Yes or No
#2
Moderator
no, it looks good, everyone is doing it nowadays..
i have this emblem on my front fender.. both of them
![](http://images.streetsideauto.com/images/fbtn/image/259x192/fbtn-62-0205-14027.jpg)
cuz you know... i gotta let everyone know i be on dubz
i have this emblem on my front fender.. both of them
![](http://images.streetsideauto.com/images/fbtn/image/259x192/fbtn-62-0205-14027.jpg)
cuz you know... i gotta let everyone know i be on dubz
#3
Team Owner
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Kansas City, MO (Overland Park, KS)
Posts: 36,545
Received 6,470 Likes
on
5,162 Posts
Ron, I can tell you that this site is no big on badging cars.
The following users liked this post:
HeartTLs (06-12-2014)
#5
Team Owner
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Kansas City, MO (Overland Park, KS)
Posts: 36,545
Received 6,470 Likes
on
5,162 Posts
^^^ That would be A LOT worse!
#6
The Original Shawdy
3.7L badge isn't bad. It's not like you're asking to put in on a 3.5L. Now that would get you a lot of haters haha. However, I wouldn't put too many badges on it. It may look crowded and out of place. Maybe if it's on the other side of the trunk to balance it out. Just my thoughts. Post pictures if you pull the trigger.
#7
Moderator
i think sh-awd badge is enough to tell people its 3.7.. well atleast the people that know about it.. i mean that is why your putting the badge on there right?
Trending Topics
#8
No.....
#10
Thanks
3.7L badge isn't bad. It's not like you're asking to put in on a 3.5L. Now that would get you a lot of haters haha. However, I wouldn't put too many badges on it. It may look crowded and out of place. Maybe if it's on the other side of the trunk to balance it out. Just my thoughts. Post pictures if you pull the trigger.
![Why Me](https://acurazine.com/forums/images/smilies/whyme.gif)
The following 5 users liked this post by potmilkz:
Acura_Dude (06-13-2014),
echodigital (06-13-2014),
JTL12 (06-12-2014),
justnspace (06-12-2014),
VR1 (06-13-2014)
#13
Hmm
I thought the 2013 tl sh awd came in a 3.5 or 3.7 I think people would think its a 3.5 and yes I want people to know its a 3.7 and I found a emblem on Amazon for $11.99 chrome but its fora mustang but who's going to know.
#14
^^ Nope...the 3.5 is with the FWD only, all AWD have the the 3.7
The following users liked this post:
justnspace (06-12-2014)
The following 2 users liked this post by big10purdue:
Jrvtecaccord (06-14-2014),
justnspace (06-13-2014)
The following 2 users liked this post by ucf_bronco:
Jrvtecaccord (06-14-2014),
lift3d_ (06-13-2014)
#18
Second note is that nobody aside from you cares what size engine the car has. Most people don't know the difference between a base model mustang and a Shelby gt 500 when they see them in the road. It's a mustang, that's all they know.
#19
Intermediate
Ron, I personally wouldn't do it. But at the end of the day, it should be about what you like. I'd say go for it... And just remove it later if you change your mind... Simple fix. You can also consider debadging the rest and just have the "A" in the middle and the 3.7 on the side. That'd be different.
#22
Drifting
iTrader: (1)
Less is more when it comes to emblems!
#24
Burning Brakes
The new 3.7 has a lot of mustang fans drooling over on the mustang forums. For people that know the difference between a base, GT and the HIPO versions available a 3.7 is in all cases a 3.7. These new 3.7 are easily modded and very tuner friendly, guys are pushing these cars into the low 12's and high 11's with minimal cost. If you took a base 3.7 and a GT that were optioned out the same except for the engine of course, you would have a 5 grand difference in price. That 5 grand can be put into the car and make it faster than a GT. Now you have a sleeper, if you can call a mustang a sleeper. Guys are pushing upwards of 500 hp in these cars.
#25
^ I don't know... I was a kid from the 90's and it's probably an outdated opinion but a Mustang isn't a Mustang unless it has a V-8
Heck... my old 97 GT was referenced as a neutered Mustang because of the 4.6L
Heck... my old 97 GT was referenced as a neutered Mustang because of the 4.6L
![ugh](https://acurazine.com/forums/images/smilies/ugh.gif)
#27
Burning Brakes
I feel the same exact way, but the way fuel economy is going and with the push of smaller engines, those days might be numbered. I wouldn't call the 4.6 neutered, because the old 5.0 wasn't really a 5.0, it was more like 4.8, but that didn't sounds as good. I had two 4.6 Cobras and they had plenty of power coming from that 4.6.
#29
I feel the same exact way, but the way fuel economy is going and with the push of smaller engines, those days might be numbered. I wouldn't call the 4.6 neutered, because the old 5.0 wasn't really a 5.0, it was more like 4.8, but that didn't sounds as good. I had two 4.6 Cobras and they had plenty of power coming from that 4.6.
Til this day... love the sound of that rumble of that 5.0 V-8
Last edited by C8N; 06-13-2014 at 01:48 PM.
#30
Burning Brakes
The new Coyote motors sound amazing, even better than the old 5.0. The Cobras had a different exhaust not as they were DOHC and 32 valves. Sounded more exotic I guess, but not like a Ferrari or Lamborghini.
#31
Cool
Ron, I personally wouldn't do it. But at the end of the day, it should be about what you like. I'd say go for it... And just remove it later if you change your mind... Simple fix. You can also consider debadging the rest and just have the "A" in the middle and the 3.7 on the side. That'd be different.
![Thumbs Up](https://acurazine.com/forums/images/smilies/thumbsup.gif)