04 Tl Supercharger
#1
Burning Brakes
Thread Starter
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: south jersey
Posts: 874
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
04 Tl Supercharger
OK Guys just checking if any of you guys will be picking up the comptech supercharger. $4500.00 is steep but i would love to have 300 whp
#5
Safety Car
iTrader: (1)
I am going to buy one for my A/T TL as welll....
I spoke w/ CT thru email yesterday and they said "before the end of the year" the charger will be out. So plan on early to late spring.
I guess there is no need for the extra power during the winter months, so that's a wait I can deal with.
I spoke w/ CT thru email yesterday and they said "before the end of the year" the charger will be out. So plan on early to late spring.
I guess there is no need for the extra power during the winter months, so that's a wait I can deal with.
#7
Racer
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: South Pasadena, CA
Age: 41
Posts: 317
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by PeterUbers
There is no way an Auto TL will ever see that much whp.. that's for darn sure. I'm just looking forward to the bump in torque across the band...
Trending Topics
#8
Hopefully, because if it is...I give the TL props for having a FWD car with 300WHP...but IMO I kinda of think automatic is kinda of hard to push out 300whp IMO. But if it does Props to Comptech!
#9
You touch my tra la la...
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: New York
Age: 37
Posts: 2,788
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
300whp? That means the Supercharger has to add like 80whp or even more. I doubt that will happen, especially considering they can't go all out on the SC because of the engine's high compression ratio.
#11
Powered by Guinness
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Stockton, CA
Age: 55
Posts: 1,541
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes
on
2 Posts
Originally Posted by Shoot2Thrill
What chapter did I miss that says the M/T and especially the A/T are even remotely robust enough to take a extra 20 WHP and survive in real life.
#12
With manuals its possible. Just takes extra time and tuning. Maybe a smaller pulley.
Is Comptech going to recommend a built up tranny to handle the extra power?
It should be a 330-350hp car I would figure.
Is Comptech going to recommend a built up tranny to handle the extra power?
It should be a 330-350hp car I would figure.
#13
Suzuka Master
Originally Posted by Aegir
Minor hijack, but I still cannot get used to that acurazine stuff!
#14
4500 is kinda steep but does the warranty get voided? i know some tuners are associated with the car manufacturer and modding with their parts will not void the warranty. if the comptech S/C can be installed while retaining the warranty then it might be worth a consideration.
#16
Originally Posted by 1SICKLEX
caball 4500 is very, very cheap for a F/I kit
#17
Originally Posted by caball88
yes but this is a supercharger setup which is less complicated then a turbocharger. i realize the prices for F/I and its about where it should be. i came from a bmw forum and 4500 is cheap for F/I. on the beemers it ran like 8K for stage 1 turbos. but it was much cheaper for S/C. especially since the S/C for the 3rd gen is pretty similar to the previous gen TL/CL which share the same motor.
#18
Racer
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: White Plains, NY
Age: 50
Posts: 302
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Nitrotiger
OK Guys just checking if any of you guys will be picking up the comptech supercharger. $4500.00 is steep but i would love to have 300 whp
so what would the BHP be? like 350?
#19
Originally Posted by MrGQDieselNY
WHP I assume is HP at the wheels? so thats like 80-100 extra HP? for $4,500...hmmm
so what would the BHP be? like 350?
so what would the BHP be? like 350?
#20
Don't start whining about your transmission when you put a supercharger on your car. Acura never intended for the engine to develop that much power so kiss the warranty goodbye and start waiting for the tranny to fail....is it really worth it for some extra power??
#21
Disproportionate Member
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Austin, Texas
Age: 57
Posts: 538
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Hmm.. where is this info coming from? The Comptech Site lists it as still "under development", with no further info available. As others have said, if it's true, it's a decent price for the power, but I'm skeptical until I see results. The tranny worries me a bit also..
#23
Burning Brakes
Thread Starter
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: south jersey
Posts: 874
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Stock compression will be fine there are many CL/TL owners out there spraying 100 shot of nos all day long with no issues. The auto tranny wil be a nightmare just like the old CL TYPE S unless they made big improvements to the tranny from the earlier years. When i had my TYPE S i went through 1 tranny at 26k I have the 6 speed so im not worrired maybe need a clutch thats all
#24
Ak Ting Up
Originally Posted by Nitrotiger
OK Guys just checking if any of you guys will be picking up the comptech supercharger. $4500.00 is steep but i would love to have 300 whp
I talked to my Acura techs and they will install it because they are a vendor of Comptech parts but they are not sure about the warranty issues to date.
#25
Posts: 1,100,980
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Lake Arrowhead
Posts: 2,144
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I have an 03 TL-S, I have the S/C with an Intercooler, fuel reg. upgrade, e-manage (on the way) and 9 lbs of boost with the hbp and larger s/c pulley. So far I've had no problems with the car .
#26
Disproportionate Member
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Austin, Texas
Age: 57
Posts: 538
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
But there's a difference between the 11:1 compression ratio of the 2004 vs. the 10.5:1 on the previous incarnations. I don't know that you could make the assumption that they would behave the same under boost, because it would be much more likely to detonate or pre-combust in the 04.
