Image Dynamics components

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 05-06-2012, 09:56 PM
  #1  
Intermediate
Thread Starter
 
phlames's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Age: 41
Posts: 47
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Image Dynamics components

What amp is good for the image dynamics ctx65cs components??
Old 05-07-2012, 08:19 AM
  #2  
Advanced
 
Stillmatic29's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Texas
Posts: 73
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
I'm running roughly 100 rms per side to mine via JL HD900/5. sounds great
The following users liked this post:
phlames (05-07-2012)
Old 05-07-2012, 08:21 AM
  #3  
Three Wheelin'
 
Opel's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: NYC
Age: 42
Posts: 1,360
Likes: 0
Received 47 Likes on 33 Posts
An amp that can put out 100w-150wrms @ 4ohm per channel
The following users liked this post:
phlames (05-07-2012)
Old 05-07-2012, 08:59 AM
  #4  
Intermediate
Thread Starter
 
phlames's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Age: 41
Posts: 47
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Im lookin at an alpine mrp f300......dont kno if its good enough....
Old 05-07-2012, 09:01 AM
  #5  
Burning Brakes
 
niebur3's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Age: 48
Posts: 750
Received 69 Likes on 57 Posts
How much are you looking to spend?
Old 05-07-2012, 09:11 AM
  #6  
Team Owner
 
I hate cars's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Bakersfield
Posts: 20,172
Received 1,812 Likes on 1,283 Posts
I've run them off of a 75w/ch amp up to roughly 200w. 75w gets plenty loud. Higher than that, the tweeter starts to get harsh. Some say it's the supplied crossover, I never tried them active so I don't know if that's true for sure.
The following users liked this post:
phlames (05-07-2012)
Old 05-07-2012, 09:37 AM
  #7  
Racer
 
rich20730's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Longview (East Texas)
Age: 42
Posts: 330
Received 34 Likes on 33 Posts
Originally Posted by I hate cars
I've run them off of a 75w/ch amp up to roughly 200w. 75w gets plenty loud. Higher than that, the tweeter starts to get harsh. Some say it's the supplied crossover, I never tried them active so I don't know if that's true for sure.
Same here. I've run them off of 75 watts per channel and it was plenty. I'm currently running them active with 200 watts per channel to the mids and 75 watts per channel to the tweets and they handle it just fine. I would suggest getting an amp with more power that way if you decide to upgrade your comps in the future you won't have to buy a new amp.
The following users liked this post:
phlames (05-07-2012)
Old 05-07-2012, 09:50 AM
  #8  
Intermediate
Thread Starter
 
phlames's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Age: 41
Posts: 47
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by niebur3
How much are you looking to spend?
Im lookin to spend bout $200.....the alpine is 149.99...
Old 05-07-2012, 09:52 AM
  #9  
Intermediate
Thread Starter
 
phlames's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Age: 41
Posts: 47
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by rich20730
Same here. I've run them off of 75 watts per channel and it was plenty. I'm currently running them active with 200 watts per channel to the mids and 75 watts per channel to the tweets and they handle it just fine. I would suggest getting an amp with more power that way if you decide to upgrade your comps in the future you won't have to buy a new amp.
well the alpine is 150 watts RMS x 2 bridged output at 4 ohms (4-ohm stable in bridged mode) 50 watts RMS x 4 at 4 ohms (75 watts RMS x 4 at 2 ohms)....
Old 05-07-2012, 10:35 AM
  #10  
Racer
 
rich20730's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Longview (East Texas)
Age: 42
Posts: 330
Received 34 Likes on 33 Posts
Originally Posted by phlames
well the alpine is 150 watts RMS x 2 bridged output at 4 ohms (4-ohm stable in bridged mode) 50 watts RMS x 4 at 4 ohms (75 watts RMS x 4 at 2 ohms)....
150 watts per channel is plenty for the CTX's. It just depends what you plan to do in the future. If you decide you want to run your components active, you'll likely need another amp since 50 watts per channel is not going to be very much power.

