BC coilovers installed on my '14 MDX - AcuraZine - Acura Enthusiast Community

Notices

BC coilovers installed on my '14 MDX

Old 10-10-2018, 05:54 PM
  #1  
Registered Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Aug 2017
Age: 59
Posts: 22
Thanks: 0
Thanked 5 Times in 4 Posts
BC coilovers installed on my '14 MDX

Yesterday I finished installing BC coilovers on my MDX.

Reason for this is that even though in general I really do like the MDX, I don't like the wobbly suspension and soft leaning cornering of the car.

I must say that first impressions with the BC kit is very positive.
It was a pain to get the old struts out of the car, installing was a lot easier as the BC units ar a lot smaller and shorter.
I set the ridehight as high as possible, didn't want to lower too much, ended up with lowering the car 1 1/4 inch all round from standard hight.

The units came with factory set dampening at 8 of 30 clicks from full hard which seemed a bit too much for my taste, so I changed the setting to 15 clicks from full hard to try out.
I still have to figure out how to get to the adjustment of the rears after the install, but for now I am trying out how it is at this setting.

First impressions are really good:
- now the suspension is a lot firmer, not wobbly anymore
- still reasonably comfortable, not annoyingly hard
- cornering is way better, it goes through corners almost like a good sports sedan, really what I was looking for.
Handling overall is very much improved.

So first impressions are really positive, this was what I was looking for in way of better handling without sacrificing too much comfort.
G3RS is offline  
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to G3RS For This Useful Post:
9SpeedTran (10-11-2018), justnspace (10-11-2018)
Old 10-10-2018, 07:35 PM
  #2  
Registered Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: NYC
Posts: 421
Thanked 23 Times in 22 Posts
Hi,

any pictures to share?
jzhu625 is offline  
Old 10-11-2018, 12:41 AM
  #3  
Registered Member
 
Join Date: May 2018
Age: 32
Posts: 95
Thanked 7 Times in 7 Posts
I wish my wife would let me install coilovers
bmoua15 is offline  
Old 10-11-2018, 09:14 AM
  #4  
Registered Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Aug 2017
Age: 59
Posts: 22
Thanks: 0
Thanked 5 Times in 4 Posts
A few fast not so good pics
Hight like this is nice I think, but I wouldn't want it lowered more..
Original

On BC

On BC

On BC

BC compared to OE: front strut
G3RS is offline  
The Following User Says Thank You to G3RS For This Useful Post:
pgeorg (10-11-2018)
Old 10-11-2018, 10:48 AM
  #5  
Registered Member
 
p07r0457's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2017
Location: Chapel Hill, NC
Posts: 250
Thanked 41 Times in 30 Posts
Definitely looks lowered.

I wish they made a suspension upgrade that didn't lower the vehicle -- I might consider it then.
p07r0457 is offline  
Old 10-11-2018, 12:01 PM
  #6  
Registered Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Aug 2017
Age: 59
Posts: 22
Thanks: 0
Thanked 5 Times in 4 Posts
Originally Posted by p07r0457 View Post
Definitely looks lowered.

I wish they made a suspension upgrade that didn't lower the vehicle -- I might consider it then.
Yep, I don't like clearly lowered cars either (those where part of the tires are in the wheelwells).
This is why I set the coilovers as high as possible, but that still meant a 1 1/4" drop (I think with this kit you could drop the car 3-4 inches if you wanted to, not my thing..).

However, as the wheelwell gaps above the tyres were quite big to start with, this means that even in the 1 1/4 " lowered stance a gap between wheelwells and tires remains, not giving the obvious lowered look.

Stance as is now, looks good and acceptable for me and ofcourse the lowering means lower gravity point, thus better cornering just as result of the lowering..
And the sportier characteristics of the BC shocks and springs adding a lot more cornering sharpness to this.

Last edited by G3RS; 10-11-2018 at 12:04 PM.
G3RS is offline  
Old 10-11-2018, 02:31 PM
  #7  
Registered Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Aug 2017
Age: 59
Posts: 22
Thanks: 0
Thanked 5 Times in 4 Posts
Originally Posted by p07r0457 View Post
Definitely looks lowered.

