Acura: RLX News

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 03-12-2014, 10:59 AM
  #4681  
Senior Moderator
 
Ken1997TL's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Better Neighborhood, Arizona
Posts: 45,641
Received 2,329 Likes on 1,309 Posts
Originally Posted by kurtatx
Not long ago everyone was convinced zero to sixty would take 8 seconds.
My wife's CR-Z does that and gets 40+ mpg (and that's before it got supercharged)

Adding two doors and three seats doesn't make it a competitor though.
Old 03-12-2014, 12:25 PM
  #4682  
brahs be jelly
 
MTEAZY's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Posts: 1,836
Received 247 Likes on 169 Posts
Originally Posted by Ken1997TL
My wife's CR-Z does that and gets 40+ mpg (and that's before it got supercharged)

Adding two doors and three seats doesn't make it a competitor though.
Wait what?? Your CRZ is supercharged??? When did this happen?
Old 03-12-2014, 12:39 PM
  #4683  
Some dude
 
MeehowsBRZ's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Chicagoland
Posts: 1,605
Received 347 Likes on 203 Posts
Originally Posted by MuGen7Modulo
According to this site:

2014 Acura RLX Sport Hybrid SH-AWD 0-60 mph 5.1 Quarter Mile 13.6


So this is what RLX can have for "dinner":

2014 BMW 535i xDrive 0-60 mph 5.2 Quarter Mile 13.7
2014 Audi A6 3.0T 0-60 mph 5.5 Quarter Mile 13.7
2014 Mercedes E350 Sedan 0-60 mph 5.9 Quarter Mile 14.3
2013 Lexus GS 350 F-Sport Package 0-60 mph 5.4 Quarter Mile 13.8

And for sure will take on all with the driving dynamics of Honda technology.

All those cars look better and you totally forgot about the M5, S6, and E AMG for the rich person who cares about 0-60 times.
The following users liked this post:
jwong77 (03-12-2014)
Old 03-12-2014, 01:50 PM
  #4684  
VR1
Itz JDM y0!
 
VR1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: Houston, TX
Age: 27
Posts: 2,136
Received 443 Likes on 290 Posts
Originally Posted by oonowindoo
yah like the type of people who buy RLX SHAWD actually care about 0 to 60.

useless performance
I don't even..
Old 03-12-2014, 02:01 PM
  #4685  
Senior Moderator
 
Ken1997TL's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Better Neighborhood, Arizona
Posts: 45,641
Received 2,329 Likes on 1,309 Posts
Originally Posted by MTEAZY
Wait what?? Your CRZ is supercharged??? When did this happen?
Well if you read what I had to say in the Civic thread (when we digressed on the CR-Z) you'd know about that.
Old 03-12-2014, 05:04 PM
  #4686  
brahs be jelly
 
MTEAZY's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Posts: 1,836
Received 247 Likes on 169 Posts
Originally Posted by Ken1997TL
Well if you read what I had to say in the Civic thread (when we digressed on the CR-Z) you'd know about that.
I don't see where we were in disagreement. You claimed to have a highly-regarded source say that the CRZ would use the CTR powertrain. I pointed out I had that idea ages before your so-called source. Then you got defensive and started name-dropping CRZ owners. I even think it is a good idea so I feel the anger is misplaced.

Last edited by MTEAZY; 03-12-2014 at 05:06 PM.
Old 03-12-2014, 06:47 PM
  #4687  
I feel the need...
 
Fibonacci's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Motown
Posts: 14,957
Received 515 Likes on 363 Posts
Originally Posted by EhkoXC
Appreciate the qualification there. I actually agree that they should put that system in every car they can. Market the shit out of it. By all accounts so far, it's a fantastic system, but it will never register with the car buying public if the minimum cost of entry is $60k. While the NSX is the halo car, they need to actually do something with that halo effect. Make an ILX Sport Hybrid, make a TLX version, hell make an MDX and RDX version too! Go nuts!
This is where I disagree with you. No need to add a lot of extra weight, complexity and expense of hybrid-AWD. Acura already has an awesome torque vectoring power-on oversteer all-wheel drive system called SH-AWD. Acura should instead have used economies of scale to bring down the weight, complexity and cost of SH-AWD and made it available as an option to EVERY car/cuv in their line up.

