2009 Acura TL SH-AWD Test Drive
#1
Advanced
Thread Starter
2009 Acura TL SH-AWD Test Drive
#3
Three Wheelin'
I don't know......5.5sec is a little suspicious.....no mention how they tested it, when or where. High 5's maybe (according to Wavehogger's #'s) but 5.5 is too good to be true.
#4
AZ Community Team
Join Date: May 2007
Location: N35°03'16.75", W 080°51'0.9"
Posts: 32,488
Received 7,771 Likes
on
4,342 Posts
Added to the Reviews Thread.
5.5 Sec is what Honda Tuning and/or TOV claimed as well:
http://www.hondatuningmagazine.com/n...awd/index.html
5.5 Sec is what Honda Tuning and/or TOV claimed as well:
.... the TL destroys its competition with its impressive 0-60 sprint of only 5.5 seconds. ....
#5
I agree 100%
This review is by far the best review i have seen yet that was very descriptive about the 4G.
I also agree with the reviewer in his last sentence about the 4G being greatly improved over the 3G and now more competitive with other cars in its class/category such as the A4, 3-series, IS, C-class etc.
The 5.5s 0-60 time is again very humorous as you can easily tell the reviewer drove the car for seven days probably like a test drive as their was once again no skid pad tests, 1/4 mile, 100-0 braking etc etc etc. I would sure like to see where he got those numbers along with that Honda Tuning magazine as there is yet to be a credible Automotive Publication that does testing (not just reviews) that gets a Sub 6s 0-60 time.
This review is by far the best review i have seen yet that was very descriptive about the 4G.
I also agree with the reviewer in his last sentence about the 4G being greatly improved over the 3G and now more competitive with other cars in its class/category such as the A4, 3-series, IS, C-class etc.
The 5.5s 0-60 time is again very humorous as you can easily tell the reviewer drove the car for seven days probably like a test drive as their was once again no skid pad tests, 1/4 mile, 100-0 braking etc etc etc. I would sure like to see where he got those numbers along with that Honda Tuning magazine as there is yet to be a credible Automotive Publication that does testing (not just reviews) that gets a Sub 6s 0-60 time.
#7
AZ Community Team
Join Date: May 2007
Location: N35°03'16.75", W 080°51'0.9"
Posts: 32,488
Received 7,771 Likes
on
4,342 Posts
2nd time I've seen that vid posted - ^^^
I still can't figure out what it proves. There is no timing to susbstantiate the 5.54 seconds. It's just some guy flooring his the accelerator.
I still can't figure out what it proves. There is no timing to susbstantiate the 5.54 seconds. It's just some guy flooring his the accelerator.
Trending Topics
#9
2015 TLX SH-AWD ADVANCE
#10
Suzuka Master
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Raleigh, NC - USA
Age: 82
Posts: 7,674
Received 2,599 Likes
on
1,581 Posts
#12
Turd Polisher
iTrader: (1)
Youtube video timers are not to be used as testing equipment.
#13
AZ Community Team
Join Date: May 2007
Location: N35°03'16.75", W 080°51'0.9"
Posts: 32,488
Received 7,771 Likes
on
4,342 Posts
I've tried about 20 times, but I just can't get it to stop right at 60 mph.
There's Red Text there. Honest.
Hmmmm, wish I'd read these posts first.
#14
You'll Never Walk Alone
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Vancouver, BC, Canada
Age: 37
Posts: 9,511
Received 842 Likes
on
524 Posts
lol, I'm not sure if you were being sarcastic or what, but that video was posted by Wavehogger on this forum. And he made this great, long post describing how he conducted the acceleration tests. He did several runs and recorded about 5 videos. He showed how (again with a video) brake torquing will force the transmission to start in 2nd gear (even when you put it in 1st), etc. 5.54s is his fastest run and he too believed that run was simply an "outlier." Most of his runs were about 5.8 - 6s (unless he started in 2nd gear).
#15
You'll Never Walk Alone
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Vancouver, BC, Canada
Age: 37
Posts: 9,511
Received 842 Likes
on
524 Posts
I agree 100%
This review is by far the best review i have seen yet that was very descriptive about the 4G.
I also agree with the reviewer in his last sentence about the 4G being greatly improved over the 3G and now more competitive with other cars in its class/category such as the A4, 3-series, IS, C-class etc.
The 5.5s 0-60 time is again very humorous as you can easily tell the reviewer drove the car for seven days probably like a test drive as their was once again no skid pad tests, 1/4 mile, 100-0 braking etc etc etc. I would sure like to see where he got those numbers along with that Honda Tuning magazine as there is yet to be a credible Automotive Publication that does testing (not just reviews) that gets a Sub 6s 0-60 time.
This review is by far the best review i have seen yet that was very descriptive about the 4G.
I also agree with the reviewer in his last sentence about the 4G being greatly improved over the 3G and now more competitive with other cars in its class/category such as the A4, 3-series, IS, C-class etc.
The 5.5s 0-60 time is again very humorous as you can easily tell the reviewer drove the car for seven days probably like a test drive as their was once again no skid pad tests, 1/4 mile, 100-0 braking etc etc etc. I would sure like to see where he got those numbers along with that Honda Tuning magazine as there is yet to be a credible Automotive Publication that does testing (not just reviews) that gets a Sub 6s 0-60 time.
#16
AZ Community Team
Join Date: May 2007
Location: N35°03'16.75", W 080°51'0.9"
Posts: 32,488
Received 7,771 Likes
on
4,342 Posts
lol, I'm not sure if you were being sarcastic or what, but that video was posted by Wavehogger on this forum. And he made this great, long post describing how he conducted the acceleration tests. He did several runs and recorded about 5 videos. He showed how (again with a video) brake torquing will force the transmission to start in 2nd gear (even when you put it in 1st), etc. 5.54s is his fastest run and he too believed that run was simply an "outlier." Most of his runs were about 5.8 - 6s (unless he started in 2nd gear).
Ah!
No, I wasn't being sarcastic. I just had no frame of reference for the video; IOW - the video by itself didn't mean anything. I couldn't figure out how it suppported a 5.5 time.
Thanks for clarifying the source; I do recall some of Wavhogger's posts on this.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
nanos
Car Parts for Sale
26
11-12-2015 08:41 PM