tire size issue, difference between 255 and 245

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jul 26, 2012 | 11:08 PM
  #1  
ed_423's Avatar
Thread Starter
SeeYou2Crew #2
 
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 8,574
Likes: 825
From: Socal 626
tire size issue, difference between 255 and 245

sup guys, as some of you guys know, im running 235/35 up front and 255/35 in the rear. however, im rubbing a lot in the rear right now, partially because im only at -1.1 camber. im thinking of downsizing my rear to 245/35/19, lowering it a bit to close the gap it will create, and add a bit more camber. here's a side view



1. do you think i should change the size? looks a bit off that the rear is so beefy, but the front is slightly stretched lol

2. if i do change from 255 to 245, how much gap will i increase? im worried that if i lower the back to close up that gap, i'll get that reverse rack going on, where the back is lower than the front lol

thanks guys
Reply
Old Jul 26, 2012 | 11:32 PM
  #2  
odus's Avatar
Burning Brakes
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 806
Likes: 88
ummm seeing as your staying with a 35 series your not going to loose height but you will get a little more stretch maybe the stretch might make you think you have more gap but the tire should stay the same i would assume. im sure someone will tell me if i wrong but thats what i think.
Reply
Old Jul 27, 2012 | 12:14 AM
  #3  
ed_423's Avatar
Thread Starter
SeeYou2Crew #2
 
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 8,574
Likes: 825
From: Socal 626
hmm cuz i thought the 35 is in respect to the side wall ratio, so if my side wall gets smaller, even though im staying at 35 series it will ultimately be a bit shorter as well?

someone correct me as well haha. but thank you odus for the help appreciate it!
Reply
Old Jul 27, 2012 | 02:07 AM
  #4  
Prototype's Avatar
Instructor
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 147
Likes: 11
Any reason why you can't run 235 in the back as well? besides the fact that our rear wheels sit 'more sunk' in the rear? I'm a big advocate of the correct stagger tire setup as defined by the vehicles drivetrain and/or the same size front/rear. Besides enhancing the appearance of your vehicle, I don't see a benefit from a functionality standpoint.

I guess logically, if you wanted to do it correctly, you'd run a wider wheel/tire combo in the front and less wide wheel/tire combo in the rear with obviously the appropriate offsets to get the look you want.

and to answer your questions:

1. I'd go with the same size in the front. Camber settings do magical things in terms of how the wheel/tire setup looks in your wheel well. In the photo, your rear tires look hella big.

2. Moving from 255 to 245, you'll see a .1 inch size difference. Well, maybe you won't really notice a .1 inch size difference, but that's the difference going from 255 to 245 LOL.

tire size defined (broad view):

235/35r18

235 = section width of tire
35 = aspect ratio of the section width of tire (35% of the section width)
18 = wheel size

Odus, when i first got into cars and learned about tires, I always that the middle number remained the same size sidewall regardless of section width and wheel size. I was wrong LOL

For detailed definitions: http://www.tirerack.com/tires/tirete....jsp?techid=46


Good luck, Ed. If i had 19in, I'd probably run 245/35 all around. If I was running a reverse stagger (correct stagger on FWD), I'd probably run 10in with 285/30r19 or 245/35 in front and 8.5in, maybe 9in in back with a 225/40 or 235/35 and the correct offsets to make them look appropriate on the car.

Sorry, information overload...
Reply
Old Jul 27, 2012 | 03:43 AM
  #5  
odus's Avatar
Burning Brakes
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 806
Likes: 88
so changing the width but keeping same aspect ratio witch is how tall the sidewall is can change the sidewall? im confused more pyro hahaha
Reply
Old Jul 27, 2012 | 06:26 AM
  #6  
kaza's Avatar
Instructor
 
Joined: Mar 2010
Posts: 158
Likes: 17
Originally Posted by odus
so changing the width but keeping same aspect ratio witch is how tall the sidewall is can change the sidewall? im confused more pyro hahaha
correct, The sidewall number is simply a percentage of the width. So 35% of 245 is less overall than 35% of 255. Its not going to be a huge difference but is a difference. Oh and the difference between 255 and 245 is 10 millimeters NOT .1 of an inch.
Reply
Old Jul 27, 2012 | 06:27 AM
  #7  
kaza's Avatar
Instructor
 
Joined: Mar 2010
Posts: 158
Likes: 17
Originally Posted by ed_423
hmm cuz i thought the 35 is in respect to the side wall ratio, so if my side wall gets smaller, even though im staying at 35 series it will ultimately be a bit shorter as well?

