XLR8 V2 UR Pulley - Pics, Dyno.....

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 04-07-2013, 02:27 AM
  #1  
Instructor
Thread Starter
 
TLOHTL's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 244
Received 47 Likes on 34 Posts
Exclamation XLR8 V2 UR Pulley - Pics, Dyno.....

Hi Azine,

There has been a lot of talks in regards to this NEW XLR8 design.

This thread is here to assist those interested in doing this mod.
I will have a : review, pics, vids & DYNO sheet.

First off :

Car : 2005 Acura TL 6-spd

Mods : Aem cold air intake, Outlaw Engineering Spacers, RV6 V3 PCD's.

Car made : 240whp with the above mods.

Now onto the latest mod :



This is the NEWEST XLR8 UR Pulley. It is even lighter than the original. This is the Standard size Pulley.

The install was pretty easy. Had it done right on the DYNO.
We did a few pulls b4. Made 240whp.



All done ! Looking Nice....Now let's see what it can do POWER wise.....



( Don't mind, car is a lil dirty.... )

And the moment we have all been waiting for......





And now my review on the mod : (4WHP/2WTQ)

Well where to start ? Another GREAT mod from the boys @ XLR8 Performance !

The car drives so much ( lighter ) persay.
It's as if you have a trunk full, and 5 ppl in the car. ( This was b4 mod ) Now it's like your the only one in the car and it just wants to go! ( after this pulley mod )

You can really feel the car accelerate much much easier !

I put about 800kms on it so far ( highway, city etc. )
And I LOVE it !

If you were on the fence with this mod..... JUST GET IT
The following 8 users liked this post by TLOHTL:
1black_seven (09-30-2014), 253RL (08-29-2014), Chisel (09-29-2014), DomGSR-T (04-07-2013), jiga21 (06-29-2014), Sonnick (09-29-2014), Speeden6 (09-29-2014), thisaznboi88 (04-07-2013) and 3 others liked this post. (Show less...)
Old 04-07-2013, 02:36 AM
  #2  
Safety Car
iTrader: (7)
 
vietxquangstah's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: DALLAS TX
Posts: 3,806
Received 765 Likes on 550 Posts
Nice!
Old 04-07-2013, 10:55 AM
  #3  
Safety Car
iTrader: (7)
 
thisaznboi88's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: San Jose, CA/ Charleston, WV
Posts: 4,045
Received 619 Likes on 459 Posts
Finally some Dyno numbers!! Now people can stop bashing the pulley and say that it makes no power. I love my UR pulley
Old 04-07-2013, 11:08 AM
  #4  
Safety Car
 
pimpin-tl's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Abilene, TX
Age: 49
Posts: 3,992
Received 148 Likes on 99 Posts
Pulley's do not gain measurable HP. 4 hp and 2 TQ can be a threads-hold difference between the 1st dyno run and the next. temps also can change that.
The following users liked this post:
Sonnick (04-07-2013)
Old 04-07-2013, 11:27 AM
  #5  
Instructor
Thread Starter
 
TLOHTL's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 244
Received 47 Likes on 34 Posts
Yes finally some dyno numbers.

This thread was to illustrate that these pulleys do add power. 3 pulls were done b4 and 3 after.
Hp/tq was same b4/after with each run off by a ( .1 - . 3 )
Old 04-07-2013, 11:40 AM
  #6  
Safety Car
 
pimpin-tl's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Abilene, TX
Age: 49
Posts: 3,992
Received 148 Likes on 99 Posts
Originally Posted by TLOHTL
Yes finally some dyno numbers.

This thread was to illustrate that these pulleys do add power. 3 pulls were done b4 and 3 after.
Hp/tq was same b4/after with each run off by a ( .1 - . 3 )
Umm means nothing. Like I said the threshold difference can be caused between the different pulls and temps. UDP pulleys DO NOT gain HP period.
Old 04-07-2013, 03:48 PM
  #7  
Safety Car
iTrader: (7)
 
thisaznboi88's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: San Jose, CA/ Charleston, WV
Posts: 4,045
Received 619 Likes on 459 Posts
^ don't shit on his thread. There is finally numbers. No one else ever post stuff.
The following users liked this post:
9632tl (04-08-2013)
Old 04-07-2013, 04:12 PM
  #8  
Safety Car
iTrader: (4)
 
JTS97Z28's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Plainfield, IL
Age: 43
Posts: 4,242
Received 946 Likes on 650 Posts
Originally Posted by pimpin-tl
Pulley's do not gain measurable HP. 4 hp and 2 TQ can be a threads-hold difference between the 1st dyno run and the next. temps also can change that.


