Premium Gas

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 09-01-2018, 04:13 PM
  #1  
1st Gear
Thread Starter
 
Tim1949's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2018
Age: 74
Posts: 1
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Premium Gas

Just joined and considering purchase of 2019 TSX. Wondering about others' experience with different grades of gas? Any input would be greatly appreciated and assist in making a decision about whether to buy or not.

thanks

tim
Old 09-01-2018, 04:28 PM
  #2  
Advanced
 
jreyes's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2016
Age: 33
Posts: 92
Received 8 Likes on 5 Posts
Originally Posted by Tim1949
Just joined and considering purchase of 2019 TSX. Wondering about others' experience with different grades of gas? Any input would be greatly appreciated and assist in making a decision about whether to buy or not.

thanks

tim
There are a million different threads on this. Common theme - it is recommended by the Honda engineers, so put premium (91) in. In my case, the car is very laggy when using anything other than 91. Well worth the extra $5 for gas.
The following users liked this post:
kurtatx (10-13-2018)
Old 09-01-2018, 04:32 PM
  #3  
Three Wheelin'
 
dezymond's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2014
Location: Bay Area, CA
Posts: 1,503
Received 319 Likes on 228 Posts
This topic has been beaten to death. Put whichever gas you like it in. I personally put premium and I'll leave it at that.
The following users liked this post:
kurtatx (10-13-2018)
Old 09-01-2018, 09:22 PM
  #4  
Suzuka Master
 
BEAR-AvHistory's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Raleigh, NC - USA
Age: 82
Posts: 7,674
Received 2,599 Likes on 1,581 Posts
Welcome to the site.

The only thing I run regular in are my trucks. Best to put in what's on your gas cap or filler door. This topic has been beaten to death & you can do a search for the great gas octane debates.

Over all the TLX series gets pretty good gas mileage so it should not be much of an issue in a buy decision.

Last edited by BEAR-AvHistory; 09-01-2018 at 09:25 PM.
The following users liked this post:
kurtatx (10-13-2018)
Old 09-03-2018, 05:16 AM
  #5  
Banned
 
Crashmaster's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2015
Location: Kansas
Posts: 329
Likes: 0
Received 79 Likes on 60 Posts
Originally Posted by Tim1949
Just joined and considering purchase of 2019 TSX. Wondering about others' experience with different grades of gas? Any input would be greatly appreciated and assist in making a decision about whether to buy or not.

thanks

tim
Obviously you mean TLX and not TSX. I've had my TLX for almost 4 years. I've tried various gasoline's and it seems to run best on 93. On 87 octane it seems to not have all the get-up-and-go it should. Often on long trips through small towns premium is not always available so I put in regular with no problem. With the knock sensors and computer control, no damage will be caused by using 87.
Old 09-03-2018, 05:57 AM
  #6  
Moderator
 
CheeseyPoofs McNut's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: Ohio
Posts: 1,993
Received 1,405 Likes on 636 Posts
Welcome to the forum!

The manual "recommends" premium. But does not require it. As such you can run premium if you wish but you will do no damage to the car if you don't. The only negative consequence may be a small hit in the horsepower which, depending on how you drive, you may or may not notice.

So there you have it - don't let the gas recommendations stop you from making the purchase if that's the final hurdle IMO.

Cheers!
Old 09-03-2018, 11:15 PM
  #7  
There are four lights!
 
ZipSpeed's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: Calgary, Canada
Posts: 509
Received 215 Likes on 124 Posts
I don’t know if Acura does anything differently, but the same engine found on the Honda models specify regular. In the end, sensors can detect fuel quality and software can adapt. Curious, if one were to use premium in the Pilot, I wonder if you get 290 hp vs the 280.
Old 09-04-2018, 02:31 PM
  #8  
Suzuka Master
 
BEAR-AvHistory's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Raleigh, NC - USA
Age: 82
Posts: 7,674
Received 2,599 Likes on 1,581 Posts
Originally Posted by ZipSpeed
I don’t know if Acura does anything differently, but the same engine found on the Honda models specify regular. In the end, sensors can detect fuel quality and software can adapt. Curious, if one were to use premium in the Pilot, I wonder if you get 290 hp vs the 280.
Back around 2006 in 3G days Honda listed a 10+ HP rate for premium in some tech literature that was posted to the web site . Have no idea if the current car is programed that way. Turbos are the most affected by octane because both ignition timing & boost are regulated by the octane rating.
Old 09-04-2018, 04:18 PM
  #9  
Advanced
 
