Springs settling

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 04-07-2006, 06:50 PM
  #1  
Back in a Type S
Thread Starter
 
ProvidenceLeaf's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: New England-MA
Posts: 876
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Springs settling

In general how long does it take for springs to settle?

I had my TEIN H-Techs installed yesterday with new Tokico blues and the front is rediculously higher than the rear. I get alomst 3 fingers in the front and 1 finger in the back. I think the H-techs have been discussed before in here. I read that this has been a problem with H-Techs on a type-S. If this is the case I'm going to be very disappointed since I was debating on getting H&R Sports.

I know it's only been one day, but the back is already settled in and unless I lose another full finger in the front it's going to look stupid to me.

Any comments would be great.
Old 04-07-2006, 07:41 PM
  #2  
アキュラ 力
 
JPTL-S's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Posts: 2,737
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Sounds like something is wrong. It almost sounds like the springs for the front were placed in the rear and vice versa (if that is even possible). I know when I had my H&R Sport springs installed, there was a noticeable difference in height when I picked up my car. I could get about 2 fingers in between the tire and the wheel well all the way around. Even after a week, the change in the tire to wheel well gap measurement was negligible.
Old 04-07-2006, 08:34 PM
  #3  
Senior Moderator
iTrader: (2)
 
NSXNEXT's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2000
Location: where the weather suits my clothes
Age: 55
Posts: 27,921
Received 1,080 Likes on 661 Posts
Do you have the typical 400 pound sub box in your trunk?
Old 04-07-2006, 09:29 PM
  #4  
Back in a Type S
Thread Starter
 
ProvidenceLeaf's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: New England-MA
Posts: 876
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Originally Posted by NSXNEXT
Do you have the typical 400 pound sub box in your trunk?
No sub box. Actually nothing in the trunk. Does it matter that the bumpstops were not cut in the front? The bumpstops in the front are connected to the dust cover so the only way to cut it would be to take it apart. So instead of messing with it we left it as is. I didn't think bumpstops effected ride height...Is that true?
Old 04-07-2006, 09:43 PM
  #5  
Back in a Type S
Thread Starter
 
ProvidenceLeaf's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: New England-MA
Posts: 876
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Originally Posted by ProvidenceLeaf
No sub box. Actually nothing in the trunk. Does it matter that the bumpstops were not cut in the front? The bumpstops in the front are connected to the dust cover so the only way to cut it would be to take it apart. So instead of messing with it we left it as is. I didn't think bumpstops effected ride height...Is that true?
Here are some pics. I made them much brighter so you can see where the tire ends much better.






Comments appreciated!
Old 04-10-2006, 11:57 PM
  #6  
Racer
 
flydog's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Arizona
Age: 52
Posts: 428
Received 3 Likes on 2 Posts
The rear on that car looks way too low almost like it would rub going over bumps. Tein says its supposed to be a 1" drop in the rear and that looks like 2" or more. Its as if you had cement bags in the trunk. I dont think its possible to switch the front springs for the rear but you may want to look into that. The springs should be labeled with an R or F.

Another possibility is the shocks for the rear are the wrong part # and the perch is too low.

Bump stops just keep the car from making metal to metal contact when bottoming out. It doesnt have anything to do with ride height.

This isnt a settling issue. Settling might lower the front 1/4".The fronts will not compress the 1" or more you need to get it to look right. The problem seems to be in the rear anyway. The front looks pretty close to where it need should be. Maybe a little low but that could be because of the sag in the rear.
Old 04-11-2006, 12:27 AM
  #7  
10th Gear
 
xtltypesx's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Age: 41
Posts: 13
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
sup guys.. i have about 50000 miles on my car.. do you guys thing its ok if i just get the h&r springs with no shocks?
Old 04-11-2006, 08:25 AM
  #8  
Back in a Type S
Thread Starter
 
ProvidenceLeaf's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: New England-MA
Posts: 876
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Originally Posted by flydog
The rear on that car looks way too low almost like it would rub going over bumps. Tein says its supposed to be a 1" drop in the rear and that looks like 2" or more. Its as if you had cement bags in the trunk. I dont think its possible to switch the front springs for the rear but you may want to look into that. The springs should be labeled with an R or F.

Another possibility is the shocks for the rear are the wrong part # and the perch is too low.

Bump stops just keep the car from making metal to metal contact when bottoming out. It doesnt have anything to do with ride height.

This isnt a settling issue. Settling might lower the front 1/4".The fronts will not compress the 1" or more you need to get it to look right. The problem seems to be in the rear anyway. The front looks pretty close to where it need should be. Maybe a little low but that could be because of the sag in the rear.
Hmmm...this is quite a problem here. Thanks for the suggestion. You have a very good point about the back being way to low. I thought the same thing but the part numbers for the shocks are correct. I don't think it is even possible to confuse the front springs from the back.

