stage 3 = 0 hp gain but catback = 10 hp ????

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 04-18-2010, 10:31 AM
  #1  
Advanced
Thread Starter
 
ackebous's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Pennsylvania
Age: 72
Posts: 64
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
stage 3 = 0 hp gain but catback = 10 hp ????

I have been reading a lot of posts here over the last month. Can someone help me understand why a catback exhaust can yield a 10 hp gain, but doing a stage 3 mod will not give any? Is it that the factory mufflers are so restrictive or is it the difference between the stock 2 1/4 " piping verses 2 1/2" ? Just curious. I did the stage 1 and to me it feels more responsive.
Old 04-18-2010, 10:42 AM
  #2  
Fear and Loathing in my
iTrader: (3)
 
Timb227's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: NJ
Age: 38
Posts: 1,191
Received 6 Likes on 4 Posts
From what I understand, removing or adding mid mufflers and resonators do not add, or free up any hp. So by taking them off any exhaust, it will not yield any performance. Likewise with adding a resonator, it does not reduce performance.

I believe with an aftermarket exhaust being 2.5", and stock being 2.25", it creates a much more free flowing exhaust. The larger piping as well as the smoother bends and Y pipe, also add HP.
Old 04-18-2010, 02:13 PM
  #3  
Three Wheelin'
 
SpiderX1016's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Age: 32
Posts: 1,785
Received 96 Likes on 74 Posts
Well, Changing the Resonator won't give you any power and removing the muffler will be a very little increase in power.

The difference of 2.25" and 2.5" won't really be much either.
Old 04-18-2010, 02:25 PM
  #4  
A Black TL
 
TL|GTX's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: MI
Posts: 1,373
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Yes actually changing the size of the piping does make most of the diff.
Old 04-18-2010, 03:13 PM
  #5  
Instructor
 
tlmaster1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: NJ
Age: 41
Posts: 240
Likes: 0
Received 12 Likes on 10 Posts
go with 3'' flange back to factory mufflers the best sound ever i love it on mine better then g35 or g37 animal
Old 04-18-2010, 06:58 PM
  #6  
1st Gear
 
keystonegreg's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Saskatchewan
Age: 64
Posts: 1
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Does after market j-pipe and catback exhaust improve fuel economy ?
Old 04-18-2010, 09:04 PM
  #7  
Drifting
iTrader: (1)
 
greco9885's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: long island, new york
Age: 35
Posts: 2,587
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Originally Posted by tlmaster1
go with 3'' flange back to factory mufflers the best sound ever i love it on mine better then g35 or g37 animal
3" is way to big for an n/a car. u are actually loosing some tq since the obvious lack of backpressure

and how did u turn 2.25 inlets to the mufflers into 3" inlets?
Old 04-18-2010, 09:06 PM
  #8  
LIST/RAMEN/WING MAHSTA 짱
iTrader: (16)
 
princelybug's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Orange, CA
Posts: 22,454
Received 207 Likes on 158 Posts
^


OP, any stage (1-4) won't do anything for you performance-wise. Doing this is strictly for sound. Stage 4 is basically a straight pipe. This will give you the best "flow" but you'll get a lot of rasp.
Old 04-18-2010, 09:07 PM
  #9  
LIST/RAMEN/WING MAHSTA 짱
iTrader: (16)
 
princelybug's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Orange, CA
Posts: 22,454
Received 207 Likes on 158 Posts
On a N/A car, going any more than 1/4" larger than stock diameter in the exhaust piping is going to be counter-productive.
Old 04-18-2010, 11:21 PM
  #10  
Team Owner
 
I hate cars's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Bakersfield
Posts: 20,172
Received 1,812 Likes on 1,283 Posts
With stock precats in place you could run a dual 6" exhaust all the way back and see no loss in low end.

Backpressure will still be higher even if you cut the exhaust off after the precats than it would be with PCD and a good cat back.

Even when torque is lost, it's not really lost, it's just shifted higher in the powerband.

