100% sure this is 2.4 6MT ILX
#3
You're correct that's the 2.4L but it also has the optional Acura aero package in that photo. I'm not very impressed with the aero package to be honest, the side skirts look like they're just held on by doublesided tape and you can clearly see the skirts don't have ends in that pic. It definitely looks like an after thought.
#4
You're correct that's the 2.4L but it also has the optional Acura aero package in that photo. I'm not very impressed with the aero package to be honest, the side skirts look like they're just held on by doublesided tape and you can clearly see the skirts don't have ends in that pic. It definitely looks like an after thought.
#5
This car looks really nice in some pics and then in others, like the one above, it looks like Chevy beat it with the Pontiac Design Stick.
#7
Summer is Coming
I think the car looks pretty good. I don't think looks is what will hold this car back, I think it will be the drivetrain. The 2.0L is probably not going to be very exciting even for an entry level Acura. If they offered the 2.4L in an auto I bet they would sell a lot of them. The truth is they will produce very few 2.4L manuals. So this car will mostly be known for its lame 2.0L and the 1.5L hybrid that doesn't get hybrid FE and can't match some non-hybrid cars.
Trending Topics
#8
I think the car looks pretty good. I don't think looks is what will hold this car back, I think it will be the drivetrain. The 2.0L is probably not going to be very exciting even for an entry level Acura. If they offered the 2.4L in an auto I bet they would sell a lot of them. The truth is they will produce very few 2.4L manuals. So this car will mostly be known for its lame 2.0L and the 1.5L hybrid that doesn't get hybrid FE and can't match some non-hybrid cars.
The question is whether the 2.0 plus 5AT will have enough 'poke' for the general public. Looking back, the 2.0 plus 5AT combination sold ~20-30K (depending on year) for the RSX, and that was somewhat limited because it was only a coupe. That engine only had 155 hp (in today's rating) and it weighed ~2700-2800. I think if this car can do 0-60 in 8-8.5 seconds, get high 20's in the city on regular, and cost no more than $25K for the Premium Package, it should be able to sell it's production goals.
#9
Summer is Coming
Honestly, I'm disappointed with the powertrain choices, mostly because I don't see one that suits me (manual driver). However, we need to separate what enthusiasts here want, with what the buying public wants. Basically, they want automatics.
The question is whether the 2.0 plus 5AT will have enough 'poke' for the general public. Looking back, the 2.0 plus 5AT combination sold ~20-30K (depending on year) for the RSX, and that was somewhat limited because it was only a coupe. That engine only had 155 hp (in today's rating) and it weighed ~2700-2800. I think if this car can do 0-60 in 8-8.5 seconds, get high 20's in the city on regular, and cost no more than $25K for the Premium Package, it should be able to sell it's production goals.
The question is whether the 2.0 plus 5AT will have enough 'poke' for the general public. Looking back, the 2.0 plus 5AT combination sold ~20-30K (depending on year) for the RSX, and that was somewhat limited because it was only a coupe. That engine only had 155 hp (in today's rating) and it weighed ~2700-2800. I think if this car can do 0-60 in 8-8.5 seconds, get high 20's in the city on regular, and cost no more than $25K for the Premium Package, it should be able to sell it's production goals.
I just saw that the 2012 Civic Hybrid, which is the same powertrain as the ILX hybrid, goes 0-60 in 10.8 sec and the braking sucks. And expect the ILX to weigh more than the Civic. It already is expected to get less mileage than the Civic. And once again car makers take the easy way out and put the batteries behind the rear seat. So you lose trunk space and can't fold the rear seat down. You would think after years of designing hybrids they would design in space for the batteries that allow more functionality in the car. I expect the ILX will be the same way. So if you pick the ILX hybrid you give up a lot on performance, added costs, less trunk space and functionality, for minimal FE gains.
Last edited by Rocket_man; 03-18-2012 at 04:55 PM.
#10
David_Dude
Honestly, I'm disappointed with the powertrain choices, mostly because I don't see one that suits me (manual driver). However, we need to separate what enthusiasts here want, with what the buying public wants. Basically, they want automatics.
The question is whether the 2.0 plus 5AT will have enough 'poke' for the general public. Looking back, the 2.0 plus 5AT combination sold ~20-30K (depending on year) for the RSX, and that was somewhat limited because it was only a coupe. That engine only had 155 hp (in today's rating) and it weighed ~2700-2800. I think if this car can do 0-60 in 8-8.5 seconds, get high 20's in the city on regular, and cost no more than $25K for the Premium Package, it should be able to sell it's production goals.
The question is whether the 2.0 plus 5AT will have enough 'poke' for the general public. Looking back, the 2.0 plus 5AT combination sold ~20-30K (depending on year) for the RSX, and that was somewhat limited because it was only a coupe. That engine only had 155 hp (in today's rating) and it weighed ~2700-2800. I think if this car can do 0-60 in 8-8.5 seconds, get high 20's in the city on regular, and cost no more than $25K for the Premium Package, it should be able to sell it's production goals.
I think this car was meant for the Earth Dreams engines and better transmissions but they are too late to make it into this car. They may give the car a little boost and better FE but probably not til the MMD. Honda is a few years behind thier competition here and will be paying for it.
I just saw that the 2012 Civic Hybrid, which is the same powertrain as the ILX hybrid, goes 0-60 in 10.8 sec and the braking sucks. And expect the ILX to weigh more than the Civic. It already is expected to get less mileage than the Civic. And once again car makers take the easy way out and put the batteries behind the rear seat. So you lose trunk space and can't fold the rear seat down. You would think after years of designing hybrids they would design in space for the batteries that allow more functionality in the car. I expect the ILX will be the same way. So if you pick the ILX hybrid you give up a lot on performance, added costs, less trunk space and functionality, for minimal FE gains.
I just saw that the 2012 Civic Hybrid, which is the same powertrain as the ILX hybrid, goes 0-60 in 10.8 sec and the braking sucks. And expect the ILX to weigh more than the Civic. It already is expected to get less mileage than the Civic. And once again car makers take the easy way out and put the batteries behind the rear seat. So you lose trunk space and can't fold the rear seat down. You would think after years of designing hybrids they would design in space for the batteries that allow more functionality in the car. I expect the ILX will be the same way. So if you pick the ILX hybrid you give up a lot on performance, added costs, less trunk space and functionality, for minimal FE gains.
#11
Racer
I think the car looks pretty good. I don't think looks is what will hold this car back, I think it will be the drivetrain. The 2.0L is probably not going to be very exciting even for an entry level Acura. If they offered the 2.4L in an auto I bet they would sell a lot of them.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
IBankMouse
1G TSX (2004-2008)
8
06-13-2020 12:53 PM
rcs86
Car Parts for Sale
3
08-02-2016 06:52 PM