Preview shot of my new photoshoot.
#1
Banned
Thread Starter
Preview shot of my new photoshoot.
Here's a teaser gentlemen...
More updates this week....
My friend complained how my car was too black and very hard to get lighting to actually see my car for night shots.
Result of 30 seconds exposure...hahah
More updates this week....
My friend complained how my car was too black and very hard to get lighting to actually see my car for night shots.
Result of 30 seconds exposure...hahah
Trending Topics
#10
Drifting
Originally Posted by ballinfizzle89
Looks hot man!
Wouldn't you want to higher the ISO? Sorry, :Noob: at PS/photography
Wouldn't you want to higher the ISO? Sorry, :Noob: at PS/photography
the higher the ISO = the less "sharp" the image is due to noise. higher ISO's use more power as well, contributing to the noise or "graininess" that you see on some shots. but higher ISO's reduce the amount of time needed to properly expose the subject (shorter shutter speeds) needed to get the proper exposure. again, its counter-intuitive, as shorter shutter speeds sometimes dont get as much light on the subject (this isnt the same "light" that is properly exposing the subject), hence you get a dark image from time to time.
the solution is two fold - use full Manual mode or bracket your shots. when you bracket, you shoot the same subject 3 to 5 times at varying settings (overexposed, underexposed, proper exposure, etc). you then can do a composite picture where you combine the highlights, shadows and details to get a "properly" exposed photo (similar to what HDR is all about).
the OP said that the shot was taken at 30 seconds. from experience, i can say that the camera was set at a low ISO (maybe ISO 100), hence the dark subject. now depending on the camera, 30 seconds may be the maximum time he can keep the shutter open, or it may have a manual mode, where he can increase the time (maybe about 2 mins) if he wants to keep the detail (avoid grain/noise) and get a brighter, more exposed subject.
or he can set it at a slightly higher ISO (maybe ISO 400), and experiment some more. Im almost positive that an increase in ISO (or longer exposure time) would yield a brighter subject. that or he can use a flash. that works too
#12
Banned
Thread Starter
Just awaiting the rest of the shots from my friend...
Here's another one from that day. It was kinda a 3 car photoshoot.
I will start a new thread to show you guys all the pics when I receive the rest.
My friend said my car shoulda been in the middle in this shot, but I didn't listen at the shoot when he told me to move it. =P
I guess it's too dark for the corner.
Here's another one from that day. It was kinda a 3 car photoshoot.
I will start a new thread to show you guys all the pics when I receive the rest.
My friend said my car shoulda been in the middle in this shot, but I didn't listen at the shoot when he told me to move it. =P
I guess it's too dark for the corner.
#15
Burning Brakes
Where's Darksom? This has NBP written all over it
#16
FizzyStatus!
iTrader: (6)
Originally Posted by sixsixfour
generally speaking, lower the ISO = sharper the image at the expense of more exposure time (longer shutter speeds) needed to get a proper exposure. its counter-intuitive though, because the camera will use a larger (small number) aperture, which will reduce the depth of field (amount of the subject in focus), reducing the clarity.
the higher the ISO = the less "sharp" the image is due to noise. higher ISO's use more power as well, contributing to the noise or "graininess" that you see on some shots. but higher ISO's reduce the amount of time needed to properly expose the subject (shorter shutter speeds) needed to get the proper exposure. again, its counter-intuitive, as shorter shutter speeds sometimes dont get as much light on the subject (this isnt the same "light" that is properly exposing the subject), hence you get a dark image from time to time.
the solution is two fold - use full Manual mode or bracket your shots. when you bracket, you shoot the same subject 3 to 5 times at varying settings (overexposed, underexposed, proper exposure, etc). you then can do a composite picture where you combine the highlights, shadows and details to get a "properly" exposed photo (similar to what HDR is all about).
the OP said that the shot was taken at 30 seconds. from experience, i can say that the camera was set at a low ISO (maybe ISO 100), hence the dark subject. now depending on the camera, 30 seconds may be the maximum time he can keep the shutter open, or it may have a manual mode, where he can increase the time (maybe about 2 mins) if he wants to keep the detail (avoid grain/noise) and get a brighter, more exposed subject.
or he can set it at a slightly higher ISO (maybe ISO 400), and experiment some more. Im almost positive that an increase in ISO (or longer exposure time) would yield a brighter subject. that or he can use a flash. that works too
the higher the ISO = the less "sharp" the image is due to noise. higher ISO's use more power as well, contributing to the noise or "graininess" that you see on some shots. but higher ISO's reduce the amount of time needed to properly expose the subject (shorter shutter speeds) needed to get the proper exposure. again, its counter-intuitive, as shorter shutter speeds sometimes dont get as much light on the subject (this isnt the same "light" that is properly exposing the subject), hence you get a dark image from time to time.
the solution is two fold - use full Manual mode or bracket your shots. when you bracket, you shoot the same subject 3 to 5 times at varying settings (overexposed, underexposed, proper exposure, etc). you then can do a composite picture where you combine the highlights, shadows and details to get a "properly" exposed photo (similar to what HDR is all about).
the OP said that the shot was taken at 30 seconds. from experience, i can say that the camera was set at a low ISO (maybe ISO 100), hence the dark subject. now depending on the camera, 30 seconds may be the maximum time he can keep the shutter open, or it may have a manual mode, where he can increase the time (maybe about 2 mins) if he wants to keep the detail (avoid grain/noise) and get a brighter, more exposed subject.
or he can set it at a slightly higher ISO (maybe ISO 400), and experiment some more. Im almost positive that an increase in ISO (or longer exposure time) would yield a brighter subject. that or he can use a flash. that works too
oh and Flash on NBP=big no no hahah with all y experience ofcourse
#18
Banned
Thread Starter
Originally Posted by ballinfizzle89
Elkayem-MORE PICS hahah those look rele good though
I wish I can post sooner for you guys to enjoy too, but I am awaitng my friend, cuz he has to resize some of the pics and edit them.
