a Civic, 2.4 liters and turbocharged is way too much torque. 2.4 liters NA is probably enough. But I would believe a 1.6 liter turbo engine or a max of 2 liters force-fed. No more.
Old 02-05-2005, 11:24 PM
  #265  
Liquid Ice
 
LiQiCE's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Northern Virginia, USA
Posts: 2,909
Received 89 Likes on 48 Posts
Originally Posted by gavriil
You mean in the MDX?
Errr ... yeah not CRX hahah, I meant the CR-V ... Only off by one letter!

Originally Posted by gavriil
Other than the diesel example, where turbocharging is pretty much necessary these days, I dont remember of any other turbo honda mass produced engine offered for the European market. Do you?
Unfortunately I don't have any specific examples, but the kid over at ClubRSX took pictures of a Japanese Honda van that was turbo charged. This is all pretty much hear-say though unless someone can back me up with some more info... and google didn't give me much in terms of hits except for people who had added a turbo aftermarket.

Originally Posted by gavriil
For a Civic, 2.4 liters and turbocharged is way too much torque. 2.4 liters NA is probably enough. But I would believe a 1.6 liter turbo engine or a max of 2 liters force-fed. No more.
Sorry, should have been clearer, I meant it'd be sweet for the TSX to get the Civic Type R 2.4L 240hp NA engine and have it be turbocharged. I highly doubt this would happen ... but one can dream, can't they?
Old 02-05-2005, 11:33 PM
  #266  
Liquid Ice
 
LiQiCE's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Northern Virginia, USA
Posts: 2,909
Received 89 Likes on 48 Posts
Actually here's one ...

Browsing Honda of Japan's website, they sell a car called the Hobio which includes a turbo and an intercooler on some models.

http://www.honda.co.jp/auto-lineup/h...ata/index.html

Another model, called the "That's TURBO":

http://www.honda.co.jp/auto-lineup/t...ata/index.html

And one called the "Life" :

http://www.honda.co.jp/auto-lineup/l...ata/index.html

Not an overwhelming majority ... but you can see that Honda does make some production line turbo cars.
Old 02-06-2005, 12:37 PM
  #267  
Moderator Alumnus
 
gavriil's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Washington DC (NOVA)
Age: 52
Posts: 16,399
Likes: 0
Received 8 Likes on 8 Posts
Originally Posted by LiQiCE
Actually here's one ...

Browsing Honda of Japan's website, they sell a car called the Hobio which includes a turbo and an intercooler on some models.

http://www.honda.co.jp/auto-lineup/h...ata/index.html

Another model, called the "That's TURBO":

http://www.honda.co.jp/auto-lineup/t...ata/index.html

And one called the "Life" :

http://www.honda.co.jp/auto-lineup/l...ata/index.html

Not an overwhelming majority ... but you can see that Honda does make some production line turbo cars.
Right but how much of that is offered to the European market?
Old 02-06-2005, 01:45 PM
  #268  
Race Director
 
biker's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Alexandria, VA
Posts: 14,305
Received 624 Likes on 503 Posts
None.
Old 02-06-2005, 02:42 PM
  #269  
Liquid Ice
 
LiQiCE's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Northern Virginia, USA
Posts: 2,909
Received 89 Likes on 48 Posts
Originally Posted by gavriil
Right but how much of that is offered to the European market?
Yeah probably none. But why is that significant? I'm not sure I follow you.

I just think its interesting that people have said Honda has never done a production turbo when in fact they have ... They just aren't available in the US (or Europe). I'll skip counting the Diesel Turbo Accord since its not a "regular" engine that runs on regular unleaded.
Old 02-07-2005, 11:25 AM
  #270  
Moderator Alumnus
 
gavriil's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Washington DC (NOVA)
Age: 52
Posts: 16,399
Likes: 0
Received 8 Likes on 8 Posts
Originally Posted by LiQiCE
Yeah probably none. But why is that significant? I'm not sure I follow you.
Because you wrote the following (above):

Originally Posted by LiQiCE
From what I understand, the JDM/EU Accord / USDM TSX platform already supports VTM-4 AWD, and Honda has made Turbos in the past just not in the United States. The Euro Accord Diesel Turbo is an example.

Old 02-07-2005, 03:26 PM
  #271  
Liquid Ice
 
LiQiCE's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Northern Virginia, USA
Posts: 2,909
Received 89 Likes on 48 Posts
Originally Posted by gavriil
Right but how much of that is offered to the European market?
Originally Posted by gavriil
Because you wrote the following (above):

Originally Posted by LiQiCE
From what I understand, the JDM/EU Accord / USDM TSX platform already supports VTM-4 AWD, and Honda has made Turbos in the past just not in the United States. The Euro Accord Diesel Turbo is an example.
Huh? I said that Honda has made turbos in the past, just not in the USA. Japan being somewhere other than the USA, and I used the Euro Diesel Turbo Accord as an example that I could think of off the top of my head.

