SD Union Wheels Review of 2009 TL SH-AWD

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 02-28-2009, 10:49 PM
  #1  
Drifting
Thread Starter
 
LaCostaRacer's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Carlsbad, CA
Age: 63
Posts: 2,499
Received 220 Likes on 180 Posts
Smile SD Union Wheels Review of 2009 TL SH-AWD

Here's a link to a review I saw in my paper today. It's a pretty good review:

http://www3.signonsandiego.com/stori...ity/?uniontrib

I was expecting the Editor to complain about the interior button layout complexity like he did on the MDX but no peep on that subject. He really liked the AWD performance and features. I found the last paragraph very odd. I'm not sure if he just wants a non-tech AWD or a tech FWD- he seems to think SH and AWD are two different items perhaps.

Enjoy!
Old 02-28-2009, 11:03 PM
  #2  
Pro
 
S2000 Driver's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Fairfield County, CT
Posts: 534
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Given that my brother owns a DeLorean DMC-12, I found this excerpt from the above review particularly amusing:

"...If Universal Pictures planned a fourth “Back to the Future” film, the TL could replace the DeLorean as the car adapted for space travel..."


Last edited by S2000 Driver; 02-28-2009 at 11:05 PM.
Old 03-01-2009, 12:02 AM
  #3  
Racer
 
hydr0's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Brooklyn, NY
Age: 43
Posts: 292
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 2 Posts
There is enough of a performance gap between the base and Super Handling TLs to allow for a midrange model. Maybe an SH without AWD? But for any driver with an enthusiast's pulse, the SH is the TL to have.
What he means is that there's too much of a performance gap between FWD and SH-AWD, and that maybe they can slot in another model. An SH-FWD, if you will. Not a bad idea, but the price difference between the FWD and AWD, to me, does not allow for another model. The FWD and SH-FWD would be too close together in price, and nobody would get the regular FWD. Unless they raised the price of the AWD, or lowered the price of the FWD, it wouldn't be feasible. And they definitely aren't doing either of those lol.
Old 03-01-2009, 07:18 AM
  #4  
I feel strongly both ways
 
PsychDoc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: NYC
Age: 75
Posts: 617
Likes: 0
Received 11 Likes on 7 Posts
Originally Posted by hydr0
What he means is that there's too much of a performance gap between FWD and SH-AWD
What???

There's essentially no difference in their acceleration numbers. While the SH-AWD will certainly do better in slaloms, that's about the only area in which there's a significant performance difference. The 25 extra HP of the 3.7 liter are easily offset by the SH-AWD car's additional weight and (to a larger extent) added mechanical complexity and resultant drag on the engine. The FWD car handles exceptionally well and it'll at least keep up with the awd car 0-60 and especially in the 1/4 mile.
Old 03-01-2009, 11:40 PM
  #5  
Three Wheelin'
 
bmode's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: LA
Posts: 1,507
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
I've always disagreed with such comments as the AWD is drastically different from FWD. I jumped on the FWD, because the AWD wasn't available at the time. Then when the AWD came out, I test drove it twice, and realized the difference was only in the turns. Plus I didn't care for the double leather stitching interior. It did feel heavier too, but very sport with the HPT and rims. The FWD rims ruin the exterior experience.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
GhostTL09
Car Parts for Sale
4
09-19-2015 01:57 PM
ostrich
5G TLX (2015-2020)
7
09-11-2015 04:28 PM
TSX 09
2G TSX (2009-2014)
2
09-06-2015 01:07 PM
Stu2414
4G TL Problems & Fixes
2
08-30-2015 07:30 PM



Quick Reply: SD Union Wheels Review of 2009 TL SH-AWD



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:15 PM.