Stock Dyno of a 2013 Accord V6 6MT

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 09-19-2013 | 01:15 PM
  #1  
SatinSilverAV6's Avatar
Thread Starter
2003 Accord Coupe V6
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 1,825
Likes: 74
From: Oceanside, Ca
Stock Dyno of a 2013 Accord V6 6MT


Pretty impressive numbers.
Stock 2013 Honda Accord EX V6 Coupe 6MT

I figured this would be the best place to post this?
Old 09-19-2013 | 01:17 PM
  #2  
justnspace's Avatar
Moderator
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Feb 2010
Posts: 86,295
Likes: 16,270
damnit, cant see vids at work. lol

can you post the final numbers?
Old 09-19-2013 | 01:19 PM
  #3  
DefMunkie's Avatar
Touge Chaser
 
Joined: Aug 2013
Posts: 340
Likes: 100
From: Central Texas
255.5 hp @ 6200rpm
226.09 lb*ft @4900rpm
The following users liked this post:
justnspace (09-19-2013)
Old 09-19-2013 | 01:23 PM
  #4  
justnspace's Avatar
Moderator
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Feb 2010
Posts: 86,295
Likes: 16,270
torque seems low
Old 09-19-2013 | 02:01 PM
  #5  
SatinSilverAV6's Avatar
Thread Starter
2003 Accord Coupe V6
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 1,825
Likes: 74
From: Oceanside, Ca
Originally Posted by justnspace
torque seems low
it was in 97 degree temps at 40 percent humidity, maybe that affected it.

Also TOV had a dyno with significantly higher torque at 235wtq
Old 09-19-2013 | 02:03 PM
  #6  
SatinSilverAV6's Avatar
Thread Starter
2003 Accord Coupe V6
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 1,825
Likes: 74
From: Oceanside, Ca
here is the auto 13' V6 touring to compare

http://www.vtec.net/articles/view-ar...&page_number=2

240WHP and 225WTQ
Old 09-19-2013 | 03:43 PM
  #7  
Sonnick's Avatar
All motor
 
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 3,530
Likes: 532
From: Long Island
Good post. Just a 'bit' underrated at 278 crank hp lol. Probably more like 290.
Old 09-19-2013 | 05:20 PM
  #8  
paperboy42190's Avatar
Moderator
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 6,992
Likes: 1,162
From: Alhambra, CA
very nice
Old 09-19-2013 | 05:51 PM
  #9  
anx1300c's Avatar
Suzuka Master
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 5,020
Likes: 930
From: 633 Stag Trail Rd
That's STD though, which generally reads ~ 3-4% high. Probably makes mid/upper 240's SAE. Still solid for a stock 3.5.
Old 09-19-2013 | 08:18 PM
  #10  
justnspace's Avatar
Moderator
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Feb 2010
Posts: 86,295
Likes: 16,270
why is the torque so low?
Old 09-20-2013 | 01:26 AM
  #11  
paperboy42190's Avatar
Moderator
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 6,992
Likes: 1,162
From: Alhambra, CA
because its a honda
The following 2 users liked this post by paperboy42190:
BEAR-AvHistory (09-30-2013), F23A4 (09-25-2013)
Old 09-20-2013 | 07:33 AM
  #12  
bouncer07's Avatar
Burning Brakes
 
Joined: Aug 2011
Posts: 1,150
Likes: 182
From: Minnesota
Vtec makes up most of the TQ in the gearings anyway.. lol.
Old 09-20-2013 | 08:15 AM
  #13  
Sonnick's Avatar
All motor
 
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 3,530
Likes: 532
From: Long Island
Oh, it's STD? I didn't see the video. Still not bad for a stock car. Makes more power than the 8G, which already goes 13.7 @ 102 stock and I believe is a bit lighter. I wanna run one!!
Old 09-20-2013 | 08:46 AM
  #14  
anx1300c's Avatar
Suzuka Master
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 5,020
Likes: 930
From: 633 Stag Trail Rd
You won't have any problems with a stock one. The 8G is quick, but that 13.7 @ 102, stock is about as typical as TypeS 09 running a 13.9 @ 100 in his intake only '05 TL.

