4G 2010 TL-Tech vs 3G TL Type S
#1
08 WDP TL-S
Thread Starter
4G 2010 TL-Tech vs 3G TL Type S
Hey guys,
A friend just bought a 2010 TL with tech package,and he said he gonna smoke me from a dig or even a roll.....then i said "yeah,you are right",he said he wanna run me on a highway some day next week,and we make the bet on one hundred dollars....so should i race him or just leave it?
we both cars r bone stock 5 AT
please comment and let me know should i go for it or not!
A friend just bought a 2010 TL with tech package,and he said he gonna smoke me from a dig or even a roll.....then i said "yeah,you are right",he said he wanna run me on a highway some day next week,and we make the bet on one hundred dollars....so should i race him or just leave it?
we both cars r bone stock 5 AT
please comment and let me know should i go for it or not!
#3
Turd Polisher
iTrader: (1)
My money is on the 3G TL-S.
#4
2003 Accord Coupe V6
iTrader: (2)
From what I understand is that the 3rd Gen TL-S weighs about 100lbs less than the 4th Gen TL FWD Tech from what I have found on the internet. Your TL-S has a 6hp and 2tq advantage at the crank(who knows what that means at the wheels). My money is on your TL-S but it will be a close race. If you were racing the TSX V6 which weighs about the same as your TL-S then that would be a toss up as they run the same 1/4 mile times as a TL-S 5at.
#5
US Navy Seabees
get it on video, I think you'll win.
Trending Topics
#8
16GS FSprt,03Max,12 335is
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Manhattan Beach, Ca / Dallas, Tx
Age: 51
Posts: 976
Received 7 Likes
on
4 Posts
From what I understand is that the 3rd Gen TL-S weighs about 100lbs less than the 4th Gen TL FWD Tech from what I have found on the internet. Your TL-S has a 6hp and 2tq advantage at the crank(who knows what that means at the wheels). My money is on your TL-S but it will be a close race. If you were racing the TSX V6 which weighs about the same as your TL-S then that would be a toss up as they run the same 1/4 mile times as a TL-S 5at.
#9
Senior Moderator
SOTP speaking, the 4G TL (base) which I drove at a recent GM event felt about as quick as the used 07 TL-S 5AT I drove last year. IMHO, I'd like to see those runs on video....but, nix the betting part. Wagers make people do some unsavory things.
#11
Senior Moderator
You asked for it (and besides the '11 TL base), we drove the current year models of the:
Acura MDX
ES350
Buick Lacrosse CXL
Buick Regal CXL
Buick Enclave
Chevy Traverse
Ford Explorer
Chevy C6 GS
Chevy Camaro SS
Chevy Volt
Chevy Equinox
Chevy Cruze
Notable comments:
The new Explorer is on the cusp of being the benchmark mid-size crossover SUV; it's only in need of an engine with at least 300hp/300lb-ft.
The Acura TL may compete directly with the Lacrosse and ES350 but even in base form, it clearly outperforms the latter two through just about every performance category. But, I give credit to GM on the Lacrosse: it's the GM version of the ES and a near perfect copy....right down to the quality of the materials. (Wife loved the ES, but IMO TL FTW!!)
The turbocharged Regal CXL was gutless...as was the Chevy Cruze. (A GM rep did indicated that a much more powerful turbo motor was coming for the Regal later this year.)
The Chevy Volt was terrific. I'd get this over the Leaf for the main reason being that it's Chevy Cruz engine acts as an alternative charging source.
MDX vs Enclave: Enclave has slightly better utility but it doesn't make up for it's relatively poor handling vs the MDX. (I drove the '11 MDX just to see if I could sense any notable change in gear shifting vs my '09 model.) The Traverse is stripper version of the Enclave, unless of course you get all the options. (generally speaking)
Chevy C6 GS: even with an automatic.
The Chevy Camaro SS was a LOT more civilized and refined than I thought it'd be. Then again, I've not driven a Camaro since the days in which an IROC-Z trim was offered.
My wife and I loved the Chevy Equinox and would readily get this over the CR-V and RAV4.