IL
ILX SH-AWD

TL
TLX SH-AWD

RL
RLX SH-AWD

RD
RDX SH-AWD

MD
MDX SH-AWD

Damn, all of a sudden Acura's Advanced Acronyms start to stand for something and define the lineup. Even better, add a Type S to every SH-AWD version with more buttoned down suspension/brake upgrades (if they don't want to bother with power tweaks). At the very least, Acura should do that. Shit, Acura could hire me at half the price of the retarded executives they have and I'd have the brand turned around in less than 5 years.
Old 03-12-2014, 06:52 PM
  #4688  
dom
Senior Moderator
 
dom's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Toronto, Canada
Age: 47
Posts: 47,710
Received 801 Likes on 662 Posts
^ SH-AWD in the new TLX is 25% lighter.....
Old 03-12-2014, 07:01 PM
  #4689  
Senior Moderator
 
fsttyms1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Appleton WI
Age: 49
Posts: 81,383
Received 3,063 Likes on 2,119 Posts
Originally Posted by Fibonacci
This is where I disagree with you. No need to add a lot of extra weight, complexity and expense of hybrid-AWD. Acura already has an awesome torque vectoring power-on oversteer all-wheel drive system called SH-AWD. Acura should instead have used economies of scale to bring down the weight, complexity and cost of SH-AWD and made it available as an option to EVERY car/cuv in their line up.

IL
ILX SH-AWD

TL
TLX SH-AWD

RL
RLX SH-AWD

RD
RDX SH-AWD

MD
MDX SH-AWD

Damn, all of a sudden Acura's Advanced Acronyms start to stand for something and define the lineup. Even better, add a Type S to every SH-AWD version with more buttoned down suspension/brake upgrades (if they don't want to bother with power tweaks). At the very least, Acura should do that. Shit, Acura could hire me at half the price of the retarded executives they have and I'd have the brand turned around in less than 5 years.
As long as you do something about the current styling (blandness/beak) at the same time.
Old 03-12-2014, 07:06 PM
  #4690  
I feel the need...
 
Fibonacci's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Motown
Posts: 14,957
Received 515 Likes on 363 Posts
Originally Posted by dom
^ SH-AWD in the new TLX is 25% lighter.....
But it wasn't "good" enough for the RLX?

So, listen up guys, lets huddle up here and reinvent the wheel for a car which will sell in volumes of less than 2000 annually and add a ton of weight, complexity and cost.

Spend your money where people with gobs of disposable income care. Power + Style - Plenum = Sales. This is easy math Acura.
Old 03-12-2014, 07:11 PM
  #4691  
dom
Senior Moderator
 
dom's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Toronto, Canada
Age: 47
Posts: 47,710
Received 801 Likes on 662 Posts
You didn't hear? Luxury car buyers only care about MPG's now. And are big on acronyms. And want an X at the end of their Luxury car name. Resonates with their kids I guess. And apparently love fugly.
Old 03-12-2014, 07:15 PM
  #4692  
Senior Moderator
 
fsttyms1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Appleton WI
Age: 49
Posts: 81,383
Received 3,063 Likes on 2,119 Posts
Originally Posted by dom
You didn't hear? Luxury car buyers only care about MPG's now. And are big on acronyms. And want an X at the end of their Luxury car name. Resonates with their kids I guess. And apparently love fugly.
I guess ive been indoors with the blinds closed, with no contact with the outside world too long cause i never heard that
Old 03-12-2014, 07:29 PM
  #4693  
I feel the need...
 
Fibonacci's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Motown
Posts: 14,957
Received 515 Likes on 363 Posts
Originally Posted by dom
And apparently love fugly discounts
fixed
Old 03-12-2014, 08:14 PM
  #4694  
6G TLX-S
 
Edward'TLS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: YVR
Posts: 10,196
Received 1,155 Likes on 826 Posts
Originally Posted by Fibonacci

.....

IL
ILX SH-AWD

TL
TLX SH-AWD

RL
RLX SH-AWD

RD
RDX SH-AWD

MD
MDX SH-AWD

Damn, all of a sudden Acura's Advanced Acronyms start to stand for something and define the lineup. Even better, add a Type S to every SH-AWD version with more buttoned down suspension/brake upgrades (if they don't want to bother with power tweaks). At the very least, Acura should do that. Shit, Acura could hire me at half the price of the retarded executives they have and I'd have the brand turned around in less than 5 years.
Not gonna happen, because Acura has cut corners, and given the RDX a low-tech (= non ADVANCE) conventional AWD system.