I kind of agree with what pimpin-tl said. I dont want to be one to shit on the thread either because thats awesome that this guy went out and bought the mod and even had the car dynod. I just think that 4whp is such a small number than you can see those differences or more just between each pull. And then to come on here and he made it sound like he added a supercharger or something with the description of how it felt LOL. I mean we are talking about a pulley......
The following 2 users liked this post by JTS97Z28:
pimpin-tl (04-07-2013), Sonnick (04-08-2013)
Old 04-07-2013, 05:10 PM
  #9  
Advanced
 
bigballer8526's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 91
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Originally Posted by JTS97Z28
I kind of agree with what pimpin-tl said. I dont want to be one to shit on the thread either because thats awesome that this guy went out and bought the mod and even had the car dynod. I just think that 4whp is such a small number than you can see those differences or more just between each pull. And then to come on here and he made it sound like he added a supercharger or something with the description of how it felt LOL. I mean we are talking about a pulley......
agreed, but there's a big difference if the 4whp gain is throughout the powerband or just limited to a certain engine speed. cant really see the graph that well, so cant comment on that
Old 04-07-2013, 05:21 PM
  #10  
Suzuka Master
iTrader: (2)
 
anx1300c's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: 633 Stag Trail Rd
Posts: 5,020
Received 930 Likes on 612 Posts
Props to you for doing this! It's stupid to think that lowering parasitic loss through everything after the crankshaft can't show anything on the dyno. If this were the case, then why would dynos that bolt up directly to the hubs, thus eliminating the wheels, always read higher? Obviously, the pulley gains will be smaller than eliminating the wheels and tires, but physics dictate it will gain power, albeit miniscule. And again, the gains will be most prominent in first gear and drop off in each subsequent gear; inertia at work.

That said, c'mon, it feels like you lost four passengers and a trunk full of gear? Are we talking hamsters as passengers and a trunk full of cotton balls? I know what my car feels like with just two average weight passengers and a trunk full of luggage, and then how it feels unloaded. I felt nothing when adding the pulley. It's your mind playing tricks.

But again, I do thank you for contributing to the forum.
The following users liked this post:
Sonnick (04-08-2013)
Old 04-07-2013, 06:00 PM
  #11  
Team Owner
iTrader: (2)
 
Steven Bell's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Kansas City, MO (Overland Park, KS)
Posts: 36,545
Received 6,470 Likes on 5,162 Posts
Nice work.
Old 04-07-2013, 06:06 PM
  #12  
Racer
iTrader: (1)
 
DomGSR-T's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Montreal
Age: 49
Posts: 356
Received 122 Likes on 75 Posts
Thanks for your work/time for that great test! that's the numbers I tought that mods would do and I'm glad I don't have to test it myself to make sure I will do other same day dyno soon with different parts.
The following users liked this post:
hondazex (04-08-2013)
Old 04-07-2013, 06:34 PM
  #13  
Instructor
Thread Starter
 
TLOHTL's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 244
Received 47 Likes on 34 Posts
Originally Posted by thisaznboi88
^ don't shit on his thread. There is finally numbers. No one else ever post stuff.


Thanks ! And sorry if Im making it sound " too good ". But what Im trying to say is it's not just about the 4whp. This mod only adds 4whp/2wtq. This mod was installed on the dyno took 40 min. 3 pulls b4 and 3 pulls after. 3 pulls b4 were all 240whp. 3 pulls after were all 244whp. Ok enough with the numbers.

