2004 TL review in Autoweek

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 08-26-2003, 12:01 AM
  #81  
Pro
 
need4spd_RENAMED's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Hmmmm?
Posts: 619
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally posted by EmuMessenger
My old 96 MAxima SE-5MT was rated at 6.6 and it feels much faster than my TLS-Navi.
Old 08-26-2003, 12:06 AM
  #82  
Pro
 
need4spd_RENAMED's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Hmmmm?
Posts: 619
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally posted by 2004TL
Hey the person who saved the webpage and posted, I hope you save the images, as they are linking to the site, and they will be gone soon too
Yep, I did save them, just have no way to post them to the internet to link them to the article.

If anyone posts them to the net, I would be hape to change the links, just let me know.

Thanks!
Old 08-26-2003, 12:34 AM
  #83  
Intermediate
 
ViperLuke's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: San Diego
Age: 64
Posts: 38
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally posted by Gebbeth
Accord: 3265lbs/240hp = 13.6 weight to hp ratio
3265lbs/212lbs/ft = 15.4 weight to torque ratio

'04TL: 3575lbs/270hp = 13.2 weight to hp ratio
3575lbs/238lbs/ft = 15.0 weight to torque ratio

TSX: 3241lbs/200hp = 16.2 weight to hp ratio
3241lbs/166ft/lbs = 19.5 weight to torque ratio

'03TL: 3538lbs/260hp = 13.6 weight to hp ratio
3538lbs/232ft/lbs = 15.2 weight to hp ratio

At 270HP the 04TL has a slightly better hp/weight ratio than all of the above. You have to factor in the 6-speed manual. A well driven factory manual is almost always faster then a factory automatic. Usually by about a 1/2 sec. in the quarter.
Old 08-26-2003, 12:46 AM
  #84  
Advanced
 
Gebbeth's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Posts: 86
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I have the '04TL numbers above. There is only a very slight improvement in weight to hp ratio.
Old 08-26-2003, 01:04 AM
  #85  
Race Director
 
Raheel's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Sacramento, CA
Posts: 11,001
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally posted by ViperLuke
At 270HP the 04TL has a slightly better hp/weight ratio than all of the above. You have to factor in the 6-speed manual. A well driven factory manual is almost always faster then a factory automatic. Usually by about a 1/2 sec. in the quarter.
Dont forget about the LSD, Tighter Suspension so you can take corners faster, and many diff technologies that will make the car faster than the current TL-S
Old 08-26-2003, 06:42 AM
  #86  
Suzuka Master
 
EmuMessenger's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: TN
Age: 54
Posts: 6,546
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally posted by need4spd
:-*
Old 08-26-2003, 07:00 AM
  #87  
Advanced
 
Gebbeth's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Posts: 86
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
ViperLuke:

The '03 TL did not come in a manual. So you need to compare apples to apples. Since the auto is the only benchmark to compare the old TL to the new TL, you need to begin there. In fact, the old TL, new TL and auto Accord need to be compared to give you the relative differences in performance. I guess you could compare the Accord 6 speed coupe with the new TL, but that's not exactly an apples to apples comparison either.

From the weight to hp numbers, I don't expect to see much, if any improvement in acceleration and speed numbers in the new TL. I do expect a stiffer suspension and possibly better handling (probably similar feel to the TSX). But again, I'm really afraid that the balance will be thrown off by the bigger engine up front (could it be something like 65/35 instead of the 60/40 ratio on the TSX). Understeer may be a problem unless the Honda/Acura engineers have really beefed up and strengthened the front suspension components. I'd rather they compromise ride comfort for a more performance oriented suspention.
Old 08-26-2003, 08:45 AM
  #88  
6th Gear
 
hugomarvin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Posts: 6
Likes: 0
Received 7 Likes on 1 Post
2004 Tl review

The autoweek website no longer has the stated review.
Does anyone have an alternate location where i can view the review and accompanying pictures?
Old 08-26-2003, 08:49 AM
  #89  
Advanced
 
BradW's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Greensboro, NC
Posts: 65
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Re: 2004 Tl review

Originally posted by hugomarvin
The autoweek website no longer has the stated review.
Does anyone have an alternate location where i can view the review and accompanying pictures?

Page 5
Old 08-26-2003, 08:50 AM
  #90  
Pro
 
need4spd_RENAMED's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Hmmmm?
Posts: 619
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Re: 2004 Tl review

Originally posted by hugomarvin
The autoweek website no longer has the stated review.
Does anyone have an alternate location where i can view the review and accompanying pictures?
Look at page 5 of this thread, the article is posted there.
Old 08-26-2003, 08:58 AM
  #91  
6th Gear
 
hugomarvin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Posts: 6
Likes: 0
Received 7 Likes on 1 Post
Re: Re: 2004 Tl review

Originally posted by need4spd
Look at page 5 of this thread, the article is posted there.
Thanks 1

Much appreciated.
Old 08-27-2003, 02:20 AM
  #92  
Intermediate
 
ViperLuke's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: San Diego
Age: 64
Posts: 38
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally posted by Gebbeth
ViperLuke:

The '03 TL did not come in a manual. So you need to compare apples to apples. Since the auto is the only benchmark to compare the old TL to the new TL, you need to begin there.
For me. The manual is my only option. It's quite possible the 03TL will equal the 04TL automatic in performance. But I doubt that will be the case with the manual 04 TL. I think you should compare both. Car mags do it all the time.
Old 08-27-2003, 05:12 PM
  #93  
Advanced
 
bdt980's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Kansas City MO (Killa City in Misery)
Age: 40
Posts: 83
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally posted by princed
Interesting...

