3G TL (2004-2008)
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

350z and G35 destroyed from a dig (plus Si fail)

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 09-14-2011, 02:59 PM
  #81  
The Dumb One
iTrader: (1)
 
Rockstar21's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Baton Rouge, LA
Age: 37
Posts: 11,810
Received 373 Likes on 249 Posts
Originally Posted by Dave_B
Because everyone thinks they're John Force until they get that timeslip and realize the car isn't as fast as they thought.
sounds more like you're referring to the driver of the car rather than the car itself...

even if they cant drive, the car is faster than before, respectfully
Old 09-15-2011, 12:22 PM
  #82  
2008 335i e92 6MT
iTrader: (1)
 
MobTownTL's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Mobile/Auburn, AL and Biloxi,MS
Age: 33
Posts: 602
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Dave_B
Because everyone thinks they're John Force until they get that timeslip and realize the car isn't as fast as they thought.
^that. haha


thought my 07 5AT TL was the shit... until I stepped into the 335i...
Old 09-15-2011, 12:49 PM
  #83  
Moderator
Chapter Leader (South Florida Region)
iTrader: (6)
 
rockstar143's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 78,002
Received 20,014 Likes on 14,518 Posts
I've gotta get me one of these 335's...
I thought my 6MT was quick...till I drove my buddies G37S. That thing puts you in your seat!
Old 09-15-2011, 12:50 PM
  #84  
Burning Brakes
 
Dave_B's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Shawnee, KS
Age: 50
Posts: 950
Likes: 0
Received 45 Likes on 32 Posts
Originally Posted by Rockstar21
sounds more like you're referring to the driver of the car rather than the car itself...

even if they cant drive, the car is faster than before, respectfully
Yes, it is mostly a driver issue. Loud exhausts, wheel spin, torque steer, axle tramp, etc. all can fool the senses and mind into thinking a car is faster than it really is. I'm guilty of this as well. Everything past 100' in a drag is easy (MPH). But first 100' will make or break you and the reality is most people can't get cars off the line for squat, especially higher powered FWD cars.

Secondly, reaction time means everything. If the other driver punches the gas just .3 slower than you, that's over 2 car lengths lost by the end of the 1/4 mile even though the cars may run identical times. You can't see the difference in reaction time from the other seat. All you see is you walking away and it gives the perception of being faster.

All this is why I harp so much on pointless street racing is.

Last edited by Dave_B; 09-15-2011 at 12:53 PM.
Old 09-16-2011, 01:05 PM
  #85  
Intermediate
 
sleepysvt98's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Kansas City, MO
Posts: 32
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Originally Posted by Dave_B
Yes, it is mostly a driver issue. Loud exhausts, wheel spin, torque steer, axle tramp, etc. all can fool the senses and mind into thinking a car is faster than it really is. I'm guilty of this as well. Everything past 100' in a drag is easy (MPH). But first 100' will make or break you and the reality is most people can't get cars off the line for squat, especially higher powered FWD cars.

Secondly, reaction time means everything. If the other driver punches the gas just .3 slower than you, that's over 2 car lengths lost by the end of the 1/4 mile even though the cars may run identical times. You can't see the difference in reaction time from the other seat. All you see is you walking away and it gives the perception of being faster.

All this is why I harp so much on pointless street racing is.

Dave, we should hit the track up for fun sometime. This weather is nearly perfect for it. I just haven't been to KCIR in years.
Old 09-16-2011, 01:17 PM
  #86  
takin care of Business in
iTrader: (5)
 
swoosh's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Kansas City, MO
Age: 40
Posts: 30,994
Received 4,732 Likes on 4,064 Posts
^^^ Im in too...
Old 09-16-2011, 10:16 PM
  #87  
Safety Car
 
erick3's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Seattle, Washington
Age: 36
Posts: 4,163
Received 7 Likes on 6 Posts
Originally Posted by rockstar143
I've gotta get me one of these 335's...
I thought my 6MT was quick...till I drove my buddies G37S. That thing puts you in your seat!
the g37s and the tl-s 6mt are just about even from a roll...just sayin'
Old 09-16-2011, 11:08 PM
  #88  
9 mpg.
 