There were a number of other cars there that I did not drive:
Nissan Maxima (I've driven this before; it's the best car in the segment. If it had a conventional AT, I'd recommend this over the TL base)
Honda Accord 4 cyl (I've driven the V6 EX-L previously...nuff said)
Ford Taurus
Assorted GMC trucks (not interested in trucks but I wished I'd tried the Acadia Denali)
Chevy Camaro RS
Honda Civic
Honda CR-V
Honda Pilot
Toyota RAV4 (my 19 y/o daughter loved it)
Toyota Camry
Hyundai Elantra
Cliff Note: Check out GM Main Street in Motion
Acura MDX
ES350
Buick Lacrosse CXL
Buick Regal CXL
Buick Enclave
Chevy Traverse
Ford Explorer
Chevy C6 GS
Chevy Camaro SS
Chevy Volt
Chevy Equinox
Chevy Cruze
Notable comments:
The new Explorer is on the cusp of being the benchmark mid-size crossover SUV; it's only in need of an engine with at least 300hp/300lb-ft.
The Acura TL may compete directly with the Lacrosse and ES350 but even in base form, it clearly outperforms the latter two through just about every performance category. But, I give credit to GM on the Lacrosse: it's the GM version of the ES and a near perfect copy....right down to the quality of the materials. (Wife loved the ES, but IMO TL FTW!!)
The turbocharged Regal CXL was gutless...as was the Chevy Cruze. (A GM rep did indicated that a much more powerful turbo motor was coming for the Regal later this year.)
The Chevy Volt was terrific. I'd get this over the Leaf for the main reason being that it's Chevy Cruz engine acts as an alternative charging source.
MDX vs Enclave: Enclave has slightly better utility but it doesn't make up for it's relatively poor handling vs the MDX. (I drove the '11 MDX just to see if I could sense any notable change in gear shifting vs my '09 model.) The Traverse is stripper version of the Enclave, unless of course you get all the options. (generally speaking)
Chevy C6 GS: even with an automatic.
The Chevy Camaro SS was a LOT more civilized and refined than I thought it'd be. Then again, I've not driven a Camaro since the days in which an IROC-Z trim was offered.
My wife and I loved the Chevy Equinox and would readily get this over the CR-V and RAV4.
There were a number of other cars there that I did not drive:
Nissan Maxima (I've driven this before; it's the best car in the segment. If it had a conventional AT, I'd recommend this over the TL base)
Honda Accord 4 cyl (I've driven the V6 EX-L previously...nuff said)
Ford Taurus
Assorted GMC trucks (not interested in trucks but I wished I'd tried the Acadia Denali)
Chevy Camaro RS
Honda Civic
Honda CR-V
Honda Pilot
Toyota RAV4 (my 19 y/o daughter loved it)
Toyota Camry
Hyundai Elantra
Cliff Note: Check out GM Main Street in Motion
Last edited by F23A4; 07-27-2011 at 08:01 PM.
#12
08 WDP TL-S
Thread Starter
#13
08 WDP TL-S
Thread Starter
From what I understand is that the 3rd Gen TL-S weighs about 100lbs less than the 4th Gen TL FWD Tech from what I have found on the internet. Your TL-S has a 6hp and 2tq advantage at the crank(who knows what that means at the wheels). My money is on your TL-S but it will be a close race. If you were racing the TSX V6 which weighs about the same as your TL-S then that would be a toss up as they run the same 1/4 mile times as a TL-S 5at.
#15
08 WDP TL-S
Thread Starter
thanks bro....so i think i will go for it and let you guys knoe wut the result is...cuz my frd said he has no problem to beat me
#16
08 WDP TL-S
Thread Starter
yeah...thats why i scare of it too...becuz before i got my 3G-S,i drove a 4G TL (base fwd) as my courtesy car from dealer,and i feel its strong too
#17
Car Enthusiast
Easy ... Borrow a PDA phone (they are good now a day) and I am assuming you already have one. Use rubber bands and tie both of the phones on the passenger seat. One facing to the right (if you're on the left) and one face forward.
#18
All motor
Dude just hold your digital camera and hit record. Just make sure when you hit triple digits you take the necessary precaution to reach around and put your seatbelt on, of course, while still holding the camera steady as you race. The extra pull you give on the seatbelt might actually lurch the car forward, resulting in a victory.
#19
16GS FSprt,03Max,12 335is
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Manhattan Beach, Ca / Dallas, Tx
Age: 51
Posts: 976
Received 7 Likes
on
4 Posts
You asked for it (and besides the '11 TL base), we drove the current year models of the:
Acura MDX
ES350
Buick Lacrosse CXL
Buick Regal CXL
Buick Enclave
Chevy Traverse
Ford Explorer
Chevy C6 GS
Chevy Camaro SS
Chevy Volt
Chevy Equinox
Chevy Cruze
Notable comments:
The new Explorer is on the cusp of being the benchmark mid-size crossover SUV; it's only in need of an engine with at least 300hp/300lb-ft.