Pocketman's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Indiana
Posts: 53
Received 9 Likes on 8 Posts
My 2015 and 2017 2.4 TLXs run fine on regular gasoline. It's my unscientific opinion though, that mpg is better with premium. I think someone posted a mileage comparison between 87 and 91 octane fuel in their TLX.
Old 09-04-2018, 05:18 PM
  #10  
Suzuka Master
 
BEAR-AvHistory's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Raleigh, NC - USA
Age: 82
Posts: 7,674
Received 2,599 Likes on 1,581 Posts
Interesting or not. A what octane gas should I use thread has resurfaced for the 8,759,022 time.
The following 2 users liked this post by BEAR-AvHistory:
F23A4 (09-10-2018), thoiboi (10-19-2018)
Old 09-10-2018, 12:36 PM
  #11  
Racer
 
technocrat's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2014
Location: GTA, Canada
Posts: 415
Received 62 Likes on 43 Posts
Here is a study done by Consumer reports and one of the cars was a 2015 TLX. Interesting results I must say

https://www.consumerreports.org/fuel...d-premium-gas/

Some snippets from this report

To determine whether using regular gas in a vehicle that recommends premium gas had any effect on fuel economy or acceleration, we evaluated two models: a 2015 Acura TLX four-cylinder and a 2016 Nissan Maxima V6 (both shown below). Each recommends but does not require the use of premium gas. That guidance can be found on the inside of their fuel-filler door and is often explained in greater detail in the owner’s manual.
Both sedans achieved the same fuel economy when tested with regular fuel as they did with premium. During this testing, the cars felt and sounded the same; we did not experience any engine pinging or knocking noise in either car when using regular fuel.

The owner’s manuals indicate that drivers might notice a decrease in performance when running on regular gas, but our test results said otherwise. The 0-60 mph acceleration times were identical in the TLX and Maxima on regular and premium gas.
What’s more, in the Acura owner’s manual the automaker only recommends using “top-tier detergent gasoline”—which can be of any octane grade, regular or premium—for performance and reliability reasons. But there is nothing in the manual that equates premium gas with improved reliability.

That said, if owners make the switch and think their car is performing sluggishly, or they hear knocking or pinging, they should go back to premium fuel.

Beyond these test findings, it is key to note that our car reliability dataconsistently show that the most dependable cars tend to be those running on regular fuel.
Old 10-13-2018, 10:32 AM
  #12  
Instructor
 
centflatsx's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Central Florida
Posts: 149
Received 29 Likes on 19 Posts
If Acura says put Premuim then I would. If it says recommended then I'd expirement.
Old 10-14-2018, 08:09 AM
  #13  
Senior Moderator
 
F23A4's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Age: 55
Posts: 17,886
Received 1,659 Likes on 926 Posts

”Asian 2.4L” (curious)
The following users liked this post:
Terdbath (10-19-2018)
Old 10-19-2018, 12:32 PM
  #14  
Intermediate
 
daschwa's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Age: 44
Posts: 40
Received 9 Likes on 5 Posts
I've always found this article interesting on the topic. They use a miata with a custom ecu to see how much power/torque can be extracted out of a variety fuels.

https://grassrootsmotorsports.com/articles/fuel-truth/

While a much simpler engine I'm sure some of it translates as they're both NA.
The following users liked this post:
WheelMcCoy (10-19-2018)
Old 10-19-2018, 01:48 PM
  #15  
Racer
 
noclue02's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2016
Age: 39
Posts: 394
Received 8 Likes on 7 Posts
Originally Posted by Pocketman
My 2015 and 2017 2.4 TLXs run fine on regular gasoline. It's my unscientific opinion though, that mpg is better with premium. I think someone posted a mileage comparison between 87 and 91 octane fuel in their TLX.
My experience is different on this. Finally took my car for a short road trip, ~400 miles each way. I filled up with 91 beginning of the trip, and when I got to the destination, my gas was near empty. On my way back, I had to use 89 because Shell station is out of 91, and I was too lazy to drive around looking for another one. When I got home, my car used up a little past half a tank, maybe 1/8 pass the half mark. Both trip was avg around 85-90 mph.
Old 10-19-2018, 01:58 PM
  #16  
Intermediate
 