someone correct me as well haha. but thank you odus for the help appreciate it!
You sir are correct than it will be a bit shorter. see above post

Last edited by kaza; Jul 27, 2012 at 06:30 AM.
Reply
Old Jul 27, 2012 | 09:44 AM
  #8  
Prototype's Avatar
Instructor
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 147
Likes: 11
Originally Posted by indymeh
correct, The sidewall number is simply a percentage of the width. So 35% of 245 is less overall than 35% of 255. Its not going to be a huge difference but is a difference. Oh and the difference between 255 and 245 is 10 millimeters NOT .1 of an inch.
Actually, I was referring to the aspect ratio or 'series' difference, not the section width. Sorry for the confusion.
Reply
Old Jul 27, 2012 | 12:16 PM
  #9  
ed_423's Avatar
Thread Starter
SeeYou2Crew #2
 
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 8,574
Likes: 825
From: Socal 626
thanks guys!

and to be honest Protoype, your information helps a lot, so don't feel bad at overloading on info! haha

i didn't want to stick with 235/35 in the rear because i have much more room in the back. im not a fan of that super stretch look, hence why i went with 255 in the first place. just didn't realize how big it is compared to 235. now i want to switch to 245/35 so it wont look at beefy, and it'll match the front a little bit more

and yeah i understand the whole reverse staggered for FWD, but i ultimately chose the "look" route over function

thanks guys for the responds!
Reply
Old Jul 27, 2012 | 12:46 PM
  #10  
ceb's Avatar
ceb
Suzuka Master
 
Joined: May 2011
Posts: 5,478
Likes: 1,279
Originally Posted by Prototype
Any reason why you can't run 235 in the back as well? besides the fact that our rear wheels sit 'more sunk' in the rear? I'm a big advocate of the correct stagger tire setup as defined by the vehicles drivetrain and/or the same size front/rear. Besides enhancing the appearance of your vehicle, I don't see a benefit from a functionality standpoint.

I guess logically, if you wanted to do it correctly, you'd run a wider wheel/tire combo in the front and less wide wheel/tire combo in the rear with obviously the appropriate offsets to get the look you want.

and to answer your questions:

1. I'd go with the same size in the front. Camber settings do magical things in terms of how the wheel/tire setup looks in your wheel well. In the photo, your rear tires look hella big.

2. Moving from 255 to 245, you'll see a .1 inch size difference. Well, maybe you won't really notice a .1 inch size difference, but that's the difference going from 255 to 245 LOL.

tire size defined (broad view):

235/35r18

235 = section width of tire
35 = aspect ratio of the section width of tire (35% of the section width)
18 = wheel size

Odus, when i first got into cars and learned about tires, I always that the middle number remained the same size sidewall regardless of section width and wheel size. I was wrong LOL

For detailed definitions: http://www.tirerack.com/tires/tirete....jsp?techid=46


Good luck, Ed. If i had 19in, I'd probably run 245/35 all around. If I was running a reverse stagger (correct stagger on FWD), I'd probably run 10in with 285/30r19 or 245/35 in front and 8.5in, maybe 9in in back with a 225/40 or 235/35 and the correct offsets to make them look appropriate on the car.

Sorry, information overload...
This continually needs reiteration because people don't "get it."

The 18 is a fixed number. It is the bead diameter of the wheel being used.

The 235/245/255 etc is a fixed number and is the width of the tire tread when mounted on the correctly sized wheel.

The 35 is NOT a fixed number and is the height of the sidewall expressed as a percentage of the tire width as described before. In this case the sidewall height is 35% of the 235/245/255.

Your overall diameter should always be close to the overall diameter of the stock tire (225/50/17) and your front/rear diameters should be nearly identical.

Last edited by ceb; Jul 27, 2012 at 12:52 PM.
Reply
Old Jul 27, 2012 | 01:51 PM
  #11  
benben01's Avatar
Three Wheelin'
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 1,377
Likes: 362
From: MD
Eddie'O Be a ballah and run 275/35 in the rear like me To be honest, I think your cheapest and most effective solution is to dial in more negative camber.. Try -2.0 in the rear and see that works. If you still rub like hell, then down size the tire to a 245/35.
Reply
Old Jul 27, 2012 | 03:09 PM
  #12  
tobwac's Avatar
Three Wheelin'
 