D's Up's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Sometimes here, sometimes there.
Age: 32
Posts: 1,628
Received 306 Likes on 249 Posts
Originally Posted by erick3
the g37s and the tl-s 6mt are just about even from a roll...just sayin'
What happened to your buddy's possessed TL-S that was beating 370's and 335i's? That car was nuts.
Old 09-17-2011, 04:07 PM
  #89  
Intermediate
 
EwitzDavid's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: boston
Age: 37
Posts: 26
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
i own both a 05 350z and a 07 tl type s. my g/f drives the tl and we raced from a roll and the race was only even for a couple of secs until i started pulling away. i doubt OP pulls like 6-7 cars.
Old 09-17-2011, 09:59 PM
  #90  
Your Friendly Canadian
 
Aman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Toronto, Ontario
Age: 32
Posts: 17,433
Received 1,492 Likes on 1,050 Posts
^ Did you read the thread?
The following 2 users liked this post by Aman:
justnspace (09-19-2011), TylerT (09-18-2011)
Old 09-18-2011, 08:08 PM
  #91  
Instructor
Thread Starter
 
DisgustipatedAP1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Posts: 204
Likes: 0
Received 18 Likes on 14 Posts
Originally Posted by EwitzDavid
i own both a 05 350z and a 07 tl type s. my g/f drives the tl and we raced from a roll and the race was only even for a couple of secs until i started pulling away. i doubt OP pulls like 6-7 cars.
My TL weighs roughly 300 lbs less than your Type S (if it's 6MT 400~ lbs less if it's 5AT) and has more whp. And I shift faster than your GF, no contest.

Originally Posted by Aman
^ Did you read the thread?
No, that'd require effort. Just read the thread title, skim the OP and reply. That's how it's done.
Old 09-18-2011, 09:58 PM
  #92  
Suzuka Master
 
BEAR-AvHistory's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Raleigh, NC - USA
Age: 82
Posts: 7,674
Received 2,600 Likes on 1,581 Posts
Originally Posted by DisgustipatedAP1
My TL weighs roughly 300 lbs less than your Type S (if it's 6MT 400~ lbs less if it's 5AT) and has more whp. And I shift faster than your GF, no contest:
Think you might be overstating the weight spread by quite a bit.

Things might go better if you just made a vid to prove your case.

If you don't want to get it timed at a track because the tracks near you are all to slow & you don't want to dyno it because the dynos near you are all bad just do a simple phone vid.

A 0-60 & 0-100 (simulates a 1/4 mile run) vid will let the guys here who doubt your claims run a stopwatch against the vid. Seems like a simple solution to knowing how fast your car really is.

Any car that can win by 6/7 car lengths after two major driving mistakes (launch bog & rev limit hit) should show some pretty impressive numbers on the vid.

BTW how do you know you have more horsepower the the Type S which is +28crank hp out of the box along with more torque. You have no idea what your horsepower is because as you said, for the reasons you have given, you have never tested it.

Additionally, you have no idea you can shift faster then his girl friend because like the horsepower & speed its never been tested.
The following 2 users liked this post by BEAR-AvHistory:
DaChef320 (09-19-2011), swoosh (09-18-2011)
Old 09-18-2011, 10:06 PM
  #93  
takin care of Business in
iTrader: (5)
 
swoosh's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Kansas City, MO
Age: 40
Posts: 30,994
Received 4,732 Likes on 4,064 Posts
^^^ Thanks-fuc$ing-you LOL....
Old 09-18-2011, 11:44 PM
  #94  
Burning Brakes
 
Dave_B's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Shawnee, KS
Age: 50
Posts: 950
Likes: 0
Received 45 Likes on 32 Posts
Originally Posted by DisgustipatedAP1
My TL weighs roughly 300 lbs less than your Type S (if it's 6MT 400~ lbs less if it's 5AT) and has more whp.
Alright. List your weight reduction mods.
Old 09-18-2011, 11:46 PM
  #95  
Burning Brakes
 
Dave_B's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Shawnee, KS
Age: 50
Posts: 950
Likes: 0
Received 45 Likes on 32 Posts
Originally Posted by sleepysvt98
Dave, we should hit the track up for fun sometime. This weather is nearly perfect for it. I just haven't been to KCIR in years.
Let's do it. You gather the TLs and I'll gather the Gs. I haven't been to the strip since 09, maybe 08.
Old 09-19-2011, 12:47 AM
  #96  
Senior Moderator
 
F23A4's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Age: 56
Posts: 17,901
Received 1,671 Likes on 932 Posts
Have a designated camera man when you go.....preferably someone who a) is not cross eyed, b) has a steady hand and c) has a video recording device that's NOT a cell phone.
Old 09-19-2011, 10:03 AM
  #97  
All motor
 
Sonnick's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Long Island
Posts: 3,530
Received 532 Likes on 395 Posts
Originally Posted by F23A4
Have a designated camera man when you go.....preferably someone who a) is not cross eyed, b) has a steady hand and c) has a video recording device that's NOT a cell phone.
^ This.

