RV6 V2 True Dual Exhaust for '04-'08 TL Type-S Quads Batch 2 Collecting deposits
02-26-2012, 09:59 PM
#82
takin care of Business in
iTrader: (5)
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Kansas City, MO
Age: 40
Posts: 30,994
Received 4,732 Likes
on
4,064 Posts
RICHIE that sounds great.....sounds very very aggressive.....yes i will be honest and say it does have a tad bit of rasp, but its barely noticeable and as you mentioned NOT BAD AT ALL for a DD car....
PS: damn man you killed that auto hahaha, i really cant wait, if you strike a deal with JnR with the ECU tune along with the exhaust.....you full exhaust + ECU + tuned will be an AT KILLLAAAA !!!!
PS: damn man you killed that auto hahaha, i really cant wait, if you strike a deal with JnR with the ECU tune along with the exhaust.....you full exhaust + ECU + tuned will be an AT KILLLAAAA !!!!
The following 2 users liked this post by Inaccurate:
BostonSilverTypeS (03-24-2012),
justnspace (03-01-2012)
03-03-2012, 02:02 AM
#89
Intermediate
just in time got my deposit to richie, now we patiently wait which is the hardest part! it will be well worth it though, sounds so good i love morrissey's setup that's what i'm going for.
Last edited by Redbirds11; 03-03-2012 at 02:08 AM.
The following users liked this post:
Morrissey25 (03-03-2012)
03-04-2012, 08:05 PM
#93
Deposit Sent!! Time to save up for that ECU
1. Allen C
2. Kevin D
3. Ervin G
4. Julian R
5. Ryan T
6. Kareem M
7. John K
8. Choong L
9. Scott M (X25)
10. Tonino S
11. Andrew W
12. Micheal D
13. Joe A
14. Khang N
15. Pooran A
16 Daniel H
17. Aron M
18. Jifeng H
19. Walter G
20. Clayton C
1. Allen C
2. Kevin D
3. Ervin G
4. Julian R
5. Ryan T
6. Kareem M
7. John K
8. Choong L
9. Scott M (X25)
10. Tonino S
11. Andrew W
12. Micheal D
13. Joe A
14. Khang N
15. Pooran A
16 Daniel H
17. Aron M
18. Jifeng H
19. Walter G
20. Clayton C
03-04-2012, 11:06 PM
#95
Intermediate
Deposit Sent!! Time to save up for that ECU
1. Allen C
2. Kevin D
3. Ervin G
4. Julian R
5. Ryan T
6. Kareem M
7. John K
8. Choong L
9. Scott M (X25)
10. Tonino S
11. Andrew W
12. Micheal D
13. Joe A
14. Khang N
15. Pooran A
16 Daniel H
17. Aron M
18. Jifeng H
19. Walter G
20. Clayton C
1. Allen C
2. Kevin D
3. Ervin G
4. Julian R
5. Ryan T
6. Kareem M
7. John K
8. Choong L
9. Scott M (X25)
10. Tonino S
11. Andrew W
12. Micheal D
13. Joe A
14. Khang N
15. Pooran A
16 Daniel H
17. Aron M
18. Jifeng H
19. Walter G
20. Clayton C
03-05-2012, 12:46 AM
#97
Intermediate
03-05-2012, 09:01 PM
#98
Updated list
1. Allen C
2. Kevin D
3. Ervin G
4. Julian R
5. Ryan T
6. Kareem M
7. John K
8. Choong L
9. Scott M (X25)
10. Tonino S
11. Andrew W
12. Micheal D
13. Joe A
14. Khang N
15. Pooran A
16 Daniel H
17. Aron M
18. Jifeng H
19. Walter G
20. Clayton C
21. Cory Graff
1. Allen C
2. Kevin D
3. Ervin G
4. Julian R
5. Ryan T
6. Kareem M
7. John K
8. Choong L
9. Scott M (X25)
10. Tonino S
11. Andrew W
12. Micheal D
13. Joe A
14. Khang N
15. Pooran A
16 Daniel H
17. Aron M
18. Jifeng H
19. Walter G
20. Clayton C
21. Cory Graff
03-06-2012, 07:53 PM
#100
^Look over the link below, it's a thread on the first batch and have some installed RV6 exhaust pics.