How about the PPI BK520.4 for $200 :http://www.woofersetc.com/p-10580-bk...amplifier.aspx

95x4 @4ohms
130x4 @2ohms
260x2 Bridged @ 4ohms

Plus, it has bandpass crossovers and remote gain control
The following users liked this post:
phlames (05-07-2012)
Old 05-07-2012, 11:02 AM
  #11  
Intermediate
Thread Starter
 
phlames's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Age: 41
Posts: 47
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by rich20730
150 watts per channel is plenty for the CTX's. It just depends what you plan to do in the future. If you decide you want to run your components active, you'll likely need another amp since 50 watts per channel is not going to be very much power.

How about the PPI BK520.4 for $200 :http://www.woofersetc.com/p-10580-bk...amplifier.aspx

95x4 @4ohms
130x4 @2ohms
260x2 Bridged @ 4ohms

Plus, it has bandpass crossovers and remote gain control
Im goin to get the ppi...how did u run the wires for the speaker?? Before the factory amp or after the factory amp?? I ran my subs thru the factory sub wire using audio control lc2i...sounds niiice too!!!
Old 05-07-2012, 11:40 AM
  #12  
Mug
Burning Brakes
 
Mug's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Anchorage, Alaska
Age: 47
Posts: 867
Received 37 Likes on 26 Posts
I'll be running them with 50 watts once my spacers come in. I'll post my results here if I remember!
Old 05-07-2012, 11:53 AM
  #13  
Racer
 
rich20730's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Longview (East Texas)
Age: 42
Posts: 330
Received 34 Likes on 33 Posts
Originally Posted by phlames
Im goin to get the ppi...how did u run the wires for the speaker?? Before the factory amp or after the factory amp?? I ran my subs thru the factory sub wire using audio control lc2i...sounds niiice too!!!
I started out taking the post-amp signal with the LC6i and then later switched to the preamp signal with a line driver and a processor.
Old 05-07-2012, 12:04 PM
  #14  
Intermediate
Thread Starter
 
phlames's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Age: 41
Posts: 47
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by rich20730
I started out taking the post-amp signal with the LC6i and then later switched to the preamp signal with a line driver and a processor.
Ok...do u have pics??
Old 05-07-2012, 12:33 PM
  #15  
Coolest A-zine Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Trunk Monkey's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Oklahoma
Age: 36
Posts: 3,084
Received 172 Likes on 163 Posts
There's another member that's looking to do the LC6i....does that unit act as a good line driver? It looks like it's meant to be an LOC, but has a line-driver built in and can go up to 9.5v.
Old 05-07-2012, 12:59 PM
  #16  
Racer
 
rich20730's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Longview (East Texas)
Age: 42
Posts: 330
Received 34 Likes on 33 Posts
Originally Posted by phlames
Ok...do u have pics??
Pics of the LC6i? Pics of my current setup? I only have one picture of the LC6i while it was installed. I had it under the passenger seat. If I was doing the install over I'd put it under the driver's seat since there is much more room.





Originally Posted by Trunk Monkey
There's another member that's looking to do the LC6i....does that unit act as a good line driver? It looks like it's meant to be an LOC, but has a line-driver built in and can go up to 9.5v.
It's just an LOC, no line driver. That's the second time I've heard that. Weird I just looked at the website to see if they've updated it or anything and I see that they have a check mark for line driver in the product comparison table, but if you actually go to the product page and/or manual you will see that it says nothing about it being a line driver.

Unless they've updated it I'm 99% sure it's not a line driver. I even accidentally hooked it up to the black harness with the preamp signals when I first bought it and I got no sound.