Joined: May 2010
Posts: 1,748
Likes: 222
From: sandy hook nj
camber them in lol and run -4.5 like me hahhaha
no honestly 245/35 will give you more room and when you lower it a bit its gonna look even
Reply
Old Jul 27, 2012 | 05:06 PM
  #13  
Prototype's Avatar
Instructor
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 147
Likes: 11
Originally Posted by benben01
Eddie'O Be a ballah and run 275/35 in the rear like me To be honest, I think your cheapest and most effective solution is to dial in more negative camber.. Try -2.0 in the rear and see that works. If you still rub like hell, then down size the tire to a 245/35.
This, Ed!! I completely overlooked your current camber settings!! -1.1 is nothing DOOD! move it to -2.0!!! You should have plenty of clearance on the inside.
Reply
Old Jul 27, 2012 | 07:52 PM
  #14  
ed_423's Avatar
Thread Starter
SeeYou2Crew #2
 
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 8,574
Likes: 825
From: Socal 626
but it'll still look un-proportional though right?
Reply
Old Jul 29, 2012 | 08:14 AM
  #15  
chaqui74's Avatar
Racer
 
Joined: Jul 2010
Posts: 446
Likes: 64
From: Miami,Fl
245/35 and play with the camber dial it to -1.5/2. Unless just do the camber first with the same tire your running and go from there, alignment will be cheaper then Buying two tires.

Last edited by chaqui74; Jul 29, 2012 at 08:17 AM.
Reply
Old Jul 29, 2012 | 09:39 AM
  #16  
UTAH TSX's Avatar
Burning Brakes
 
Joined: May 2012
Posts: 1,183
Likes: 508
Roll those fenders I have 255/40/18 9 1/2 wide 35 offset with megan street coil overs Im tucked about one inch on the rear with adjustable rear arms and 1.2 deg camber they rubbed bad before rolling fenders now zero rub even with my three kids in the back seat thats about 250 lbs and it looks much better rolled and tucked a little bit
Reply
Old Jul 29, 2012 | 09:44 AM
  #17  
UTAH TSX's Avatar
Burning Brakes
 
Joined: May 2012
Posts: 1,183
Likes: 508
Oh forgot see how youre rear wheel is pushed back the controll arm kit with all 3 arms will let you pull wheel forward so it does not hit the rear bumper flange in the wheel well that is were mine rubbed the worst before changing arms
Reply
Old Jul 29, 2012 | 03:11 PM
  #18  
ed_423's Avatar
Thread Starter
SeeYou2Crew #2
 
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 8,574
Likes: 825
From: Socal 626
i ran out of breathe reading your post LOl

my fenders are shaved already lol


i think as of now, i might just lower a bit more and dial in some camber...change tires when these run out.
Reply
Old Jul 29, 2012 | 04:07 PM
  #19  
rockstar143's Avatar
Moderator
Chapter Leader (South Florida Region)
15 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 78,249
Likes: 20,202
THe guys at the local tire place were wondering why I was hellbent on running a wider tire...they kept saying it'll kill clearance and weigh more. It's true...and with our rather torqueless cars I'd say that running a little narrower is probably best.
Reply
Old Jul 30, 2012 | 06:15 PM
  #20  
1 UTAH TSX's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: May 2012
Posts: 2
Likes: 2
Sorry Ive been a mechanic for 30 years and I specialize in run on sentences and miss spelled words
Reply
Old Jul 30, 2012 | 08:37 PM
  #21  
rockstar143's Avatar
Moderator
Chapter Leader (South Florida Region)
15 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 78,249
Likes: 20,202
Well, who the hell needs punctuation when you have 30 years of knowledge about ANYTHING!?!?

Carry on, sir!
Reply
Old Sep 2, 2012 | 03:10 AM
  #22  
ed_423's Avatar
Thread Starter
SeeYou2Crew #2
 
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 8,574
Likes: 825
From: Socal 626
alright guys..i lowered my rear and dial in almost -4 camber on both side...im rubbing like CRAZY.

i lowered my rear too much

my rear tires are too beefy.

i lowered another .75"







question:

im gonna raise the car by at least .5", after that would 245/35 clear? or should i just stick with 235/35/19's?
Reply
Old Sep 3, 2012 | 04:07 PM
  #23  
ed_423's Avatar
Thread Starter
SeeYou2Crew #2
 
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 8,574
Likes: 825
From: Socal 626
bump
Reply
Old Sep 3, 2012 | 04:32 PM
  #24  
HOLLYHOOD's Avatar
Racer
 
Joined: Jun 2012
Posts: 395
Likes: 57
From: CT
go to 215 you punk
Reply
Old Sep 3, 2012 | 04:37 PM
  #25  
tobwac's Avatar
Three Wheelin'
 