You guys are being way too conservative about backpressure in these cars.
Old 04-19-2010, 08:47 AM
  #11  
Advanced
Thread Starter
 
ackebous's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Pennsylvania
Age: 72
Posts: 64
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by princelybug
^


OP, any stage (1-4) won't do anything for you performance-wise. Doing this is strictly for sound. Stage 4 is basically a straight pipe. This will give you the best "flow" but you'll get a lot of rasp.
That seems consistent with everything I been reading on this forum. But, I was just wondering specifcally what gives the HP gain in the catback systems from ATLP, Excerlerate, ect. Are the catbacks 2 1/2 all the way to the mufflers? What is the size of the oem from the y split to the mufflers? It would be interesting to understand the effects of different size pipes. For example, what size is the tubing of say the ATLP J pipe. What kind of volume would this have? For example, if the J pipe uses 2" that would be 2 pipes each being 2" collecting into oem 2 1/4 or 2 1/2" catback system pipes back to the Y and ?? after that. It just seems like the exhaust gases are being compressed and then decompressed again at the Y. So bottom line, what gives the hp gain and can it be achieved at a fraction of the cost of a catback system?
Old 04-19-2010, 10:10 AM
  #12  
Banned
iTrader: (2)
 
JackSampson's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Here
Posts: 493
Received 8 Likes on 7 Posts
Ok so going with any stage 1-4 yields no performance gain. So lets assume a TL-S is set up with stock precats, RV-6 J-Pipe, RV-6 Test Pipe, stock piping and mufflers after stage 3 exhaust. Now would changing out the last bit of piping and stock mufflers give any kind of performance gain?
Old 04-19-2010, 03:34 PM
  #13  
.:dedicated:.
iTrader: (1)
 
chinkwapin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Cupertino, CA
Age: 34
Posts: 748
Received 37 Likes on 35 Posts
Originally Posted by ackebous
That seems consistent with everything I been reading on this forum. But, I was just wondering specifcally what gives the HP gain in the catback systems from ATLP, Excerlerate, ect. Are the catbacks 2 1/2 all the way to the mufflers? What is the size of the oem from the y split to the mufflers? It would be interesting to understand the effects of different size pipes. For example, what size is the tubing of say the ATLP J pipe. What kind of volume would this have? For example, if the J pipe uses 2" that would be 2 pipes each being 2" collecting into oem 2 1/4 or 2 1/2" catback system pipes back to the Y and ?? after that. It just seems like the exhaust gases are being compressed and then decompressed again at the Y. So bottom line, what gives the hp gain and can it be achieved at a fraction of the cost of a catback system?
im 99% sure my comptech catback is 2.5 in to the y-pipe then 2 in to the mufflers. the 1/4 in difference from stock is what makes the difference, so technically you could get a 2.5 in catback custom made for cheaper than aftermarket catbacks and still see about the same results.
Old 04-19-2010, 03:41 PM
  #14  
Intermediate
 
Blown's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Age: 48
Posts: 28
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by SpiderX1016
The difference of 2.25" and 2.5" won't really be much either.
The difference is actually a lot more than you would think because we're talking about a 23% increase in the cross-sectional area of the pipe.
The amount of gain yielded by an exhaust mod all has to do with how restrictive the part being replaced is relative to the rest of the system. So it just goes to show that the factory mufflers and resonators are decent but the pipe is smaller than optimum and the stock J-pipe design is restrictive.
Old 04-19-2010, 03:58 PM
  #15  
LIST/RAMEN/WING MAHSTA 짱
iTrader: (16)
 
princelybug's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Orange, CA
Posts: 22,454
Received 207 Likes on 158 Posts
^
+1.
Old 04-19-2010, 04:00 PM
  #16  
LIST/RAMEN/WING MAHSTA 짱
iTrader: (16)
 
princelybug's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Orange, CA
Posts: 22,454
Received 207 Likes on 158 Posts
Originally Posted by chinkwapin
im 99% sure my comptech catback is 2.5 in to the y-pipe then 2 in to the mufflers. the 1/4 in difference from stock is what makes the difference, so technically you could get a 2.5 in catback custom made for cheaper than aftermarket catbacks and still see about the same results.
Be careful. If this was the case, no one would purchase name brand aftermarket exhausts. There is a LOT to be said about materials used, quality of welding, and mandrel bends.
Old 04-20-2010, 02:34 AM
  #17  
.:dedicated:.
iTrader: (1)
 
chinkwapin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Cupertino, CA
Age: 34
Posts: 748
Received 37 Likes on 35 Posts
Originally Posted by princelybug
Be careful. If this was the case, no one would purchase name brand aftermarket exhausts. There is a LOT to be said about materials used, quality of welding, and mandrel bends.
true but im just saying that it IS possible. obviously custom jobs have many variables to factor into the cost, while name brand products come with a higher price tag, they are backed by warranty, support, R&D, etc. you get what you pay for i guess?
Old 04-20-2010, 09:08 AM
  #18  
Intermediate
 
Blown's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Age: 48
Posts: 28
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
If you go to a shop to get a custom exhaust made just make sure they are using mandrel bent stainless pipe when they quote you and if possible take a look at some of their previous work to make sure they have good welding skills.
Old 04-21-2010, 11:30 AM
  #19  
10th Gear
 
