My j32a3 swapped Accord
#81
All motor
Anyone interested in using j37 heads should strongly consider the 10+ j37a1 MDX heads instead of the 07-09 heads because they not only flow better than the older heads, they also have better valvetrain components, higher lift cams, better cooling efficiency, and less moving parts for better reliability. The heads feature hollow cams that are not able to be ground so you won't be able to use aftermarket cams...only down side.
#82
Suzuka Master
iTrader: (2)
Sick numbers, Simi. I know you want to sell, but have you considered a TL trans swap? I think that having an LSD would solve a good portion of your traction problems. I'm obviously not making your power, but I'm around 270 whp and 3260 lbs (stockish 7G Accord weight?) and on summer tires, with temps over 65 or so, only first gear is tough to deal with. Obviously, as the temps drop below 50, traction becomes proportionately worse and second gear starts to become an issue, but that's to be expected on any car.
#83
Lol.
Wasn't there something that concerned Paul though, when it came to running the 3.7 heads on the 3.0 and 3.2? Can't remember what it was, but I think I read it on v6p.
Sick numbers, Simi. I know you want to sell, but have you considered a TL trans swap? I think that having an LSD would solve a good portion of your traction problems. I'm obviously not making your power, but I'm around 270 whp and 3260 lbs (stockish 7G Accord weight?) and on summer tires, with temps over 65 or so, only first gear is tough to deal with. Obviously, as the temps drop below 50, traction becomes proportionately worse and second gear starts to become an issue, but that's to be expected on any car.
Wasn't there something that concerned Paul though, when it came to running the 3.7 heads on the 3.0 and 3.2? Can't remember what it was, but I think I read it on v6p.
Sick numbers, Simi. I know you want to sell, but have you considered a TL trans swap? I think that having an LSD would solve a good portion of your traction problems. I'm obviously not making your power, but I'm around 270 whp and 3260 lbs (stockish 7G Accord weight?) and on summer tires, with temps over 65 or so, only first gear is tough to deal with. Obviously, as the temps drop below 50, traction becomes proportionately worse and second gear starts to become an issue, but that's to be expected on any car.
No doubt it is a cool car, but as I get older, I lose more and more interest in it
Last edited by simione; 03-11-2015 at 09:18 AM.
#84
Three Wheelin'
What size tires are you running?
#86
All motor
Yea the issue is the FD paired with the J36 low end. The FD is advertised as a 3.80, but is in fact a 3.94 (2013 V6 6AT Final Drive) according to research and trial & error. The 3.55 would be PERFECT for Simi's car, but unfortunately those are really hard to get. I get 0 traction in 1st, so I can only imagine how Simi's car feels with an extra ~50 ft lbs at low RPM, even on wider tires.
The following users liked this post:
FamilyGuy (03-11-2015)
#87
Three Wheelin'
Yea sounds like you're gonna need at least a 265 wide tire to hook up and even then you may need to roll the throttle to WOT instead of just punching it.
You can also try a larger diameter wheel n tire, to effectively reduce the effect of the FD, but then your upper gears will lose some of the benefit of the FD.
Tirerack shows the pilot super sport tread width of the 245/45/17 as 8", and a 235/45/17 as 8.2". That doesn't sound right...?
You can also try a larger diameter wheel n tire, to effectively reduce the effect of the FD, but then your upper gears will lose some of the benefit of the FD.
Tirerack shows the pilot super sport tread width of the 245/45/17 as 8", and a 235/45/17 as 8.2". That doesn't sound right...?
Last edited by FamilyGuy; 03-11-2015 at 11:33 AM.
#88
Yea sounds like you're gonna need at least a 265 wide tire to hook up and even then you may need to roll the throttle to WOT instead of just punching it.
You can also try a larger diameter wheel n tire, to effectively reduce the effect of the FD, but then your upper gears will lose some of the benefit of the FD.
Tirerack shows the pilot super sport tread width of the 245/45/17 as 8", and a 235/45/17 as 8.2". That doesn't sound right...?
You can also try a larger diameter wheel n tire, to effectively reduce the effect of the FD, but then your upper gears will lose some of the benefit of the FD.
Tirerack shows the pilot super sport tread width of the 245/45/17 as 8", and a 235/45/17 as 8.2". That doesn't sound right...?
The following users liked this post:
Sonnick (03-11-2015)
#89
Suzuka Master
iTrader: (2)
when I did the original j32a3 swap, it came with the TL transmission. I joined it to the j36. The issue is the amount of torque I make at low rpm paired with the FD. If i were to do it over again, I probably would not have done the fd. it was a decision I made without having done enough research on it. If I made more power and revved to 7400, it would probably be of more use.
No doubt it is a cool car, but as I get older, I lose more and more interest in it
No doubt it is a cool car, but as I get older, I lose more and more interest in it
Yea the issue is the FD paired with the J36 low end. The FD is advertised as a 3.80, but is in fact a 3.94 (2013 V6 6AT Final Drive) according to research and trial & error. The 3.55 would be PERFECT for Simi's car, but unfortunately those are really hard to get. I get 0 traction in 1st, so I can only imagine how Simi's car feels with an extra ~50 ft lbs at low RPM, even on wider tires.
The following users liked this post:
anx1300c (03-11-2015)
#91
Three Wheelin'
Just need to figure out how to correct the speedo
#92
Pretty sure Hondata won't touch it until there is increased demand for it. I text Doug about it, and he said it is not an easy thing to incorporate into flash pro.
I purchased a speedometer correction box, but I would need to figure out the pulse per mile sent to the speedometer to wire it correctly.
I purchased a speedometer correction box, but I would need to figure out the pulse per mile sent to the speedometer to wire it correctly.