#27
I hear you about the tranny problems. I will only buy it if the dealer will cover my FULL stock warranty with the supercharger.
ALSO, make sure you get it in writing.
If they won't cover your transmission then I would think long and hard if I were you. Also check your bank account balance.
ALSO, make sure you get it in writing.
If they won't cover your transmission then I would think long and hard if I were you. Also check your bank account balance.
#28
Originally Posted by Chemmech
I have an 03 TL-S, I have the S/C with an Intercooler, fuel reg. upgrade, e-manage (on the way) and 9 lbs of boost with the hbp and larger s/c pulley. So far I've had no problems with the car .
#29
Posts: 1,100,980
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Lake Arrowhead
Posts: 2,144
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by caball88
what did you dyno the car at? and did the dealer you get the car from still honor the warranty?
The car is probably making somewhere near 450 crank hp. At the wheels the same setup yeilded 369 whp for a CL-S 6 speed. Go over to acura-cl.com and do a search on Scalbert or Chemmech.
#31
I do my own work.
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: ATL
Age: 43
Posts: 1,488
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Chemmech
I have an 03 TL-S, I have the S/C with an Intercooler, fuel reg. upgrade, e-manage (on the way) and 9 lbs of boost with the hbp and larger s/c pulley. So far I've had no problems with the car .
#32
Originally Posted by Chemmech
I'm going to have the car dyno'ed this week, I'll let you know soon. Dealer knows nothing of my mods. I will probably put the car back to stock for any waranty work, new transmission etc.
The car is probably making somewhere near 450 crank hp. At the wheels the same setup yeilded 369 whp for a CL-S 6 speed. Go over to acura-cl.com and do a search on Scalbert or Chemmech.
The car is probably making somewhere near 450 crank hp. At the wheels the same setup yeilded 369 whp for a CL-S 6 speed. Go over to acura-cl.com and do a search on Scalbert or Chemmech.
In both Car and Driver and Sport Compact Car, they have tested the S/C CL-S and stayed in the 14s for the 1/4 mile and 0-60 times barely dropped.
#33
Here is what he wrote on my website concerning his custom set-up and a dyno graph. Scalbert is the coolest guy around.
or those of you that know me and the process I have been trying to build up this car, I thought it might acceptable to mention this here. Although this is not concerning a Lexus, my wife does drive one and so does her father.
Anyway, I finally got to the dyno last Friday with my blown CL-S6 and the numbers came out to just about where I had anticipated:
369 WHP
310 WTQ
This was with my custom upper intake manifold/intercooler that some of you have seen. It was done with about 7.5 PSI boost.
The red line is a plot prior to installing the IC which was done last winter. This was with 5.5 PSI boost. I will be doing a bit more tuning with it and maybe a bit more boost. I'll probably wait until fall/winter to go back though for a bit cooler temps as it was almost 90 out at the time. I believe 400 WHP is in reach and the final goal as this is already too much for this platform. The gearing of the 6-Speed and trying to send it through the front wheels makes traction difficult.
Full Plot:
http://www.flwse.com/images/steve/Dy...6SCIC_Dyno.jpg
or those of you that know me and the process I have been trying to build up this car, I thought it might acceptable to mention this here. Although this is not concerning a Lexus, my wife does drive one and so does her father.
Anyway, I finally got to the dyno last Friday with my blown CL-S6 and the numbers came out to just about where I had anticipated:
369 WHP
310 WTQ
This was with my custom upper intake manifold/intercooler that some of you have seen. It was done with about 7.5 PSI boost.
The red line is a plot prior to installing the IC which was done last winter. This was with 5.5 PSI boost. I will be doing a bit more tuning with it and maybe a bit more boost. I'll probably wait until fall/winter to go back though for a bit cooler temps as it was almost 90 out at the time. I believe 400 WHP is in reach and the final goal as this is already too much for this platform. The gearing of the 6-Speed and trying to send it through the front wheels makes traction difficult.
Full Plot:
http://www.flwse.com/images/steve/Dy...6SCIC_Dyno.jpg
#34
Thanks everyone, it has been a fun project. Particularly since most of it has occurred since the birth of our twin daughters who are now 10 months old. In other words, it has all been mostly a blur.
The details of what is on the car:
Comptech SC with a pulley combo which nets about 7.5 PSI mean.
Comptech Headers
King Motorsports Ported TB
Greddy E-Manage with a Custom PnP Harness
Lastly, a Custom Upper Intake Manifold with an Integrated Intercooler using a Spearco Core.
I do have the TechEdge Wide Band A/F monitor in the car which has proved to be invaluable.
I am going to try and hit 400 WHP as there is still some room left. At this point though, it is really just academic as the power is worthless with this FWD chassis. But the car is smooth, comfortable and easy to drive with one of the best manuals I have driven and an absolute ball on the highway.
I really need to get to the track though as I'm itching to get some times in. I'm not expecting blistering ETs but decent traps should be possible.