The 6AT in the 9G looks promising since C&D got a 14.1 @ 101 out of one.
Old 09-23-2013 | 01:19 PM
  #15  
mazdaspeed3God's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 351
Likes: 1
Originally Posted by SatinSilverAV6
2013 Honda Accord Coupe EX-L V6 w/Nav 6 Speed Manual Transmission Dyno Test - YouTube

Pretty impressive numbers.
Stock 2013 Honda Accord EX V6 Coupe 6MT

I figured this would be the best place to post this?
No it's not young man... this is Racing Story forum section not a dyno show... Wrong thread buddy.


Originally Posted by justnspace
damnit, cant see vids at work. lol
You are not supposed to watch youtube videos at work. At work you work. Get to work yo sackboi!

Originally Posted by justnspace
torque seems low
That's typical HONDA. Get used to it. Put up with it or get a different ride. MS3 is shit full of torque.

Originally Posted by justnspace
why is the torque so low?
That's second time you whining about torque you know.

Originally Posted by bouncer07
Vtec makes up most of the TQ in the gearings anyway.. lol.
But only at high RPM's. You lose all your time before it reaches powerband. lolz


mazdaspeed3god
Old 09-23-2013 | 01:26 PM
  #16  
mazdaspeed3God's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 351
Likes: 1
Originally Posted by anx1300c
You won't have any problems with a stock one. The 8G is quick, but that 13.7 @ 102, stock is about as typical as TypeS 09 running a 13.9 @ 100 in his intake only '05 TL.

The 6AT in the 9G looks promising since C&D got a 14.1 @ 101 out of one.
Young man, 8G Accord cannot get to quarter in 13.7 sec and not at 102 trap speed... Don't go by dragstrip numbers as they've been modded, stripped out, etc and on 50 mph tailwind. Not realistic buddy. Go get da Road&Track or MotorTrend mag out.


kekekekeke
Old 09-23-2013 | 03:38 PM
  #17  
Sonnick's Avatar
All motor
 
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 3,530
Likes: 532
From: Long Island
^ They trapped 102.5 in that mag, fool. I believe it was a 14.2 though. Anything over 100mph has 13.x potential. It's been done by actual drivers, don't be an asshat.
Old 09-23-2013 | 04:31 PM
  #18  
anx1300c's Avatar
Suzuka Master
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 5,020
Likes: 930
From: 633 Stag Trail Rd
Originally Posted by mazdaspeed3God
Young man, 8G Accord cannot get to quarter in 13.7 sec and not at 102 trap speed... Don't go by dragstrip numbers as they've been modded, stripped out, etc and on 50 mph tailwind. Not realistic buddy. Go get da Road&Track or MotorTrend mag out.


kekekekeke
Firstly, I'm older than you.

Secondly, do you still not grasp the English language enough to understand I'm saying that 13's at 102 isn't typical of a bone stock 8G? Perhaps you need to take an internet gander over to Merriam Webster and study the word "typical", then get back to me. I'm seriously starting to question your basic intelligence quotient.
The following 6 users liked this post by anx1300c:
BEAR-AvHistory (09-26-2013), EvilVirus (09-23-2013), justnspace (09-24-2013), mazdaspeed3God (09-24-2013), Sonnick (09-23-2013), TylerT (09-24-2013) and 1 others liked this post. (Show less...)
Old 09-24-2013 | 12:01 PM
  #19  
SatinSilverAV6's Avatar
Thread Starter
2003 Accord Coupe V6
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 1,825
Likes: 74
From: Oceanside, Ca
Originally Posted by mazdaspeed3God
Young man, 8G Accord cannot get to quarter in 13.7 sec and not at 102 trap speed...

kekekekeke
tell that to the guy that did it stock on V6p
Old 09-24-2013 | 01:08 PM
  #20  
mazdaspeed3God's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 351
Likes: 1
Originally Posted by Sonnick
^ They trapped 102.5 in that mag, fool. I believe it was a 14.2 though.
Oh I meant one or the other not both. 14.2, typical for an 8G Accord 6MT with a good driver.