The Acura TL may compete directly with the Lacrosse and ES350 but even in base form, it clearly outperforms the latter two through just about every performance category. But, I give credit to GM on the Lacrosse: it's the GM version of the ES and a near perfect copy....right down to the quality of the materials. (Wife loved the ES, but IMO TL FTW!!)
The turbocharged Regal CXL was gutless...as was the Chevy Cruze. (A GM rep did indicated that a much more powerful turbo motor was coming for the Regal later this year.)
The Chevy Volt was terrific. I'd get this over the Leaf for the main reason being that it's Chevy Cruz engine acts as an alternative charging source.
MDX vs Enclave: Enclave has slightly better utility but it doesn't make up for it's relatively poor handling vs the MDX. (I drove the '11 MDX just to see if I could sense any notable change in gear shifting vs my '09 model.) The Traverse is stripper version of the Enclave, unless of course you get all the options. (generally speaking)
Chevy C6 GS: even with an automatic.
The Chevy Camaro SS was a LOT more civilized and refined than I thought it'd be. Then again, I've not driven a Camaro since the days in which an IROC-Z trim was offered.
My wife and I loved the Chevy Equinox and would readily get this over the CR-V and RAV4.
There were a number of other cars there that I did not drive:
Nissan Maxima (I've driven this before; it's the best car in the segment. If it had a conventional AT, I'd recommend this over the TL base)
Honda Accord 4 cyl (I've driven the V6 EX-L previously...nuff said)
Ford Taurus
Assorted GMC trucks (not interested in trucks but I wished I'd tried the Acadia Denali)
Chevy Camaro RS
Honda Civic
Honda CR-V
Honda Pilot
Toyota RAV4 (my 19 y/o daughter loved it)
Toyota Camry
Hyundai Elantra
Cliff Note: Check out GM Main Street in Motion
Acura MDX
ES350
Buick Lacrosse CXL
Buick Regal CXL
Buick Enclave
Chevy Traverse
Ford Explorer
Chevy C6 GS
Chevy Camaro SS
Chevy Volt
Chevy Equinox
Chevy Cruze
Notable comments:
The new Explorer is on the cusp of being the benchmark mid-size crossover SUV; it's only in need of an engine with at least 300hp/300lb-ft.
The Acura TL may compete directly with the Lacrosse and ES350 but even in base form, it clearly outperforms the latter two through just about every performance category. But, I give credit to GM on the Lacrosse: it's the GM version of the ES and a near perfect copy....right down to the quality of the materials. (Wife loved the ES, but IMO TL FTW!!)
The turbocharged Regal CXL was gutless...as was the Chevy Cruze. (A GM rep did indicated that a much more powerful turbo motor was coming for the Regal later this year.)
The Chevy Volt was terrific. I'd get this over the Leaf for the main reason being that it's Chevy Cruz engine acts as an alternative charging source.
MDX vs Enclave: Enclave has slightly better utility but it doesn't make up for it's relatively poor handling vs the MDX. (I drove the '11 MDX just to see if I could sense any notable change in gear shifting vs my '09 model.) The Traverse is stripper version of the Enclave, unless of course you get all the options. (generally speaking)
Chevy C6 GS: even with an automatic.
The Chevy Camaro SS was a LOT more civilized and refined than I thought it'd be. Then again, I've not driven a Camaro since the days in which an IROC-Z trim was offered.
My wife and I loved the Chevy Equinox and would readily get this over the CR-V and RAV4.
There were a number of other cars there that I did not drive:
Nissan Maxima (I've driven this before; it's the best car in the segment. If it had a conventional AT, I'd recommend this over the TL base)
Honda Accord 4 cyl (I've driven the V6 EX-L previously...nuff said)
Ford Taurus
Assorted GMC trucks (not interested in trucks but I wished I'd tried the Acadia Denali)
Chevy Camaro RS
Honda Civic
Honda CR-V
Honda Pilot
Toyota RAV4 (my 19 y/o daughter loved it)
Toyota Camry
Hyundai Elantra
Cliff Note: Check out GM Main Street in Motion
As far as Maxima I agree, it could be the best in that segment base TL, etc etc. If it had the 7spd auto thats in my Z or the 5spd auto unit that they used in the G until 08 it would be a great car instead of real good. That CVT and its drone at full power is just annoying annoying!
Last edited by Monte TLS,MAX; 07-28-2011 at 11:03 AM.
