My 3g 6mt vs. new r32
#1
Instructor
Thread Starter
Join Date: Mar 2008
Age: 45
Posts: 174
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
My 3g 6mt vs. new r32
I was minding my business at a stoplight and he pulled up next to me. I glanced at his car because it looked nice and noticed it was an r32. The light was about to turn green so i was ready to take off and since im 6mt the car rolled back some as i let off the brake. I took off slow but he floored it. Next stoplight he has window down and says he didnt know that my car came in a manual. He says lets see what you got. I said alright. The light went green and with his awd traction took off. By 40 mph i caught up and by 80 he was way behind me. 4 or 5 cars. I let off and he turned at some street. I think he was ashamed. Pretty funny though.
eddie
eddie
#3
Instructor
Thread Starter
Join Date: Mar 2008
Age: 45
Posts: 174
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I know. I know. I havent done that in a couple of years. I was nervous at the time and shouldnt do it again. We were coming out of the main city into the flat lands were the limit is 75. Thats not a good excuse though.
Trending Topics
#15
Safety Car
wow really? i was under the impression that those things were a lot quicker! i remember test driving the gti...it seemed quicker, but a couple of weeks later i took one from 0 to 60ish...i walked him....?
#16
Suzuka Master
iTrader: (2)
Those R32's are HEAVY. Very nice car though, IMO. Love the dual exhaust in the middle of the bumper. The times I've seen for them are ~6.4/14.7, so a 3G TL6MT should take it fairly easily.
#18
Burning Brakes
Originally Posted by erick3
wow really? i was under the impression that those things were a lot quicker! i remember test driving the gti...it seemed quicker, but a couple of weeks later i took one from 0 to 60ish...i walked him....?
#19
Originally Posted by Dave_B
In the right hand, the 1st gen R32 should be quicker. They're legit 14.2-14.4 second cars. With a couple of mods, they're 13.8-14.0 cars. They do require a high rpm launch, but they still move pretty good.
See? This is what I mean. You always try to put down on Honda/Acura and make other manufacturers look good. The cars are not the problem, it is you.
![Wink](https://acurazine.com/forums/images/smilies/wink.gif)
#20
Burning Brakes
Originally Posted by Manual Transmission
Any cars with good hands can get better results on a drag strip. So can the Acura TL 6MT cars hitting nearly 14 sec flat in the quarter and trap speed of 99~ 100 mph. So does the Acura TL 6MT. It requires high RPM launch to get in the optimal torque band.
See? This is what I mean. You always try to put down on Honda/Acura and make other manufacturers look good. The cars are not the problem, it is you.
![Wink](https://acurazine.com/forums/images/smilies/wink.gif)
See? This is what I mean. You always try to put down on Honda/Acura and make other manufacturers look good. The cars are not the problem, it is you.
![Wink](https://acurazine.com/forums/images/smilies/wink.gif)
"Put down Honda/Acura" to make all other manufactuers look good. My God what a weak sauce argument. Maybe you need to get over your own Honda/Acura bias and venture outside this forum to get a performance perspective of other cars. I'm a numbers guy. I live for this type stuff. The 1st gen R32 is quick car and when launched right, it's going to outrun most any stock TL 6MT in the 1/4 mile and it surely won't get beat by 4 to 5 cars by 80mph by ANY stock or lightly modded TL. If you've ever run at the strip, you'd know that a 4 to 5 car difference (assuming same reaction time) by 80mph is about a 1-second difference by the end of the 1/4 mile where the 4 to 5 cars turns into about 7 to 8 by the far end.
In the right hands and under stellar conditions, the R32 has done 13.8s@100mph STOCK, but I don't bring up the stellar times because they're not the norm. If you don't believe me check out Vortex.com.
I also know all about launching a lower torque, higher HP manual FWD car. I owned a decently modded NA Maxima with 210whp/205wtq that torque steered and wheel-hopped it's way to 14.3s@100mph with low 2.1 60 foots on 215/60R15 RSA all-season rubber with 5000rpm launches. Don't tell about what FWD can and can't do.
I'm not going to take any of your racing logic seriously until you actually get some honest runs under your belt. What are you afraid of? Maybe the reality that you're an inexperienced driver and your TL would probably run upper 14s?
Why don't you stick to the topic and stop wasting my time? Nobody wants to read this crap.
#21
Turd Polisher
iTrader: (1)
@ Manual Transmission: Cool your jets. Why do you have to be on Dave_B's case 24/7?
I mean sure, his previous posts have showed a little bias, but really he speaks the truth most of the time.
Give him a break
I mean sure, his previous posts have showed a little bias, but really he speaks the truth most of the time.