Taking equally driven cars....are you ready?......G35/TL is a drivers race (slight edge to G35)

No one is saying it didn't happen Disgust (well, at least I'm not). But sever driver error seems to be the culprit here. 6-7 cars while you hit the rev limiter AND bogged? As Dave pointed out, that alone is good for about .5 in the 1/4, which is about 2 lengths. So you would've pulled 8-9 lengths if you hadn't done that? Again, despite your driver error on that run, his or her must've been much worse in order for your margin of victory to be that great.

To put it in perspective, I've ran a properly driven revup G35 6MT with TP/E (idk what else, because he was shady) and it was basically neck and neck, with me coming out ahead > or = to 1/2 car each time. And I drive the sh1t out of my car (ask), put down similar power as you, and am 200+lbs lighter than a TL. Just saying.

Last edited by Sonnick; 09-19-2011 at 10:12 AM.
Old 09-19-2011, 10:30 AM
  #98  
All motor
 
Sonnick's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Long Island
Posts: 3,530
Received 532 Likes on 395 Posts
Originally Posted by Sonnick
^ This.

Taking equally driven cars....are you ready?......G35/TL is a drivers race (slight edge to G35)

No one is saying it didn't happen Disgust (well, at least I'm not). But sever driver error seems to be the culprit here. 6-7 cars while you hit the rev limiter AND bogged? As Dave pointed out, that alone is good for about .5 in the 1/4, which is about 2 lengths. So you would've pulled 8-9 lengths if you hadn't done that? Again, despite your driver error on that run, his or her must've been much worse in order for your margin of victory to be that great.

To put it in perspective, I've ran a properly driven revup G35 6MT with TP/E (idk what else, because he was shady) and it was basically neck and neck, with me coming out ahead </= to 1/2 car each time. And I drive the sh1t out of my car (ask), put down similar power as you, and am 200+lbs lighter than a TL. Just saying.
Fixed.
Old 09-19-2011, 12:43 PM
  #99  
Suzuka Master
iTrader: (2)
 
anx1300c's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: 633 Stag Trail Rd
Posts: 5,020
Received 930 Likes on 612 Posts
Originally Posted by Dave_B
Alright. List your weight reduction mods.
LOL, he's comparing his own car with two gallons of gas, no spare, tools etc to a Type-S with a full tank, spare, tools, heavy all season mats, and hopefully a half keg in the trunk.

In reality, there's a 70 lb weight difference between a 6MT base with navi and a 6MT Type S, 77 lbs if the base doesn't have navi. Knock off maybe another 35-40 lbs for the OP's bolt ons and 20 for his lighter wheels.
Old 09-19-2011, 03:00 PM
  #100  
Burning Brakes
 
Dave_B's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Shawnee, KS
Age: 50
Posts: 950
Likes: 0
Received 45 Likes on 32 Posts
Originally Posted by anx1300c
LOL, he's comparing his own car with two gallons of gas, no spare, tools etc to a Type-S with a full tank, spare, tools, heavy all season mats, and hopefully a half keg in the trunk.

In reality, there's a 70 lb weight difference between a 6MT base with navi and a 6MT Type S, 77 lbs if the base doesn't have navi. Knock off maybe another 35-40 lbs for the OP's bolt ons and 20 for his lighter wheels.
Ok, so:

1) 2 gallons of fuel (-90lbs) (assuming 17 gal tank)
2) No spare (-25lbs, maybe)
3) Lightweight wheels (-20lbs) BUT what about the tires, they might offset the loss.
4) No floor mats (-15lbs)
5) Lighter exhaust parts (-30lbs, at best)

I'm seeing about a difference of 180lbs assuming the TLS was loaded to the gills with options and fuel. In reality, it was probably closer to a 120lbs difference, if that. Also, we don't know if he's overweight. Seeing that the TLS has a bit more power, I don't how the difference could be so great.