But...The front used to be about 4 fingers and now it is about 3 (1" lower) and the back used to be about 3 fingers and now it's about 1 (1.5" lower)

IS THAT EVEN POSSIBLE?!?! From what I can remember the rear springs are larger so there is no way to confuse those. Plus I just don't think it would fit anyway if you did confuse them!

Maybe you are correct about the shock. Hmmmm....maybe they were not manufactured correct and the perch is too low on them. I guess the only solution would be to compare a stock shock to the Tokicos I put in my car.

One more thing...Is it possible that when the rears were being reassembled I might have forgot to install a piece to affect the ride height? Probably not, but I just wanted to cover all angles here...

I guess I'm going to have to redo this whole mess.

ANYONE PLEASE SOME SUGGESTIONS!!!
Old 04-11-2006, 08:35 AM
  #9  
.:KCCO:.
 
ayethetiense's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Irvine
Age: 42
Posts: 2,174
Received 4 Likes on 3 Posts
Just make sure the spring is sitting properly. Take it out and turn it clockwise and counterclockwise to make sure its sitting in there right.
Old 04-11-2006, 10:06 AM
  #10  
Back in a Type S
Thread Starter
 
ProvidenceLeaf's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: New England-MA
Posts: 876
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Some more pics now that the springs have settled even more...


Anyway, I'm going to have them checked out soon. I don't think it was an install issue. I have a feeling it's the same complaint that other type-S owners have had with the TEIN H-Tech sagging in the rear. The fronts look just about right now, but the backs are too low. It makes the car look stupid IMO. I'll get back to everyone who has PMed me on this as soon as I figure this out!





Old 04-11-2006, 10:07 AM
  #11  
Racer
 
flydog's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Arizona
Age: 52
Posts: 428
Received 3 Likes on 2 Posts
Maybe the nut on top of the shock wasnt turned down all the way. That would easily give you half an inch extra drop depending on how much thread the Tokicos have.

There is no way to change ride height on the rears because the shock has the bottom mount built in and its fixed. On the fronts it may be possible to raise it a bit by jamming the yoke bolt in below the shock instead of through the recessed area but you would probably see a difference between the left and right sides.

It could also be the spring rotated wrong in the perch as the previous poster mentioned but that would raise the height not lower it so it doesnt address the issue in the rear although it would raise the front slightly.

I think it may be possible to put the fronts on the rears. Look at your old springs and see if the diameters are the same. If they are close they would probably fit ok if switched.
Old 04-11-2006, 10:09 AM
  #12  
Racer
 
flydog's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Arizona
Age: 52
Posts: 428
Received 3 Likes on 2 Posts
Originally Posted by ProvidenceLeaf
Some more pics now that the springs have settled even more...



That rear is way saggy and the front almost looks stock. Switched springs would be the first thing to check.
Old 04-11-2006, 10:56 AM
  #13  
Back in a Type S
Thread Starter
 
ProvidenceLeaf's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: New England-MA
Posts: 876
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
It's not the front and rears being switched. I checked it out. The diameters are different and the rear springs are taller than the front so you would notice the difference, and it wouldn't sit properly, and wouldn't have fit.

Personally I'm starting to think it's the H-tech problem of the rear being much lower than stated. There have been other people on here with this problem after installing the H-techs. It sounds very similar to when people were having issues with the old H&R O.E. springs with the rears sagging.
Old 04-11-2006, 12:08 PM
  #14  
I=X - optomos
 
optomos's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: ATL
Posts: 1,171
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Do a cali lowering job. Take a torch to the front springs untill they sag to the height you want em.
Old 04-11-2006, 12:40 PM
  #15  
アキュラ 力
 
JPTL-S's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Posts: 2,737
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Exclamation

Damn bro, looks like you're not the only one:

https://acurazine.com/forums/car-talk-5/mini-gang-134052/
Old 04-11-2006, 01:58 PM
  #16  
checkmate...
 
mr.motoring's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Red Stick, LA Chocolate City, LA
Age: 43
Posts: 1,422
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by ProvidenceLeaf
It's not the front and rears being switched. I checked it out. The diameters are different and the rear springs are taller than the front so you would notice the difference, and it wouldn't sit properly, and wouldn't have fit.
Also, the rear springs are progressive rate while the fronts are constant, and not to mention a helluva lot stiffer.
Old 04-11-2006, 03:24 PM
  #17  
Angry Half-Black Man
 
slice's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Santa Clara, CA
Age: 46
Posts: 136
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From the most recent pics you posted the front looks like mine but the ass end looks way too low. I've noticed with my H-techs that there is a slight (1/4"-1/2") difference between the front and the back but your's is ridiculous! Maybe you got a bad set? Good luck!
Old 04-11-2006, 03:29 PM
  #18  
Back in a Type S
Thread Starter
 
ProvidenceLeaf's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: New England-MA
Posts: 876
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Originally Posted by slice
From the most recent pics you posted the front looks like mine but the ass end looks way too low. I've noticed with my H-techs that there is a slight (1/4"-1/2") difference between the front and the back but your's is ridiculous! Maybe you got a bad set? Good luck!