Maybe I just have a different idea of what a line driver is. I wouldn't be surprised if it outputs up to a 9.5volt signal when you adjust the outpul level, but you are still stuck taking the already amplified post stock-amp signal in the first place.
The following users liked this post:
phlames (05-07-2012)
Old 05-07-2012, 01:33 PM
  #17  
Racer
 
rich20730's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Longview (East Texas)
Age: 42
Posts: 330
Received 34 Likes on 33 Posts
Originally Posted by phlames
Im goin to get the ppi...how did u run the wires for the speaker?? Before the factory amp or after the factory amp?? I ran my subs thru the factory sub wire using audio control lc2i...sounds niiice too!!!
Btw. The PPI is only $150 at sonic electronix. I only
posted the woofers etc link because sonic's site was down at the time. You could even get the BK800.4 for $179 http://www.sonicelectronix.com/item_...r-BK800.4.html
The following users liked this post:
phlames (05-07-2012)
Old 05-07-2012, 01:53 PM
  #18  
Intermediate
Thread Starter
 
phlames's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Age: 41
Posts: 47
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by rich20730
Pics of the LC6i? Pics of my current setup? I only have one picture of the LC6i while it was installed. I had it under the passenger seat. If I was doing the install over I'd put it under the driver's seat since there is much more room.







It's just an LOC, no line driver. That's the second time I've heard that. Weird I just looked at the website to see if they've updated it or anything and I see that they have a check mark for line driver in the product comparison table, but if you actually go to the product page and/or manual you will see that it says nothing about it being a line driver.

Unless they've updated it I'm 99% sure it's not a line driver. I even accidentally hooked it up to the black harness with the preamp signals when I first bought it and I got no sound.

Maybe I just have a different idea of what a line driver is. I wouldn't be surprised if it outputs up to a 9.5volt signal when you adjust the outpul level, but you are still stuck taking the already amplified post stock-amp signal in the first place.
I have to get a line driver too??
Old 05-07-2012, 02:04 PM
  #19  
Racer
 
rich20730's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Longview (East Texas)
Age: 42
Posts: 330
Received 34 Likes on 33 Posts
^^^^ If you are taking the post stock amp signal you don't need one. If you want to bypass the stock amp a line driver can be helpful, but it's not necessary many cases. A lot of it depends on what your goals and preferences are.
Old 05-07-2012, 02:16 PM
  #20  
Intermediate
Thread Starter
 
phlames's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Age: 41
Posts: 47
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Talking

Originally Posted by rich20730
^^^^ If you are taking the post stock amp signal you don't need one. If you want to bypass the stock amp a line driver can be helpful, but it's not necessary many cases. A lot of it depends on what your goals and preferences are.
ok thanx....i want a crisp & clean litsening thats all...
Old 05-07-2012, 03:11 PM
  #21  
Three Wheelin'
 
Opel's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: NYC
Age: 42
Posts: 1,360
Likes: 0
Received 47 Likes on 33 Posts
Originally Posted by rich20730
^^^^ If you are taking the post stock amp signal you don't need one. If you want to bypass the stock amp a line driver can be helpful, but it's not necessary many cases. A lot of it depends on what your goals and preferences are.
Rich,
My understanding is that the RF 360.2 accepts low and high level inputs (20vrms max), and puts out 5vrms w/ +/- 10db gain. Why did you use the LOC? I don't think the stock amp puts out anywhere near 20v to drive the stock speakers.

Just curious...unless I'm wrong about the stock amp voltage output.
Also, I don't think a line driver is necessary with the RF 360 either.


Originally Posted by phlames
ok thanx....i want a crisp & clean litsening thats all...
A line driver will amplify the pre amp voltage and feed your aftermarket amp with 2-4vrms. This will help you keep amp gains at a minimum.

I found out the hard way. First I went post amp since my aftermarket amp accepted speaker level inputs... didn't like it...amplifying an already amplified and distorted signal from stock amp.

Then went pre amp, since my AM amp accepts low inputs (as low as .2v) ...
Didn't like it... Had to try and compensate for low input by setting gains high.

Then finally, I got a AC Matrix plus....now the AF amp gets a nice clean 4vrms input, and gains are all the way at minimum. It is loud and clear.
Old 05-07-2012, 03:45 PM
  #22  
Racer
 
rich20730's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Longview (East Texas)
Age: 42
Posts: 330
Received 34 Likes on 33 Posts
Originally Posted by Opel
Rich,
My understanding is that the RF 360.2 accepts low and high level inputs (20vrms max), and puts out 5vrms w/ +/- 10db gain. Why did you use the LOC? I don't think the stock amp puts out anywhere near 20v to drive the stock speakers.

