3G TL (2004-2008)
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

My 3g 6mt vs. new r32

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 05-14-2008, 02:58 PM
  #1  
Instructor
Thread Starter
 
so cal eddie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Age: 45
Posts: 174
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
My 3g 6mt vs. new r32

I was minding my business at a stoplight and he pulled up next to me. I glanced at his car because it looked nice and noticed it was an r32. The light was about to turn green so i was ready to take off and since im 6mt the car rolled back some as i let off the brake. I took off slow but he floored it. Next stoplight he has window down and says he didnt know that my car came in a manual. He says lets see what you got. I said alright. The light went green and with his awd traction took off. By 40 mph i caught up and by 80 he was way behind me. 4 or 5 cars. I let off and he turned at some street. I think he was ashamed. Pretty funny though.

eddie
Old 05-14-2008, 03:20 PM
  #2  
Racer
iTrader: (1)
 
cuteguy1414's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 358
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Great kill..but next time time take it to the drag strip! Take care driving!
Old 05-14-2008, 03:30 PM
  #3  
Instructor
Thread Starter
 
so cal eddie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Age: 45
Posts: 174
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I know. I know. I havent done that in a couple of years. I was nervous at the time and shouldnt do it again. We were coming out of the main city into the flat lands were the limit is 75. Thats not a good excuse though.
Old 05-14-2008, 04:08 PM
  #4  
大日本帝国
 
Go90go's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Double Standard Land
Posts: 5,321
Received 36 Likes on 31 Posts
Good kill. VW owners have a thing against Hondas. Next time you see one, tell him/her that their "fast" belongs in your car, .

~Cheers~
Old 05-14-2008, 04:26 PM
  #5  
You'll Never Walk Alone
iTrader: (1)
 
iforyou's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Vancouver, BC, Canada
Age: 37
Posts: 9,511
Received 841 Likes on 524 Posts
nice kill
Old 05-14-2008, 05:54 PM
  #6  
Drifting
iTrader: (10)
 
'03TL-S's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Texas
Age: 36
Posts: 2,279
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Any mods done to the your TL?
Old 05-14-2008, 06:06 PM
  #7  
Instructor
Thread Starter
 
so cal eddie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Age: 45
Posts: 174
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
k/n filter with resonator delete, ur pulley stock size, and p2r spacer. Eh i dont think it was worth the money though. I didnt notice any difference.
Old 05-14-2008, 07:19 PM
  #8  
luvs redheads!
 
swift22's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: back in WI
Age: 39
Posts: 1,193
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
everytime i hear R32 i think skyline...

f- VW
Old 05-14-2008, 09:15 PM
  #9  
COTM Coordinator
 
MurkyRiversTL's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Apple Valley, Ca
Age: 41
Posts: 3,211
Received 15 Likes on 10 Posts
nice.... although it would be a different story against a modded gti. those things are wicked.
Old 05-14-2008, 11:13 PM
  #10  
Feenin on some 20's
iTrader: (2)
 
ILLustriousUA6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: somewhere
Posts: 4,255
Received 31 Likes on 20 Posts
modded anything's wicked.

nice kill bro
Old 05-14-2008, 11:34 PM
  #11  
COTM Coordinator
 
MurkyRiversTL's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Apple Valley, Ca
Age: 41
Posts: 3,211
Received 15 Likes on 10 Posts
a modded radio flyer wagon isn't wicked lol.
Old 05-14-2008, 11:51 PM
  #12  
2003 TL-S A-SPEC
 
BIGTUFFGUY's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Montreal, Canada
Age: 42
Posts: 849
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
i beg to differ.



good job on the kill
Old 05-15-2008, 12:09 AM
  #13  
COTM Coordinator
 
MurkyRiversTL's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Apple Valley, Ca
Age: 41
Posts: 3,211
Received 15 Likes on 10 Posts
) wow I stand corrected anything modded IS wicked lol.
Old 05-15-2008, 12:39 AM
  #14  
eat, sleep, NGC
 
nova_G's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Age: 36
Posts: 368
Received 2 Likes on 1 Post
Originally Posted by BIGTUFFGUY
i beg to differ.



