Looks like the 2005 w/o Nav has BRIDGESTONES
09-30-2004, 04:25 PM
#1
Intermediate
Thread Starter
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Southern New England
Posts: 34
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Looks like the 2005 w/o Nav has BRIDGESTONES
Just got off the phone with a local dealership. They got three 05's in today. Both non-Nav cars have the Bridgestones on them, the Nav car has the Michelins. Does this make it official, or is there any chance Acura is just getting rid of Bridgestones on the early production 05's?
09-30-2004, 06:09 PM
#2
TL User
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: San Francisco, CA
Age: 45
Posts: 171
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I have almost 7,000 on reformulated EL-42s and have absolutely no problems with them (knock on wood). Having said that, Michelin is a much better tire, so this seems to be some cost cutting on the part of Acura.... OR may be that dealer just swapped the tires himself. Who are you going to believe Acura or some dealer?
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
rp_guy
Member Cars for Sale
9
07-16-2017 07:33 AM
GWEEDOspeedo
Car Parts for Sale
4
01-15-2016 10:39 PM
lanechanger
Member Cars for Sale
4
10-13-2015 10:56 AM
Joe Avesyan
3G TL Performance Parts & Modifications
9
09-29-2015 03:57 PM