Bottomline, this guy probably exagerates a bit.
The following 2 users liked this post by Dave_B:
justnspace (09-19-2011), TylerT (09-19-2011)
Old 09-19-2011, 08:07 PM
  #101  
Moderator
iTrader: (7)
 
paperboy42190's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Alhambra, CA
Age: 34
Posts: 6,992
Received 1,162 Likes on 847 Posts
the most i ever filled my tank was nearly 15 gallons, and i was on the Empty line already, like if you started your car the needle wouldnt even move up. since the tl has a 17.1 gallon tank, is that to say you guys are racing with the gauge at the E line alrdy?

also, do floor mats really weigh 15 lbs?
Old 09-19-2011, 08:26 PM
  #102  
LFG RANGERS!!!!!!!!!!!
iTrader: (6)
 
e30cabrio's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Earth
Posts: 12,211
Received 1,992 Likes on 1,366 Posts
I did not read past the first few posts but I have to chime in.

I had an 01 CLs with a 3.7 stroker & every bolt on and kicked the s*it out of all manner of TLs and it was no match for my full bolt on Dynoed @ the wheels 271.2hp 262tq 06Z.

Perhaps your partners can't drive? Perhaps their cars are broken?

I neither know nor care but must say I do not believe your car could out perform a properly Z or G.
The following users liked this post:
justnspace (09-19-2011)
Old 09-19-2011, 09:07 PM
  #103  
LFG RANGERS!!!!!!!!!!!
iTrader: (6)
 
e30cabrio's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Earth
Posts: 12,211
Received 1,992 Likes on 1,366 Posts
I do not believe your car could out perform a properly set up Z or G.

Is what I meant.
Old 09-22-2011, 01:37 AM
  #104  
Instructor
Thread Starter
 
DisgustipatedAP1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Posts: 204
Likes: 0
Received 18 Likes on 14 Posts
Originally Posted by Dave_B
Alright. List your weight reduction mods.

Already have, look around. But I'll do it again just to humor you.
Originally Posted by Dave_B
Ok, so:

1) 2 gallons of fuel (-90lbs) (assuming 17 gal tank)
2) No spare (-25lbs, maybe)
3) Lightweight wheels (-20lbs) BUT what about the tires, they might offset the loss.
4) No floor mats (-15lbs)
5) Lighter exhaust parts (-30lbs, at best)

I'm seeing about a difference of 180lbs assuming the TLS was loaded to the gills with options and fuel. In reality, it was probably closer to a 120lbs difference, if that. Also, we don't know if he's overweight. Seeing that the TLS has a bit more power, I don't how the difference could be so great.

Bottomline, this guy probably exagerates a bit.
Originally Posted by paperboy42190
the most i ever filled my tank was nearly 15 gallons, and i was on the Empty line already, like if you started your car the needle wouldnt even move up. since the tl has a 17.1 gallon tank, is that to say you guys are racing with the gauge at the E line alrdy?

also, do floor mats really weigh 15 lbs?
18 gallon tank, 3 gallons = -90 lbs
Spare tire removed = -34 lbs
Lightweight wheels + lighter tires (roughly 1.5 lbs lighter each tire than the 235/45/17 Michelin's I had on before) = 25 lbs
Bolt-ons removed = 30-40 lbs
Windshield washer fluid gone = 5 lbs
Owners manual/stuff out = 2 lbs (LOL)
Floormats gone = 5 lbs

Total = at least 190 lbs less than stock

Also got an 11 lb battery I'm putting in, so that's a reduction of 34 lb. Also going even lighter on the rims, so that's another 20~ lbs off the wheels.

So basically a bunch of guys on a forum think there's no way a TL 6MT running 255mm Nitto NT05's, full bolt-ons and almost 200 lbs of weight reduction can destroy G35's and 350z's with bolt-ons and God-only-knows tires? Typical.

P.S. I weigh 190 lbs. Definitely not overweight.
Old 09-22-2011, 01:39 AM
  #105  
Instructor
Thread Starter
 
DisgustipatedAP1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Posts: 204
Likes: 0
Received 18 Likes on 14 Posts
Originally Posted by F23A4
Have a designated camera man when you go.....preferably someone who a) is not cross eyed, b) has a steady hand and c) has a video recording device that's NOT a cell phone.