The best way to describe this mod is the car accelerates much more effortlessly.
Thats why I used the 5 people in car and trunk full vs. Only driver.
This is NOT the crazziest or the Best mod for the TL ! But it is worth every penny and you can feel the difference.
Old 04-07-2013, 09:59 PM
  #14  
Burning Brakes
 
Dave_B's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Shawnee, KS
Age: 49
Posts: 950
Likes: 0
Received 45 Likes on 32 Posts
Originally Posted by pimpin-tl
Umm means nothing. Like I said the threshold difference can be caused between the different pulls and temps. UDP pulleys DO NOT gain HP period.
Agreed. I had a UR UDP on my prior 96 Maxima. Dynoed it and it made no measureable power. 1/4 mile runs after were actually fractionally slower because the reduced moment of inertia made the car harder to launch and 330' times were reduced. It bogged much easier. After about 40 1/4 mile passes and 1.5 years, I got rid of the UDP. It's snake oil. Never again. The car was no slower when I put the OEM pulley back on (7.5lbs vs 1.2lbs). Consistent upper 14.6s@96mph with the UDP and consistent lower 14.6s@96mph without.
The following users liked this post:
pimpin-tl (04-07-2013)
Old 04-07-2013, 10:18 PM
  #15  
Suzuka Master
 
rossv1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Macon,GA
Age: 31
Posts: 5,840
Received 850 Likes on 673 Posts
Old 04-08-2013, 11:16 AM
  #16  
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (1)
 
Excelerate's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: www.ExceleratePerformance.com
Age: 43
Posts: 9,877
Received 624 Likes on 478 Posts
Thank you for the dyno numbers and feedback. Glad to see you're enjoying the product. It's an inexpensive upgrade and even the dyno numbers don't fully reflect how much more responsive the throttle is after the upgrade.
Old 04-08-2013, 11:52 AM
  #17  
All motor
 
Sonnick's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Long Island
Posts: 3,530
Received 532 Likes on 395 Posts
Originally Posted by anx1300c
Props to you for doing this! It's stupid to think that lowering parasitic loss through everything after the crankshaft can't show anything on the dyno. If this were the case, then why would dynos that bolt up directly to the hubs, thus eliminating the wheels, always read higher? Obviously, the pulley gains will be smaller than eliminating the wheels and tires, but physics dictate it will gain power, albeit miniscule. And again, the gains will be most prominent in first gear and drop off in each subsequent gear; inertia at work.

That said, c'mon, it feels like you lost four passengers and a trunk full of gear? Are we talking hamsters as passengers and a trunk full of cotton balls? I know what my car feels like with just two average weight passengers and a trunk full of luggage, and then how it feels unloaded. I felt nothing when adding the pulley. It's your mind playing tricks.

But again, I do thank you for contributing to the forum.
^ This to the T.

I felt the gains of the pulley in 1st gear only. 5 passengers and a full trunk..............lol.
Old 04-18-2013, 08:06 AM
  #18  
2008 TL Type-S
 
TurboGSR96's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: Newark, Delaware
Age: 42
Posts: 93
Received 13 Likes on 12 Posts
I am unfamiliar with the stock pulley, is the stock unit just a pulley or is it a damper?
Old 04-18-2013, 08:11 AM
  #19  
Race Director
iTrader: (1)
 
maharajamd's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Columbus, OH
Posts: 13,382
Received 1,544 Likes on 1,197 Posts
^The stock pulley has a harmonic dampener in it. These are solid.

It's a huge debate and not worth bringing up. Many enthusiasts run many miles with aftermarket "solid" pulleys.
Old 04-18-2013, 08:25 AM
  #20  
2008 TL Type-S
 
TurboGSR96's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: Newark, Delaware
Age: 42
Posts: 93
Received 13 Likes on 12 Posts
Originally Posted by Maharajamd
^The stock pulley has a harmonic dampener in it. These are solid.

It's a huge debate and not worth bringing up. Many enthusiasts run many miles with aftermarket "solid" pulleys.
Lol I know, i wonder how many of those enthusiasts drop their oil pans and check their bearings after 50k miles... for minute gain ill pass for longevity... the stocker is a damper for a reason imo.
Old 04-18-2013, 04:08 PM
  #21  
Slot Machine Lubricator
iTrader: (2)
 
1black_seven's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: KS/TX
Posts: 1,883
Received 404 Likes on 316 Posts
Someone mentioned to me that our engines were internally balanced.
When I installed mine, my first gear felt lighter coming off a red light but that's about it.