I wish they made a suspension upgrade that didn't lower the vehicle -- I might consider it then.
Lowering within certain limits is OK for me, lowering too much as you often see, I don't like either.
But the lowering is part of why roadholding improves as center point of gravity of the car will be lower, thus improving handling too..
G3RS is offline  
Old 10-11-2018, 05:56 PM
  #8  
Registered Member
 
9SpeedTran's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2014
Posts: 605
Thanked 174 Times in 96 Posts
How much did this cost? I would have to have the dealer (or somebody else) install... What would installation be likely to run me?
9SpeedTran is online now  
Old 10-11-2018, 08:19 PM
  #9  
Registered Member
 
Join Date: May 2018
Age: 32
Posts: 95
Thanked 7 Times in 7 Posts
Originally Posted by p07r0457 View Post
Definitely looks lowered.

I wish they made a suspension upgrade that didn't lower the vehicle -- I might consider it then.
If only Acura had a A-Spec suspension option for us.
bmoua15 is offline  
Old 10-11-2018, 08:35 PM
  #10  
Registered Member
 
p07r0457's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2017
Location: Chapel Hill, NC
Posts: 250
Thanked 41 Times in 30 Posts
Originally Posted by bmoua15 View Post
If only Acura had a A-Spec suspension option for us.
afaik, a-spec is just an appearance package.... no special performance parts.
p07r0457 is offline  
Old 10-11-2018, 08:40 PM
  #11  
Registered Member
 
9SpeedTran's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2014
Posts: 605
Thanked 174 Times in 96 Posts
Originally Posted by G3RS View Post
Yesterday I finished installing BC coilovers on my MDX.

Reason for this is that even though in general I really do like the MDX, I don't like the wobbly suspension and soft leaning cornering of the car.

I must say that first impressions with the BC kit is very positive.
It was a pain to get the old struts out of the car, installing was a lot easier as the BC units ar a lot smaller and shorter.
I set the ridehight as high as possible, didn't want to lower too much, ended up with lowering the car 1 1/4 inch all round from standard hight.

The units came with factory set dampening at 8 of 30 clicks from full hard which seemed a bit too much for my taste, so I changed the setting to 15 clicks from full hard to try out.
I still have to figure out how to get to the adjustment of the rears after the install, but for now I am trying out how it is at this setting.

First impressions are really good:
- now the suspension is a lot firmer, not wobbly anymore
- still reasonably comfortable, not annoyingly hard
- cornering is way better, it goes through corners almost like a good sports sedan, really what I was looking for.
Handling overall is very much improved.

So first impressions are really positive, this was what I was looking for in way of better handling without sacrificing too much comfort.
Which model did you pick?
9SpeedTran is online now  
Old 10-11-2018, 08:44 PM
  #12  
Registered Member
 
9SpeedTran's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2014
Posts: 605
Thanked 174 Times in 96 Posts
Originally Posted by 9SpeedTran View Post
Which model did you pick?
I see from the website there is only one, but Google appeared to show a lot more. Somehow I am not sure I could convince the CFO that the ROI on this would be compelling. ;-)
9SpeedTran is online now  
Old 10-12-2018, 05:25 AM
  #13  
Registered Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Aug 2017
Age: 59
Posts: 22
Thanks: 0
Thanked 5 Times in 4 Posts
Originally Posted by 9SpeedTran View Post
Which model did you pick?
For the 14+ MDX there are 2 kits, one with rubber top mounts and one with pillowball camber adjustable top mounts
There is an option of Swift springs (which have different spring rates) at about +300 US, but as I don't know the influence of these as compared to standard BC springs, I chose not to go with these.

I chose the BR-RS kit with front rubber top mounts: code A-81-RS for Acura MDX 14+YD3, ...... most common price about 995 US for the complete kit
NOT the track orientated kit with the pillowball camber-adjustable topmounts A-81-BR as adjustable top camber plates are of no use for the street and because of the absence of rubber, these can cause suspension rattle, which on a track car doesn' t matter, but you don't want on a daily car.

