235 vs. 245 Observations
#1
2004 SSM/EB/5AT/Navi/RSB
Thread Starter
235 vs. 245 Observations
Last Thursday, I had my 245/45 Avon tires replaced with a set of 235/45 Goodyear Eagle F1 AS tires. I was talked into getting them as a) they were in stock and b) they are wider than some 245s, including the Bridgestone RE960s. This morning, I had the 235s replaced with 245s in the same GY tire (there's a long story I don't feel like typing as to why I was back at the tire shop again). While I didn't expect to notice any differences in feel, I did. Namely...
1. The 235s had a much crisper turn-in response.
2. The ride was more harsh on the 235s.
3. While rim protection was 'OK' on the 235s, it's better on the 245s.
4. Both tires hold really well, but the 245s feel a bit more mushy.
Both sets are running the same air pressure, but the 235s felt overinflated compared to the slightly underinflated feel of the 245s.
Has anyone else noticed this sort of thing? It doesn't really bother me much, but I wouldn't have 'upgraded' to the 245s had I known the difference was going to be so significant. That said, I do appreciate the reduction in ride harshness with the 245s, so maybe it's a wash.
1. The 235s had a much crisper turn-in response.
2. The ride was more harsh on the 235s.
3. While rim protection was 'OK' on the 235s, it's better on the 245s.
4. Both tires hold really well, but the 245s feel a bit more mushy.
Both sets are running the same air pressure, but the 235s felt overinflated compared to the slightly underinflated feel of the 245s.
Has anyone else noticed this sort of thing? It doesn't really bother me much, but I wouldn't have 'upgraded' to the 245s had I known the difference was going to be so significant. That said, I do appreciate the reduction in ride harshness with the 245s, so maybe it's a wash.
#3
Oderint dum metuant.
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Lake Wylie
Age: 46
Posts: 12,496
Likes: 0
Received 534 Likes
on
446 Posts
1) This makes sense...the 235 is more stretched than the 245, which decreases sidewall flex.
2) This makes sense...the sidewall on the 235 is slightly smaller than the sidewall of the 245; a larger sidewall absorbs more of the impact.
3) This makes sense...the tire is wider while the rim is the same width.
4) I'm guessing by hold you mean handling, or basically something related to #1 and/or cornering...if so, this makes sense, as well.
It is interesting that there is a noticeable difference, though. You're talking less than a quarter inch increase in sidewall height and less than half an inch increase in overall tire width. However, what you've reported is why my next set of wheels will have 235's on them.
2) This makes sense...the sidewall on the 235 is slightly smaller than the sidewall of the 245; a larger sidewall absorbs more of the impact.
3) This makes sense...the tire is wider while the rim is the same width.
4) I'm guessing by hold you mean handling, or basically something related to #1 and/or cornering...if so, this makes sense, as well.
It is interesting that there is a noticeable difference, though. You're talking less than a quarter inch increase in sidewall height and less than half an inch increase in overall tire width. However, what you've reported is why my next set of wheels will have 235's on them.
#4
2004 SSM/EB/5AT/Navi/RSB
Thread Starter
In point number 1, I was describing how quickly the car began turning after I turned the steering wheel. There is zero lag with the 235s, but a little slop with the 245s. In point 4, I was talking about how well the tire held during a long turn, such as a freeway cloverleaf ramp. Both tires grip well and give me fair warning as I approach the limit of traction.
I think another reason the wider tires might feel a little less harsh is that there is more tire area to bridge the imperfections in the road. But, as you said, the actual dimensional differences are quite slight.
I think another reason the wider tires might feel a little less harsh is that there is more tire area to bridge the imperfections in the road. But, as you said, the actual dimensional differences are quite slight.
#5
Don't feed the...WTF?
I actually just put some 245's on my car this past summer. I actually found that I liked the handling better. I do know exactly what you mean by they aren't as agile when your turning (the 245's) - but I think it's kind of nice. I feel that there is more effort required to turn the wheels because they are a little more grippy.
Hard to explain, but if you've gone from 235's to the 245's - you all probably know the differences.
Hard to explain, but if you've gone from 235's to the 245's - you all probably know the differences.
#7
FTW
Originally Posted by GLowrdr
I actually just put some 245's on my car this past summer. I actually found that I liked the handling better. I do know exactly what you mean by they aren't as agile when your turning (the 245's) - but I think it's kind of nice. I feel that there is more effort required to turn the wheels because they are a little more grippy.
Hard to explain, but if you've gone from 235's to the 245's - you all probably know the differences.
Hard to explain, but if you've gone from 235's to the 245's - you all probably know the differences.
What tires you got GLowrdr? I'm from MN too.
Trending Topics
#8
Sidewall strength is where a lot of the differance lays
You trade sidewall flex for less roll over but sacrafice ride for it
Or you go the opposite direction and take ride over absolute performance
Unless you track day your car- most drivers wouldnt know what tires are on it
More width also scrubs off more speed when you turn in to the corner-
more tire surface is expressed to the road-
You trade sidewall flex for less roll over but sacrafice ride for it
Or you go the opposite direction and take ride over absolute performance
Unless you track day your car- most drivers wouldnt know what tires are on it
More width also scrubs off more speed when you turn in to the corner-
more tire surface is expressed to the road-
#9
2004 SSM/EB/5AT/Navi/RSB
Thread Starter
Originally Posted by XxAfG786xX
so wider tires dont give better handling?