daschwa's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Age: 44
Posts: 40
Received 9 Likes on 5 Posts
Originally Posted by noclue02
My experience is different on this. Finally took my car for a short road trip, ~400 miles each way. I filled up with 91 beginning of the trip, and when I got to the destination, my gas was near empty. On my way back, I had to use 89 because Shell station is out of 91, and I was too lazy to drive around looking for another one. When I got home, my car used up a little past half a tank, maybe 1/8 pass the half mark. Both trip was avg around 85-90 mph.
A head or tail wind could easily account for this difference. If 89 was that much more efficient than 91 it would be well known.
The following 4 users liked this post by daschwa:
a35tl (10-20-2018), dezymond (10-19-2018), KeithL (10-19-2018), kurtatx (10-22-2018)
Old 10-19-2018, 10:51 PM
  #17  
Three Wheelin'
 
dezymond's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2014
Location: Bay Area, CA
Posts: 1,503
Received 319 Likes on 228 Posts
Don't mean to rain on your parade, but there are so many factors to gas mileage than just the type of gas that's used. Think of the elements and if your roadtrip had any elevation as well. Wind plays a huge difference in the mpg game, that's why most early hybrids look the way that they do, so they can into the air as efficiently and with less drag as possible.
Old 10-20-2018, 07:27 AM
  #18  
Latent car nut
iTrader: (2)
 
horseshoez's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2017
Location: Southern New Hampshire
Age: 68
Posts: 7,844
Received 2,005 Likes on 1,407 Posts
Originally Posted by noclue02
My experience is different on this. Finally took my car for a short road trip, ~400 miles each way. I filled up with 91 beginning of the trip, and when I got to the destination, my gas was near empty. On my way back, I had to use 89 because Shell station is out of 91, and I was too lazy to drive around looking for another one. When I got home, my car used up a little past half a tank, maybe 1/8 pass the half mark. Both trip was avg around 85-90 mph.
Sorry, your test is irrelevant. Now, if you had done the test over say 10 tanks of 91 and 10 tanks of 89 it might be a tiny bit compelling, but one tank of each pretty much means no usable data was obtained.
Old 10-21-2018, 10:38 AM
  #19  
Racer
 
noclue02's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2016
Age: 39
Posts: 394
Received 8 Likes on 7 Posts
That was not a professional test people. I just saying I got better mileage using 89 although I am not disagreed at all with what you all saying. Gonna try to use 89 for awhile and see the different just for the heck of it.
Old 10-22-2018, 04:17 PM
  #20  
Burning Brakes
 
WheelMcCoy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Northeast
Posts: 764
Received 151 Likes on 115 Posts
Originally Posted by noclue02
That was not a professional test people. I just saying I got better mileage using 89 although I am not disagreed at all with what you all saying. Gonna try to use 89 for awhile and see the different just for the heck of it.
Is it uphill, both ways?
Old 10-22-2018, 05:20 PM
  #21  
Senior Moderator
 
thoiboi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: SoCal, CA
Posts: 46,883
Received 8,584 Likes on 6,630 Posts
Originally Posted by horseshoez
Sorry, your test is irrelevant. Now, if you had done the test over say 10 tanks of 91 and 10 tanks of 89 it might be a tiny bit compelling, but one tank of each pretty much means no usable data was obtained.
are you saying he has @noclue02 what he's talking about






Old 10-22-2018, 06:10 PM
  #22  
Team Owner
iTrader: (15)
 
Flipster23's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 35,747
Received 2,334 Likes on 1,962 Posts
Originally Posted by noclue02
That was not a professional test people. I just saying I got better mileage using 89 although I am not disagreed at all with what you all saying. Gonna try to use 89 for awhile and see the different just for the heck of it.
It wasn't any kind of test my man. A lot of things come into play, why you got better gas mileage on the way home.

I don't understand why people buy a vehicle that requires 91 and then go and out 87 or 89....
Old 10-24-2018, 09:31 AM
  #23  
Racer
 
noclue02's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2016
Age: 39
Posts: 394
Received 8 Likes on 7 Posts
Originally Posted by thoiboi
are you saying he has @noclue02 what he's talking about






The following users liked this post:
mapleloaf (11-03-2018)
Old 11-03-2018, 09:21 AM
  #24  
Three Wheelin'
 
mapleloaf's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada
Posts: 1,494
Received 869 Likes on 413 Posts

”Asian 2.4L” (curious)
[/QUOTE]

He did say it wasn't direct injected, whereas the TLX 2.4 is.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
DevilDogge
3G TL (2004-2008)
17
08-19-2007 07:53 PM
vtec260
2G TL (1999-2003)
9
01-29-2007 10:04 AM
lead_sled_dog
2G CL (2001-2003)
12
09-09-2003 08:58 PM
randomwalk101
2G TL (1999-2003)
32
03-19-2002 08:49 PM



Quick Reply: Premium Gas



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:21 AM.