Last edited by G3RS; 10-12-2018 at 05:29 AM.
G3RS is offline  
The Following User Says Thank You to G3RS For This Useful Post:
9SpeedTran (10-12-2018)
Old 10-13-2018, 09:32 AM
  #14  
Registered Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Aug 2017
Age: 59
Posts: 22
Thanks: 0
Thanked 5 Times in 4 Posts
Today I had alignment done.... at least ...that was the intention...

To my big surprise on the G3 MDX FWD that I have, NOTHING of the wheelsettings can be changed: there is NO camber or caster adjustability !!
Only Toe can be done.

My first ever car that is this (non-adjustable) way, I feel this is rediculous.

Yes, I understand that the MDX is meant as family car, not sports oriŽntated, but as in it's segment I thought it was meant to be on the sportier side.
Not having any alignment adjustability is plain stupid.
Big failure on the side of the designing engineers.

As the car is lowered a bit with the BC's and camber cannot be adjusted, this means that it is now out of spec (camber spec is about 1 deg negative, now mine has 2 deg negative). this means it now has somewhat track orientated camber, which is still a quite acceptable setting for me, but why no adjustability???
A good thing that I set ridehight as high as possible, otherwise camber would have been even more neg and outside of the for me acceptable range for a regular daily car.

Some things in the MDX design are really weird.... as if the engineers made it difficult to change the car to be faster/ better steering on purpose...

Last edited by G3RS; 10-13-2018 at 09:34 AM.
G3RS is offline  
Old 10-13-2018, 09:34 AM
  #15  
Registered Member
 
p07r0457's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2017
Location: Chapel Hill, NC
Posts: 250
Thanked 41 Times in 30 Posts
I'd think it's less of an engineering issue and more of a cost issue. Acura doesn't build in the adjustability if it costs money to do so, considering 99.9% of MDX owners will not use it.
p07r0457 is offline  
Old 10-13-2018, 05:55 PM
  #16  
Registered Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Aug 2017
Age: 59
Posts: 22
Thanks: 0
Thanked 5 Times in 4 Posts
Originally Posted by p07r0457 View Post
I'd think it's less of an engineering issue and more of a cost issue. Acura doesn't build in the adjustability if it costs money to do so, considering 99.9% of MDX owners will not use it.
Then that is a rediculous consideration.

Lots of things can happen to a car to offset the alignment such as hit a curb or whatever to very slightly put things out of factory spec.
With adjustability, things can then be changed back to correct settings.
Also there can be lots of reasons why an owner may choose to personalise alignment, such as changing the steering response or to change understeer-or oversteer chacteristics to personal preference.
Personalising these things this is something that I always do with every car that I own.

Some cars have more alignment adjustability then others but to have none.... I have never seen a car that has only toe adjustability, this is a first.
G3RS is offline  
Old 10-13-2018, 06:35 PM
  #17  
Registered Member
 
p07r0457's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2017
Location: Chapel Hill, NC
Posts: 250
Thanked 41 Times in 30 Posts
Originally Posted by G3RS View Post
Then that is a rediculous consideration.

Lots of things can happen to a car to offset the alignment such as hit a curb or whatever to very slightly put things out of factory spec.
With adjustability, things can then be changed back to correct settings.
Also there can be lots of reasons why an owner may choose to personalise alignment, such as changing the steering response or to change understeer-or oversteer chacteristics to personal preference.
Personalising these things this is something that I always do with every car that I own.
Again, you are the minority -- by a long shot. 99.9% of MDX owners do no such thing.

Originally Posted by G3RS View Post
Some cars have more alignment adjustability then others but to have none.... I have never seen a car that has only toe adjustability, this is a first.
AFAIK, it's not that uncommon. Many vehicles have no adjustability, from the factory. Although, with some models you can buy aftermarket parts to add some adjustability. I had a Jeep, for example, where aftermarket cam bolts were available. But from the factory there was nothing more than toe adjustment. I heard a mechanic refer to them as "toe and go" for alignments.
p07r0457 is offline  
Old 10-14-2018, 01:57 PM
  #18  
Registered Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Aug 2017
Age: 59
Posts: 22
Thanks: 0
Thanked 5 Times in 4 Posts
Originally Posted by p07r0457 View Post
Again, you are the minority -- by a long shot. 99.9% of MDX owners do no such thing.
Yep, I fully understand, you are correct.
I will be probably one of the very few "idiots' wanting to personalize alignment to my driving style.
Nevertheless on any other car I have or ever had, I could, and it is annoying that on a relatively nice car like the MDX, there is simply no OE possibility to change things..