Let's wait and see which model is next on the downgrading list.
Old 03-12-2014, 09:40 PM
  #4695  
Senior Moderator
 
fsttyms1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Appleton WI
Age: 49
Posts: 81,383
Received 3,063 Likes on 2,119 Posts
Originally Posted by Edward'TLS
Not gonna happen, because Acura has cut corners, and given the RDX a low-tech (= non ADVANCE) conventional AWD system.

Let's wait and see which model is next on the downgrading list.
Probably the TLX
Old 03-12-2014, 09:47 PM
  #4696  
Team Owner
iTrader: (1)
 
CGTSX2004's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Beach Cities, CA
Posts: 24,299
Received 378 Likes on 198 Posts
Originally Posted by Fibonacci
But it wasn't "good" enough for the RLX?

So, listen up guys, lets huddle up here and reinvent the wheel for a car which will sell in volumes of less than 2000 annually and add a ton of weight, complexity and cost.

Spend your money where people with gobs of disposable income care. Power + Style - Plenum = Sales. This is easy math Acura.
Actually, you're thinking about this the wrong way. if anything, adding it to the RLX was a way to justify the development cost of the system for the NSX, since this same system will effectively be applied to the NSX when it is released.
Old 03-13-2014, 01:49 AM
  #4697  
6G TLX-S
 
Edward'TLS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: YVR
Posts: 10,196
Received 1,155 Likes on 826 Posts
^^^^^

It doesn't make sense.

A few hundred units of RLX sales per month is almost negligible in trying to justify the
development cost of the new system, only the hot selling MDX and the volume-selling-sedan TL/TLX will add at least 10 of thousands of units per month to effectively spread out the development cost.
Old 03-13-2014, 08:08 AM
  #4698  
Senior Moderator
 
fsttyms1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Appleton WI
Age: 49
Posts: 81,383
Received 3,063 Likes on 2,119 Posts
Originally Posted by Edward'TLS
^^^^^

It doesn't make sense.

A few hundred units of RLX sales per month is almost negligible in trying to justify the
development cost of the new system, only the hot selling MDX and the volume-selling-sedan TL/TLX will add at least 10 of thousands of units per month to effectively spread out the development cost.
Old 03-13-2014, 09:30 AM
  #4699  
Team Owner
iTrader: (1)
 
CGTSX2004's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Beach Cities, CA
Posts: 24,299
Received 378 Likes on 198 Posts
Originally Posted by Edward'TLS
^^^^^

It doesn't make sense.

A few hundred units of RLX sales per month is almost negligible in trying to justify the
development cost of the new system, only the hot selling MDX and the volume-selling-sedan TL/TLX will add at least 10 of thousands of units per month to effectively spread out the development cost.
Well, considering they developed the system for a halo car that will likely sell more in the tens of units per month range, a few hundred units per month seems like it would appreciably spread that development cost out some already.

I don't disagree with you that it would make more sense to spread that cost out further, but given the challenges already with acquiring the requisite batteries for the existing production needs, I cannot see them expanding the offering further until they have resolved the battery supply issue as well as the challenge of the amount of trunk space that is consumed.
Old 03-13-2014, 12:25 PM
  #4700  
You'll Never Walk Alone
iTrader: (1)
 
iforyou's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Vancouver, BC, Canada
Age: 37
Posts: 9,521
Received 846 Likes on 526 Posts
eSH-AWD is an awesome innovation. Sure it adds a bit of weight, but it's a system that improve traction, power, torque, fuel economy, and handling significantly and simultaneously. It's a shame that so far it's only available on the RLX and NSX. It's also a shame that this system, like the original SH-AWD system, is not being promoted properly.
Old 03-13-2014, 12:50 PM
  #4701  
I feel the need...
 