Just curious...unless I'm wrong about the stock amp voltage output.
Also, I don't think a line driver is necessary with the RF 360 either.

A line driver will amplify the pre amp voltage and feed your aftermarket amp with 2-4vrms. This will help you keep amp gains at a minimum.

I found out the hard way. First I went post amp since my aftermarket amp accepted speaker level inputs... didn't like it...amplifying an already amplified and distorted signal from stock amp.

Then went pre amp, since my AM amp accepts low inputs (as low as .2v) ...
Didn't like it... Had to try and compensate for low input by setting gains high.

Then finally, I got a AC Matrix plus....now the AF amp gets a nice clean 4vrms input, and gains are all the way at minimum. It is loud and clear.
I don't have a 3Sixty.2. Trunk Monkey has one I think. You might be confusing me with him. My progression has actually been pretty similar to yours:

In my first setup I was taking the post stock-amp signal and using a line-out converter (LC6i) into the Rockford Punch PBR 300x4 and Sony sub amp. It sounded good, but I had a slight hiss due to the noise floor on the stock amp.

Later, I decided to buy a processor (Alpine PXE-H660) and take the preamp signal. Due to the low output voltage from the stock headunit a had to turn up the gain on the PXE almost all the way in order to get a decent volume level. This introduced some engine noise into my system so I bought the Rockford Balanced Line Driver which fixed the problem.

My current setup is this:

Stock Headunit > Rockford BLD > Alpine PXE > Punch PBR 300x4, Sony 200x2, Alpine 1000x1 > ID CTX65 comps, Polk DB 651 rears, Idmax 12 IB

It sounds terrific
Old 05-07-2012, 05:05 PM
  #23  
Drifting
 
eggyhustles's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Bronx, NY
Age: 37
Posts: 2,630
Received 45 Likes on 36 Posts
900w minimum per side
Old 05-07-2012, 05:17 PM
  #24  
Three Wheelin'
 
Opel's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: NYC
Age: 42
Posts: 1,360
Likes: 0
Received 47 Likes on 33 Posts
Originally Posted by rich20730
I don't have a 3Sixty.2. Trunk Monkey has one I think. You might be confusing me with him. My progression has actually been pretty similar to yours:

In my first setup I was taking the post stock-amp signal and using a line-out converter (LC6i) into the Rockford Punch PBR 300x4 and Sony sub amp. It sounded good, but I had a slight hiss due to the noise floor on the stock amp.

Later, I decided to buy a processor (Alpine PXE-H660) and take the preamp signal. Due to the low output voltage from the stock headunit a had to turn up the gain on the PXE almost all the way in order to get a decent volume level. This introduced some engine noise into my system so I bought the Rockford Balanced Line Driver which fixed the problem.

My current setup is this:

Stock Headunit > Rockford BLD > Alpine PXE > Punch PBR 300x4, Sony 200x2, Alpine 1000x1 > ID CTX65 comps, Polk DB 651 rears, Idmax 12 IB

It sounds terrific
I'm sorry, I completely missed it in the pics...I didn't look at it closely...your amp looked like the RF 360.2 lol

The RF BLD as I understand is only a 2 channel...Are you only using 2 channels for your entire set up? Some member here (forget the name) claims that the front signal from front channels is better for the sub than the actually sub channel. I don't doubt him...Just pointing it out....I might even try it.
For now, I'm using the AC Matrix +, driving all channels

While I can't claim that Ive had too much experience with this whole thing...I can only recommend pre amp to anyone, just like many others have recommended. Pre amp with a line driver instead of post amp + loc . A lot ff amps accept very low pre amp inputs...but it's not the same as when you feed your amp with 4vrms.