Last edited by 1black_seven; 04-18-2013 at 04:10 PM.
Old 08-30-2013, 02:32 PM
  #22  
Instructor
iTrader: (2)
 
gilla_monster's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: New Jersey
Age: 40
Posts: 220
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I would venture a guess that you really wouldn't notice a difference with the UR pulley UNLESS you replace the dual mass flywheel at the same time. There is so much power required to get that behemoth turning that the much smaller and lighter OEM pulley just goes along for the ride. I could see how some people, eager to get a tickle from their butt-dyno, would "feel" a difference, but in reality, it would only be off idle RPM.
Like spinning a bicycle wheel vs. a motorcycle wheel; once you get them going, inertia does the rest.
Old 08-30-2013, 04:33 PM
  #23  
Suzuka Master
 
Joneill44's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Boston
Age: 32
Posts: 7,998
Received 3,594 Likes on 1,720 Posts
Originally Posted by Excelerate
Thank you for the dyno numbers and feedback. Glad to see you're enjoying the product. It's an inexpensive upgrade and even the dyno numbers don't fully reflect how much more responsive the throttle is after the upgrade.
Part # ?
Old 08-30-2013, 08:13 PM
  #24  
Burning Brakes
 
callahan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Fort Wayne, IN
Age: 35
Posts: 990
Received 73 Likes on 71 Posts
Originally Posted by gilla_monster
I would venture a guess that you really wouldn't notice a difference with the UR pulley UNLESS you replace the dual mass flywheel at the same time. There is so much power required to get that behemoth turning that the much smaller and lighter OEM pulley just goes along for the ride. I could see how some people, eager to get a tickle from their butt-dyno, would "feel" a difference, but in reality, it would only be off idle RPM.
Like spinning a bicycle wheel vs. a motorcycle wheel; once you get them going, inertia does the rest.
I did notice a slight change with the pulley, when I installed my LW flywheel it was a huge difference. Car revs much more freely now, take offs are a different story lol.
Old 09-03-2013, 12:09 AM
  #25  
Burning Brakes
 
Fatfrii's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: CA
Posts: 819
Received 45 Likes on 29 Posts
the argument that it makes no gains is invalid until there are more dynos done like this one. Never criticize someone who is in pursuit of any type of knowledge. Good job OP and encourage more people to Dyno after pulley installs.
Old 09-03-2013, 06:29 AM
  #26  
Burning Brakes
 
Grand_hustle17's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Age: 37
Posts: 814
Received 95 Likes on 84 Posts
Originally Posted by pimpin-tl
Umm means nothing. Like I said the threshold difference can be caused between the different pulls and temps. UDP pulleys DO NOT gain HP period.
Unless temps are dropping 20 degrees or more withing that 30-60min time frame i dont see how you can really say otherwise when clearly... Cleeeearly this is shown to make power... Whether you want to call it measurable power then thats your ignorance... The pulley makes power... And just so you know, temp changes arent always beneficial to making power so unless you can prove otherwise you should quit the hating...
The following users liked this post:
Chisel (09-28-2014)
Old 09-03-2013, 09:03 AM
  #27  
Suzuka Master
iTrader: (2)
 
anx1300c's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: 633 Stag Trail Rd
Posts: 5,020
Received 930 Likes on 612 Posts
Temperatures mean nothing on a corrected dyno anyway. The correction factor software adjusts the numbers accordingly for any ambient changes. There was a thread on here in which a mechanical engineer mathematically proved the gains in each gear that the pulley would show.
The following users liked this post:
thisaznboi88 (09-03-2013)
Old 09-04-2013, 01:18 PM
  #28  
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (1)
 
Excelerate's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: www.ExceleratePerformance.com
Age: 43
Posts: 9,877
Received 624 Likes on 478 Posts
Originally Posted by gilla_monster
I would venture a guess that you really wouldn't notice a difference with the UR pulley UNLESS you replace the dual mass flywheel at the same time. There is so much power required to get that behemoth turning that the much smaller and lighter OEM pulley just goes along for the ride. I could see how some people, eager to get a tickle from their butt-dyno, would "feel" a difference, but in reality, it would only be off idle RPM.
Like spinning a bicycle wheel vs. a motorcycle wheel; once you get them going, inertia does the rest.
It does make a difference regardless of installing a LWFW or not. It's not going to throw you back in your seat but it is a worthwhile mod for $200.