Anything over 100mph has 13.x potential. It's been done by actual drivers, don't be an asshat.
Did you think I was referring to car video games? lol All refer to actual drivers ha ha. Not entirely true though. I thought I have seen cars that trap sub 100 mph and get to 13.x. Su... sssuuu (hint) Your getting a little touchy today! Oh I mean yesterday lolz


Originally Posted by anx1300c
Firstly, I'm older than you.

Secondly, do you still not grasp the English language enough to understand I'm saying that 13's at 102 isn't typical of a bone stock 8G? Perhaps you need to take an internet gander over to Merriam Webster and study the word "typical", then get back to me. I'm seriously starting to question your basic intelligence quotient.
Ah! Thanks for the corrrection! + rep.




mazdagod
Old 09-24-2013 | 03:41 PM
  #21  
Sonnick's Avatar
All motor
 
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 3,530
Likes: 532
From: Long Island
No, 13.x is not usual for a 8G 6-6. With a good driver though, it's entirely possible. The norm would probably be more like 14.2 - 14.4.
The following users liked this post:
F23A4 (09-25-2013)
Old 09-25-2013 | 04:35 AM
  #22  
F23A4's Avatar
Senior Moderator
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 17,904
Likes: 1,673
Ever since the 6-6 debuted with the 7G, it's been a sleeper, with performance numbers in the ballpark of more upmarket coupes such as the G37 without the insurance penalty. (Generally speaking)
Old 09-26-2013 | 05:29 PM
  #23  
vhtran's Avatar
Car Enthusiast
 
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 663
Likes: 185
From: Northeast
I don't see any Accord in the video. All I can see is a GT-R.
Old 10-03-2013 | 11:24 AM
  #24  
zapco's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: Aug 2013
Posts: 185
Likes: 8
From: CA
mazda3speedgod=idiot.
Old 12-03-2013 | 11:12 PM
  #25  
Scottwax's Avatar
Mr. Detail
 
Joined: Oct 2011
Posts: 1,096
Likes: 198
From: Arlington, TX
Originally Posted by anx1300c
You won't have any problems with a stock one. The 8G is quick, but that 13.7 @ 102, stock is about as typical as TypeS 09 running a 13.9 @ 100 in his intake only '05 TL..
8th gen cars aren't really any quicker than 7th gen cars due to the weight gain. 9th gen cars are definitely the quickest Accords yet.
Old 12-04-2013 | 10:02 AM
  #26  
BEAR-AvHistory's Avatar
Suzuka Master
 
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 7,674
Likes: 2,600
From: Raleigh, NC - USA
Was it on a DynoJet, could not see the top of the chart. 255whp is very nice for a small N/A engine.
Old 12-05-2013 | 04:59 PM
  #27  
SatinSilverAV6's Avatar
Thread Starter
2003 Accord Coupe V6
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 1,825
Likes: 74
From: Oceanside, Ca
Originally Posted by Scottwax
8th gen cars aren't really any quicker than 7th gen cars due to the weight gain. 9th gen cars are definitely the quickest Accords yet.
The auto 8th gen is actually a touch slower than the 7th gen auto, however the 6MT 8th gen is faster than the 6MT 7th gen by quite a bit. I agree though, 9th gen accords both auto and 6MT are the quickest yet.
Old 12-05-2013 | 05:00 PM
  #28  
SatinSilverAV6's Avatar
Thread Starter
2003 Accord Coupe V6
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 1,825
Likes: 74
From: Oceanside, Ca
Originally Posted by BEAR-AvHistory
Was it on a DynoJet, could not see the top of the chart. 255whp is very nice for a small N/A engine.
yes it was on a dynojet.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
lidobitesize
5G TLX Tires, Wheels & Suspension
18
10-22-2016 10:21 PM
Zonian22
Member Cars for Sale
3
11-14-2015 01:20 PM
JarrettLauderdale
2G CL Dynograph Gallery
5
09-21-2015 07:51 PM
cruisingnycfl
3G TL (2004-2008)
3
09-02-2015 12:11 PM



Quick Reply: Stock Dyno of a 2013 Accord V6 6MT



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:59 AM.