I hear good things about the ID CTXs .....I might give Jerry a call in the near future....I just gotta catch my breath for a bit

Last edited by Opel; 05-07-2012 at 05:23 PM.
Old 05-07-2012, 05:56 PM
  #25  
Intermediate
Thread Starter
 
phlames's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Age: 41
Posts: 47
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Should i try hookin up my lc2i pre amp for better sound quality? Or keep it how i have it wired straight to factory sub wires??
Old 05-07-2012, 06:30 PM
  #26  
Three Wheelin'
 
Opel's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: NYC
Age: 42
Posts: 1,360
Likes: 0
Received 47 Likes on 33 Posts
Originally Posted by phlames
Should i try hookin up my lc2i pre amp for better sound quality? Or keep it how i have it wired straight to factory sub wires??
LC2 cannot go pre amp....that is supposed to reduce signal....pre amp signal is already 1v at most... LOCs are used to drive down the signal. Line drivers are used to drive it up. Think of them as loc-Step down transformer, line driver-step up transformer.

The LOC should be installed in between the stock amp=speaker output (wires that go to speakers), and the aftermarket amp . Line driver is installed in between head unit output (wires before going into the stock amp) and aftermarket amp.
Old 05-07-2012, 06:51 PM
  #27  
Racer
 
rich20730's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Longview (East Texas)
Age: 42
Posts: 330
Received 34 Likes on 33 Posts
Originally Posted by phlames
Should i try hookin up my lc2i pre amp for better sound quality? Or keep it how i have it wired straight to factory sub wires??
It will only work post-amp.

Originally Posted by Opel

The RF BLD as I understand is only a 2 channel...Are you only using 2 channels for your entire set up? Some member here (forget the name) claims that the front signal from front channels is better for the sub than the actually sub channel. I don't doubt him...Just pointing it out....I might even try it.
For now, I'm using the AC Matrix +, driving all channels

While I can't claim that Ive had too much experience with this whole thing...I can only recommend pre amp to anyone, just like many others have recommended. Pre amp with a line driver instead of post amp + loc . A lot ff amps accept very low pre amp inputs...but it's not the same as when you feed your amp with 4vrms.

I hear good things about the ID CTXs .....I might give Jerry a call in the near future....I just gotta catch my breath for a bit
I'm using the Aux input on the PXE which just requires a full-range, stereo signal in order to output to all 7 channels.

I haven't heard anything about the preamp front signals being better. I think that may be true for the post-amp signals, but I was under the impression that all of the preamp signals are full range and flat, and I suppose the sub channel would be mono.

If I wasn't using a processor, I would have gone with the Matrix using all channels like you are doing so I could maintain use of the sub level, fader, and center controls through the headunit.

I agree that taking the preamp is optimal in this car, but I can't say that I thought that post amp was all that bad, other than the slight hiss caused by the stock amp.

I really like the CTX's, but I haven't heard any of the high-end components (Esotars, utopias etc) that people rave about so I'm tempted to upgrade, mostly out of pure curiosity to see if I'm really missing out on anything.
The following users liked this post:
phlames (05-07-2012)
Old 05-07-2012, 08:20 PM
  #28  
Intermediate
Thread Starter
 
phlames's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Age: 41
Posts: 47
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Ok im going to use the front speakers for the mids n hi amp...
Old 05-07-2012, 10:12 PM
  #29  
Advanced
 
Seatown1two's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Age: 43
Posts: 74
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
I'm wondering if there are a set comparable to the ctx65 that would not require me to cut metal from the door...
Old 05-07-2012, 10:16 PM
  #30  
Coolest A-zine Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Trunk Monkey's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Oklahoma
Age: 36
Posts: 3,084
Received 172 Likes on 163 Posts
Possibly...

Amazon Amazon
Old 05-07-2012, 11:23 PM
  #31  
Team Owner
 
I hate cars's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Bakersfield
Posts: 20,172
Received 1,812 Likes on 1,283 Posts
Originally Posted by rich20730
It will only work post-amp.



I'm using the Aux input on the PXE which just requires a full-range, stereo signal in order to output to all 7 channels.

I haven't heard anything about the preamp front signals being better. I think that may be true for the post-amp signals, but I was under the impression that all of the preamp signals are full range and flat, and I suppose the sub channel would be mono.

If I wasn't using a processor, I would have gone with the Matrix using all channels like you are doing so I could maintain use of the sub level, fader, and center controls through the headunit.

I agree that taking the preamp is optimal in this car, but I can't say that I thought that post amp was all that bad, other than the slight hiss caused by the stock amp.

