My New RDX A-Spec Advance...the first 2000 miles
#81
The following users liked this post:
hand-filer (04-09-2022)
#82
Racer
Thread Starter
You could care less? Based on the frequency you discuss 0-60, it seems to what you care most about. 5-60, 30-50 and 50-70 are far more important metrics when it comes to everyday drivability. And there's nothing wrong with the Edge ST. It's a solid vehicle, with a surprisingly refined powertrain. That punchy 2.7T in the RDX would be stellar, and probably no less efficient than the 2.0T.
The following users liked this post:
jcross1231 (04-09-2022)
#83
Touring
Owning Hondas since the original Accord in 1976, we've been to the dealer exactly one time for unscheduled service...if you ignore the '87 CRX. Should have bought the '88 instead.
The following users liked this post:
rbbcpa (04-15-2022)
The following users liked this post:
EFR (04-09-2022)
#85
#86
Three Wheelin'
Think most mfg's make the suspension for a non-sport vehicle too stiff. US roads are not as smooth as glass, and YouTube reviews tend to just want everything to be a pure sports ride. However, as a "daily driver", as opposed to a "couple hour test drive", softer suspension is always better.
#87
Three Wheelin'
Regarding suspension --
- Is the suspension in comfort mode softer than the fixed suspension on the Base/Tech/A-Spec?
- Would smaller wheels of the Advance provide added comfort over A-Spec Advance?
- Is the suspension in comfort mode softer than the fixed suspension on the Base/Tech/A-Spec?
- Would smaller wheels of the Advance provide added comfort over A-Spec Advance?
#88
Racer
Thread Starter
1) I suspect it is, but cannot confirm
2) Probably, but I don't want to go swapping them around as there are also unforeseen consequences, likely.
The following users liked this post:
rbbcpa (04-15-2022)
#90
Touring
#91
The less sidewall, the firmer the ride. If you keep the same diameter and use a smaller rim, you will obviously have more sidewall, which will result in a smoother ride. So, defining "ride" is subjective. Some prefer softer and some prefer firmer. Anyone buying an RDX should probably not be purchasing it for a smooth ride.
#92
Three Wheelin'
I am one of those. What would you recommend for a smooth ride in the entry luxury space? I think the RDX rides smooth than BMW/Audi/MB/Volvo in this space. Perhaps Lexus is better but then styling is off.
#93
Lincoln and probably Volvo. Maybe you drove a Volvo with overinflated tires?
#94
Three Wheelin'
Regarding Volvo -- Just going by reviews and what people say on the forums. Haven't test driven one. Volvo is out for me because they use Google for their infotainment. It supposedly works worse than Sensus, so you submit to surveillance for worse functionality! Lincoln is not my type of brand, don't mean it in a bad way, just that it doesn't appeal to me.
#95
Racer
Thread Starter
#96
Three Wheelin'
I would have thought that but they have now put RFT on the NX so it's not as smooth/quiet anymore and likely to get more harsh as the tires wear. RX maybe, but look at the styling. It's also devoid of any steering feel, an area where the RDX shines. The ID.4 that I tried had a very compliant suspension with excellent, RDX-like steering feel.
#97
Racer
Thread Starter
I would have thought that but they have now put RFT on the NX so it's not as smooth/quiet anymore and likely to get more harsh as the tires wear. RX maybe, but look at the styling. It's also devoid of any steering feel, an area where the RDX shines. The ID.4 that I tried had a very compliant suspension with excellent, RDX-like steering feel.
#99
Racer
Thread Starter
#101
Touring
#102
Racer
Thread Starter
#104
Just got a 2022 RDX PMC. The comfort mode is about as smooth as my 2020 MDX Advance, and dealer told me that Acura made driving mode differences more exaggerated in the 2022 RDX so it is likely smoother than prior RDX years. Both my MDX and RDX have the active dampers and I suspect it is not as smooth a comfort mode without them. Both are as smooth as my 2016 Lexus Rx was, so comparable to some of the best-rated comfort on the (Japanese) market. I swore off all American cars 30 years ago when I went from continual breakdowns with a Ford to none with a Honda Civic, so I never testdrove other models.
And the higher trim RDXs do come with space for an add-on spare, my dealer just ordered the kit and it should arrive in about 1-2 weeks.
And the higher trim RDXs do come with space for an add-on spare, my dealer just ordered the kit and it should arrive in about 1-2 weeks.
#105
Racer
Thread Starter
Just got a 2022 RDX PMC. The comfort mode is about as smooth as my 2020 MDX Advance, and dealer told me that Acura made driving mode differences more exaggerated in the 2022 RDX so it is likely smoother than prior RDX years. Both my MDX and RDX have the active dampers and I suspect it is not as smooth a comfort mode without them. Both are as smooth as my 2016 Lexus Rx was, so comparable to some of the best-rated comfort on the (Japanese) market. I swore off all American cars 30 years ago when I went from continual breakdowns with a Ford to none with a Honda Civic, so I never testdrove other models.
And the higher trim RDXs do come with space for an add-on spare, my dealer just ordered the kit and it should arrive in about 1-2 weeks.
And the higher trim RDXs do come with space for an add-on spare, my dealer just ordered the kit and it should arrive in about 1-2 weeks.
#106
The following users liked this post:
Unobtanium (04-13-2022)
#108
Touring
We rented a VW in Italy a couple of years ago that had a flat on the Autostrada. When I looked in the trunk, there was no spare. Just a can of foam and an air pump. I was surprised it actually worked. We drove on to the Venice airport to exchange the car. The guy at Hertz who received it accused us of stealing the spare. Apparently, this was all new to them back then. His English was so bad we had to go find someone else to translate. It still took some convincing. It would be nice if the spare was a no-charge or minimal charge option, but it seems all options are expensive these days.
