J32 intake manifold options
#1
Advanced
Thread Starter
J32 intake manifold options
I've done plenty of searching and googling and can't fund the exact answers I'm looking for. I'd like to get a bit more pep out of the 3.2 but without going overboard on cost. Is the 3.5 intake manifold worth getting, or should I just find another 3.2 manifold and have it port matched? I plan to go with the p2r spacer and thermal gasket, as well as TB spacer. I'm not trying to drop the cash for the j37 intake manifold-unless I find one on CL.
The following users liked this post:
J series Kingdom (10-20-2022)
The following users liked this post:
J series Kingdom (10-20-2022)
#4
Advanced
Thread Starter
I'm trying not to spend 500+ on the intake mani/TB before even counting in spacers, thermal gaskets, etc. Just trying to get bit more power without spending a massive amount.
The following users liked this post:
alexander212 (04-25-2023)
#7
Advanced
Thread Starter
Even with a bored TB and ported manifold? I'm all down to save the cash and put it towards other things, but if it's pointless then screw it. I know how much a difference all the small things make-I had a 2l VW (115hp/122tq) making just over 130whp/140wtq, on a college budget. Granted, that car broke A LOT and wasn't anywhere near as nice as the TL, but Id like to take advantage of all the little things I can.
Trending Topics
#9
Advanced
Thread Starter
I read threads for it and against it which is why I asked. So I'll rule it out and probably just go with the thermal gasket. But I'm still looking for IM info, if the 3.5 is worth it or just stick with the 3.2.
The following users liked this post:
pohljm (10-15-2015)
#11
Advanced
Thread Starter
So the exhaust is more of an issue than the intake? I was already looking into cat deletes, should I just concentrate on the whole exhaust system for more bang for my buck then? Cat deletes, J-pipe and back? Is the stock exhaust size a restriction or should I go bigger? I'm not dropping 1k on an exhaust, I'll be having my local shop do it. Except the cat deletes, they wont touch that on a street car, but I have a way around that.
The following 2 users liked this post by Oh Sickest TL:
alexander212 (04-25-2023),
EvilVirus (10-16-2015)
#14
Suzuka Master
iTrader: (2)
The biggest gains for me were from HFPCs, 3.7 manifold/ported runners/ZDX TB/4" CAI (I group the four together as one mod) and Flashpro. (Not in any particular order) All three showed significant independent gains in trap speed. I would say all three were roughly equal, and all three could be felt seat-of-the-pants >5k rpm.
OP, the 3.7 swap has shown as much as 15 whp on a 3.0 Accord. It's expensive, but it makes power at the expense of some slight drivability issues (which can be smoothed out with Flashpro). I still recommend doing exhaust mods before swapping manifolds.
OP, the 3.7 swap has shown as much as 15 whp on a 3.0 Accord. It's expensive, but it makes power at the expense of some slight drivability issues (which can be smoothed out with Flashpro). I still recommend doing exhaust mods before swapping manifolds.
The following users liked this post:
EvilVirus (10-16-2015)
#17
Safety Car
iTrader: (5)
the new flashpro checkbox helps it to a degree, there's even some rev hang from my setup and bucking in 1st gear, but the new flashpro option they added to the software helps some
The following users liked this post:
EvilVirus (10-16-2015)
#18
Jeff
iTrader: (3)
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: Port City, New Brunswick Canada
Posts: 5,728
Received 815 Likes
on
726 Posts
yea none of that but I do have a p1078 code. says intake manifold runner high rpm malfunction. so that butterfly valve in the top plate isn't opening or something? I switched the solenoid back to the 3.2 unit and same code came back. U know of anything? I can't figure it out.... Car runs fine though but I feel like it could be better if I can fix this code
The following users liked this post:
EvilVirus (10-16-2015)
#21
Burning Brakes
Nope 04-06 AT gets no love from flashpro. I would go with HFPC's over the cat deletes. They cost more but reduce rasp when you modify the j pipe and rest of the exhaust. Unless you have those I don't see why you need the larger intake.
#22
Advanced
Thread Starter
I'm going to try to keep my exhaust semi-quiet so I'm not too concerned about rasp, as long as the overall tone and volume sounds good. I'm going to start looking into J-pipes and go from there. Thanks guys!
#23
Pro
iTrader: (1)
You will also see a nice gain if you decide to go boost with the 3.7L IM, TB, and PnP runners. For my setup, I definitely think its helps the system breathe a lot better. When I was N/A I gained about 12hp before I added the Flash Pro.
I do have some light bucking, but it wasnt too noticeable until i added the turbo.
I do have some light bucking, but it wasnt too noticeable until i added the turbo.
The following users liked this post:
Slpr04UA6 (10-17-2015)
#27
In this case, if you plan on swapping out mufflers and adding a jpipe, don't make the first move of cutting out and replacing your stock resonator with another brand. Just a suggestion, but I am very happy with the performance sound when paired with magnaflows and OEM resonator. I would hold off on MM delete as well, and only do that after you have determined you want more exhaust note. But jpipe and mufflers as a first round of exhaust mods shouldn't set you back too much while providing a noticeable difference in the tone of the car.
#28
Advanced
Thread Starter
In this case, if you plan on swapping out mufflers and adding a jpipe, don't make the first move of cutting out and replacing your stock resonator with another brand. Just a suggestion, but I am very happy with the performance sound when paired with magnaflows and OEM resonator. I would hold off on MM delete as well, and only do that after you have determined you want more exhaust note. But jpipe and mufflers as a first round of exhaust mods shouldn't set you back too much while providing a noticeable difference in the tone of the car.
3 Weeks ago, I had the res and MM deleted. So I'm kinda screwed in that aspect, but we'll see how things go and if need be Im sure I can find stock parts if I decide I'd rather go that route once I have the J-pipe
#29
#31
Suzuka Master
iTrader: (2)
Use whatever J37 throttle body is cheapest. A few years ago, the ZDX TB was significantly cheaper than the others, so most of us went with that one. I don't know the pricing structure now, but manufacturers always seem to start gouging when they see an influx of orders on certain parts.
The following users liked this post:
Oh Sickest TL (11-03-2015)
#34
5th Gear
Join Date: Jan 2019
Location: Williston ,South Carolina
Age: 45
Posts: 5
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
3.5 intake swap
I got on ebay and got all parts of my 3.5 intake for cheep.40 for lower intake 50 for spacer 35 upper intake on my 01 acura cl. Just cleaned the parts thouroly and bam big gains.
#36
Reply
I know this is an old post, but I figured I would still chime in. More is not always better. In the case of the intake manifold, more attention should be paid to how easy air can flow and not how much air it takes in. Because if you bring in more air but it is still going through inefficient airway, you are just going to get a bunch of backed up air.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
ncciv
4G TL Performance Parts & Modifications
12
02-08-2016 05:10 PM