Give him a break
![Roll Eyes](https://acurazine.com/forums/images/smilies/rolleyes.gif)
#22
You'll Never Walk Alone
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Vancouver, BC, Canada
Age: 37
Posts: 9,511
Received 841 Likes
on
524 Posts
Originally Posted by Dave_B
In the right hand, the 1st gen R32 should be quicker. They're legit 14.2-14.4 second cars. With a couple of mods, they're 13.8-14.0 cars. They do require a high rpm launch, but they still move pretty good.
Like this:
"In the right hand, the 3rd gen TL 6MT's are legit 14.2-14.4 second cars (done by Jeff@TOV, multiple tests in C&D, CL forum, and the racing thread here). With a couple of mods, they're 13.8-14.0 cars (types-09, omprelude, etc)"
In other words, I'd say they are as fast as each other on the track. Not that you really care, but on the street, the TL would have the advantage if you forget about the launch.
#23
Burning Brakes
Originally Posted by iforyou
Don't you think what you just said can also be applied to the 6MT TL?
Like this:
"In the right hand, the 3rd gen TL 6MT's are legit 14.2-14.4 second cars (done by Jeff@TOV, multiple tests in C&D, CL forum, and the racing thread here). With a couple of mods, they're 13.8-14.0 cars (types-09, omprelude, etc)"
In other words, I'd say they are as fast as each other on the track. Not that you really care, but on the street, the TL would have the advantage if you forget about the launch.
Like this:
"In the right hand, the 3rd gen TL 6MT's are legit 14.2-14.4 second cars (done by Jeff@TOV, multiple tests in C&D, CL forum, and the racing thread here). With a couple of mods, they're 13.8-14.0 cars (types-09, omprelude, etc)"
In other words, I'd say they are as fast as each other on the track. Not that you really care, but on the street, the TL would have the advantage if you forget about the launch.
#24
Senior Moderator
Originally Posted by Manual Transmission
See? This is what I mean. You always try to put down on Honda/Acura and make other manufacturers look good. The cars are not the problem, it is you.
![Wink](https://acurazine.com/forums/images/smilies/wink.gif)
Originally Posted by Dave_B
In the right hand, the 1st gen R32 should be quicker. They're legit 14.2-14.4 second cars. With a couple of mods, they're 13.8-14.0 cars. They do require a high rpm launch, but they still move pretty good.
#25
Senior Moderator
Originally Posted by Dave_B
No, no, I agree. It's just a lot easier to extract the most from the R32 assuming you're willing make the most of that Haldex AWD and risk a costly repair. Racing a high powered FWD car is just damn hard. Traction is like a light switch. With the R32, rev up to 5000-6000 and quickly slip the clutch and you might manage a high 1.8 60'. With the TL, you'll be doing amazing if you get a low 2.1.
![Agree](https://acurazine.com/forums/images/smilies/agree.gif)
#26
Burning Brakes
Originally Posted by F23A4
Even moreso with a FWD VQ35 than the J-series. But
, the off the line hookup with the R32 is fairly impressive.
![Agree](https://acurazine.com/forums/images/smilies/agree.gif)
#27
Instructor
Thread Starter
Join Date: Mar 2008
Age: 45
Posts: 174
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Wow!! you guys are going at it. The car I raced is a new gen r32. Its automatic with no option for a manual. When we took off he just floored it. He didnt hold the brake down, floor the pedal, and let off the brake. I would have heard him do that. If he would have done that it would have taken me longer to catch up to him.
#28
Burning Brakes
Originally Posted by so cal eddie
Wow!! you guys are going at it. The car I raced is a new gen r32. Its automatic with no option for a manual. When we took off he just floored it. He didnt hold the brake down, floor the pedal, and let off the brake. I would have heard him do that. If he would have done that it would have taken me longer to catch up to him.
#29
i am so smart S M R T
![Thumbs up](https://acurazine.com/forums/images/icons/icon14.gif)
Originally Posted by Dave_B
In the right hand, the 1st gen R32 should be quicker. They're legit 14.2-14.4 second cars. With a couple of mods, they're 13.8-14.0 cars. They do require a high rpm launch, but they still move pretty good.
#30
You'll Never Walk Alone
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Vancouver, BC, Canada
Age: 37
Posts: 9,511
Received 841 Likes
on
524 Posts
Originally Posted by Dave_B
No, no, I agree. It's just a lot easier to extract the most from the R32 assuming you're willing make the most of that Haldex AWD and risk a costly repair. Racing a high powered FWD car is just damn hard. Traction is like a light switch. With the R32, rev up to 5000-6000 and quickly slip the clutch and you might manage a high 1.8 60'. With the TL, you'll be doing amazing if you get a low 2.1.
#32
Burning Brakes
Originally Posted by 01clsstock
i have to agree with the nissan fan on this one. plus the r32 exhaust note is pretty sweet
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Zonian22
Member Cars for Sale
3
11-14-2015 01:20 PM