auto tl type s vs?
#1
Advanced
Thread Starter
auto tl type s vs?
Ok before I start I know alot of people on here don't aprove of driving crazy on the highway but hey im young and I like to do crazy things sometimes. Which were all guilty of. When i see cars speed by me i think "which cars can we out perform" and yesterday I fell to the temptation of racing a is250. Basically smoked him. Couldn't keep up with me. Duh hes only got a 2.5 i know. Anybody wana share a similar exp? If you wana call it another fail race thread. Watever. But if you wana talk about cars we can compete against, im listening.
#2
I think the only cars we can give a run for their money are G's, 350Zs, the older GT Mustang w/ 300Hp, & possibly IS' models. Other than that, we can either beat without too much issue or get blown away.
These cars are great, but personally, I've given up trying to compare performance wise to anything. I think the FWD hampers the potential of the Type-S too much.
These cars are great, but personally, I've given up trying to compare performance wise to anything. I think the FWD hampers the potential of the Type-S too much.
#5
16GS FSprt,03Max,12 335is
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Manhattan Beach, Ca / Dallas, Tx
Age: 50
Posts: 976
Received 7 Likes
on
4 Posts
I think the only cars we can give a run for their money are G's, 350Zs, the older GT Mustang w/ 300Hp, & possibly IS' models. Other than that, we can either beat without too much issue or get blown away.
These cars are great, but personally, I've given up trying to compare performance wise to anything. I think the FWD hampers the potential of the Type-S too much.
These cars are great, but personally, I've given up trying to compare performance wise to anything. I think the FWD hampers the potential of the Type-S too much.
Last edited by Monte TLS,MAX; 03-26-2011 at 02:25 PM.
#6
Safety Car
iTrader: (4)
I agree the lack of TL-S vids on youtube kinda stinks. What I wanted to see the most was a auto TL-S against an manual TL-S. I owned an automatic and now purchasing a 6mt. The 6mt seemed significantly quicker. How would this relate in a side by side run assuming excellent 6mt driver?
James
James
#7
US Navy Seabees
another one of these huh...why don't you go to your local track and find out. I beat a modded 08 civic si, modded mini cooper s, 07ish audi a4, monte carlo ss, and a few trucks..other than that I got totally smoked by muscle dragster cars lol. The 1/4 mile track is where its at if you really wanna see what you can do.
Trending Topics
#10
Humm what 350z's, and 05-10 GT mustangs can an "automatic" TLS give a run for their money. All 350's from 03 up even in auto are faster than an auto TLS, I don't want to get into the 07/08 HR's....slaughter. Same goes for the 05 + GT's auto or manual vs an auto TLS, and the only IS any stock TLS can beat is the 250........350 bye bye TLS. Closer to an auto TLS are the 03-06 G sedan automatics, 07+ G sedans bye bye auto TLS.
'05 Mustang GTs are not that fast. Autos are dogshit slow, and it doesn't take much to hang on the rear of the manuals. A member & I on here have both run the same GT, and neither of us got left behind.
Notice how I also said possibly IS models.
Last edited by Rick_TL-S; 03-27-2011 at 12:08 AM.
#11
Instructor
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Central New Jersey
Age: 39
Posts: 170
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes
on
4 Posts
From personal experience, even tho I have a 6-speed, I have went against an 04 350z and got it, not by a lot but still got ahead, IS 250 also not much of a problem, the G35 Sedans, with 6-speed and a good driver is questionable.
IS 350 umm last one I raced smoked me bad lol, hell it even managed to kill my friends G8 GT. BMW 335i - no chance, 328 BMW- close but can take it, 05 Mustang GT's (auto) are slower than people think, Charger R/T Hemi -walked him.
Again, this is with a 6-speed and grippy tires, given that you can launch the car properly (took me a while to adjust) The automatic in the TL-S hinders it's performance, every Auto TL-S I went against (same or similar mods) I was able to walk, as well as the new SH-AWD TL (auto)
IS 350 umm last one I raced smoked me bad lol, hell it even managed to kill my friends G8 GT. BMW 335i - no chance, 328 BMW- close but can take it, 05 Mustang GT's (auto) are slower than people think, Charger R/T Hemi -walked him.