Originally Posted by Joneill44
Part # ?
Here's the link:

http://store.excelerateperformance.c.../i-291887.aspx
Old 09-05-2013, 12:13 AM
  #29  
Suzuka Master
iTrader: (2)
 
anx1300c's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: 633 Stag Trail Rd
Posts: 5,020
Received 930 Likes on 612 Posts
Josh, is your site going to be functional soon? Been trying to place an order and keep getting 500 errors.
Old 09-05-2013, 08:09 AM
  #30  
Senior Moderator
 
fsttyms1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Appleton WI
Age: 49
Posts: 81,383
Received 3,063 Likes on 2,119 Posts
Originally Posted by TurboGSR96
Lol I know, i wonder how many of those enthusiasts drop their oil pans and check their bearings after 50k miles... for minute gain ill pass for longevity... the stocker is a damper for a reason imo.
I have seen mine with over 220k on them and they were just fine (when i swapped the motor for the 6 speed conversion) Current motor has close to 400k on it with 200k with the light weight pulley on it (on and both motors were 15k oil change intervals). And i will put it on my new 3.7 motor im putting in. Saying you will loose longevity without knowing
The following users liked this post:
Chisel (09-28-2014)
Old 09-05-2013, 08:15 AM
  #31  
Senior Moderator
 
fsttyms1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Appleton WI
Age: 49
Posts: 81,383
Received 3,063 Likes on 2,119 Posts
And those that think that it doesnt make a difference, why do you think F1 engines go thru such drastic engineering to reduce every ounce of rotating weight. Because it makes a difference. Years ago I built a 327 engine that had a knifeedged and lightened crank, it was 5.5 lbs lighter than the crank i had originally installed. On the dyno (with NO other changes to the engine) it made around 24 hp more and was able to spin almost 8k rpm (if memory serves me correctly). The motor was MUCH more lively

Its funny some say its not worth it when they are looking for other ways to find every last bit of power . Just the same as those that think that tuning a stock engine just to gain 7> hp isnt worth it. Some times its NOT about the number but the overall drive-ability that makes it worth it.

Last edited by fsttyms1; 09-05-2013 at 08:37 AM.
Old 09-05-2013, 02:06 PM
  #32  
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (1)
 
Excelerate's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: www.ExceleratePerformance.com
Age: 43
Posts: 9,877
Received 624 Likes on 478 Posts
Originally Posted by anx1300c
Josh, is your site going to be functional soon? Been trying to place an order and keep getting 500 errors.
Just use the normal website:

http://store.excelerateperformance.com/

The HOA store is being revamped as we were having difficulty customizing it.
Old 09-07-2013, 11:22 PM
  #33  
Mr. Detail
 
Scottwax's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Arlington, TX
Age: 62
Posts: 1,096
Received 198 Likes on 151 Posts
Technically, a lighter pulley doesn't add power, it just reduces parasitic losses. But the end result is the same. Just like lighter wheels. They don't actually give your car more horsepower but since the take less power to accelerate, you can show gains on a dyno as it accelerates.

And pretty much anything you can do to reduce rotating weight is good. I road bike and a rear wheel 200 grams (about 1/2 pound) lighter was a noticeable improvement. Spins up more quickly. I didn't instantly become more powerful, just had a wheel sucking up less watts than the old one.
Old 09-28-2014, 02:02 PM
  #34  
Intermediate
 
Chisel's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: Saint Michael, MN
Posts: 27
Received 5 Likes on 4 Posts
Scottwax is absolutely correct...
Old 09-28-2014, 09:11 PM
  #35  
J-series addict
iTrader: (4)
 
yungone501's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Plano, Tx
Posts: 2,363
Received 614 Likes on 464 Posts
Great thread.