What year is your TL? Also, are you on stock shocks, or did you do aftermarket like Tokicos?
Old 04-11-2006, 05:49 PM
  #19  
Racer
 
flydog's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Arizona
Age: 52
Posts: 428
Received 3 Likes on 2 Posts
Well then it could be what the other poster's issue was in the other thread. The front shocks are sitting on top of the bolt in the yoke instead of the shock being seated all the way and the bolt running through the notch in the shock. Hard to believe they would make the same exact mistake on both sides. That about an inch right there.
Old 04-11-2006, 06:16 PM
  #20  
Back in a Type S
Thread Starter
 
ProvidenceLeaf's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: New England-MA
Posts: 876
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Originally Posted by flydog
Well then it could be what the other poster's issue was in the other thread. The front shocks are sitting on top of the bolt in the yoke instead of the shock being seated all the way and the bolt running through the notch in the shock. Hard to believe they would make the same exact mistake on both sides. That about an inch right there.
Nope...already checked that. it's sitting all the way in.

I heard from another member that Tokico blues will lower the car a bit anyway and with the combo of the sagging H-techs that everyone else has is why my car looks like that.

I think I'm going to have to start a poll.
Old 04-11-2006, 06:23 PM
  #21  
Not Asian
 
phipark's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: St. Louis
Age: 45
Posts: 13,409
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Measure the jack points to the ground for thr front and the rear. If they are equal, then the springs aren't the problem. The Tein H-Techs lower the front and rear 1.2". A lot of people don't notice the the wheel wells in the front are higher than the rear.
Old 04-12-2006, 07:36 AM
  #22  
Angry Half-Black Man
 
slice's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Santa Clara, CA
Age: 46
Posts: 136
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by ProvidenceLeaf
What year is your TL? Also, are you on stock shocks, or did you do aftermarket like Tokicos?

I have a 02 Type-S still on stock shocks. I did a quick finger measurment this morning and the front is three fingers, back is two. Like phipark said, the wheel wells in the front could just be higher than those in the rear. A guy in my parking lot has a 03 TL-P with stock springs and shocks (I think) so I'm gonna pull a and measure the difference between front and rear on his.
Old 04-12-2006, 11:12 AM
  #23  
Senior Moderator
 
fsttyms1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Appleton WI
Age: 49
Posts: 81,383
Received 3,063 Likes on 2,119 Posts
Originally Posted by phipark
Measure the jack points to the ground for thr front and the rear. If they are equal, then the springs aren't the problem. The Tein H-Techs lower the front and rear 1.2". A lot of people don't notice the the wheel wells in the front are higher than the rear.
Old 04-12-2006, 12:53 PM
  #24  
checkmate...
 
mr.motoring's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Red Stick, LA Chocolate City, LA
Age: 43
Posts: 1,422
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by phipark
Measure the jack points to the ground for thr front and the rear. If they are equal, then the springs aren't the problem. The Tein H-Techs lower the front and rear 1.2". A lot of people don't notice the the wheel wells in the front are higher than the rear.
You're referring to the CL lowering by 1.2", not the TL.

Yes, the stock front wheel well gap is larger due to it being higher than the rear. However the H-Tech's lower the front 1.5" and the back 1.0" which would give an even wheel well gap between the front and rear.
Old 04-13-2006, 01:29 AM
  #25  
アキュラ 力
 
JPTL-S's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Posts: 2,737
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Yet another one: https://acurazine.com/forums/showthread.php?t=135008
Old 05-01-2006, 10:21 AM
  #26  
Advanced
 
Timslunch2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Age: 46
Posts: 73
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by phipark
Measure the jack points to the ground for thr front and the rear. If they are equal, then the springs aren't the problem. The Tein H-Techs lower the front and rear 1.2". A lot of people don't notice the the wheel wells in the front are higher than the rear.
Even though mine sits higher in the front i did measure form the jacking points and sure enough the front is 1/2 lower than the back. Leason learned with TEIN springs. Next year I'll just do it right and get the coilovers
Old 05-01-2006, 11:39 AM
  #27  
Back in a Type S
Thread Starter
 
ProvidenceLeaf's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: New England-MA
Posts: 876
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
I needed to respond because I solved this issue...