Again, this is with a 6-speed and grippy tires, given that you can launch the car properly (took me a while to adjust) The automatic in the TL-S hinders it's performance, every Auto TL-S I went against (same or similar mods) I was able to walk, as well as the new SH-AWD TL (auto)
#12
Your Friendly Canadian
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Toronto, Ontario
Age: 31
Posts: 17,431
Received 1,485 Likes
on
1,049 Posts
When you start racing cars like the Z, G, 328, etc... it's all about driver skill. Especially with MT.
#13
Advanced
Thread Starter
When I was against the is250 It was lliterally no competition... and 335i's, we can't take em? Cars.com says coupe does 0 to 60 at 6.04 aand 1/4 in 14.7. Those numbers are very similar to ours
Last edited by demer11; 03-27-2011 at 03:38 AM.
#14
US Navy Seabees
#17
16GS FSprt,03Max,12 335is
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Manhattan Beach, Ca / Dallas, Tx
Age: 50
Posts: 976
Received 7 Likes
on
4 Posts
![Too Cool](https://acurazine.com/forums/images/smilies/toocool.gif)
Last edited by Monte TLS,MAX; 03-27-2011 at 02:21 PM.
#18
16GS FSprt,03Max,12 335is
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Manhattan Beach, Ca / Dallas, Tx
Age: 50
Posts: 976
Received 7 Likes
on
4 Posts
Have had absolutely no trouble running 350Zs. I've ran 2, and both times, pulled past them once we got past 100. One of them even tapped his brakes to avoid me from pushing a fender by him during our first run.
'05 Mustang GTs are not that fast. Autos are dogshit slow, and it doesn't take much to hang on the rear of the manuals. A member & I on here have both run the same GT, and neither of us got left behind.
Notice how I also said possibly IS models.
'05 Mustang GTs are not that fast. Autos are dogshit slow, and it doesn't take much to hang on the rear of the manuals. A member & I on here have both run the same GT, and neither of us got left behind.
Notice how I also said possibly IS models.
Last edited by Monte TLS,MAX; 03-27-2011 at 02:57 PM.
#19
16GS FSprt,03Max,12 335is
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Manhattan Beach, Ca / Dallas, Tx
Age: 50
Posts: 976
Received 7 Likes
on
4 Posts
From personal experience, even tho I have a 6-speed, I have went against an 04 350z and got it, not by a lot but still got ahead, IS 250 also not much of a problem, the G35 Sedans, with 6-speed and a good driver is questionable.
IS 350 umm last one I raced smoked me bad lol, hell it even managed to kill my friends G8 GT. BMW 335i - no chance, 328 BMW- close but can take it, 05 Mustang GT's (auto) are slower than people think, Charger R/T Hemi -walked him.
Again, this is with a 6-speed and grippy tires, given that you can launch the car properly (took me a while to adjust) The automatic in the TL-S hinders it's performance, every Auto TL-S I went against (same or similar mods) I was able to walk, as well as the new SH-AWD TL (auto)
IS 350 umm last one I raced smoked me bad lol, hell it even managed to kill my friends G8 GT. BMW 335i - no chance, 328 BMW- close but can take it, 05 Mustang GT's (auto) are slower than people think, Charger R/T Hemi -walked him.
Again, this is with a 6-speed and grippy tires, given that you can launch the car properly (took me a while to adjust) The automatic in the TL-S hinders it's performance, every Auto TL-S I went against (same or similar mods) I was able to walk, as well as the new SH-AWD TL (auto)
![ugh](https://acurazine.com/forums/images/smilies/ugh.gif)
#21
Senior Moderator
If you are manual you can possible be close to a 03-06 350z, automatic TLS nah (wow past 100 that a serious race..hehe). 07/08 HR Z's no chance, those things can trap 105 to 108 stock. 05-10 GT manuals stock trap 104/105 , autos 100 to 102 and do 13's without issue, tell me what stock "automatic" TLS than can do that (mid 14's @ mid 90's). Key word is "automatic" as the original poster stated, automatic TLS's just do not put the power to the ground as well as the manuals. Manuals trap 4 to 5mph more and thats a fact, mid 90's vs high 90's to 101 ish.........big difference.
![Agree](https://acurazine.com/forums/images/smilies/agree.gif)
I've driven several variations of the 3G TL and unless I 'needed' and automatic TL, I'd opt for the 04-06 6MT over an 07-08 TL-S 5AT.