#93
Three Wheelin'
Did he mention how much increased demand? I think the speedo correction would actually encourage more people to do a FD mod.
#96
Three Wheelin'
This and that I don't want to constantly have to remember how fast I'm really going vs what's in front of me on the speedo, which will be a PITA and confuse others when driving my car.
#97
All motor
It almost makes the car feel faster lol. That's a good thing, but also a bad thing. Also, the mileage is off the same % that the speedo is off. My speedo is off ~13.2% or something, so that means for every mile my indicator reads 1.132 miles. It's not horrible, but if we're talking 15k mileage per year normally, that equates to an additional ~2k miles.
For the 3.0 and 3.2, I think the gears are really well spaced out. BUT, you need to be revving to 7200+ to be worth it. Honestly, to take full advantage I think you need to rev to 8k.
For the 3.0 and 3.2, I think the gears are really well spaced out. BUT, you need to be revving to 7200+ to be worth it. Honestly, to take full advantage I think you need to rev to 8k.
#98
Suzuka Master
iTrader: (2)
Forgot about the fact it's going to rack up the miles faster. That does suck, and I don't see Hondata doing a thing about it. I mean, it took 10+ years and hundreds of us begging them to come out with FP for our cars. Only a small handful of peeps are ever going to do gears.
#99
Burning Brakes
iTrader: (1)
Corrected.
On the FD issue, I don't think having Hondata correct it will prompt people to do the final drive. At the current pricing, Im not even gonna think about it. It's a ring and pinion - shouldn't be more than $400, and I agree that the 3.90 is too much gear. 3.55 is perfect, but then people think that it is not enough of a jump from 3.21
On the FD issue, I don't think having Hondata correct it will prompt people to do the final drive. At the current pricing, Im not even gonna think about it. It's a ring and pinion - shouldn't be more than $400, and I agree that the 3.90 is too much gear. 3.55 is perfect, but then people think that it is not enough of a jump from 3.21
#100
Confusing Name Guy
Sorry for the necro bump Simi, did you use the heads off the 07-09 MDX or did you use the 2010+ MDX heads? I'm assuming the 2ng gen (07-09) J37A1 heads since you're using RL cams with them, correct?
#102
Confusing Name Guy
Thanks simione, your thread has definitely pushed me closer in the direction of doing a j36 of my own - going to be an interesting proposition on a 5AT - I think it might actually be a little more controllable too with a high stall TC.
Also one other quick question - when buying the crank and rod bearings, how do you determine which ones to buy - I was trying to find the info on v6p albeit with no luck. Thanks in advance
Also one other quick question - when buying the crank and rod bearings, how do you determine which ones to buy - I was trying to find the info on v6p albeit with no luck. Thanks in advance
#103
Thanks simione, your thread has definitely pushed me closer in the direction of doing a j36 of my own - going to be an interesting proposition on a 5AT - I think it might actually be a little more controllable too with a high stall TC.
Also one other quick question - when buying the crank and rod bearings, how do you determine which ones to buy - I was trying to find the info on v6p albeit with no luck. Thanks in advance
Also one other quick question - when buying the crank and rod bearings, how do you determine which ones to buy - I was trying to find the info on v6p albeit with no luck. Thanks in advance
#106
My point still stands and applies.
My properly setup car has no wheel hop, it is magic.
Last edited by brian6speed; 05-08-2015 at 08:24 AM.
#107
After some thought, the numbers are about on par. You see, this motor is just basically a stock build with the 3.7 crank. Obviously, the only place you see a big difference is in the torque department, where I make more at 2500 rpm than where your 3.2 peaks at. I am at stock compression and stock cams. There are no other 3.6 liter dynos out there for me to compare mine to. I know Paul built one that made 306, but that was with ported heads and higher compression
#108
Confusing Name Guy
There is a series of letters on the crank and block that you use to determine what color bearings to use. Also, the rod has a number on it that you use with the letters on the crank to determine the rod bearing. I will take a pic of the service manual and post it for you when I get home.
#109
Does this mean you effectively have to buy the crank and rods first, and THEN order the bearings? Or would a retailer like DCH be able to check this for you beforehand if supplied with the appropriate block number? If I have questions I'll just pm you so as not to clutter up your thread, and sorry for the n00b questions, this is all completely new to me
#110
Confusing Name Guy
Haha I figured - somewhat inefficient but what can you do I guess
For the RL pistons, I'm assuming whether one needs to use the regular or oversize will depend on your block? I intend to reuse my stock j32a3 block so I guess I'll need to tear it down and check clearance manually? Or is this another case of block numbering lol
For the RL pistons, I'm assuming whether one needs to use the regular or oversize will depend on your block? I intend to reuse my stock j32a3 block so I guess I'll need to tear it down and check clearance manually? Or is this another case of block numbering lol
#111
Haha I figured - somewhat inefficient but what can you do I guess
For the RL pistons, I'm assuming whether one needs to use the regular or oversize will depend on your block? I intend to reuse my stock j32a3 block so I guess I'll need to tear it down and check clearance manually? Or is this another case of block numbering lol
For the RL pistons, I'm assuming whether one needs to use the regular or oversize will depend on your block? I intend to reuse my stock j32a3 block so I guess I'll need to tear it down and check clearance manually? Or is this another case of block numbering lol
#112
Confusing Name Guy
Will do on the service manual. Going to be my reading at work for the next bit methinks. I realized I was looking at the 05-08 RL pistons which would have been an effective CR of 10.5:1 while the 09+ ones are going to be the same as stock j32a3 spec at 11:1 which is what I want I think. Either way thanks for the nudge in the right direction
#117
Team Owner
+1 on the LSD. It's a must for a FWD car.
#119
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
TheTLProject
Car Parts for Sale
0
08-08-2016 05:25 PM