I installed H&R sports instead.

There is a definite sagging problem with the H-techs in the rear and not enough of a drop in the front for 02-03.

To refresh everyone the H-techs are supposed to lower the car -1.5 Front/-1.0 Rear. I still had a huge 3 finger gap in the front and almost NO gap at all in the back (see previous pics in the thread)

As everyone knows the H&R sports are supposed to lower the car -1.75 Front/-1.5 Rear. After I installed the H&R sports I have about a little over 1 finger gap in the front and about the same in the back.

Kind of strange when I got rid of almost 2 fingers in the front and the H&Rs are only supposed to lower the car .25" more then the H-techs. My car actually was raised up about 1 finger in the rear which is ridiculous since the H&Rs are supposed to lower the car .5" more than the H-techs.

So anyway the fact that TEIN drop figures are dead wrong with the H-techs. As you can see from this thread that many people have had issues with these springs. BTW...this is not something that you want to do twice. It was a lot of work and I wish I had installed H&Rs like most of you said to begin with (lesson learned) Anyway here are some new pics after I installed the H&R sports...See the difference?





Old 05-01-2006, 01:10 PM
  #28  
Three Wheelin'
iTrader: (4)
 
c0v3rr1d3's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: RI
Age: 42
Posts: 1,414
Received 13 Likes on 6 Posts
lookin much better!
Old 05-01-2006, 02:03 PM
  #29  
Back in a Type S
Thread Starter
 
ProvidenceLeaf's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: New England-MA
Posts: 876
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Originally Posted by c0v3rr1d3
lookin much better!
Thanks!

Here are some better pics to see the difference. I didn't realize the shadows were so bad in the first pics.






Old 05-01-2006, 03:07 PM
  #30  
checkmate...
 
mr.motoring's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Red Stick, LA Chocolate City, LA
Age: 43
Posts: 1,422
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Looks good. So time for camber kits?
Old 05-01-2006, 03:27 PM
  #31  
アキュラ 力
 
JPTL-S's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Posts: 2,737
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Now that looks good bro! Glad to see you decided to go with H&R's
Old 05-02-2006, 12:39 PM
  #32  
Back in a Type S
Thread Starter
 
ProvidenceLeaf's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: New England-MA
Posts: 876
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Originally Posted by mr.motoring
Looks good. So time for camber kits?
Not sure yet. I'm going to have it aligned this week. I hope not...We'll see!
Old 05-08-2006, 04:02 AM
  #33  
WDP!!! REPRESENT
 
TLTYPES03's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Age: 38
Posts: 105
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
definetely a better choice goin with the H & R springs...i was pretty set on getting these ones myself....hows the ride and handling now with these rather than the stock ones?
Old 05-08-2006, 05:53 AM
  #34  
Back in a Type S
Thread Starter
 
ProvidenceLeaf's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: New England-MA
Posts: 876
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
The ride is just a bit stiffer than usual. It's not bad at all. The roads in RI are awful and l don't regret doing this mod.

Handling is MUCH improved, but I also installed Eibach sway bars at the same time when I changed the springs from the H-techs to H&R Sports.

You're helping the handling just by lowering the car so even without the sways there should be some improvement.

I hope this helps.
Old 05-08-2006, 05:16 PM
  #35  
Burning Brakes
 
JMAL's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: NYC
Age: 42
Posts: 913
Received 4 Likes on 3 Posts
looks good. i wanna see if you needed a camber kit, if not... thats the next mod for me.
Old 05-18-2006, 02:35 PM
  #36  
Back in a Type S
Thread Starter
 
ProvidenceLeaf's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: New England-MA
Posts: 876
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Originally Posted by JMAL
looks good. i wanna see if you needed a camber kit, if not... thats the next mod for me.

Yeah I needed a camber kit. It was much better spending the $120 on a camber kit now, than the $$$ I would have to spend on new tires in the future because of premature inside tire wear! The install was very easy...It took me about 45 min. total to install the kit. Here is a seperate thread that I posted about this...

https://acurazine.com/forums/car-talk-5/5th-gear-top-gear-downloads-136927/
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
MrHeeltoe
1G TSX Tires, Wheels, & Suspension
20
02-23-2023 01:54 PM
emailnatec
5G TLX Tires, Wheels & Suspension
29
09-28-2018 04:27 PM
CarlosILX13
ILX Performance Parts & Modifications
14
07-11-2016 11:07 AM
MrHeeltoe
2G TSX Tires, Wheels & Suspension
3
09-29-2015 10:43 PM
MrHeeltoe
3G TL Tires, Wheels & Suspension
0
09-28-2015 05:43 PM



Quick Reply: Springs settling



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:58 AM.