2006 GS300 Vs 2002 TL Type S
05-05-2006, 09:21 AM
#1
2006 GS300 Vs 2002 TL Type S
Ran into some road rage against this ass, he had no chance on passing me up. Just wanted to throw it out there just in case you find a dick head in a new lexus, you can show them whats up. also wanted to know any elses opinion or experience... i dunno i felt like he was going ez on it because his car was new.
05-08-2006, 03:42 PM
#3
The Boss
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: New Jack City
Age: 46
Posts: 4,375
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
-2,994 cc 3 liters V 6 front engine with 87.4 mm bore, 82.8 mm stroke, 11.5 compression ratio, double overhead cam, variable valve timing/camshaft and four valves per cylinder 3GR-FSE
-Premium unleaded fuel 91
-Fuel economy EPA highway (mpg): 30 and EPA city (mpg): 22
-Multi-point injection fuel system
-18.8 gallon main premium unleaded fuel tank
-Power: 183 kW , 245 HP SAE @ 6,200 rpm; 230 ft lb , 312 Nm @ 3,600 rpm
http://www.automotive.com/2006/43/le...est/index.html
numbers like 0-60 in 6.8 seconds
They are slow in comparison to 3G-TL.
-Premium unleaded fuel 91
-Fuel economy EPA highway (mpg): 30 and EPA city (mpg): 22
-Multi-point injection fuel system
-18.8 gallon main premium unleaded fuel tank
-Power: 183 kW , 245 HP SAE @ 6,200 rpm; 230 ft lb , 312 Nm @ 3,600 rpm
http://www.automotive.com/2006/43/le...est/index.html
numbers like 0-60 in 6.8 seconds
They are slow in comparison to 3G-TL.
05-08-2006, 07:55 PM
#4
NiGhT rIdEr
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: brooklyn, ny
Age: 45
Posts: 3,269
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes
on
2 Posts
Originally Posted by AcuraDriver2006
numbers like 0-60 in 6.8 seconds
They are slow in comparison to 3G-TL.
They are slow in comparison to 3G-TL.