Will do.
Originally Posted by anx1300c
LOL, he's comparing his own car with two gallons of gas, no spare, tools etc to a Type-S with a full tank, spare, tools, heavy all season mats, and hopefully a half keg in the trunk.

In reality, there's a 70 lb weight difference between a 6MT base with navi and a 6MT Type S, 77 lbs if the base doesn't have navi. Knock off maybe another 35-40 lbs for the OP's bolt ons and 20 for his lighter wheels.
I know math is hard, but try running the numbers again.

Originally Posted by e30cabrio
I did not read past the first few posts but I have to chime in.

I had an 01 CLs with a 3.7 stroker & every bolt on and kicked the s*it out of all manner of TLs and it was no match for my full bolt on Dynoed @ the wheels 271.2hp 262tq 06Z.

Perhaps your partners can't drive? Perhaps their cars are broken?

I neither know nor care but must say I do not believe your car could out perform a properly Z or G.
Unless your 01 CLS was a POS without a proper tune, I call bullshit. That thing would rape a slow 06 350z. Anything below 07-08 350z VHR is subpar. Your full-bolton 06 350z can't even pull on a VHR 350z...

And haven't there been people in this very forum saying they've beaten VHR 350z's with their 6MT TL-S? Come the fuck on.
Old 09-22-2011, 03:06 AM
  #106  
Moderator
iTrader: (7)
 
paperboy42190's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Alhambra, CA
Age: 34
Posts: 6,992
Received 1,162 Likes on 847 Posts
I weigh 125 lbs
Old 09-22-2011, 03:16 AM
  #107  
03 acura cl type s
iTrader: (1)
 
rush's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: 3.7 boost life
Age: 40
Posts: 828
Received 41 Likes on 34 Posts
Check out this video on YouTube:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FA9kj...e_gdata_player


Sent from my iPhone
Old 09-22-2011, 04:27 AM
  #108  
Instructor
Thread Starter
 
DisgustipatedAP1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Posts: 204
Likes: 0
Received 18 Likes on 14 Posts
Originally Posted by rush
Check out this video on YouTube:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FA9kj...e_gdata_player


Sent from my iPhone
Dude, it must be fake, some guy here is saying his slow-ass 06 350z with full-boltons is faster than his 3.7 CL-S!

I mean, that video of that CL-S 3.5 you posted of the car with a passenger AND the windows down AND the sunroof open destroying its aerodynamics yet STILL pulling cars on the 350z in 1 gear higher than optimal (4th gear)... that proves nothing! Duh!



Props to rush. Some of the people in this thread are just ridiculous.
Old 09-22-2011, 07:22 AM
  #109  
LFG RANGERS!!!!!!!!!!!
iTrader: (6)
 
e30cabrio's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Earth
Posts: 12,211
Received 1,992 Likes on 1,366 Posts
Originally Posted by DisgustipatedAP1
Will do.


I know math is hard, but try running the numbers again.



Unless your 01 CLS was a POS without a proper tune, I call bullshit. That thing would rape a slow 06 350z. Anything below 07-08 350z VHR is subpar. Your full-bolton 06 350z can't even pull on a VHR 350z...

And haven't there been people in this very forum saying they've beaten VHR 350z's with their 6MT TL-S? Come the fuck on.
My CLs was quite fast. My Z is significantly faster and after my 4 liter stroker goes in it will be much faster.

I'll buy you a clue Where should I send it?
Old 09-22-2011, 07:23 AM
  #110  
LFG RANGERS!!!!!!!!!!!
iTrader: (6)
 
e30cabrio's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Earth
Posts: 12,211
Received 1,992 Likes on 1,366 Posts
Originally Posted by DisgustipatedAP1
Dude, it must be fake, some guy here is saying his slow-ass 06 350z with full-boltons is faster than his 3.7 CL-S!

I mean, that video of that CL-S 3.5 you posted of the car with a passenger AND the windows down AND the sunroof open destroying its aerodynamics yet STILL pulling cars on the 350z in 1 gear higher than optimal (4th gear)... that proves nothing! Duh!



Props to rush. Some of the people in this thread are just ridiculous.
QFT take a look in the mirror to see one of the people you refer to.