When I wife asked me just a bit ago if my new tires were working better, I told her they weren't as harsh-feeling. She said, "Oh good...I didn't like the way you could feel every bump with the narrower tires." So, in my case, the "wife acceptance factor" (WAF) is higher with the wider tires.
#12
Instructor
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Near Seattle WA
Posts: 186
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
One difference between GT tires and UHP tires is tread wear - UHP tires wear faster because of the rubber compound is stickier and thus wears faster. UHP tires also have a stiffer sidewall to withstand corner forces. This will increase tire harshness but if you want UHP you want response not a cruiser.
#13
Suzuka Master
iTrader: (1)
If you're comparing different makes in the different sizes, it's like comparing apples and oranges. It's like comparing touring to HP to UHP tires, and even within each category you'll find tires the same designated size, but with different tread width, section width, and even different diameters.
The TL I purchased had 235/45-17 Bridgestone's, but had the dealer switch rims as I didn't like the nicks. Along came Sumitomo 235/45-17 which changed the ride drastically. Better handling, but a much harsher ride. I then installed chromed Acura wheels and Yoko Advan S.4 245/45-17 which afforded a better ride, crisper handling and overall better driveability, but at a price, as the tires weren't inexpensive.
The TL I purchased had 235/45-17 Bridgestone's, but had the dealer switch rims as I didn't like the nicks. Along came Sumitomo 235/45-17 which changed the ride drastically. Better handling, but a much harsher ride. I then installed chromed Acura wheels and Yoko Advan S.4 245/45-17 which afforded a better ride, crisper handling and overall better driveability, but at a price, as the tires weren't inexpensive.
#14
FTW
Originally Posted by donc
One difference between GT tires and UHP tires is tread wear - UHP tires wear faster because of the rubber compound is stickier and thus wears faster. UHP tires also have a stiffer sidewall to withstand corner forces. This will increase tire harshness but if you want UHP you want response not a cruiser.
This maybe true, but the BS RE960's had a 40k warranty. So even with quick tire wear i'm not too concerned.
#15
Don't feed the...WTF?
Originally Posted by lusid
What tires you got GLowrdr? I'm from MN too.
I just got them this summer, so I can't say how they go i nthe snow, but I've heard they are pretty good for snow and ice. I personally like the dry and wet performance.
#17
Team Owner
You went wider but kept the aspect ratio the same which gave you a taller sidewall. Your sidewalls are now 45% of 245 vs 45% of 235. With rare excetions taller sidewalls will always give you a more mushy feeling. You would've been better off going with a 255/40 so it has a nearly identical sidewall or diameter of the stock tires.
#18
2004 SSM/EB/5AT/Navi/RSB
Thread Starter
Originally Posted by Turbonut
If you're comparing different makes in the different sizes, it's like comparing apples and oranges. It's like comparing touring to HP to UHP tires, and even within each category you'll find tires the same designated size, but with different tread width, section width, and even different diameters.
I was comparing brand-new Goodyear Eagle F1 A/S 235/45 to brand-new Goodyear Eagle F1 A/S 245/45 when I made my observations. I'm on the 245s now.
So far, I'm really digging this tire. They are quiet, sticky, and they have virtually ZERO tramlining. I commute a bridge every day that has a seam in the concrete right along my tire's path. All my previous tires would grab this groove and 'lock in.' These tires don't grab it at all, so I don't have to drive off-center in that lane anymore. I'm guessing this is because this is the first tire I've had that doesn't have straight grooves running parallel to the tire's sidewall.
#19
Suzuka Master
iTrader: (1)
Originally Posted by bluenoise
I'm not sure if you're talking about my initial post or not, but just to clarify my own experience...
I was comparing brand-new Goodyear Eagle F1 A/S 235/45 to brand-new Goodyear Eagle F1 A/S 245/45 when I made my observations. I'm on the 245s now.
I was comparing brand-new Goodyear Eagle F1 A/S 235/45 to brand-new Goodyear Eagle F1 A/S 245/45 when I made my observations. I'm on the 245s now.
#20
Don't feed the...WTF?
Originally Posted by GLowrdr
I actually just put some 245's on my car this past summer. I actually found that I liked the handling better. I do know exactly what you mean by they aren't as agile when your turning (the 245's) - but I think it's kind of nice. I feel that there is more effort required to turn the wheels because they are a little more grippy.
Hard to explain, but if you've gone from 235's to the 245's - you all probably know the differences.
Hard to explain, but if you've gone from 235's to the 245's - you all probably know the differences.
OK.. so it's a little late in the game --> but I just now realized that I've been talking out of my ass this whole thread. I didnt go from 235/40's to 245/40's. I went to 235/45's and got a wider tire.
That's why I like the handling a lot better. I couldn't figure out why everyone was saying it was mushy...lol
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
MrHeeltoe
1G TSX Tires, Wheels, & Suspension
20
02-23-2023 01:54 PM
MrHeeltoe
2G TSX Tires, Wheels & Suspension
3
09-29-2015 10:43 PM
MrHeeltoe
3G TL Tires, Wheels & Suspension
0
09-28-2015 05:43 PM