Going back to the original topic, I'd be interested in seeing how an 07-08 TL-S 5AT does against a TSX V6.....though I suspect it'd be a stalemate.
Last edited by F23A4; 03-27-2011 at 08:02 PM.
#23
16GS FSprt,03Max,12 335is
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Manhattan Beach, Ca / Dallas, Tx
Age: 50
Posts: 976
Received 7 Likes
on
4 Posts
![Agree](https://acurazine.com/forums/images/smilies/agree.gif)
I've driven several variations of the 3G TL and unless I 'needed' and automatic TL, I'd opt for the 04-06 6MT over an 07-08 TL-S 5AT.
Going back to the original topic, I'd be interested in seeing how an 07-08 TL-S 5AT does against a TSX V6.....though I suspect it'd be a stalemate.
#24
Instructor
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Central New Jersey
Age: 39
Posts: 170
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes
on
4 Posts
![Agree](https://acurazine.com/forums/images/smilies/agree.gif)
I've driven several variations of the 3G TL and unless I 'needed' and automatic TL, I'd opt for the 04-06 6MT over an 07-08 TL-S 5AT.
Going back to the original topic, I'd be interested in seeing how an 07-08 TL-S 5AT does against a TSX V6.....though I suspect it'd be a stalemate.
![Tomato](https://acurazine.com/forums/images/smilies/tomato.gif)
#25
16GS FSprt,03Max,12 335is
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Manhattan Beach, Ca / Dallas, Tx
Age: 50
Posts: 976
Received 7 Likes
on
4 Posts
Actually there's a video floating around somewhere, either on Azine or youtube where I think an auto TSX V6 went against AT TL-S from a roll. The TSX slowly kept creeping away from the TL-S. Not sure if either was modded. I have yet to come across one to go against. Last two V6 TSX I saw had chicks behind the wheel, they were white and one of them had a fuzzy steering wheel cover
and I doubt they'd want to race lol
![Tomato](https://acurazine.com/forums/images/smilies/tomato.gif)
http://www.caranddriver.com/var/ezfl...06720d4d53.pdf
Last edited by Monte TLS,MAX; 03-28-2011 at 12:08 AM.
#26
Suzuka Master
iTrader: (2)
That 99 mph is surprising. All the other tests have it at 96-97 mph; should be a close race. Crazy price for a TSX though.
http://www.caranddriver.com/reviews/...take_road_test
http://www.insideline.com/acura/tsx/...and-video.html
http://www.motortrend.com/roadtests/...v_6/index.html
http://www.caranddriver.com/reviews/...take_road_test
http://www.insideline.com/acura/tsx/...and-video.html
http://www.motortrend.com/roadtests/...v_6/index.html
#28
Like I've said, I've had no issue running 350Zs & I doubt a 6Spd wouldn't have much trouble pulling on them.
07/08 HR Z's no chance, those things can trap 105 to 108 stock. 05-10 GT manuals stock trap 104/105 , autos 100 to 102 and do 13's without issue, tell me what stock "automatic" TLS than can do that (mid 14's @ mid 90's). Key word is "automatic" as the original poster stated, automatic TLS's just do not put the power to the ground as well as the manuals. Manuals trap 4 to 5mph more and thats a fact, mid 90's vs high 90's to 101 ish.........big difference.
![Roll Eyes](https://acurazine.com/forums/images/smilies/rolleyes.gif)
Do some searching in this forum; you'll find that doesn't carry over very well to most of the racing posted in this forum, seeing as most of us aren't going to race from a stop & then go until we hit what we believe is a 1/4 mile. Go look up some of Sonnick's threads for proof. 14.04 is what he has listed in his sig., yet he's gone up & beaten/hung with cars that should "slaughter" him because "they're in the 13's"....
And I never said a word about manual vs. automatic TLs.
Last edited by Rick_TL-S; 03-28-2011 at 02:54 AM.
#29
Senior Moderator
Do some searching in this forum; you'll find that doesn't carry over very well to most of the racing posted in this forum, seeing as most of us aren't going to race from a stop & then go until we hit what we believe is a 1/4 mile. Go look up some of Sonnick's threads for proof. 14.04 is what he has listed in his sig., yet he's gone up & beaten/hung with cars that should "slaughter" him because "they're in the 13's"....