AccordtypeT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Age: 45
Posts: 14
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by greco9885
3" is way to big for an n/a car. u are actually loosing some tq since the obvious lack of backpressure

and how did u turn 2.25 inlets to the mufflers into 3" inlets?
hey I don't want to argue with you but I saw few honda prelude put 3" piping and made sinificant gain over 2.5 piping about 5-10 whp and it's just 2.2liter so don't you think that a 3.5 liter need bigger than 2.5
Old 04-23-2010, 01:22 PM
  #20  
Intermediate
 
Blown's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Age: 48
Posts: 28
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
According to David Vizard, who has written many books on making hp, you can break down exhaust sizing like this:
Pipe should flow at least 2.2 cfm per hp produced.
Straight pipe will flow ~115 cfm per square inch of cross-sectional area.
Bends restrict flow and a muffler with the same size inlet and outlet will flow less than pipe of the same size. How much less depends on the design of the muffler and severity and quality of bends in the system.

So for a stock base TL, ideal exhaust diameter comes out right at 2.5". That's why there are good gains to be had with a 2.5" catback. If you back calculate for 3" it would be ideal for 370hp or so.
Old 04-23-2010, 01:50 PM
  #21  
Banned
iTrader: (2)
 
JackSampson's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Here
Posts: 493
Received 8 Likes on 7 Posts
Originally Posted by chinkwapin
im 99% sure my comptech catback is 2.5 in to the y-pipe then 2 in to the mufflers. the 1/4 in difference from stock is what makes the difference, so technically you could get a 2.5 in catback custom made for cheaper than aftermarket catbacks and still see about the same results.
Good info. So just go to an exhaust shop and have them install 2.5" mandrel bent pipe and new mufflers from the axle back? What kind of gains would this produce on a TL-S?
Old 04-24-2010, 10:18 PM
  #22  
Cruisin'
 
el_ache_veintidos's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Age: 42
Posts: 19
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Honda's love big exhaust. On a full bolt-on h22, k20, k24 or f20c you can run a 3" exhaust with minimal low end losses and get a couple more hp on the top end over a 2.5". I have seen gains of up to 8-10 whp from this. It have been dyno proven again and again and you can still see a LOT of people that keep telling others that a 3" exhaust is to big for a h22/k20/f20c without any facts to back up their claims, even after seeing dyno graphs that prove that they are wrong! Our engines obviously lack the high-revving DOHC vtec and even worst is that our exhaust manifolds are cast on the head limiting greatly exhaust flow and reducing the possibility to improve exhaust scavenging. Not all engines have the same needs, even when they have the same horsepower and displacement, so no mater what some books might said, there is no fancy formula to calculate the correct exhaust diameter. All that being said, I can't tell you for sure if a 3" exhaust will provide gains on our j32 engine, but when I do a custom single exhaust on my 04 6-speed it will be 3" because I believe it's not to big for an engine that displaces 3.2lt and can produce well over 260whp with bolt ons. I'm not a master builder nor have write any books, but I have work with hondas for over 10 years and have being part of every major honda forum out there, and on my h22 civic I have a 3" exhaust and on my previous car, a 07 civic Si (k20z3) I used to have also a 3" exhaust, both with good dyno proven gains over the 2.5" that were on the cars before. It's not back pressure what you are looking for after the header collector (j-pipe collector on our cars). If this was the case, you will lose horsepower by running open exhaust, when in real life you will normally see bigger gains that what you will see from any exhaust install. This don't mean that bigger is better because dumping exhaust directly to the air after the header collector it's not the same that dumping it in to a straight pipe. You have to keep exhaust pulses organized so they don't lose speed, that is what really restricts how big the diameter can be. If the exhaust pulses enter a exhaust that is to big for them, they start "bouncing" on the walls of the exhaust and lose speed and you lose power ;-)
Old 04-24-2010, 10:37 PM
  #23  
Cruisin'
 
el_ache_veintidos's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Age: 42
Posts: 19
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Arggg! my post was divided in paragraphs just before I click post message :-/
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
rp_guy
Member Cars for Sale
9
07-16-2017 07:33 AM
rcs86
Car Parts for Sale
3
08-02-2016 06:52 PM
johnpancakes014
2G TL Performance Parts & Modifications
3
09-27-2015 12:58 PM
jmaxima03
Member Cars for Sale
1
09-27-2015 10:22 AM



Quick Reply: stage 3 = 0 hp gain but catback = 10 hp ????



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:55 PM.