Fibonacci's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Motown
Posts: 14,957
Received 515 Likes on 363 Posts
Originally Posted by Edward'TLS
Not gonna happen, because Acura has cut corners, and given the RDX a low-tech (= non ADVANCE) conventional AWD system.
Totally had forgotten they had already dummified the RDX AWD system.
Old 03-14-2014, 09:04 AM
  #4702  
Pro
 
EhkoXC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Age: 38
Posts: 584
Received 65 Likes on 39 Posts
Originally Posted by Fibonacci
This is where I disagree with you. No need to add a lot of extra weight, complexity and expense of hybrid-AWD. Acura already has an awesome torque vectoring power-on oversteer all-wheel drive system called SH-AWD. Acura should instead have used economies of scale to bring down the weight, complexity and cost of SH-AWD and made it available as an option to EVERY car/cuv in their line up.

IL
ILX SH-AWD

TL
TLX SH-AWD

RL
RLX SH-AWD

RD
RDX SH-AWD

MD
MDX SH-AWD

Damn, all of a sudden Acura's Advanced Acronyms start to stand for something and define the lineup. Even better, add a Type S to every SH-AWD version with more buttoned down suspension/brake upgrades (if they don't want to bother with power tweaks). At the very least, Acura should do that. Shit, Acura could hire me at half the price of the retarded executives they have and I'd have the brand turned around in less than 5 years.
I'm on board with that too honestly, or even having both systems available. I was simply thinking of trying to recoup some of the cost of development for the new system. They just need to have something that's unique to them and leverage it for all it's worth. And while PAWS is a neat tech, it's not something to hang your hat on as a company.
Old 03-17-2014, 06:58 PM
  #4703  
YEH
Burning Brakes
 
YEH's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 972
Received 115 Likes on 88 Posts
Originally Posted by Edward'TLS
Not gonna happen, because Acura has cut corners, and given the RDX a low-tech (= non ADVANCE) conventional AWD system.

Let's wait and see which model is next on the downgrading list.
That's b/c RDX buyers (soccer-moms) don't care about performance/handling.

Same reason why Acura started to offer the MDX in FWD.
Old 03-18-2014, 02:10 AM
  #4704  
6G TLX-S
 
Edward'TLS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: YVR
Posts: 10,196
Received 1,155 Likes on 826 Posts
^^^^^

Shit, does it mean the future MDX will be using that shitty conventional AWD too ?

I guess that ILX buyers too don't care about performance/handling, because Acura doesn't even give it any AWD/sport-calibration-suspension option.
Old 03-18-2014, 03:59 PM
  #4705  
Pro
 
EhkoXC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Age: 38
Posts: 584
Received 65 Likes on 39 Posts
Originally Posted by YEH
That's b/c RDX buyers (soccer-moms) don't care about performance/handling.

Same reason why Acura started to offer the MDX in FWD.
No. They started to offer the MDX in FWD because they can sell it for a lower base price in places where AWD doesn't matter, and by extension move more units.

Still don't get the RDX decision though.
Old 03-18-2014, 06:09 PM
  #4706  
You'll Never Walk Alone
iTrader: (1)
 
iforyou's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Vancouver, BC, Canada
Age: 37
Posts: 9,521
Received 846 Likes on 526 Posts
RDX decision is simply an reaction to the poor sales of the 1g RDX. They built a turbocharged, fun to drive CUV. But its sales never took off due to relatively poor fuel consumption and stiff ride.

As such, Acura decided to make the 2G RDX a softer, more vanilla CUV. Long and behold, it's selling like hot cakes these days.

How about the enthusiasts? Well, we can only hope that there will be a Type S version with SH-AWD in the future. But I doubt it.
Old 03-18-2014, 06:13 PM
  #4707  
I drive a Subata.
iTrader: (1)
 
JS + XES's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Socal
Age: 39
Posts: 20,301
Received 2,603 Likes on 1,571 Posts
Its sales never took off due to it's fuglyness.
Old 03-18-2014, 06:40 PM
  #4708  
Senior Moderator
 
Ken1997TL's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Better Neighborhood, Arizona
Posts: 45,641
Received 2,329 Likes on 1,309 Posts
Originally Posted by JS + BRZ
Its sales never took off due to it's fuglyness.
Naww, It was mostly empty nesters buying the 1st gen RDX. They loved the exterior appearance. They hated the ride, poor fuel economy, turbo torque rush and cheaper dash plastics.

Voila, Acura fixed those things and now they're everywhere..
Old 03-18-2014, 07:30 PM
  #4709  
YEH
Burning Brakes
 
YEH's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 972
Received 115 Likes on 88 Posts
Originally Posted by EhkoXC
No. They started to offer the MDX in FWD because they can sell it for a lower base price in places where AWD doesn't matter, and by extension move more units.