https://acurazine.com/forums/3g-tl-performance-parts-modifications-112/rv6-true-dual-exhaust-04-08-tl-accepting-deposits-now-784087/
https://acurazine.com/forums/3g-tl-performance-parts-modifications-112/rv6-true-dual-exhaust-04-08-tl-accepting-deposits-now-784087/
03-06-2012, 09:03 PM
#101
takin care of Business in
iTrader: (5)
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Kansas City, MO
Age: 40
Posts: 30,994
Received 4,732 Likes
on
4,064 Posts
^^^ well thats for batch 1....i bet a lot of people on the list wanna see how the tips look like....
03-07-2012, 11:29 AM
#102
KingofKIngs
Join Date: May 2011
Age: 31
Posts: 5
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
hey rich, would you be making another batch if you sell all by april? im really considering this for my 04 tl and i have my v3 jpipe, just need to get the aspec kit before the exhaust
03-07-2012, 10:36 PM
#103
Richie, is it possible to incorporate the "farting" sound from the first batch (I believe the technical term is a VERY VERY CLEAR AND AGGRESSIVE DOPPLER EFFECT) as heard in the video at 0:09, 0:50-0:52 and 1:53-1:55?
Half the reason I wanted your catback was because of that unique sound... But I didn't seem to hear it clearly in any of your videos.
Thanks!
Last edited by Andy270211; 03-07-2012 at 10:41 PM.
03-08-2012, 02:31 AM
#104
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=f1j0N...eature=related
Richie, is it possible to incorporate the "farting" sound from the first batch (I believe the technical term is a VERY VERY CLEAR AND AGGRESSIVE DOPPLER EFFECT) as heard in the video at 0:09, 0:50-0:52 and 1:53-1:55?
Half the reason I wanted your catback was because of that unique sound... But I didn't seem to hear it clearly in any of your videos.
Thanks!
Richie, is it possible to incorporate the "farting" sound from the first batch (I believe the technical term is a VERY VERY CLEAR AND AGGRESSIVE DOPPLER EFFECT) as heard in the video at 0:09, 0:50-0:52 and 1:53-1:55?
Half the reason I wanted your catback was because of that unique sound... But I didn't seem to hear it clearly in any of your videos.
Thanks!
03-08-2012, 10:18 AM
#105
takin care of Business in
iTrader: (5)
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Kansas City, MO
Age: 40
Posts: 30,994
Received 4,732 Likes
on
4,064 Posts
^^^ 
Andy, I think that sound comes in at part throttle under load....
Andy, I think that sound comes in at part throttle under load....
03-08-2012, 02:13 PM
#106
Intermediate
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=f1j0N...eature=related
Half the reason I wanted your catback was because of that unique sound... But I didn't seem to hear it clearly in any of your videos.
Thanks!
Half the reason I wanted your catback was because of that unique sound... But I didn't seem to hear it clearly in any of your videos.
Thanks!
03-08-2012, 02:35 PM
#108
Former Sponsor
Thread Starter
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=f1j0N...eature=related
Richie, is it possible to incorporate the "farting" sound from the first batch (I believe the technical term is a VERY VERY CLEAR AND AGGRESSIVE DOPPLER EFFECT) as heard in the video at 0:09, 0:50-0:52 and 1:53-1:55?
Half the reason I wanted your catback was because of that unique sound... But I didn't seem to hear it clearly in any of your videos.
Thanks!
Richie, is it possible to incorporate the "farting" sound from the first batch (I believe the technical term is a VERY VERY CLEAR AND AGGRESSIVE DOPPLER EFFECT) as heard in the video at 0:09, 0:50-0:52 and 1:53-1:55?
Half the reason I wanted your catback was because of that unique sound... But I didn't seem to hear it clearly in any of your videos.
Thanks!