And I never said a word about manual vs. automatic TLs.
And I never said a word about manual vs. automatic TLs.
The reference to 'automatic vs manual' TL is likely intended to lend some perspective, particularly as the Accord V6/TL exhibit MAJOR performance differences dependent solely upon the transmission type. Sonnick's car is a 6MT that's decently modded (not to mention, helmed by a good driver) racing a 370Z that's modded (though the jury is out on whether or not mods help or hurt the Z).
But steering this back on topic, the question the OP has posed is which vehicles (pressumably stock and performance oriented) can an 07-08 TL-S 5AT outperform, all other factors being equal?
Last edited by F23A4; 03-28-2011 at 08:24 AM.
#30
Senior Moderator
![Damn](https://acurazine.com/forums/images/smilies/damn.gif)
![Wish](https://acurazine.com/forums/images/smilies/wish.gif)
#31
Advanced
Thread Starter
yea to get back on point, can we beat 04-08 maximas? 3.5liter altimas? v6 new gen camrys? and new gen v6 accords? these cars in my opinion are our competition.
#32
2003 Accord Coupe V6
iTrader: (2)
![2 Cents](https://acurazine.com/forums/images/smilies/2cents.gif)
#33
2003 Accord Coupe V6
iTrader: (2)
After reading F23A4's post, I was curious to and did some research, and what you said about it creeping away makes since judging by the times C/D got for it 14.6 @99mph. That trap speed is a few mph higher than an auto TLS can do so it has better top end power, so that vid you saw puts into perspective.
http://www.caranddriver.com/var/ezfl...06720d4d53.pdf
http://www.caranddriver.com/var/ezfl...06720d4d53.pdf
#34
US Navy Seabees
It is all a drivers race. With equal drivers: The Camry V6 is the quickest out of them all running 14.3 stock at best. The TL-S Auto, 04-08 Maxima and 07+3.5L Altimas are all capable of 14.5-14.6 stock. The 8th Gen Accord V6 is the slowest running a high 14 to low 15's at best.![2 Cents](https://acurazine.com/forums/images/smilies/2cents.gif)
![2 Cents](https://acurazine.com/forums/images/smilies/2cents.gif)
![Thumbs Up](https://acurazine.com/forums/images/smilies/thumbsup.gif)
#35
All motor
Although sometimes irrelevant, bench racing has it's certain moments. That's all people can base opinions on since there are few people who run the TL/TL-s at the track. I'd love to get behind the wheel of a bone stock 3G TL-s 6MT to see what it can do. Although I'm sure it wouldn't be easy to launch...
As for my run with the 370z, he had I/E at the time (usually dyno 20-25whp higher than stock with those 2 mods). However, the driver has 100lbs on me, and didn't shift at redline for 3rd gear. He is a good driver as well. He pulled 1.5-2 cars on me from 10-105. The first time we ran he was stock with 1100 miles or whatever, and had a 200+lb passenger. I pulled about a fender to 1/2 car I believe on 3/4 runs. 1 run we were dead even. Thanks for the props Lee![Wink](https://acurazine.com/forums/images/smilies/wink.gif)
Btw, my 1/4 run in my sig was when I had I/Jpipe only on a crappy 2.24 60'. I've since went back and the car felt like poop. I didn't launch because I believe my motor mounts are bad, and ran the same 14.04 with an even worse 2.35 60'. My tax return should be coming soon and I will be using some of that money for the custom Jpipe (will have many pics/vids, etc) as well as a dyno. And then my exhaust will be complete hehe.
The TL/Accord are great cars. They are not slow. They are not fast. The TL is an amazing car in every respect, more luxurious than performance-oriented for sure, but still packs a punch when modded. J&Rs standalone system is going to make our cars MUCH more mod-friendly and I expect many mid to low 13s out of our cars. I suspect there will be a few in the 12s with DRs or slicks without question. I would go as far as saying there are a few of us that could post 12s with slicks right now. With a 1.7-1.8 60' there are easily 5+ people that would be in the 12s without question.