That video only proves there are two people willing to put everyone on the road at risk.
Old 09-22-2011, 09:34 AM
  #111  
Suzuka Master
 
BEAR-AvHistory's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Raleigh, NC - USA
Age: 82
Posts: 7,674
Received 2,600 Likes on 1,581 Posts
Still waiting for the vid
Old 09-22-2011, 10:42 AM
  #112  
All motor
 
Sonnick's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Long Island
Posts: 3,530
Received 532 Likes on 395 Posts
e30: Being that you have an 01 CL, unless you did the MT swap your 3.7 is auto. If so, I can somewhat see why your full bolt on 6MT Z would be quicker. The DE Z's really aren't all that fast though, at least as fast as a lot of people think, unless you start switching FD's. The HR is where things get interesting.
Old 09-22-2011, 10:46 AM
  #113  
takin care of Business in
iTrader: (5)
 
swoosh's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Kansas City, MO
Age: 40
Posts: 30,994
Received 4,732 Likes on 4,064 Posts
Originally Posted by DisgustipatedAP1
18 gallon tank, 3 gallons = -90 lbs
Spare tire removed = -34 lbs
Lightweight wheels + lighter tires (roughly 1.5 lbs lighter each tire than the 235/45/17 Michelin's I had on before) = 25 lbs
Bolt-ons removed = 30-40 lbs
Windshield washer fluid gone = 5 lbs
Owners manual/stuff out = 2 lbs (LOL)
Floormats gone = 5 lbs

Total = at least 190 lbs less than stock

Also got an 11 lb battery I'm putting in, so that's a reduction of 34 lb. Also going even lighter on the rims, so that's another 20~ lbs off the wheels.

So basically a bunch of guys on a forum think there's no way a TL 6MT running 255mm Nitto NT05's, full bolt-ons and almost 200 lbs of weight reduction can destroy G35's and 350z's with bolt-ons and God-only-knows tires? Typical.

P.S. I weigh 190 lbs. Definitely not overweight.
LOL its a 17.2 Gallon tank to begin with

so you have had a 45 pound weight reduction from your tires....were you running blocks of iron before ?

11.25 pounds per side....even if you get the lightest 17" rims and tires you are looking at ~33 pounds per side (14 pound rims and 19 pound tires)....you wanna tell me you were running 45 pounds per side originally ? the stock TL rims + tires are ~40 pounds....so the weight reduction you will have is ~7 pounds per side which is a total of 28 pounds and no way close to 45 pounds.....unless you are will to run 16" rims+tires....of magnesium rims which are like 6-8grand per set....

either way cant wait for you to post your new setup of rims + tires....

and +1 on how much do you weigh :P
Old 09-22-2011, 03:18 PM
  #114  
Moderator
iTrader: (7)
 
paperboy42190's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Alhambra, CA
Age: 34
Posts: 6,992
Received 1,162 Likes on 847 Posts
its a 17.1 gallon tank according to acura specifications.

also, that CL needs an alignment bad! did u see how off-center his steering was just to go straight? lol
Old 09-22-2011, 03:32 PM
  #115  
Instructor
Thread Starter
 
DisgustipatedAP1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Posts: 204
Likes: 0
Received 18 Likes on 14 Posts
Originally Posted by Sonnick
e30: Being that you have an 01 CL, unless you did the MT swap your 3.7 is auto. If so, I can somewhat see why your full bolt on 6MT Z would be quicker. The DE Z's really aren't all that fast though, at least as fast as a lot of people think, unless you start switching FD's. The HR is where things get interesting.
Yeah, it's hilarious that people think DE 350Z's and G35's are fast at all, over on S2KI tuned AP1's and AP2's destroy them all day. But the VHR 350z's are ridiculously fast. I don't think most people even know the difference between 03-06 Z's and 07-08 Z's.

Originally Posted by swoosh
LOL its a 17.2 Gallon tank to begin with

so you have had a 45 pound weight reduction from your tires....were you running blocks of iron before ?