Still don't get the RDX decision though.

Yes, but if SH-AWD is about adding performance/handling...

and buyers in warmer climates decide that they don't want/need it (Audi doesn't offer the A7 and A8, much less the Q7 and Q5, in FWD even in the warmer climates for a reason - tho, think they can get away w/ a FWD Q5).

Basically means these buyers want an RX competitor.

Last edited by YEH; 03-18-2014 at 07:34 PM.
Old 03-18-2014, 09:29 PM
  #4710  
MSZ
Lola
 
MSZ's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Toronto
Age: 42
Posts: 3,985
Received 257 Likes on 150 Posts
Originally Posted by YEH
(Audi doesn't offer the A7 and A8, much less the Q7 and Q5, in FWD even in the warmer climates for a reason - tho, think they can get away w/ a FWD Q5).
They DO offer A7 and A8 in FWD in European/Asian markets.
Old 03-18-2014, 10:03 PM
  #4711  
YEH
Burning Brakes
 
YEH's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 972
Received 115 Likes on 88 Posts
Originally Posted by MSZ
They DO offer A7 and A8 in FWD in European/Asian markets.
But they don't for the US market b/c they know a FWD A7 and A8 wouldn't connote luxury/performance.

Europe (and to a certain extent Asia) is a much different market - one where no one bats an eye at the eponymous E Class taxi cab.
Old 08-14-2014, 04:04 PM
  #4712  
Senior Moderator
 
Yumcha's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Posts: 167,639
Received 22,940 Likes on 14,056 Posts
Post Hybrid Delayed

From here: http://www.leftlanenews.com/acura-rl...#ixzz3AP1YnL64

Acura says that a technical issue has forced it to delay the market launch of the RLX Sport Hybrid luxury sedan.

Though originally slated to arrive in dealerships this past spring, the RLX Sport Hybrid still isn't available for purchase. Mike Accavitti, senior vice president and general manager of Acura in the U.S., indicated that the sedan should go on sale within the next few months, but declined to specify the nature of the problem.

"I can tell you that it just hasn't met with our expectations yet," Accavitti told WardsAuto.

Positioned as the upscale version of the RLX full-size sedan, the Sport Hybrid packs a relatively complex "Super-Handling All-Wheel-Drive" powertrain comprised of a 3.5-liter V6 and an electric motor at the front of the car, and another pair of electric motors situated in back that drive the rear wheels and provide torque vectoring. The setup, which will be used in mid-engine, twin-turbocharged form for the upcoming NSX sports car, produces 377 horsepower in the RLX.

Speculative reports have cited teething problems with the Super-Handling All-Wheel-Drive system and lithium-ion battery shortages as potential causes of the setback.

While not expected to be a volume seller, Acura is hoping that the RLX Sport Hybrid will act as a halo vehicle and technology leader for the brand.

The RLX Sport Hybrid isn't the only recent Acura product to suffer a setback. The TLX sedan, which debuted a pair of advanced transmissions and other new technologies, saw its launch pushed back from spring until this summer so that Acura could ensure all elements of the car were ready for production.

Old 08-14-2014, 05:10 PM
  #4713  
AZ Community Team
 
Legend2TL's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Maryland
Posts: 18,164
Received 4,273 Likes on 2,640 Posts
My guess is the electric motor(s) is causing the delay.
Old 08-14-2014, 06:54 PM
  #4714  
Team Owner
 
oonowindoo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 23,362
Received 4,273 Likes on 3,050 Posts
you know what tho..


Who cares.... it is not like it will get noticed or provide any real impact on Acura brand or automotive industry.

They need to focus on something more realistic... fix the god damn ILX now.
The following 2 users liked this post by oonowindoo:
Nabooly (08-17-2014), RPhilMan1 (08-15-2014)
Old 08-14-2014, 08:54 PM
  #4715  
Three Wheelin'
 
Curious3GTL's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: North Carolina
Posts: 1,754
Received 596 Likes on 378 Posts
Originally Posted by oonowindoo
you know what tho..


Who cares.... it is not like it will get noticed or provide any real impact on Acura brand or automotive industry.