As for my run with the 370z, he had I/E at the time (usually dyno 20-25whp higher than stock with those 2 mods). However, the driver has 100lbs on me, and didn't shift at redline for 3rd gear. He is a good driver as well. He pulled 1.5-2 cars on me from 10-105. The first time we ran he was stock with 1100 miles or whatever, and had a 200+lb passenger. I pulled about a fender to 1/2 car I believe on 3/4 runs. 1 run we were dead even. Thanks for the props Lee
![Wink](https://acurazine.com/forums/images/smilies/wink.gif)
Btw, my 1/4 run in my sig was when I had I/Jpipe only on a crappy 2.24 60'. I've since went back and the car felt like poop. I didn't launch because I believe my motor mounts are bad, and ran the same 14.04 with an even worse 2.35 60'. My tax return should be coming soon and I will be using some of that money for the custom Jpipe (will have many pics/vids, etc) as well as a dyno. And then my exhaust will be complete hehe.
The TL/Accord are great cars. They are not slow. They are not fast. The TL is an amazing car in every respect, more luxurious than performance-oriented for sure, but still packs a punch when modded. J&Rs standalone system is going to make our cars MUCH more mod-friendly and I expect many mid to low 13s out of our cars. I suspect there will be a few in the 12s with DRs or slicks without question. I would go as far as saying there are a few of us that could post 12s with slicks right now. With a 1.7-1.8 60' there are easily 5+ people that would be in the 12s without question.
#36
Senior Moderator
It is all a drivers race. With equal drivers: The Camry V6 is the quickest out of them all running 14.3 stock at best. The TL-S Auto, 04-08 Maxima and 07+3.5L Altimas are all capable of 14.5-14.6 stock. The 8th Gen Accord V6 is the slowest running a high 14 to low 15's at best.![2 Cents](https://acurazine.com/forums/images/smilies/2cents.gif)
![2 Cents](https://acurazine.com/forums/images/smilies/2cents.gif)
![Damn](https://acurazine.com/forums/images/smilies/damn.gif)
#37
Suzuka Master
iTrader: (2)
If you are manual you can possible be close to a 03-06 350z, automatic TLS nah (wow past 100 that a serious race..hehe). 07/08 HR Z's no chance, those things can trap 105 to 108 stock. 05-10 GT manuals stock trap 104/105 , autos 100 to 102 and do 13's without issue, tell me what stock "automatic" TLS than can do that (mid 14's @ mid 90's). Key word is "automatic" as the original poster stated, automatic TLS's just do not put the power to the ground as well as the manuals. Manuals trap 4 to 5mph more and thats a fact, mid 90's vs high 90's to 101 ish.........big difference.
It is all a drivers race. With equal drivers: The Camry V6 is the quickest out of them all running 14.3 stock at best. The TL-S Auto, 04-08 Maxima and 07+3.5L Altimas are all capable of 14.5-14.6 stock. The 8th Gen Accord V6 is the slowest running a high 14 to low 15's at best.![2 Cents](https://acurazine.com/forums/images/smilies/2cents.gif)
![2 Cents](https://acurazine.com/forums/images/smilies/2cents.gif)
#39
16GS FSprt,03Max,12 335is
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Manhattan Beach, Ca / Dallas, Tx
Age: 50
Posts: 976
Received 7 Likes
on
4 Posts
Indeed. While having my MDX serviced @ the dealer on Saturday, Clinton Acura had the same TSX V6 on the sales floor that had been sitting there when I had my last MDX service. This time it was marked down by $5,000. Clearly, they're not flying out of the showroom.
(If they mark it down another $5k, it just might wind up in my garage.
)
![Damn](https://acurazine.com/forums/images/smilies/damn.gif)
![Wish](https://acurazine.com/forums/images/smilies/wish.gif)
![Thumbs Up](https://acurazine.com/forums/images/smilies/thumbsup.gif)
#40
16GS FSprt,03Max,12 335is
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Manhattan Beach, Ca / Dallas, Tx
Age: 50
Posts: 976
Received 7 Likes
on
4 Posts
Stock 05-10 GT manuals trapping 104-105 mph is far from the norm. Average is more likely ~102 mph. There does seem to be a huge variance in those cars since there was one at the track a couple years ago trapping 98-99 mph in 55 degree weather at 400' elevation. It was an '08 5MT with 12k miles on the odo and yes, the guy could drive. He had another one prior to that and that one trapped 102-103 all day, bone stock. Needless to say, he was pissed.
But the 8G Accord coupe 6MT is quicker than all of them!
But the 8G Accord coupe 6MT is quicker than all of them!