Originally Posted by p07r0457 View Post
AFAIK, it's not that uncommon. Many vehicles have no adjustability, from the factory. Although, with some models you can buy aftermarket parts to add some adjustability. I had a Jeep, for example, where aftermarket cam bolts were available. But from the factory there was nothing more than toe adjustment. I heard a mechanic refer to them as "toe and go" for alignments.
This may again be a US vs EU difference thing then..

Here in Europe all cars that I have ever owned, had one or more possibilities of alignment adjustability (like camber/caster/ Kpi/ toe/ tracking), some just 2 of these, some more, depending on the type/ kind of car ofcourse. Indeed, there are cars like some MB models that need aftermarket install of camberbolts (which MB offer as special part) but at least you can if wanted.
To have simply no adjustibility is completely new for me..

So if one hits a bad pot hole or curb which causes a tiny change in alignment, with all the to me known cars, you simply adjust alignment and go
With a car with NO adjustibility, the only thing that can be done is to research what suspension part has the tiny deformation, and put new parts on... not very cost effective..

I still am sometimes amazed by US common style of some car things (for example also like the (in my opinion) extremely low top speed limitation on the 290 Bhp MDX of 112 Mph).
Here in Europe all SUV style cars with that kind of bhp can do 130 Mph or more..

On a that note: I am lucky to own several nice cars, one of them a US version Mercedes CLK550 convertible and the first time I fully stepped on it, I was very unpleasantly surprised to find out that it's top speed was limited to 131/132 Mph...
The EU version of exactly that same car (the CLK500) is limited to 155 Mph... go figure..
Luckily it was very easy for a MB specialist to raise the top speed limitation in the software on my CLK to the here "normal" 155 Mph
It isn't so much that I go that fast regularly.., possibly just 1 or 2 times a year when driving in Germany, but very strange that in the US things on cars seem to be limited way more, even on the exact same model/ type...

Last edited by G3RS; 10-14-2018 at 02:10 PM.
G3RS is offline  
Old 10-14-2018, 02:20 PM
  #19  
Registered Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Aug 2017
Age: 59
Posts: 22
Thanks: 0
Thanked 5 Times in 4 Posts
Note on the MB CLK550 US vs CLK500 EU comparison/difference that I mentioned above..
I have researched the specs of the US and EU versions of that car and tech wise (engine/ transmission/ diff/ brakes etc) they are exactly the same.
Same capabilities, so no reason for the different top speed limit imaginable other than some US regulation..
G3RS is offline  
Old 10-14-2018, 05:03 PM
  #20  
Registered Member
 
p07r0457's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2017
Location: Chapel Hill, NC
Posts: 250
Thanked 41 Times in 30 Posts
In Germany you have a few roads where you CAN go that fast.

in the US we have none. I think 75 or 80 mph is the FASTEST any state allows. Some states cap at a mere 55mph.
p07r0457 is offline  
Old 10-14-2018, 05:30 PM
  #21  
Registered Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Aug 2017
Age: 59
Posts: 22
Thanks: 0
Thanked 5 Times in 4 Posts
Originally Posted by p07r0457 View Post
In Germany you have a few roads where you CAN go that fast.

in the US we have none. I think 75 or 80 mph is the FASTEST any state allows. Some states cap at a mere 55mph.
I know, but then why... are the US cars mentioned above limited to 112 (the MDX) or 131 the (CLK)?? that is still a lot higher than the state max speeds, still doesn't make much sense..
And I am lucky enough to have owned 2 NSX, first a EU Honda NSX and now still have a US Acura NSX that has NO speed limitation... where is the logic in that, why then isn't that car limited too?
Hmm, perhaps I can answer that myself: my Acura NSX is a 1998, perhaps at that time these US restrictions weren't thought of yet..