03-20-2012, 01:51 PM
#111
Updated list
1. Allen C
2. Kevin D
3. Ervin G
4. Julian R
5. Ryan T
6. Kareem M
7. John K
8. Choong L
9. Scott M (X25)
10. Tonino S
11. Andrew W
12. Micheal D
13. Joe A
14. Khang N
15. Pooran A
16 Daniel H
17. Aron M
18. Jifeng H
19. Walter G
20. Clayton C
21. Cory G
22. Ted D
1. Allen C
2. Kevin D
3. Ervin G
4. Julian R
5. Ryan T
6. Kareem M
7. John K
8. Choong L
9. Scott M (X25)
10. Tonino S
11. Andrew W
12. Micheal D
13. Joe A
14. Khang N
15. Pooran A
16 Daniel H
17. Aron M
18. Jifeng H
19. Walter G
20. Clayton C
21. Cory G
22. Ted D
03-21-2012, 08:38 AM
#114
Safety Car
If the Single is made with 3" tubing with mandrel bends and a single free flowing (straight thru) short muffler, it would be one of the few catbacks that would actually increase power by a lot. It would be loud and super raspy but you can't have the power increase without the free flow and the associated noise.
Locate the one-and-only short muffler under the chassis, out of immediate sight, to alleviate the "Fart Can" stigma. The only thing immediately visible would be the upswept pipe.
03-21-2012, 06:18 PM
#115
2004 SSM TL
Eh, to each their own. I really don't like that single pipe option. Really dont like it...but whatever.
Richie...how are those base tips coming along?!?!?!?!
Richie...how are those base tips coming along?!?!?!?!
The following users liked this post:
BostonSilverTypeS (03-24-2012)
03-22-2012, 02:15 PM
#117
Former Sponsor
Thread Starter
+1000. From a marketing perspective, I think the time has arrived for this option to become available. A 3" minimum diameter.... go big or go home. Free flowing or don't bother with making a single system..
If the Single is made with 3" tubing with mandrel bends and a single free flowing (straight thru) short muffler, it would be one of the few catbacks that would actually increase power by a lot. It would be loud and super raspy but you can't have the power increase without the free flow and the associated noise.
Locate the one-and-only short muffler under the chassis, out of immediate sight, to alleviate the "Fart Can" stigma. The only thing immediately visible would be the upswept pipe.
If the Single is made with 3" tubing with mandrel bends and a single free flowing (straight thru) short muffler, it would be one of the few catbacks that would actually increase power by a lot. It would be loud and super raspy but you can't have the power increase without the free flow and the associated noise.
Locate the one-and-only short muffler under the chassis, out of immediate sight, to alleviate the "Fart Can" stigma. The only thing immediately visible would be the upswept pipe.
VVVVI would have to say yes our design will gain and support more power. Other than the sexy exhaust note. Here is how we came to the conclusion and decided to go with a true dual design.
Over the past couple of years we have noticed that there was more and more dyno prove that 3.0" and 2.75" exhaust were out performing 2.5" exhaust. Not just for Hondas but for all applications.
All 3G TLs have a 2.25" exhaust system. After doing some math we found a going from 2.25" to 2.5" doesn't really make that big of a difference in internal area of the tubing.
Assuming that all exhaust are made with a 16GA 0.065" walled tube. Here we will compare the internal area of the stock exhaust, the aftermarket 2.5" and finally our true dual exhaust.
Stock 2.25" exhaust
Area=Pi*r^2
Pi = 3.14
r= (2.25" OD - 0.065" Wall)/2 =1.06
Area = 3.14*1.06^2 = 3.53in^2
Stock exhaust internal area = 3.53in^2
Most aftermarket exhaust 2.5" 16GA tube
Area=Pi*r^2
Pi = 3.14
r= (2.5" OD - 0.065" Wall)/2 =1.185
Area = 3.14*1.185^2 = 4.41in^2
2.5" aftermarket exhaust internal area = 4.41in^2
2.5" exhaust percent increase over stock.
((4.41-3.53)/(3.53))*100 = 24.93% Increase
RV6 True Dual exhaust 2x2.25"
Area=Pi*r^2
Pi = 3.14
r= (2.25" OD - 0.065" Wall)/2 =1.06
Area = 2*(3.14*1.06^2) = 7.06in^2
RV6 True dual exhaust area = 7.06in^2
RV6 exhaust percent increase over stock.