#35
Thanks, the upper intake/intercooler was custom. I did the CAD work and had a local machine shop do the work. This took me about 7 months to complete starting with rough drawings, moving to card board prototypes and then on to the AutoCAD work. I did get lucky though, the base plate which mounts to the stock runners matched up perfectly the first time. This was the most critical point and after that it was a breeze.
The SC kit is the standard Comptech system but with modifications. In base form it only made about 4 PSI boost. They had an upgraded pulley with raised this to 5.5 PSI but supposedly will void the blower warranty. Knowing where I was going and knowing these blower well; that did not concern me. I had another shop then make a custom pulley to get me the boost I am now seeing.
The only other custom piece was the GReddy E-Manage. They have no specifications for the Honda/Acura J-Series so it was all new territory. I tested it on the bench with a scope first. Then, with the addition of the custom PnP harness I made (the connectors were next to impossible to source in single piece quantities) it was just a matter of trial and error to get it to work. Right now I am extending the injector pulse width directly; taps into each injector signal. It also has the ability to retard timing (intercepting each coil signal, 6 in total) which is currently installed but no retard is applied.
As for the VTEC change over, the only thing that occurs is a slight surge in power. You can actually see it on the chart occurring at 4800 RPM. I am not using the VTEC control of the E-Manage as I felt the engagement point was ideal. I drop down to about 5k revs after a shift which is still above that point. Plus, there is still plenty of torque below that point to motivate the car. The VTEC in this car is a three lobe system or five lobes per cylinder since this is a SOHC engine.
The SC kit is the standard Comptech system but with modifications. In base form it only made about 4 PSI boost. They had an upgraded pulley with raised this to 5.5 PSI but supposedly will void the blower warranty. Knowing where I was going and knowing these blower well; that did not concern me. I had another shop then make a custom pulley to get me the boost I am now seeing.
The only other custom piece was the GReddy E-Manage. They have no specifications for the Honda/Acura J-Series so it was all new territory. I tested it on the bench with a scope first. Then, with the addition of the custom PnP harness I made (the connectors were next to impossible to source in single piece quantities) it was just a matter of trial and error to get it to work. Right now I am extending the injector pulse width directly; taps into each injector signal. It also has the ability to retard timing (intercepting each coil signal, 6 in total) which is currently installed but no retard is applied.
As for the VTEC change over, the only thing that occurs is a slight surge in power. You can actually see it on the chart occurring at 4800 RPM. I am not using the VTEC control of the E-Manage as I felt the engagement point was ideal. I drop down to about 5k revs after a shift which is still above that point. Plus, there is still plenty of torque below that point to motivate the car. The VTEC in this car is a three lobe system or five lobes per cylinder since this is a SOHC engine.
#36
Of the CL's in the various forums and from what people know, yes, this is currently the most powerful including those running nitrous.
However, this will be short lived though. Ramanan (allmotor_2000) out in California is finishing up his second turbo kit, this time using a bigger compressor and more attention to detail (not to mention the GReddy E-Manage which I made the harness for him). I suspect he will make about the same numbers as I did on less than 6 PSI boost. When he turns it up I can see him easily cranking out 400+ WHP.
That is about all we can expect to do on this engine considering the stock 10.5:1 CR. With some engine work and lowering the CR we could potentially make 500+ or more. But it is pointless on this car; there are better platforms to make massive power with.
The one part I love about my car right now is the torque curve; I couldn't have hoped for a better one. This is what makes this car such a joy to drive on a daily basis; the power is there whenever and wherever you are in the rev band without any surges, etc.
However, this will be short lived though. Ramanan (allmotor_2000) out in California is finishing up his second turbo kit, this time using a bigger compressor and more attention to detail (not to mention the GReddy E-Manage which I made the harness for him). I suspect he will make about the same numbers as I did on less than 6 PSI boost. When he turns it up I can see him easily cranking out 400+ WHP.
That is about all we can expect to do on this engine considering the stock 10.5:1 CR. With some engine work and lowering the CR we could potentially make 500+ or more. But it is pointless on this car; there are better platforms to make massive power with.
The one part I love about my car right now is the torque curve; I couldn't have hoped for a better one. This is what makes this car such a joy to drive on a daily basis; the power is there whenever and wherever you are in the rev band without any surges, etc.
#37
http://caranddriver.com/article.asp?...&page_number=1
Here is the car and driver review of the 2nd gen.
Here is the car and driver review of the 2nd gen.
#38
Intermediate
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Milwaukee, WI
Posts: 42
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by GaleForce
300whp? That means the Supercharger has to add like 80whp or even more. I doubt that will happen, especially considering they can't go all out on the SC because of the engine's high compression ratio.
#39
Ak Ting Up
Originally Posted by Chemmech
I have an 03 TL-S, I have the S/C with an Intercooler, fuel reg. upgrade, e-manage (on the way) and 9 lbs of boost with the hbp and larger s/c pulley. So far I've had no problems with the car .
Is it fast Fast FAST ?
#40
Safety Car
iTrader: (1)
Originally Posted by Shinj1EVA
So negative. I'm sure it's MORE than possible w/ a supercharger and possibly a few other minor mods.. 300whp isn't that high that it's unobtainable with the TL engine.