#20
Suzuka Master
iTrader: (2)
You asked for it (and besides the '11 TL base), we drove the current year models of the:
Acura MDX
ES350
Buick Lacrosse CXL
Buick Regal CXL
Buick Enclave
Chevy Traverse
Ford Explorer
Chevy C6 GS
Chevy Camaro SS
Chevy Volt
Chevy Equinox
Chevy Cruze
Notable comments:
The new Explorer is on the cusp of being the benchmark mid-size crossover SUV; it's only in need of an engine with at least 300hp/300lb-ft.
The Acura TL may compete directly with the Lacrosse and ES350 but even in base form, it clearly outperforms the latter two through just about every performance category. But, I give credit to GM on the Lacrosse: it's the GM version of the ES and a near perfect copy....right down to the quality of the materials. (Wife loved the ES, but IMO TL FTW!!)
The turbocharged Regal CXL was gutless...as was the Chevy Cruze. (A GM rep did indicated that a much more powerful turbo motor was coming for the Regal later this year.)
The Chevy Volt was terrific. I'd get this over the Leaf for the main reason being that it's Chevy Cruz engine acts as an alternative charging source.
MDX vs Enclave: Enclave has slightly better utility but it doesn't make up for it's relatively poor handling vs the MDX. (I drove the '11 MDX just to see if I could sense any notable change in gear shifting vs my '09 model.) The Traverse is stripper version of the Enclave, unless of course you get all the options. (generally speaking)
Chevy C6 GS: even with an automatic.
The Chevy Camaro SS was a LOT more civilized and refined than I thought it'd be. Then again, I've not driven a Camaro since the days in which an IROC-Z trim was offered.
My wife and I loved the Chevy Equinox and would readily get this over the CR-V and RAV4.
There were a number of other cars there that I did not drive:
Nissan Maxima (I've driven this before; it's the best car in the segment. If it had a conventional AT, I'd recommend this over the TL base)
Honda Accord 4 cyl (I've driven the V6 EX-L previously...nuff said)
Ford Taurus
Assorted GMC trucks (not interested in trucks but I wished I'd tried the Acadia Denali)
Chevy Camaro RS
Honda Civic
Honda CR-V
Honda Pilot
Toyota RAV4 (my 19 y/o daughter loved it)
Toyota Camry
Hyundai Elantra
Cliff Note: Check out GM Main Street in Motion
Acura MDX
ES350
Buick Lacrosse CXL
Buick Regal CXL
Buick Enclave
Chevy Traverse
Ford Explorer
Chevy C6 GS
Chevy Camaro SS
Chevy Volt
Chevy Equinox
Chevy Cruze
Notable comments:
The new Explorer is on the cusp of being the benchmark mid-size crossover SUV; it's only in need of an engine with at least 300hp/300lb-ft.
The Acura TL may compete directly with the Lacrosse and ES350 but even in base form, it clearly outperforms the latter two through just about every performance category. But, I give credit to GM on the Lacrosse: it's the GM version of the ES and a near perfect copy....right down to the quality of the materials. (Wife loved the ES, but IMO TL FTW!!)
The turbocharged Regal CXL was gutless...as was the Chevy Cruze. (A GM rep did indicated that a much more powerful turbo motor was coming for the Regal later this year.)
The Chevy Volt was terrific. I'd get this over the Leaf for the main reason being that it's Chevy Cruz engine acts as an alternative charging source.
MDX vs Enclave: Enclave has slightly better utility but it doesn't make up for it's relatively poor handling vs the MDX. (I drove the '11 MDX just to see if I could sense any notable change in gear shifting vs my '09 model.) The Traverse is stripper version of the Enclave, unless of course you get all the options. (generally speaking)
Chevy C6 GS: even with an automatic.
The Chevy Camaro SS was a LOT more civilized and refined than I thought it'd be. Then again, I've not driven a Camaro since the days in which an IROC-Z trim was offered.
My wife and I loved the Chevy Equinox and would readily get this over the CR-V and RAV4.
There were a number of other cars there that I did not drive:
Nissan Maxima (I've driven this before; it's the best car in the segment. If it had a conventional AT, I'd recommend this over the TL base)
Honda Accord 4 cyl (I've driven the V6 EX-L previously...nuff said)
Ford Taurus
Assorted GMC trucks (not interested in trucks but I wished I'd tried the Acadia Denali)
Chevy Camaro RS
Honda Civic
Honda CR-V
Honda Pilot
Toyota RAV4 (my 19 y/o daughter loved it)
Toyota Camry
Hyundai Elantra
Cliff Note: Check out GM Main Street in Motion
It had the Brembos and I'm assuming the 3.31's, because it didn't feel as strong down low as I was expecting. It felt like a very low 13 second, 13 flat car at best, so I doubt it had the 3.73's. It also had a very linear power band (peak torque doesn't come until around 4k) and that may have been partly responsible for the perceived lack of low end grunt. I did still manage to get rubber in 4th however. I really want to drive one with the 3.73's.