11.25 pounds per side....even if you get the lightest 17" rims and tires you are looking at ~33 pounds per side (14 pound rims and 19 pound tires)....you wanna tell me you were running 45 pounds per side originally ? the stock TL rims + tires are ~40 pounds....so the weight reduction you will have is ~7 pounds per side which is a total of 28 pounds and no way close to 45 pounds.....unless you are will to run 16" rims+tires....of magnesium rims which are like 6-8grand per set....

either way cant wait for you to post your new setup of rims + tires....

and +1 on how much do you weigh :P
Your numbers are way, way off. Stock 3G TL rims weigh 24-26 lbs depending on your source, and stock tires weigh a good 25-26 lbs each. I went down to rims that weigh 19.5 lbs each, and tires that weigh about 24 lbs each. The new rims I'll be getting weigh 16 lbs each, and the new tires should weigh about 23 lbs each.

Now do the math and tell me where it gets you.
Old 09-22-2011, 03:40 PM
  #116  
LFG RANGERS!!!!!!!!!!!
iTrader: (6)
 
e30cabrio's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Earth
Posts: 12,211
Received 1,992 Likes on 1,366 Posts
What I find hilarious is that without knowing anything about cars people make what they believe are informed conclusions.

My Z has a Titan 4.083 FD, it has a Quaife LSD and it has (for a DE) excellent power.

I get that power to the ground much better than any FWD car there is and I can off the line and up to the speed limit (where I say fetch the police and sustain that speed limit to the other driver who is unconcerned with the public safety) destroy 335CIs all day long. My Cl lost by 3/4 car length to them.

FWD cannot get the power to the ground.

I am building a stroker 4 liter motor that will put down 330/300 to the wheels minimum and then I will be done modding the Z.

Additionally, my car is a base (that I added the options I wanted) which weighs 3200lbs.
Old 09-22-2011, 03:50 PM
  #117  
All motor
 
Sonnick's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Long Island
Posts: 3,530
Received 532 Likes on 395 Posts
^^ With the 4.08 FD I can see your car being considerably quicker than most DE Z's. I still don't know how your 3.7 CL lost to 335i's when I am even with them?
Old 09-22-2011, 03:59 PM
  #118  
LFG RANGERS!!!!!!!!!!!
iTrader: (6)
 
e30cabrio's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Earth
Posts: 12,211
Received 1,992 Likes on 1,366 Posts
I would guess auto without LSD. It's all about getting the power on the ground.


By far the best single mod I have on my car is the differential. The FD & Quaife made the biggest single difference of any other single thing.

I smile every time I take a turn at far faster than I should and just smoothly transition to the direction I am going.
Old 09-22-2011, 04:13 PM
  #119  
Instructor
Thread Starter
 
DisgustipatedAP1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Posts: 204
Likes: 0
Received 18 Likes on 14 Posts
Originally Posted by e30cabrio
What I find hilarious is that without knowing anything about cars people make what they believe are informed conclusions.

My Z has a Titan 4.083 FD, it has a Quaife LSD and it has (for a DE) excellent power.

I get that power to the ground much better than any FWD car there is and I can off the line and up to the speed limit (where I say fetch the police and sustain that speed limit to the other driver who is unconcerned with the public safety) destroy 335CIs all day long. My Cl lost by 3/4 car length to them.

FWD cannot get the power to the ground.

I am building a stroker 4 liter motor that will put down 330/300 to the wheels minimum and then I will be done modding the Z.

Additionally, my car is a base (that I added the options I wanted) which weighs 3200lbs.
And you would still lose to a stock 350z VHR. Shoulda bought an '07 instead of an '06.

You'll spend all that money building a stroker, when a VHR could come close to those numbers just with bolt-ons + tune.
Old 09-22-2011, 04:53 PM
  #120  
LFG RANGERS!!!!!!!!!!!
iTrader: (6)
 
e30cabrio's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Earth
Posts: 12,211
Received 1,992 Likes on 1,366 Posts
!) I already have done the build, it is ready for install. (2) HR only has 6 more BHP. That equates to an average 250/230 WHP. My car has 271/262 WHP and I walk stock 370s all day long.


Additionally that has no bearing on the beating many a Z will put on a TL.

How did you go from Z hater to fanboi?

Car:
http://my350z.com/forum/new-owners/4...ix-06-6mt.html

Motor:
http://my350z.com/forum/na-builds/51...-na-build.html

As a final aside, none of these cars we are discussing are really really fast.


Quick Reply: 350z and G35 destroyed from a dig (plus Si fail)



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:34 AM.