#109
We rented a VW in Italy a couple of years ago that had a flat on the Autostrada. When I looked in the trunk, there was no spare. Just a can of foam and an air pump. I was surprised it actually worked. We drove on to the Venice airport to exchange the car. The guy at Hertz who received it accused us of stealing the spare. Apparently, this was all new to them back then. His English was so bad we had to go find someone else to translate. It still took some convincing. It would be nice if the spare was a no-charge or minimal charge option, but it seems all options are expensive these days.
When you're on some interstate in the vast wide open areas in the west, a can of goop isn't going to repair a sidewall blowout and who knows how long you're going to have to wait for cooter's towing service to come rescue you when you're an hour away from help. Also while broken down with that blowout on that lonely stretch of interstate, you want to hope that vehicle pulling over is doing so to help and is not one of the bad guys.
#110
Touring
If you're nothing more than a city dweller I can kind of understand a can of goop and a cheap air pump if you want to do DIY. Better yet, call roadside assistance.
When you're on some interstate in the vast wide open areas in the west, a can of goop isn't going to repair a sidewall blowout and who knows how long you're going to have to wait for cooter's towing service to come rescue you when you're an hour away from help. Also while broken down with that blowout on that lonely stretch of interstate, you want to hope that vehicle pulling over is doing so to help and is not one of the bad guys.
When you're on some interstate in the vast wide open areas in the west, a can of goop isn't going to repair a sidewall blowout and who knows how long you're going to have to wait for cooter's towing service to come rescue you when you're an hour away from help. Also while broken down with that blowout on that lonely stretch of interstate, you want to hope that vehicle pulling over is doing so to help and is not one of the bad guys.
#111
Spare arrived and was a quick dealer install. Kit includes jack, tire, holder, etc.
Just likey MDX. Dealer walked me through how all the parts fit into existing holes in my 3rdgen MDX, essentially Acura did a deliberate cost/MPG savings with a spare removal, but left space for an easy re-add.
Was too busy in the RDX install to ask for the demo but the dealer said RDX spare was similar.
Just likey MDX. Dealer walked me through how all the parts fit into existing holes in my 3rdgen MDX, essentially Acura did a deliberate cost/MPG savings with a spare removal, but left space for an easy re-add.
Was too busy in the RDX install to ask for the demo but the dealer said RDX spare was similar.
#112
Hopefully. I had tint on my CR-V and it helped, but it doesn’t do anything if the car sits outside for extended periods. I think the biggest heat sink is that blasted panoramic sunroof. I always have the shade closed, but it doesn’t do much.
I doubt it. People with ‘22 MDXs are complaining that the A/C is unacceptable on their vehicles as well.
I doubt it. People with ‘22 MDXs are complaining that the A/C is unacceptable on their vehicles as well.
#113
@Unobtanium is usually the offender when a thread goes “off topic”. I know that threads have a “natural” ebb and flow of discussion but it is a amplified with him.
#114
#115
I have found the OEMs to be a solid pairing with the RDX. I may “experiment” with a new brand when it comes time, but I struggle to justify spending ~$1000 for what is arguably a minimal improvement in ride.
#116
Racer
Thread Starter
@Unobtanium is usually the offender when a thread goes “off topic”. I know that threads have a “natural” ebb and flow of discussion but it is a amplified with him.
#117
Racer
Thread Starter
The change in ride quality betweem the stock tires and cc2s was greater than comfort vs sport mode.
#118
#119
Pro
Join Date: Dec 2018
Location: Minneapolis
Age: 45
Posts: 660
Likes: 0
Received 238 Likes
on
143 Posts
I also struggled with that spending but I got credit for the oem tires so that softened it a bit. I’m picky about tires and had RSAs on another car. They may be ok for awhile but after about 10-15k miles they are awful. Especially in the snow and with road noise. My Lexus NX also had mediocre OEM tires and I regretted not swapping those out but it was a lease.
The following users liked this post:
rbbcpa (04-17-2022)
#120
Burning Brakes
Complaints
The factory tires are absolutely abysmal, some requiring strips of weights 8-10" long to "balance" them. I say "balance", because the car shook at speeds above 70. The sidewalls of the tires are very rigid, which gives a good "direct" feel, but also makes the suspension modes almost superfluous, as they all feel stiff as hell. I replaced them as previously noted with Michelin CrossClimate 2's, which balanced with 1/3-1/4 as much weight, eliminated the interior "boominess" over bumps and ripples in pavement, and got rid of the vibration. The suspension modes are now also meaningful, since the tires don't make them ALL feel like "Sport". I think that on a $50K vehicle, a premium tire should be evidenced, not a bargain basement factory reject quality budget tire.
The factory tires are absolutely abysmal, some requiring strips of weights 8-10" long to "balance" them. I say "balance", because the car shook at speeds above 70. The sidewalls of the tires are very rigid, which gives a good "direct" feel, but also makes the suspension modes almost superfluous, as they all feel stiff as hell. I replaced them as previously noted with Michelin CrossClimate 2's, which balanced with 1/3-1/4 as much weight, eliminated the interior "boominess" over bumps and ripples in pavement, and got rid of the vibration. The suspension modes are now also meaningful, since the tires don't make them ALL feel like "Sport". I think that on a $50K vehicle, a premium tire should be evidenced, not a bargain basement factory reject quality budget tire.