Though I was hoping for an underdrive unit to be tested, this helps show me that I admittedly was wrong in my belief of it not adding power. Though the gains aren't as impressive as what I think the underdrive pulley would add, it's still good to know that it does do something.

On the other hand, the dyno shows that power is added at the extreme height of the rev range and torque is improved early on in the powerband. This tells me two things:

1. One can see improved torque below 3500 RPMs.

2. One must rev beyond 6300-6500 RPMs in order to utilize the added power.

To elaborate on number one, I must add that due to dyno sampling, it makes discussing the added torque benefits a bit difficult to do given they begin at roughly 3000 RPMs. That means that the pulley could be either decreasing or increasing (or even neither) the torque prior to what's seen. Judging by the traces, I'd feel safe to assume that it's probably improved prior to sampling so for those wanting to add some momentum down low for city driving or maybe even fuel efficiency (generally the two correlate), running this pulley would be a good idea. Again, unseen traces makes this only an educated assumption but one most will probably agree on that it is seeing elevation long before trace start.

As for the second point, it's not anywhere near as impressive even though the max number is 1-2hp higher than the torque numbers. Because most of the product users are seeing rev limits of 6800 RPMs (or at least the TL and the Accord), that gives a usable rev range of maybe 500 RPMs. And when you think about it, is very little considering how small that scale is as well as the small increase in power you will gain. I've always said that if you can't see improved power or torque throughout the entire rev range or if its not a respectable (definition of this word will differ) amount added in one area, than it's not worth paying for.

Conclusion would be that the product tested here in this thread has its place in the market, sure. But I'd say those who are looking for an increase in torque or fuel efficiency would appreciate it more so than the person expecting reasonable power gains up top. And also, is can agree with those who may say that the product can be purchased for the sole reason of the improvement in both areas but most who buy performance parts aren't generally looking for added mpg's or torque in the city. Shift points when made at or slightly before redline don't drop the engines speed back into a usable powerband that is supported by this pulley. This means that the added torque will only be beneficial from a dig if you buy it for performance reasons.

Again, good to see some official data on the product. Maybe next time someone could do an underdrive pulley. I've always felt the underdrive pulley would give around a 10hp addition but then again, I was reluctant to believe the standard pulley would have a measurable increase in power.
Old 09-29-2014, 10:50 AM
  #36  
Racer
iTrader: (2)
 
Speeden6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Posts: 287
Received 45 Likes on 32 Posts
Love how in the other posts Everyone said they want Dyno Proof. Now someone has Dyno Proof and everyone is saying Milarkee (spelling).

The fact of the matter is this is a cheap mod, and is (at leat to me and many others) noticable in acceleration. 4whp is probably generous however it makes gains and helps acceleration.

Basically if you want to say that this part does nothing you are saying XLR8 is scamming us which many of us know is not true. they are a great company we trust and love. Trust they make a good product and dont sell us crap. This is another example of their time, engineering, and efforts to improve the platform.

OP - Great job posting and thanks for backing up product with numbers.
Old 09-30-2014, 10:50 PM
  #37  
Slot Machine Lubricator
iTrader: (2)
 
1black_seven's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: KS/TX
Posts: 1,883
Received 404 Likes on 316 Posts
Talking

Now if someone could do this with the throttle body spacer
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
MrHeeltoe
1G TSX Tires, Wheels, & Suspension
20
02-23-2023 01:54 PM
08KBP_VA
2G RL (2005-2012)
44
10-22-2019 01:55 PM
rp_guy
Member Cars for Sale
9
07-16-2017 07:33 AM
MrHeeltoe
2G TSX Tires, Wheels & Suspension
3
09-29-2015 10:43 PM
MrHeeltoe
3G TL Tires, Wheels & Suspension
0
09-28-2015 05:43 PM



Quick Reply: XLR8 V2 UR Pulley - Pics, Dyno.....



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:01 PM.