good job on the kill

LMAO this has to be the funniest post ive seen this year!
Old 05-15-2008, 01:41 AM
  #15  
Safety Car
 
erick3's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Seattle, Washington
Age: 36
Posts: 4,163
Received 7 Likes on 6 Posts
wow really? i was under the impression that those things were a lot quicker! i remember test driving the gti...it seemed quicker, but a couple of weeks later i took one from 0 to 60ish...i walked him....?
Old 05-15-2008, 11:24 AM
  #16  
Suzuka Master
iTrader: (2)
 
anx1300c's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: 633 Stag Trail Rd
Posts: 5,020
Received 930 Likes on 612 Posts
Those R32's are HEAVY. Very nice car though, IMO. Love the dual exhaust in the middle of the bumper. The times I've seen for them are ~6.4/14.7, so a 3G TL6MT should take it fairly easily.
Old 05-15-2008, 01:32 PM
  #17  
Instructor
 
08WDP's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Bay Area
Age: 39
Posts: 183
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
those R32 with 250hp AWD but weights @ 3547....thats almost as much as the new TL-S i own, but we get 36 more hp and 30+ more tqr.
Old 05-20-2008, 05:13 PM
  #18  
Burning Brakes
 
Dave_B's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Shawnee, KS
Age: 50
Posts: 950
Likes: 0
Received 45 Likes on 32 Posts
Originally Posted by erick3
wow really? i was under the impression that those things were a lot quicker! i remember test driving the gti...it seemed quicker, but a couple of weeks later i took one from 0 to 60ish...i walked him....?
In the right hand, the 1st gen R32 should be quicker. They're legit 14.2-14.4 second cars. With a couple of mods, they're 13.8-14.0 cars. They do require a high rpm launch, but they still move pretty good.
Old 05-20-2008, 05:20 PM
  #19  
Banned
 
Manual Transmission's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Age: 48
Posts: 632
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Dave_B
In the right hand, the 1st gen R32 should be quicker. They're legit 14.2-14.4 second cars. With a couple of mods, they're 13.8-14.0 cars. They do require a high rpm launch, but they still move pretty good.
Any cars with good hands can get better results on a drag strip. So can the Acura TL 6MT cars hitting nearly 14 sec flat in the quarter and trap speed of 99~ 100 mph. So does the Acura TL 6MT. It requires high RPM launch to get in the optimal torque band.


See? This is what I mean. You always try to put down on Honda/Acura and make other manufacturers look good. The cars are not the problem, it is you.


Old 05-20-2008, 06:03 PM
  #20  
Burning Brakes
 
Dave_B's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Shawnee, KS
Age: 50
Posts: 950
Likes: 0
Received 45 Likes on 32 Posts
Originally Posted by Manual Transmission
Any cars with good hands can get better results on a drag strip. So can the Acura TL 6MT cars hitting nearly 14 sec flat in the quarter and trap speed of 99~ 100 mph. So does the Acura TL 6MT. It requires high RPM launch to get in the optimal torque band.


See? This is what I mean. You always try to put down on Honda/Acura and make other manufacturers look good. The cars are not the problem, it is you.


Oh wait, I thought I was a Infiniti/Nissan nutswinger, not a VW guy? Are you really going to chase me around this forum and try to prove me wrong? If so, I look forward to making look really foolish.

"Put down Honda/Acura" to make all other manufactuers look good. My God what a weak sauce argument. Maybe you need to get over your own Honda/Acura bias and venture outside this forum to get a performance perspective of other cars. I'm a numbers guy. I live for this type stuff. The 1st gen R32 is quick car and when launched right, it's going to outrun most any stock TL 6MT in the 1/4 mile and it surely won't get beat by 4 to 5 cars by 80mph by ANY stock or lightly modded TL. If you've ever run at the strip, you'd know that a 4 to 5 car difference (assuming same reaction time) by 80mph is about a 1-second difference by the end of the 1/4 mile where the 4 to 5 cars turns into about 7 to 8 by the far end.

In the right hands and under stellar conditions, the R32 has done 13.8s@100mph STOCK, but I don't bring up the stellar times because they're not the norm. If you don't believe me check out Vortex.com.

I also know all about launching a lower torque, higher HP manual FWD car. I owned a decently modded NA Maxima with 210whp/205wtq that torque steered and wheel-hopped it's way to 14.3s@100mph with low 2.1 60 foots on 215/60R15 RSA all-season rubber with 5000rpm launches. Don't tell about what FWD can and can't do.

I'm not going to take any of your racing logic seriously until you actually get some honest runs under your belt. What are you afraid of? Maybe the reality that you're an inexperienced driver and your TL would probably run upper 14s?