((7.06-3.53)/(3.53))*100 = 100% Increase
RV6 Equivalent tube size.
r = SQrt(A/pi)
r = SQrt(7.06in^2/3.14)=1.5
Dia = ((r+wall)*2)
Dia = ((1.5+0.065)*2 = 3.129"
RV6 Equivalent tube size = 3.129"
As you can see the RV6 exhaust offers a 100% increase in internal tube area over stock while the 2.5" exhaust only offers a 25% increase. The dual tubing of the RV6 exhaust is also equivalent to a 3.129" exhaust. This is why we will be offering a 3" inlet for people with turbo setups.
But why not make a 3" exhaust? Have you ever heard a NA 3" exhaust sound this good?
You can make up your own mind. However I feel that 2.5" systems are only good for a louder exhaust and some pretty tips.
Over the past couple of years we have noticed that there was more and more dyno prove that 3.0" and 2.75" exhaust were out performing 2.5" exhaust. Not just for Hondas but for all applications.
All 3G TLs have a 2.25" exhaust system. After doing some math we found a going from 2.25" to 2.5" doesn't really make that big of a difference in internal area of the tubing.
Assuming that all exhaust are made with a 16GA 0.065" walled tube. Here we will compare the internal area of the stock exhaust, the aftermarket 2.5" and finally our true dual exhaust.
Stock 2.25" exhaust
Area=Pi*r^2
Pi = 3.14
r= (2.25" OD - 0.065" Wall)/2 =1.06
Area = 3.14*1.06^2 = 3.53in^2
Stock exhaust internal area = 3.53in^2
Most aftermarket exhaust 2.5" 16GA tube
Area=Pi*r^2
Pi = 3.14
r= (2.5" OD - 0.065" Wall)/2 =1.185
Area = 3.14*1.185^2 = 4.41in^2
2.5" aftermarket exhaust internal area = 4.41in^2
2.5" exhaust percent increase over stock.
((4.41-3.53)/(3.53))*100 = 24.93% Increase
RV6 True Dual exhaust 2x2.25"
Area=Pi*r^2
Pi = 3.14
r= (2.25" OD - 0.065" Wall)/2 =1.06
Area = 2*(3.14*1.06^2) = 7.06in^2
RV6 True dual exhaust area = 7.06in^2
RV6 exhaust percent increase over stock.
((7.06-3.53)/(3.53))*100 = 100% Increase
RV6 Equivalent tube size.
r = SQrt(A/pi)
r = SQrt(7.06in^2/3.14)=1.5
Dia = ((r+wall)*2)
Dia = ((1.5+0.065)*2 = 3.129"
RV6 Equivalent tube size = 3.129"
As you can see the RV6 exhaust offers a 100% increase in internal tube area over stock while the 2.5" exhaust only offers a 25% increase. The dual tubing of the RV6 exhaust is also equivalent to a 3.129" exhaust. This is why we will be offering a 3" inlet for people with turbo setups.
But why not make a 3" exhaust? Have you ever heard a NA 3" exhaust sound this good?
You can make up your own mind. However I feel that 2.5" systems are only good for a louder exhaust and some pretty tips.
03-22-2012, 03:07 PM
#118
Safety Car
True. But the muffling components negate that flow advantage. How do I know? Because of dB. If it ain't loud and raspy, it ain't free flowing. Law of Nature that has not been defeated yet in the muffler world.
03-22-2012, 03:19 PM
#119
takin care of Business in
iTrader: (5)
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Kansas City, MO
Age: 40
Posts: 30,994
Received 4,732 Likes
on
4,064 Posts
^^^ more than that, you are forgetting something Tim...
the X merge from the jpipe to the exhaust is only 2.5" wide and hence flow restriction and back pressure creations comes in from the merge and the split which turns into a true dual.....the the mufflers add further more back pressure....
none the less, the exhaust does sound SEXY.....
the X merge from the jpipe to the exhaust is only 2.5" wide and hence flow restriction and back pressure creations comes in from the merge and the split which turns into a true dual.....the the mufflers add further more back pressure....
none the less, the exhaust does sound SEXY.....