Good review, but the TL is heaver than I expected, the stereo is less powerful than the TSX's, and I thought that extra front center speaker would push the TL's speaker count to 9.

Anyway, thank goodness we get the LSD and the covered cupholders. I'm surprised the review made no mention of the Brembos...

Oh, the interior pic and the pic of the red sedan -- beautiful!

EDIT: BTW - everyone may want to save this article to disk for now -- it may not be here very long...


Yep---The article is gone!!!!
Old 08-27-2003, 08:22 PM
  #94  
Advanced
 
fdefulvio's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Posts: 55
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Consumerguide.com has a TL Sneak Peek.

http://auto.consumerguide.com/auto/e...t=sneakpeek#tl
2004 Acura TL
Acura's best-selling car is redesigned for 2004 with new styling, more power, and more standard safety features. The TL is based on the platform of the Accord sedan from parent-company Honda, but is larger, more luxurious, and more expensive. The '04 TL has virtually the same wheelbase as its 1999-2003 predecessor, but is 6.3 inches shorter in overall length. Interior dimensions change little. The sole engine is again a 3.2-liter V6, but it has 270 hp vs. 225 or 260 on previous TLs. The sport-oriented Type S model is dropped, succeeded by a 6-speed manual transmission version with a firmer suspension, Brembo-brand front brakes, and a limited-slip differential. Other TLs have a 5-speed automatic transmission with a manual shift gate. ABS and 17-inch wheels are standard; manual-transmission versions are available with high-performance tires vs. the standard all-season treads. The antiskid system previously reserved for the Type S is now included on all TLs. Front side airbags are standard and are joined for '04 by head-protecting curtain side airbags. Leather upholstery with heated front seats, aluminum interior trim, and a sunroof are standard. So is satellite radio and new CD/cassette audio system with an in-dash changer that plays CDs and DVD audio discs (but not DVD videos or MP3 discs). Other new features include Acura's HandsFreeLink, which can employ the audio system as a hands-free, wireless link to any cell phone in the vehicle. A navigation system with voice command is optional. Onstar assistance is no longer available. Also gone is the Acura CL, which was essentially a coupe version of the TL. Prices were unavailable in time for this report, but Acura says the '04 TL will range between $30,000-$34,000, depending on model.
Old 08-27-2003, 08:27 PM
  #95  
Race Director
 
Raheel's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Sacramento, CA
Posts: 11,001
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts


Ok They Pointed out the 6 MT has a firmer suspension and brembo brakes in front and LSD..

Why does the AUTO not have LSD?

They also pointed out that there will be no more Onstar, Whats the reason for that?
Old 08-27-2003, 08:31 PM
  #96  
Instructor
 
Peter7777's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 163
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
No OnStar on the '04 TL? No steering wheel radio controls on the '04 ES330? Those were my two litmus test options.
Old 08-27-2003, 11:34 PM
  #97  
Race Director
 
Raheel's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Sacramento, CA
Posts: 11,001
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Voila Anthracite

Old 08-27-2003, 11:43 PM
  #98  
Race Director
 
Raheel's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Sacramento, CA
Posts: 11,001
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
BIGGER:

Old 08-28-2003, 11:46 AM
  #99  
Pro
 
need4spd_RENAMED's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Hmmmm?
Posts: 619
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Autoweek Sept 1 print Issue has 04 TL

This is a repost of :

http://www.acura-tsx.com/forums/show...&threadid=2020

In the print version of the September 1st dated issue of Autoweek, it has the 04TL article in by Billy McGuire that was posted on their web site earlier this week.

It has different photos which I will post shortly, but the TEXT is identicle to this thread, page 5:

http://www.acura-tsx.com/forums/sho...15&pagenumber=5


I did start a new thread for this.
Old 08-29-2003, 06:12 PM
  #100  
Racer
 
acura_driver's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: SF Bay Area
Posts: 498
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally posted by bdt980
Yep---The article is gone!!!!
It is back now. I suppose that is because the print version is now out.

2004 Acura TL Sharper Image: Acura’s BMW chaser gets sportier and plusher

-r
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
joflewbyu2
5G TLX (2015-2020)
105
08-18-2019 10:38 PM
ITSJESTER
4G TL Audio, Bluetooth, Electronics & Navigation
17
12-06-2018 02:29 AM
GWEEDOspeedo
Car Parts for Sale
4
01-15-2016 10:39 PM
saturno_v
5G TLX (2015-2020)
21
09-27-2015 08:13 AM
TLguy42
4G TL Audio, Bluetooth, Electronics & Navigation
0
09-26-2015 11:27 AM



Quick Reply: 2004 TL review in Autoweek



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:09 PM.