I have some pics of the 3 coupe, but he hasn't done my TL yet.
#22
Banned
Thread Starter
Originally Posted by JJaber06
Hm, is it me, or does the TL look wider than the 3 coupe?
But from the rear end, the TL looks more narrow.
Maybe I should compare it next time I come out with him.
#26
Banned
Thread Starter
It's cool how you guys love the pic even though you can barely see my car. =P
Thanks for the compliments so far! Good feedbacks! Rest of the pics coming soon!
Very very soon!
Thanks for the compliments so far! Good feedbacks! Rest of the pics coming soon!
Very very soon!
#29
Banned
Thread Starter
Originally Posted by AcuraTLboi
i wish there was a place liek this over here. gotta love the backdrop. what camera is he using?
Sorry, I don't know much about camera's, hahaahha! =P
#31
Photographer
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Honolulu, HI
Age: 44
Posts: 640
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by elkayem
Here's a teaser gentlemen...
More updates this week....
My friend complained how my car was too black and very hard to get lighting to actually see my car for night shots.
Result of 30 seconds exposure...hahah
More updates this week....
My friend complained how my car was too black and very hard to get lighting to actually see my car for night shots.
Result of 30 seconds exposure...hahah
next time you may want to try and focus on the car and not the back ground then maybe you will get better resluts. also a longer exposure time would also help. that and bump up the ISO.
#32
Banned
Thread Starter
10 seconds?
It was actually 30, my friend edited it and took it. Like I said, I don't know anything about cameras and photography, I just told you what I heard.
By the way guys, here's another picture...
It was actually 30, my friend edited it and took it. Like I said, I don't know anything about cameras and photography, I just told you what I heard.
By the way guys, here's another picture...
#33
Photographer
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Honolulu, HI
Age: 44
Posts: 640
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by elkayem
10 seconds?
It was actually 30, my friend edited it and took it. Like I said, I don't know anything about cameras and photography, I just told you what I heard.
[/IMG]
It was actually 30, my friend edited it and took it. Like I said, I don't know anything about cameras and photography, I just told you what I heard.
[/IMG]
#34
Banned
Thread Starter
Originally Posted by DNPhotography
sorry but the pic you posted is taken at 10 sec. every picture has a very little file embeded in it. its called a exif file. this file contains a lot of information including camera and the settings the pic was taken at.
I wouldn't know =P
But please don't accuse me of "lying" just because I got something wrong.
Not everyone is as good as photography as you are.
Educating someone is one thing, accusing one of lying is another.
I respect you for your knowledge, for your car, and photography.
But I do not respect that kind of attitude.
WDP owners...
Jokes
#35
Photographer
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Honolulu, HI
Age: 44
Posts: 640
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by elkayem
Oh I see.
I wouldn't know =P
But please don't accuse me of "lying" just because I got something wrong.
Not everyone is as good as photography as you are.
Educating someone is one thing, accusing one of lying is another.
I respect you for your knowledge, for your car, and photography.
But I do not respect that kind of attitude.
WDP owners...
Jokes
I wouldn't know =P
But please don't accuse me of "lying" just because I got something wrong.
Not everyone is as good as photography as you are.
Educating someone is one thing, accusing one of lying is another.
I respect you for your knowledge, for your car, and photography.
But I do not respect that kind of attitude.
WDP owners...
Jokes
#37
Instructor
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Vancouver, BC
Age: 43
Posts: 126
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Very nice shot!
Where did you take this?
This looks like you are in the burrard bridge area taking the pic of downtown from the vancouver side.
Am I correct?
Where did you take this?
This looks like you are in the burrard bridge area taking the pic of downtown from the vancouver side.
Am I correct?
#38
Banned
Thread Starter
Originally Posted by ck25
Very nice shot!
Where did you take this?
This looks like you are in the burrard bridge area taking the pic of downtown from the vancouver side.
Am I correct?
Where did you take this?
This looks like you are in the burrard bridge area taking the pic of downtown from the vancouver side.
Am I correct?
#39
Instructor
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Vancouver, BC
Age: 43
Posts: 126
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by elkayem
Yup! Right below that, more near Grandville bridge though. This is Grandville Island.
I guess I'll be there for some photo shoot next time!
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
MrHeeltoe
1G TSX Tires, Wheels, & Suspension
20
02-23-2023 01:54 PM
detailersdomain
Wash & Wax
3
10-09-2015 10:13 PM
MrHeeltoe
2G TSX Tires, Wheels & Suspension
3
09-29-2015 10:43 PM
MrHeeltoe
3G TL Tires, Wheels & Suspension
0
09-28-2015 05:43 PM