J30A4 292whp SAE
The following users liked this post:
Grand_hustle17 (03-05-2014)
03-04-2014, 10:15 PM
#43
KingKong_Dav
03-05-2014, 02:46 AM
#44
Well for one just throwing out a whp number and a trap speed out there isnt correct overall powerband and tq numbers are to be taken into consideration also. I cant make a prediction on what an accurate number is, ive seen dragging car on slicks net lower trap speeds n lower ET's due to wheel diameter. All im saying to just say 292whp is (insert mph) isnt accurate. Shit my nissan made maybe 260's n trapped 106mph lol
The following 2 users liked this post by paperboy42190:
Grand_hustle17 (03-08-2014),
Sonnick (05-06-2014)
03-05-2014, 07:18 AM
#46
Burning Brakes
I'd be pissed that someone talked about my numbers and mods on a different website...
It's interesting no doubt, but I believe our J32/35 can put out a lot more. The TLs cams to those accord guys are like a stage 2 upgrade, imagine people making billet stage 2 aggressive cam profiles for our cars, we still have power to make still.
The sky is still the limit and no one has yet reached to pushed it.
It's interesting no doubt, but I believe our J32/35 can put out a lot more. The TLs cams to those accord guys are like a stage 2 upgrade, imagine people making billet stage 2 aggressive cam profiles for our cars, we still have power to make still.
The sky is still the limit and no one has yet reached to pushed it.
03-05-2014, 08:42 AM
#47
I'd be pissed that someone talked about my numbers and mods on a different website...
It's interesting no doubt, but I believe our J32/35 can put out a lot more. The TLs cams to those accord guys are like a stage 2 upgrade, imagine people making billet stage 2 aggressive cam profiles for our cars, we still have power to make still.
The sky is still the limit and no one has yet reached to pushed it.
It's interesting no doubt, but I believe our J32/35 can put out a lot more. The TLs cams to those accord guys are like a stage 2 upgrade, imagine people making billet stage 2 aggressive cam profiles for our cars, we still have power to make still.
The sky is still the limit and no one has yet reached to pushed it.
The following users liked this post:
Sonnick (03-17-2014)
03-05-2014, 10:29 AM
#49
takin care of Business in
iTrader: (5)
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Kansas City, MO
Age: 40
Posts: 30,994
Received 4,732 Likes
on
4,064 Posts
every comment is "read a physics book"
you telling that there will be no difference in the trap speed and ET depending on how much tire tread you have left of between all season and slicks?
come on dude...or is it an inside joke which am missing out on?
03-05-2014, 12:18 PM
#51
Pro
Thread Starter
George...da fuq is wrong wichu...
every comment is "read a physics book"
you telling that there will be no difference in the trap speed and ET depending on how much tire tread you have left of between all season and slicks?
come on dude...or is it an inside joke which am missing out on?
every comment is "read a physics book"
you telling that there will be no difference in the trap speed and ET depending on how much tire tread you have left of between all season and slicks?
come on dude...or is it an inside joke which am missing out on?
Anyway, I also got permission to post this from the original fella who did all this.
On another note, as someone stated we do have billet cams available for a pretty penny.
03-05-2014, 12:19 PM
#52
Burning Brakes
People and their 1/4 mile traps and their dyno numbers... If he makes 300 whp, he should be trapping XXX MPH... this theory is true... doesnt matter what 1/4 mile times you have because for all we know, you could be running in denver miles high track and have 105MPH and go to a near sea level track and run better numbers but have about the same trap speed.
The following users liked this post:
Grand_hustle17 (03-08-2014)
03-05-2014, 12:29 PM
#53
Pro
Thread Starter
03-05-2014, 12:35 PM
#54
takin care of Business in
iTrader: (5)
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Kansas City, MO
Age: 40
Posts: 30,994
Received 4,732 Likes
on
4,064 Posts
People and their 1/4 mile traps and their dyno numbers... If he makes 300 whp, he should be trapping XXX MPH... this theory is true... doesnt matter what 1/4 mile times you have because for all we know, you could be running in denver miles high track and have 105MPH and go to a near sea level track and run better numbers but have about the same trap speed.
exactly what am trying to say....both method have variables....just because you put down 280 on the dyno, does not mean you will do the 1/4 mile in 12 seconds...
so lets just move past it...
03-05-2014, 12:37 PM
#55
Moderator
iTrader: (7)
George...da fuq is wrong wichu...
every comment is "read a physics book"
you telling that there will be no difference in the trap speed and ET depending on how much tire tread you have left of between all season and slicks?
come on dude...or is it an inside joke which am missing out on?
every comment is "read a physics book"
you telling that there will be no difference in the trap speed and ET depending on how much tire tread you have left of between all season and slicks?
come on dude...or is it an inside joke which am missing out on?
But honestly though I don't mean insult in what I said, it's just I am technical about things and every argument in a debate should be backed up by facts. And physics is facts. By saying "read a physics book" it simply says I would like to discuss this like adults.
Last edited by paperboy42190; 03-05-2014 at 12:41 PM.
03-05-2014, 12:54 PM
#57
takin care of Business in
iTrader: (5)
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Kansas City, MO
Age: 40
Posts: 30,994
Received 4,732 Likes
on
4,064 Posts
I did not say there is absolutely no correlation, but this thread has gone derailed far enough. If anyone wants to discuss this matter more deeply, please PM me.
But honestly though I don't mean insult in what I said, it's just I am technical about things and every argument in a debate should be backed up by facts. And physics is facts. By saying "read a physics book" it simply says I would like to discuss this like adults.