What REALLY impressed me was the handling/braking. Never expected a Mustang to handle like that. I priced out a GT Premium 6MT at just under 38k with the Brembos, 3.73's, HID/security package, comfort package. Pricey for a Mustang, but it does everything better than the 335i I drove, it just lacks the fit and finish of the BMW.
#21
Senior Moderator
I respect the Camaro but, I'm still a Mustang guy when it comes to pony cars.
The following users liked this post:
Bearcat94 (09-11-2011)
#22
Pro
The new GT is one of my favorite cars currently in production for sure..it handles SO well for any car especially a Stang...along with the 1M and 458 Italia lol
#23
16GS FSprt,03Max,12 335is
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Manhattan Beach, Ca / Dallas, Tx
Age: 51
Posts: 976
Received 7 Likes
on
4 Posts
Yep, those "folks" that constantly wanna down the Stang because it can out run them etc etc wanna say that it can't handle....Obviously they have not driven one lately, as many of you fellas noticed it handles very good and now does just about everything well (fast, handles, much better interior etc). A performance bargain albeit GT or V6 as of 11.
#24
Suzuka Master
iTrader: (2)
I haven't driven the new Camaro, but I've sat in one and I hated the interior and the lack of outward visibility. Plus I think it's way over styled. Factor in its hefty weight, lack of handling ability and my newly earned respect for Ford for not looking for government handouts and the Mustang's a no brainer for me.
#26
Safety Car
iTrader: (4)
I made two videos using my iphone 4. One is in a 2010 TL SH-AWD doing a 60mph punch, then another in my 6spd manual TL Type S doing the same thing. I know basing things off of the speedometer isnt the most accurate, but its all I have to work with here. Also, considering they are basically the same cars any speedo inaccuracies should be about the same. 60mph to 90mph the Type S 6mt is clearly without a doubt faster than the SH-AWD. I cant speak for an automatic Type S though sorry.
I put the videos on my computer and used the stop watch function on my iphone. I viewed the video 3 times for each car starting the clock at 60mph and stopping at 90mph.
Here are my results:
2007 TL Type S 6mt HPT 60mph to 90mph:
One = 5.1 s
Two = 5.3 s
Three = 5.2 s
2010 TL SH-AWD (in sport mode) 60mph to 90mph:
One = 6.7 s
Two = 6.9 s
Three = 6.7 s
So again, these were nothing more than me watching the same video three times for each car and starting the stop watch at 60mph and stopping at 90mph. Both runs were on the same stretch of road driving home from work at the same time at night around 9pm only 1 person in each car.
I will make a seperate thread with these results as well and will even try to post up the videos if I can.
James
I put the videos on my computer and used the stop watch function on my iphone. I viewed the video 3 times for each car starting the clock at 60mph and stopping at 90mph.
Here are my results:
2007 TL Type S 6mt HPT 60mph to 90mph:
One = 5.1 s
Two = 5.3 s
Three = 5.2 s
2010 TL SH-AWD (in sport mode) 60mph to 90mph:
One = 6.7 s
Two = 6.9 s
Three = 6.7 s
So again, these were nothing more than me watching the same video three times for each car and starting the stop watch at 60mph and stopping at 90mph. Both runs were on the same stretch of road driving home from work at the same time at night around 9pm only 1 person in each car.
I will make a seperate thread with these results as well and will even try to post up the videos if I can.
James
#28
Senior Moderator
#30
AZ Community Team
Join Date: May 2007
Location: N35°03'16.75", W 080°51'0.9"
Posts: 32,488
Received 7,771 Likes
on
4,342 Posts
The MT TL-S mentioned above should be significantly quicker than the 4G Tech. It's lighter (by another ~100 lbs than the 3G AT), better gearing, more efficient power transfer, etc.
I think the rough calc by the poster bear that out; 1 sec difference 60 - 90 is quite a lot; too much for just the roughness of the method.
Edit:
There aren't many 3G TL-S's or 4G's posted, but only one the few that are posted get to the 14.4 or less that the 3G TL-S's can do. 14.6 seconds v 14.3 seconds on average.
Admittedly, the data set is a bit thin.
http://www.dragtimes.com/Acura--TL-D...sort=year-down
Last edited by Bearcat94; 09-11-2011 at 04:44 PM.
#33
Senior Moderator
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
nsl752
1G RDX Performance Parts & Modifications
14
12-06-2016 07:32 AM