Why don't you stick to the topic and stop wasting my time? Nobody wants to read this crap.
Old 05-20-2008, 06:04 PM
  #21  
Turd Polisher
iTrader: (1)
 
TylerT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: San Diego
Age: 35
Posts: 6,803
Received 3,017 Likes on 1,515 Posts
@ Manual Transmission: Cool your jets. Why do you have to be on Dave_B's case 24/7?

I mean sure, his previous posts have showed a little bias, but really he speaks the truth most of the time.

Give him a break
Old 05-21-2008, 12:35 AM
  #22  
You'll Never Walk Alone
iTrader: (1)
 
iforyou's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Vancouver, BC, Canada
Age: 37
Posts: 9,511
Received 841 Likes on 524 Posts
Originally Posted by Dave_B
In the right hand, the 1st gen R32 should be quicker. They're legit 14.2-14.4 second cars. With a couple of mods, they're 13.8-14.0 cars. They do require a high rpm launch, but they still move pretty good.
Don't you think what you just said can also be applied to the 6MT TL?

Like this:

"In the right hand, the 3rd gen TL 6MT's are legit 14.2-14.4 second cars (done by Jeff@TOV, multiple tests in C&D, CL forum, and the racing thread here). With a couple of mods, they're 13.8-14.0 cars (types-09, omprelude, etc)"

In other words, I'd say they are as fast as each other on the track. Not that you really care, but on the street, the TL would have the advantage if you forget about the launch.
Old 05-21-2008, 07:54 AM
  #23  
Burning Brakes
 
Dave_B's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Shawnee, KS
Age: 50
Posts: 950
Likes: 0
Received 45 Likes on 32 Posts
Originally Posted by iforyou
Don't you think what you just said can also be applied to the 6MT TL?

Like this:

"In the right hand, the 3rd gen TL 6MT's are legit 14.2-14.4 second cars (done by Jeff@TOV, multiple tests in C&D, CL forum, and the racing thread here). With a couple of mods, they're 13.8-14.0 cars (types-09, omprelude, etc)"

In other words, I'd say they are as fast as each other on the track. Not that you really care, but on the street, the TL would have the advantage if you forget about the launch.
No, no, I agree. It's just a lot easier to extract the most from the R32 assuming you're willing make the most of that Haldex AWD and risk a costly repair. Racing a high powered FWD car is just damn hard. Traction is like a light switch. With the R32, rev up to 5000-6000 and quickly slip the clutch and you might manage a high 1.8 60'. With the TL, you'll be doing amazing if you get a low 2.1.
Old 05-21-2008, 08:04 AM
  #24  
Senior Moderator
 
F23A4's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Age: 56
Posts: 17,896
Received 1,666 Likes on 930 Posts
Originally Posted by Manual Transmission

See? This is what I mean. You always try to put down on Honda/Acura and make other manufacturers look good. The cars are not the problem, it is you.


I am trying really hard to understand how you have derived ^^ from this:


Originally Posted by Dave_B
In the right hand, the 1st gen R32 should be quicker. They're legit 14.2-14.4 second cars. With a couple of mods, they're 13.8-14.0 cars. They do require a high rpm launch, but they still move pretty good.
From what I gather though, extolling the performance abilities of other makes (particularly when said make vehicle seems to be underperforming in a subject instance) is somehow a slight at Acura. Caveat: Those of us who are Acura/Honda fans but have not drank the Kool-Aid, do not hold that point of view.
Old 05-21-2008, 08:10 AM
  #25  
Senior Moderator
 
F23A4's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Age: 56
Posts: 17,896
Received 1,666 Likes on 930 Posts
Originally Posted by Dave_B
No, no, I agree. It's just a lot easier to extract the most from the R32 assuming you're willing make the most of that Haldex AWD and risk a costly repair. Racing a high powered FWD car is just damn hard. Traction is like a light switch. With the R32, rev up to 5000-6000 and quickly slip the clutch and you might manage a high 1.8 60'. With the TL, you'll be doing amazing if you get a low 2.1.
Even moreso with a FWD VQ35 than the J-series. But , the off the line hookup with the R32 is fairly impressive.
Old 05-21-2008, 09:39 AM
  #26  
Burning Brakes
 
