Some tint on my windows

Subscribe
May 21, 2014 | 02:19 PM
  #41  
Quote: ^^ Whether you like the look of this car or not, the owner has clearly done some mods/customizations, such that there likely isn't another one like it.

Isn't that the definition of "exclusive"?
You missed the point entirely.
Reply 0
May 21, 2014 | 03:06 PM
  #42  
Quote: You missed the point entirely.
Did I? Did I really? Because, I read through the thread, and what I took from it, and specifically your contributions, was that the OP referred to the "beak" as being somewhat "exclusive", and you took issue with the use of that word (why it became an issue in the first place...that's the point I've missed entirely. But then, I don't tilt at windmills).

What followed was a pi$$ing match between you and the OP over the appropriateness of the word "exclusive" (again, I don't get it, but whatever), and ultimately, you posted a video of a 3G TL with the plate "XSCLUSV". So honestly, I don't think your point was all that elusive. I think I got it.

What I don't get, again, is how this thread has stretched over two pages, at least given the current discussion. We're now miles away from talking about OP's tint (my apologies, OP). So this will be all I have to say that doesn't relate to the topic.
Reply 0
May 21, 2014 | 03:39 PM
  #43  
Quote: oh i guess.. here in socal.. any tint is considered illegal.. so i might as well go the darkest. ive only got ticketed once and it was a $100 fine. im ok with that.
That doesn't work here. Any tint forward of the driver is illegal here, but I've spoken with a couple of cops who confirmed that if they can see in (mostly), they'll let it go.

But then, I'm like you...if they could see in, what's the point?
Reply 0
May 21, 2014 | 10:25 PM
  #44  
Quote:

Did I? Did I really? Because, I read through the thread, and what I took from it, and specifically your contributions, was that the OP referred to the "beak" as being somewhat "exclusive", and you took issue with the use of that word (why it became an issue in the first place...that's the point I've missed entirely. But then, I don't tilt at windmills).

What followed was a pi$$ing match between you and the OP over the appropriateness of the word "exclusive" (again, I don't get it, but whatever), and ultimately, you posted a video of a 3G TL with the plate "XSCLUSV". So honestly, I don't think your point was all that elusive. I think I got it.

What I don't get, again, is how this thread has stretched over two pages, at least given the current discussion. We're now miles away from talking about OP's tint (my apologies, OP). So this will be all I have to say that doesn't relate to the topic.
All good, most here know Brock and his contributions to this forum.
Reply 0
May 22, 2014 | 07:06 AM
  #45  
Quote: All good, most here know Brock and his contributions to this forum.
Be careful there... he might take that literally
Reply 0
May 22, 2014 | 10:10 AM
  #46  
Quote:

Did I? Did I really? Because, I read through the thread, and what I took from it, and specifically your contributions, was that the OP referred to the "beak" as being somewhat "exclusive", and you took issue with the use of that word (why it became an issue in the first place...that's the point I've missed entirely. But then, I don't tilt at windmills).

What followed was a pi$$ing match between you and the OP over the appropriateness of the word "exclusive" (again, I don't get it, but whatever), and ultimately, you posted a video of a 3G TL with the plate "XSCLUSV". So honestly, I don't think your point was all that elusive. I think I got it.

What I don't get, again, is how this thread has stretched over two pages, at least given the current discussion. We're now miles away from talking about OP's tint (my apologies, OP). So this will be all I have to say that doesn't relate to the topic.
yes you missed my point and typed way to much in response, which I didn't even bother to read all of.
Reply 0
May 22, 2014 | 10:12 AM
  #47  
Quote: Be careful there... he might take that literally
My contributions keep this forum active, even if members like it or not. Don't worry I get plenty of PMs from members who don't post that actually like the way I speak the truth. Only the Acura fanboys get butt hurt on here.
Reply 0
May 22, 2014 | 10:21 AM
  #48  
Quote: My contributions keep this forum active, even if members like it or not.
Yeah, what would AZ be without Brock's "contributions"

I hate to break it to you but this forum was active long before you got here and it will be long after you leave.
Reply 0
May 22, 2014 | 10:58 AM
  #49  
Quote: Yeah, what would AZ be without Brock's "contributions"

I hate to break it to you but this forum was active long before you got here and it will be long after you leave.
49 posts and counting on this thread, take a look at the other threads created in the same time period.
Reply 0
May 22, 2014 | 11:01 AM
  #50  
Quote: My contributions keep this forum active, even if members like it or not. Don't worry I get plenty of PMs from members who don't post that actually like the way I speak the truth. Only the Acura fanboys get butt hurt on here.
oh damn... he DID take it literally....
Reply 0
May 22, 2014 | 12:18 PM
  #51  


he may not keep it active, but the arrogance sure is entertaining
Reply 0
May 22, 2014 | 01:07 PM
  #52  
Quote: 49 posts and counting on this thread, take a look at the other threads created in the same time period.
I guess you're right...you do keep it active by trolling various members and posting bullshit. That will always get replies!

Try actually posting some useful information and adding value to the boards then I'll consider your drivel a contribution.

I also LOL'd at your statement that people send you PM's to pat you on the back for "speaking the truth". Do they not have the balls to do it in the thread or are you full of shit? My guess is the latter.
Reply 2
May 22, 2014 | 01:16 PM
  #53  
Quote: I guess you're right...you do keep it active by trolling various members and posting bullshit. That will always get replies!

Try actually posting some useful information and adding value to the boards then I'll consider your drivel a contribution.

I also LOL'd at your statement that people send you PM's to pat you on the back for "speaking the truth". Do they not have the balls to do it in the thread or are you full of shit? My guess is the latter.
Try and looking at a few other posts on other threads, where I have added useful info. I actually have been thanked a few times, believe it or not.
Reply 0
May 22, 2014 | 01:17 PM
  #54  
Quote: oh damn... he DID take it literally....
No, It was a sarcastic post actually, I guess you don't get sarcasm. #54
Reply 0
May 22, 2014 | 01:19 PM
  #55  
Quote:

he may not keep it active, but the arrogance sure is entertaining
If you're gonna say I'm arrogant, at least get your post worded correctly and lose the "not".
Reply 0
May 22, 2014 | 02:33 PM
  #56  
Quote: No, It was a sarcastic post actually, I guess you don't get sarcasm. #54
Oh... I just thought that particular post of yours was just plain bovine feces but I guess that's a difference of opinion. Nonetheless, it is good to know that you understand what sarcasm is.

Bravo Mr. Brock79!
Reply 0
May 22, 2014 | 07:47 PM
  #57  
LOL about you guys arguing about stupid shit.

Tint looks good, I'm looking at getting the same %.
Reply 0
Subscribe