But honestly though I don't mean insult in what I said, it's just I am technical about things and every argument in a debate should be backed up by facts. And physics is facts. By saying "read a physics book" it simply says I would like to discuss this like adults.
bald tires/not shifting properly/not launching properly will all affect the trap time and speed....guy never mentioned anything about doing to a drag strip am not sure why this thread took that direction...
03-05-2014, 01:14 PM
#59
Pro
Thread Starter
Lol I know what red text means. This is an open thread which means anyone may reply to any post. I was being sarcastic, however now that you mention it, I also have no doubt my car is faster.
03-05-2014, 01:54 PM
#60
Moderator
iTrader: (7)
Just gonna leave this quote here to show how immature this post is for future viewers. It's amazing how immature people can feel good about themselves by saying their car is faster than someone else's.
03-06-2014, 08:15 AM
#61
Senior Moderator
Oh will you donkeys knock it off already? There are TOO many variables to say one way is better or more accurate than another. In theory and text books things should be xxx, in practice and reality things are often different. Just leave it at that 
The following users liked this post:
EvilVirus (03-06-2014)
03-06-2014, 03:50 PM
#62
But if they're corrected to SAE in both instances, that takes the elevation variable out of the equation; they're both corrected to sea level. Your car didn't get any faster with the higher dyno numbers.
BTW, are you still running a base tune or are you dyno/e-tuned yet??
BTW, are you still running a base tune or are you dyno/e-tuned yet??
03-06-2014, 06:43 PM
#63
KingKong_Dav
Dont bash on this thread n the numbers. It is legit. If u see this tune n all the changes made to the engine than youll understand. I think this guy is using a harness from boomslang n trust me this is a race motor. Pistons cylinder heads n stuff must be upgraded and not stated.
03-06-2014, 08:18 PM
#64
Pro
Thread Starter
Dont bash on this thread n the numbers. It is legit. If u see this tune n all the changes made to the engine than youll understand. I think this guy is using a harness from boomslang n trust me this is a race motor. Pistons cylinder heads n stuff must be upgraded and not stated.
03-08-2014, 09:03 PM
#65
I'd be pissed that someone talked about my numbers and mods on a different website...
It's interesting no doubt, but I believe our J32/35 can put out a lot more. The TLs cams to those accord guys are like a stage 2 upgrade, imagine people making billet stage 2 aggressive cam profiles for our cars, we still have power to make still.
The sky is still the limit and no one has yet reached to pushed it.
It's interesting no doubt, but I believe our J32/35 can put out a lot more. The TLs cams to those accord guys are like a stage 2 upgrade, imagine people making billet stage 2 aggressive cam profiles for our cars, we still have power to make still.
The sky is still the limit and no one has yet reached to pushed it.
03-08-2014, 09:15 PM
#66
takin care of Business in
iTrader: (5)
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Kansas City, MO
Age: 40
Posts: 30,994
Received 4,732 Likes
on
4,064 Posts
I def dont think sky is the limit but it is sometimes a tad embarrassing for such an aged car there really isnt any progress on the limitations except only naming maybe 3 or 4 ppl out of a section of thousands.. I get this isnt the best platform for modding but neither are a lot of platforms which seem to have stepped out the box of "intake header exhaust= fully bolted".. ido think we should be seeing more 310+whp type S and 280+whp bases... but sometimes you wonder if ppl really tried n fail and you just dont hear about it
it all comes down to tune...
fully bolted base 6MT run 280-ish and Type S 6MT run very very close to 300....all without a tune...a good tune will bump them a good 15whp+ and running healthy
The following 2 users liked this post by swoosh:
EvilVirus (03-18-2014),
Grand_hustle17 (03-10-2014)
03-10-2014, 07:48 PM
#67
03-10-2014, 10:41 PM
#68
Suzuka Master
iTrader: (2)
You've got it backwards, dude. ET is traction dependent. Trap speed is all about power to weight. When you're spinning, you're still gaining forward momentum and when you do eventually hook, the momentum will show itself in the trap speed. It's uncanny how little variance there is the trap speed even if you miss a shift. You can blow the tires off and run a 15 flat @ 103 and the next run hook a 2.10 and run 13.8 @ 103.
03-10-2014, 10:48 PM
#69
Suzuka Master
iTrader: (2)
Well for one just throwing out a whp number and a trap speed out there isnt correct overall powerband and tq numbers are to be taken into consideration also. I cant make a prediction on what an accurate number is, ive seen dragging car on slicks net lower trap speeds n lower ET's due to wheel diameter. All im saying to just say 292whp is (insert mph) isnt accurate. Shit my nissan made maybe 260's n trapped 106mph lol
03-10-2014, 11:00 PM
#71
He was a member here also, his name was sparksmax... But nvmd him... I think you get what im saying.... Too many factors to just throw out there to say what the car will do mph wise
03-17-2014, 04:19 PM
#72
All motor
The following users liked this post:
EvilVirus (03-17-2014)
03-18-2014, 12:21 PM
#75
takin care of Business in
iTrader: (5)
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Kansas City, MO
Age: 40
Posts: 30,994
Received 4,732 Likes
on
4,064 Posts
)check out the AFR and timing chart (if you have)...will give you an idea of how much more to expect
and who am I telling...you know this shit wayyy better than I do LOL
05-04-2014, 08:50 AM
#78
Pro
Thread Starter
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Inaccurate
Car Talk
38
02-15-2012 08:31 PM