They need to focus on something more realistic... fix the god damn ILX now.
I couldn't agree more with that. Put the 2.4 with the DCT in replacement of the slow 2.0 and that alone will fix 90% of the car's problems. For less than $2,000 you can upgrade your ILX (with premium package) to the TLX. You'd be crazy not to do that. If you want the tech package the TLX has a lot of features that aren't even on the ILX.

On the flip side of that why would you upgrade from a TLX to an RLX? The advanced FWD TLX comes in at $43,000. Can you really argue that the RLX advanced is worth an extra $18,000? That's a big price difference, and for what? A better audio system, and a bigger car. Sadly, that to me isn't worth it.
Old 08-15-2014, 01:03 AM
  #4716  
6G TLX-S
 
Edward'TLS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: YVR
Posts: 10,196
Received 1,155 Likes on 826 Posts
Why on earth does Honda have to make the hybrid-motored RLX/NSX so complicated electronically and mechanically ?

Will a simple RWD one not cut it ?
Old 08-15-2014, 01:10 AM
  #4717  
Team Owner
 
oonowindoo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 23,362
Received 4,273 Likes on 3,050 Posts
Originally Posted by Edward'TLS
Why on earth does Honda have to make the hybrid-motored RLX/NSX so complicated electronically and mechanically ?

Will a simple RWD one not cut it ?
"Advance"





that no one cares.....
Old 08-15-2014, 11:25 AM
  #4718  
You'll Never Walk Alone
iTrader: (1)
 
iforyou's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Vancouver, BC, Canada
Age: 37
Posts: 9,521
Received 846 Likes on 526 Posts
Originally Posted by oonowindoo
you know what tho..


Who cares.... it is not like it will get noticed or provide any real impact on Acura brand or automotive industry.

They need to focus on something more realistic... fix the god damn ILX now.
Originally Posted by Curious3GTL
I couldn't agree more with that. Put the 2.4 with the DCT in replacement of the slow 2.0 and that alone will fix 90% of the car's problems. For less than $2,000 you can upgrade your ILX (with premium package) to the TLX. You'd be crazy not to do that. If you want the tech package the TLX has a lot of features that aren't even on the ILX.

On the flip side of that why would you upgrade from a TLX to an RLX? The advanced FWD TLX comes in at $43,000. Can you really argue that the RLX advanced is worth an extra $18,000? That's a big price difference, and for what? A better audio system, and a bigger car. Sadly, that to me isn't worth it.
Yes....ILX is more important and it's relatively easier to fix too. I'd say the 2.4 should be paired with the 8-DCT just like the TLX. I guess the 2.0 can be paired with the CVT as the base model as long as Acura can get another 20hp out of it.

Originally Posted by Edward'TLS
Why on earth does Honda have to make the hybrid-motored RLX/NSX so complicated electronically and mechanically ?

Will a simple RWD one not cut it ?
I bet you that even if they use RWD, they would still fit a detuned version of NSX's system in there just to piss people off...lol
Old 08-15-2014, 12:02 PM
  #4719  
Team Owner
 
oonowindoo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 23,362
Received 4,273 Likes on 3,050 Posts
Originally Posted by iforyou
Yes....ILX is more important and it's relatively easier to fix too. I'd say the 2.4 should be paired with the 8-DCT just like the TLX. I guess the 2.0 can be paired with the CVT as the base model as long as Acura can get another 20hp out of it.



I bet you that even if they use RWD, they would still fit a detuned version of NSX's system in there just to piss people off...lol
that 2.0L civic engine has no business being in Acura's line up.

Maybe 20 years ago in the Integra, not in 2014

2.4L should be the base engine.

2.4 Base
2.4 Tech
2.4 Type S (they need to come up with something new for this, whether turbo or some battery)
Old 08-15-2014, 12:15 PM
  #4720  
99 TL, 06 E350
 
Black Tire's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Toronto
Age: 44
Posts: 5,030
Received 164 Likes on 110 Posts
LOL..I have been bitching about that ugly and under powered ILX for sometime now.
Whatever team at Acura designed that thing should have been hung!

Originally Posted by oonowindoo
you know what tho..
Who cares.... it is not like it will get noticed or provide any real impact on Acura brand or automotive industry.
They need to focus on something more realistic... fix the god damn ILX now.


Quick Reply: Acura: RLX News



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:05 PM.