Last edited by G3RS; 10-14-2018 at 05:35 PM.
G3RS is offline  
Old 10-14-2018, 05:33 PM
  #22  
Registered Member
iTrader: (4)
 
KB1Spec's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Age: 44
Posts: 3,306
Thanked 114 Times in 95 Posts
RS-R have a set of RS-R Sports I - Coilover but for the 17 - 18 MDX though

https://www.optionsauto.com/RS-R-SPO.../RSR-XBIH231M/
KB1Spec is offline  
Old 10-14-2018, 05:35 PM
  #23  
Registered Member
 
p07r0457's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2017
Location: Chapel Hill, NC
Posts: 250
Thanked 41 Times in 30 Posts
Originally Posted by G3RS View Post
I know, but then why... are the US cars mentioned above limited to 112 (the MDX) or 131 the (CLK)?? that is still a lot higher than the state max speeds, still doesn't make much sense..
And I am lucky enough to have owned 2 NSX, first a EU Honda NSX and now still have a US Acura NSX that has NO speed limitation... where is the logic in that?
The US is a litigious country. Manufacturers feel compelled to walk a thin line. On one hand, they need to limit speed to avoid being sued by accident victims and special interest groups that shift blame away from offenders who drive recklessly onto manufacturers (who have the $$$). On the other hand, despite lower speed limits, most people would not find it reasonable to physically prevent vehicles from exceeding those limits. Acura has chosen 112mph as that line. I had a GMC Sierra that was limited to 99mph.

NSX is a vehicle that is likely to be taken to a track, so a lack of speed limiter makes perfect sense.

This'll be my last post in this thread -- I feel like you're being intentionally obtuse/argumentative and it's not productive for me to continue to respond.
p07r0457 is offline  
Old 10-14-2018, 05:58 PM
  #24  
Registered Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Aug 2017
Age: 59
Posts: 22
Thanks: 0
Thanked 5 Times in 4 Posts
Originally Posted by p07r0457 View Post
This'll be my last post in this thread -- I feel like you're being intentionally obtuse/argumentative and it's not productive for me to continue to respond.
Sorry that you feel that way as this is not my intention, I however fully respect your feelings.
I am simply surprised/irritated by the unexpected things that I encounter and which I don't see any logic to..
G3RS is offline  
Old 10-14-2018, 06:09 PM
  #25  
Moderator
iTrader: (1)
 
justnspace's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 79,257
Thanked 13,756 Times in 10,213 Posts
None of the acuras and Honda's can adjust camber/caster.

If you hit a curb, you've bent components...camber/caster can't fix that.

Plus, out of spec toe eats tires.
Welcome to the world of Honda sports cars
justnspace is offline  
Old 10-14-2018, 06:46 PM
  #26  
Registered Member
 
Join Date: May 2018
Age: 32
Posts: 95
Thanked 7 Times in 7 Posts
Originally Posted by KB1Spec View Post
RS-R have a set of RS-R Sports I - Coilover but for the 17 - 18 MDX though

https://www.optionsauto.com/RS-R-SPO.../RSR-XBIH231M/
I'm wondering if these are the active dampers they offer on the other applications.
bmoua15 is offline  
Old 10-16-2018, 01:44 AM
  #27  
Registered Member
iTrader: (4)
 
KB1Spec's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Age: 44
Posts: 3,306
Thanked 114 Times in 95 Posts
I don't think so.
KB1Spec is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
JS08TLS
3G TL Tires, Wheels & Suspension
13
02-08-2009 11:55 AM
GroundedCustom
2G CL Tires, Wheels, & Suspension
14
01-10-2009 01:09 PM
CGPTSX06
1G TSX Tires, Wheels, & Suspension
4
05-03-2006 04:37 AM
Bread-A Spec
Second Generation TL (1999-2003)
55
12-20-2004 02:02 PM
Longhorn TL
Second Generation TL (1999-2003)
2
07-25-2001 09:22 PM


Thread Tools
Search this Thread
Quick Reply: BC coilovers installed on my '14 MDX


Contact Us Advertising Cookie Policy Privacy Statement Terms of Service

© 2018 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands

We are a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for us to earn fees by linking to Amazon.com and affiliated sites.