Stock Dyno of a 2013 Accord V6 6MT
The following users liked this post:
justnspace (09-19-2013)
#6
Thread Starter
2003 Accord Coupe V6
iTrader: (2)
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 1,825
Likes: 74
From: Oceanside, Ca
here is the auto 13' V6 touring to compare
http://www.vtec.net/articles/view-ar...&page_number=2
240WHP and 225WTQ
http://www.vtec.net/articles/view-ar...&page_number=2
240WHP and 225WTQ
Trending Topics
The following 2 users liked this post by paperboy42190:
BEAR-AvHistory (09-30-2013),
F23A4 (09-25-2013)
#14
You won't have any problems with a stock one. The 8G is quick, but that 13.7 @ 102, stock is about as typical as TypeS 09 running a 13.9 @ 100 in his intake only '05 TL.
The 6AT in the 9G looks promising since C&D got a 14.1 @ 101 out of one.
The 6AT in the 9G looks promising since C&D got a 14.1 @ 101 out of one.
#15
2013 Honda Accord Coupe EX-L V6 w/Nav 6 Speed Manual Transmission Dyno Test - YouTube
Pretty impressive numbers.
Stock 2013 Honda Accord EX V6 Coupe 6MT
I figured this would be the best place to post this?
Pretty impressive numbers.
Stock 2013 Honda Accord EX V6 Coupe 6MT
I figured this would be the best place to post this?
You are not supposed to watch youtube videos at work. At work you work. Get to work yo sackboi!
That's typical HONDA. Get used to it. Put up with it or get a different ride. MS3 is shit full of torque.
That's second time you whining about torque you know.
But only at high RPM's. You lose all your time before it reaches powerband. lolz
mazdaspeed3god
#16
kekekekeke
#18
Secondly, do you still not grasp the English language enough to understand I'm saying that 13's at 102 isn't typical of a bone stock 8G? Perhaps you need to take an internet gander over to Merriam Webster and study the word "typical", then get back to me. I'm seriously starting to question your basic intelligence quotient.
The following 6 users liked this post by anx1300c:
BEAR-AvHistory (09-26-2013),
EvilVirus (09-23-2013),
justnspace (09-24-2013),
mazdaspeed3God (09-24-2013),
Sonnick (09-23-2013),
and 1 others liked this post.
#20
Anything over 100mph has 13.x potential. It's been done by actual drivers, don't be an asshat.
Firstly, I'm older than you.
Secondly, do you still not grasp the English language enough to understand I'm saying that 13's at 102 isn't typical of a bone stock 8G? Perhaps you need to take an internet gander over to Merriam Webster and study the word "typical", then get back to me. I'm seriously starting to question your basic intelligence quotient.
Secondly, do you still not grasp the English language enough to understand I'm saying that 13's at 102 isn't typical of a bone stock 8G? Perhaps you need to take an internet gander over to Merriam Webster and study the word "typical", then get back to me. I'm seriously starting to question your basic intelligence quotient.
mazdagod
The following users liked this post:
F23A4 (09-25-2013)
#25
8th gen cars aren't really any quicker than 7th gen cars due to the weight gain. 9th gen cars are definitely the quickest Accords yet.
#27
Thread Starter
2003 Accord Coupe V6
iTrader: (2)
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 1,825
Likes: 74
From: Oceanside, Ca
The auto 8th gen is actually a touch slower than the 7th gen auto, however the 6MT 8th gen is faster than the 6MT 7th gen by quite a bit. I agree though, 9th gen accords both auto and 6MT are the quickest yet.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Zonian22
Member Cars for Sale
3
11-14-2015 01:20 PM
JarrettLauderdale
2G CL Dynograph Gallery
5
09-21-2015 07:51 PM