I found some other examples of turbo Hondas that are sold in Japan. The fact that they aren't sold in Europe doesn't really make a difference in what I said, does it? ... My point was that many people say that Honda doesn't make production cars with turbos when this is in fact false. They do make production cars with turbos, they just sell them in other countries like Japan.

No offense intended in any of this post ... I just didn't understand why you commented that the cars I listed weren't sold in Europe. And what I originally said didn't have anything specifically to do with Europe either other than that Europe has the Diesel Turbo Accord.
Old 02-07-2005, 05:26 PM
  #272  
Moderator Alumnus
 
gavriil's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Washington DC (NOVA)
Age: 52
Posts: 16,399
Likes: 0
Received 8 Likes on 8 Posts
Sorry, obviously a miscommunication here.
Old 02-08-2005, 10:52 AM
  #273  
Moderator Alumnus
 
sauceman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Windsor-Quebec corridor
Age: 47
Posts: 7,709
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 4 Posts
I find that pretty interesting to have a K24A2 turbo engine, although I too have a hard time believing it.

I wonder if they'd keep the same CR and combine with a modified head to accomodate direct injection ( https://acurazine.com/forums/car-talk-5/direct-injection-honda-way-291013/ ) if they could run high boost, like in the 10-13 PSI. I would expect so, and with maybe a very reasonnable fuel consumption...
Old 02-08-2005, 11:03 AM
  #274  
Cost Drivers!!!!
 
Zapata's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: burbs of philly
Age: 46
Posts: 19,392
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
think the boost would be that high? Pretty amazing what the J32 will do such little pressure.
Old 02-08-2005, 11:07 AM
  #275  
Moderator Alumnus
 
sauceman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Windsor-Quebec corridor
Age: 47
Posts: 7,709
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 4 Posts
Originally Posted by Zapata
think the boost would be that high? Pretty amazing what the J32 will do such little pressure.
Not to get to (only) 250hp. It would just require a mere 4-5 PSI with DI and a revised and improved fuel map.

Imagine what 13 PSI would take it to though...


sauceman who is now celebrating 4000 non-whoring posts..
Old 02-08-2005, 11:12 AM
  #276  
Cost Drivers!!!!
 
Zapata's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: burbs of philly
Age: 46
Posts: 19,392
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by sauceman
Not to get to (only) 250hp. It would just require a mere 4-5 PSI with DI and a revised and improved fuel map.

Imagine what 13 PSI would take it to though...


sauceman who is now celebrating 4000 non-whoring posts..


- ah yeas i was gonna say.....13PSI and SHAWD.....omg lol......you'd here a collective from the automotive industry

- congrats!!!! non-whoring is the only way to go
Old 02-08-2005, 11:55 AM
  #277  
Burn some dust here
 
cob3683's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Atlanta
Age: 41
Posts: 5,709
Received 13 Likes on 5 Posts
The TSX would really be an awesome car if they choose to do this. Remains to be seen but I hope they do because then they'll start tinkering with everything else.
Old 02-08-2005, 08:13 PM
  #278  
goldmemberererer
 
goldmemberer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: West Hills, CA
Posts: 1,736
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I was thinking about the E55 AMG today and how I like it and maybe will someday own something similar... perhaps the "E55" of my day. Then I thought... it's too big for me. I'd prefer something smaller that was fast, reliable, luxurious, handled well, and most importantly, had a manual tranny.

That's not too much to ask for. The TSX would be all that and a bag of chips if it were boosted and AWD. It's not the most luxurious thing in the world but it's enough for me for now.
Old 07-28-2005, 12:02 PM
  #279  
Photography Nerd
 
Dan Martin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Toronto
Age: 43
Posts: 21,489
Likes: 0
Received 11 Likes on 7 Posts
Question TSX Turbo to Appear at Tokyo Motor Show This Fall?

Our Japanese member Coupe-Camper was kind enough to scan an article from "Car Top" magazine which claims that a turbo version of the TSX will be shown at the Tokyo Motor show this fall.

Here is the article and magazine cover (in case you read Japanese):






Also on his site are rumors dating back to March 7 2004 of a turbocharged Euro-R but it was probably being used as a test mule for another platform (maybe RDX?):
7 March 2004
<CL-Web>
*not Euro-R Turbo ?
from Japanese New car scoop magazine 'Magazine X'
The picture of Euro-R with turbo air intake was taken in Honda test course. But Honda said that it was the car to test the engine for another car.
There is another rumor about Euro-R that the next model will have 2.2L engine. (now 2.0L engine)
Old 07-28-2005, 12:06 PM
  #280  
Burn some dust here
 
cob3683's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Atlanta
Age: 41
Posts: 5,709
Received 13 Likes on 5 Posts
A turbo TSX would be awesome provided they don't call it an A-Spec package


Quick Reply: Acura: TSX News



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:59 AM.