Joined: May 2010
Posts: 1,748
Likes: 222
From: sandy hook nj
well you 9.5 all around just staggered offset so why not going with 235 all around
Reply
Old Sep 3, 2012 | 05:40 PM
  #26  
SlickxAc's Avatar
Burning Brakes
 
Joined: Apr 2012
Posts: 1,072
Likes: 201
From: Socal 626
Like tobwac said I'd prob just go 235 all around, also where did you take that pic it looks hella familiar
Reply
Old Sep 3, 2012 | 06:26 PM
  #27  
benben01's Avatar
Three Wheelin'
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 1,377
Likes: 362
From: MD
Originally Posted by HOLLYHOOD
go to 215 you punk
Be a man and go 275s!
Reply
Old Sep 3, 2012 | 07:23 PM
  #28  
ed_423's Avatar
Thread Starter
SeeYou2Crew #2
 
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 8,574
Likes: 825
From: Socal 626
yeah i think 235's will be what it is...and ben i can not fit 275's LOl

and 215 is wayyyyy to stretched for what i want
Reply
Old Sep 3, 2012 | 07:48 PM
  #29  
tobwac's Avatar
Three Wheelin'
 
Joined: May 2010
Posts: 1,748
Likes: 222
From: sandy hook nj
where you rub most at that dam tab?
Reply
Old Sep 3, 2012 | 09:36 PM
  #30  
ttk5's Avatar
Vancouver B.C.
 
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 2,704
Likes: 325
Oh, the endless quest to find the perfect stance for daily driving. Good choice on the -4 camber though. I am at -4 as well
Reply
Old Sep 4, 2012 | 05:40 AM
  #31  
ed_423's Avatar
Thread Starter
SeeYou2Crew #2
 
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 8,574
Likes: 825
From: Socal 626
not sure, my tabs are shaved lol. my fender is pretty much sitting on the tires right now though...
Reply
Old Sep 4, 2012 | 11:29 AM
  #32  
tobwac's Avatar
Three Wheelin'
 
Joined: May 2010
Posts: 1,748
Likes: 222
From: sandy hook nj
so you completely deleted that tab where bumper and panel are connected?

maybe try different stiffness setting
Reply
Old Sep 4, 2012 | 01:41 PM
  #33  
ed_423's Avatar
Thread Starter
SeeYou2Crew #2
 
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 8,574
Likes: 825
From: Socal 626
Originally Posted by SlickxAc
Like tobwac said I'd prob just go 235 all around, also where did you take that pic it looks hella familiar
LOl does it? cuz that's my garage bro
Reply
Old Sep 4, 2012 | 01:50 PM
  #34  
SlickxAc's Avatar
Burning Brakes
 
Joined: Apr 2012
Posts: 1,072
Likes: 201
From: Socal 626
Originally Posted by ed_423
LOl does it? cuz that's my garage bro
the first pic with the stairs lol not your garage xD
Reply
Old Sep 4, 2012 | 03:29 PM
  #35  
ed_423's Avatar
Thread Starter
SeeYou2Crew #2
 
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 8,574
Likes: 825
From: Socal 626
ohh LOl. that was at UCR
Reply
Old Sep 7, 2012 | 01:36 PM
  #36  
SlickxAc's Avatar
Burning Brakes
 
Joined: Apr 2012
Posts: 1,072
Likes: 201
From: Socal 626
Originally Posted by ed_423
ohh LOl. that was at UCR
oh lol! nvm about that then never seen it in my life
Reply
Old Sep 7, 2012 | 01:43 PM
  #37  
justnspace's Avatar
Moderator
15 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Feb 2010
Posts: 86,293
Likes: 16,291
235s all around!
Reply
Old Sep 7, 2012 | 05:58 PM
  #38  
civichbdx's Avatar
Instructor
 
Joined: Feb 2010
Posts: 223
Likes: 32
From: Miami FL
Took A quick look almost thought it was a new Cadillac lol
Look Tight!


thanks guys [/QUOTE]
Reply
Old Sep 8, 2012 | 03:41 AM
  #39  
ed_423's Avatar
Thread Starter
SeeYou2Crew #2
 
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 8,574
Likes: 825
From: Socal 626
picked up a pair of 235's for 100 bucks. michilen ps2, time to mount it tomorrow
Reply
Old Sep 8, 2012 | 02:10 PM
  #40  
SlickxAc's Avatar
Burning Brakes
 
Joined: Apr 2012
Posts: 1,072
Likes: 201
From: Socal 626
Originally Posted by ed_423
picked up a pair of 235's for 100 bucks. michilen ps2, time to mount it tomorrow
shoulda ran 215's wit me xD
Reply



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:15 PM.