I really like the CTX's, but I haven't heard any of the high-end components (Esotars, utopias etc) that people rave about so I'm tempted to upgrade, mostly out of pure curiosity to see if I'm really missing out on anything.
I went from the CTXs to Dynaudio Esotec and then to Esotar. I really liked the IDs but there's more of a difference than you could ever imagine between them and Dyns. I suggest you never try them because you will be hooked. I've never heard anything more life-like.
Old 05-08-2012, 06:03 AM
  #32  
Racer
 
rich20730's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Longview (East Texas)
Age: 42
Posts: 330
Received 34 Likes on 33 Posts
Originally Posted by I hate cars
I went from the CTXs to Dynaudio Esotec and then to Esotar. I really liked the IDs but there's more of a difference than you could ever imagine between them and Dyns. I suggest you never try them because you will be hooked. I've never heard anything more life-like.
Haha! Thanks for the warning. If I do decide to try out the Dyns at least now I know to skip over the the Esotecs and go straight for the Esotars. That way I can tell my wife I saved her $900
Old 05-08-2012, 08:11 AM
  #33  
Burning Brakes
 
niebur3's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Age: 48
Posts: 750
Received 69 Likes on 57 Posts
Originally Posted by Seatown1two
I'm wondering if there are a set comparable to the ctx65 that would not require me to cut metal from the door...
Most speakers shouldn't require you to cut the door. Most will need a single trim ring...some a double.

Originally Posted by rich20730
Haha! Thanks for the warning. If I do decide to try out the Dyns at least now I know to skip over the the Esotecs and go straight for the Esotars. That way I can tell my wife I saved her $900
I will get them ready to ship !
Old 05-08-2012, 09:23 AM
  #34  
Racer
 
rich20730's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Longview (East Texas)
Age: 42
Posts: 330
Received 34 Likes on 33 Posts
Originally Posted by niebur3
I will get them ready to ship !
Jerry, you'll be the first person I call!
Old 05-08-2012, 09:47 AM
  #35  
Intermediate
Thread Starter
 
phlames's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Age: 41
Posts: 47
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Awww man i gotta get a speaker rims for id ctx65cs for it to fit??
Old 05-08-2012, 10:03 AM
  #36  
Mug
Burning Brakes
 
Mug's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Anchorage, Alaska
Age: 47
Posts: 867
Received 37 Likes on 26 Posts
Originally Posted by phlames
Awww man i gotta get a speaker rims for id ctx65cs for it to fit??
They're huge. My rings come in today. Unfortunately, I don't know when I'll be able to work on my car again.
Old 05-08-2012, 03:09 PM
  #37  
Intermediate
Thread Starter
 
phlames's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Age: 41
Posts: 47
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by Mug
They're huge. My rings come in today. Unfortunately, I don't know when I'll be able to work on my car again.
Where u get yours from?
Old 05-08-2012, 05:55 PM
  #38  
Coolest A-zine Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Trunk Monkey's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Oklahoma
Age: 36
Posts: 3,084
Received 172 Likes on 163 Posts
If you think those are huge, pick up some Exodus Anarchy 6.5's.

Anarchy's next to H-audios that are likely quite a bit larger than the CTX's..
Old 05-08-2012, 06:57 PM
  #39  
Intermediate
Thread Starter
 
phlames's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Age: 41
Posts: 47
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Bout 100
Old 05-08-2012, 07:47 PM
  #40  
Team Owner
 
I hate cars's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Bakersfield
Posts: 20,172
Received 1,812 Likes on 1,283 Posts
Originally Posted by Trunk Monkey
If you think those are huge, pick up some Exodus Anarchy 6.5's.

Anarchy's next to H-audios that are likely quite a bit larger than the CTX's..
Those are deep at 3.66". The Scan Illuminator is 3.8" deep. I have no idea how people fit those in a door. Here's the Scan on the left, the ATs in the middle, and my Dyn Esotar 650 on the right. The Dyn is a true 6.5" while the others are 7" speakers.







Quick Reply: Image Dynamics components



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:32 PM.