Dave_B's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Shawnee, KS
Age: 50
Posts: 950
Likes: 0
Received 45 Likes on 32 Posts
Originally Posted by F23A4
Even moreso with a FWD VQ35 than the J-series. But , the off the line hookup with the R32 is fairly impressive.
I drove my friend's 6MT 2002 Maxima at the strip and that wasn't a fun drive. Too little tire, too much front end lift, and wheelspin that's hard to modulate. It didn't require near the rpms to get off the line like my VQ30, but it definitely had traction issues towards the top of 1st and crazy torque steer going into 2nd. The torque steer was borderline comical on the street. It seemed to seek out the nearest road hazard. I don't miss all the problems with racing a high powered FWD car, but I do miss some of that "rawness".
Old 05-21-2008, 09:44 AM
  #27  
Instructor
Thread Starter
 
so cal eddie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Age: 45
Posts: 174
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Wow!! you guys are going at it. The car I raced is a new gen r32. Its automatic with no option for a manual. When we took off he just floored it. He didnt hold the brake down, floor the pedal, and let off the brake. I would have heard him do that. If he would have done that it would have taken me longer to catch up to him.
Old 05-21-2008, 11:01 AM
  #28  
Burning Brakes
 
Dave_B's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Shawnee, KS
Age: 50
Posts: 950
Likes: 0
Received 45 Likes on 32 Posts
Originally Posted by so cal eddie
Wow!! you guys are going at it. The car I raced is a new gen r32. Its automatic with no option for a manual. When we took off he just floored it. He didnt hold the brake down, floor the pedal, and let off the brake. I would have heard him do that. If he would have done that it would have taken me longer to catch up to him.
The new R32s come with a sequential manual (ie not a true automatic). They have a launch mode, but it's still not as aggressive as launching the manual. The shifting is lightening quick, but the car is now too heavy. I believe it's about .2 to .3 seconds slower than the 1st gen car and really no quicker than a DSG 2.0T turbo. Regardless, I have no doubt you put 4 to 5 cars on him by 80mph, but I believe the guy let off way before you did because you're not going to close a gap like that and then put that many cars on him by 80mph, unless you're driving an 11-second car.
Old 05-21-2008, 11:12 AM
  #29  
i am so smart S M R T
 
01clsstock's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: CT
Age: 42
Posts: 630
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Thumbs up

Originally Posted by Dave_B
In the right hand, the 1st gen R32 should be quicker. They're legit 14.2-14.4 second cars. With a couple of mods, they're 13.8-14.0 cars. They do require a high rpm launch, but they still move pretty good.
i have to agree with the nissan fan on this one. plus the r32 exhaust note is pretty sweet
Old 05-21-2008, 11:57 AM
  #30  
You'll Never Walk Alone
iTrader: (1)
 
iforyou's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Vancouver, BC, Canada
Age: 37
Posts: 9,511
Received 841 Likes on 524 Posts
Originally Posted by Dave_B
No, no, I agree. It's just a lot easier to extract the most from the R32 assuming you're willing make the most of that Haldex AWD and risk a costly repair. Racing a high powered FWD car is just damn hard. Traction is like a light switch. With the R32, rev up to 5000-6000 and quickly slip the clutch and you might manage a high 1.8 60'. With the TL, you'll be doing amazing if you get a low 2.1.
Ah ic, yea, I agree, much easier to launch AWD if you are willing to abuse it.
Old 05-21-2008, 12:14 PM
  #31  
Banned
 
Manual Transmission's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Age: 48
Posts: 632
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by iforyou
Ah ic, yea, I agree, much easier to launch AWD if you are willing to abuse it.
+1. Exactly.......
Old 05-21-2008, 01:18 PM
  #32  
Burning Brakes
 
Dave_B's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Shawnee, KS
Age: 50
Posts: 950
Likes: 0
Received 45 Likes on 32 Posts
Originally Posted by 01clsstock
i have to agree with the nissan fan on this one. plus the r32 exhaust note is pretty sweet
Especially when you mod the exhaust baffle.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Yumcha
Automotive News
4
08-15-2019 12:58 PM
Zonian22
Member Cars for Sale
3
11-14-2015 01:20 PM
Acura604
3G TL (2004-2008)
10
09-28-2015 12:24 PM
Strath
3G TL (2004-2008)
36
09-27-2015 11:53 PM



Quick Reply: My 3g 6mt vs. new r32



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:17 AM.