bridgestone turenza LS-V
#1
Intermediate
Thread Starter
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: NY
Age: 38
Posts: 46
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
bridgestone turenza LS-V
hi im buying new tires for my 2002 tl-s and i was thinking about the turenza ls-v. what are your opinions on this tire and are there better ones? thnks alot
#2
10th Gear
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Paducah, KY
Age: 51
Posts: 12
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I am considering the Turanza as well, but in an H rating this time. Only think I will get 50K out of the OEM Michelin MXV4s (V rated) so I thought I would try an H this time. I never drive over 85 anyways, and if you have one fixed with a plug or whatnot, the manufacturer no longer warrants the speed rating anyways. Consumer Report ranks the Turanza as a "Best Buy."
I am also considering the new Goodyear Assurance Tripletred. H rated again, with a 740 treadwear rating, A traction, but B temp rating. The tire was put on the market in March so there are not many reviews on Tirerack, etc., but it looks sharp.
May have not been much help, but I think the Bridgestone is a "win-win" and the Goodyear a solid bet for 2/3 the price.
David
I am also considering the new Goodyear Assurance Tripletred. H rated again, with a 740 treadwear rating, A traction, but B temp rating. The tire was put on the market in March so there are not many reviews on Tirerack, etc., but it looks sharp.
May have not been much help, but I think the Bridgestone is a "win-win" and the Goodyear a solid bet for 2/3 the price.
David
#3
I've got these tires.
What I like about them: great gripping, quiet, nice tire life (I've got about 17K on them with little wear, so far), great in snow and wet.
What I don't like about them: tend to develop flat spots that go avay after driving for shortwhile, sensetive to balance (need very good balancing to feel good when you drive), you will loose "plush" feeling that you have driving lousy OEMs (that is only good side of Michelins).
What I like about them: great gripping, quiet, nice tire life (I've got about 17K on them with little wear, so far), great in snow and wet.
What I don't like about them: tend to develop flat spots that go avay after driving for shortwhile, sensetive to balance (need very good balancing to feel good when you drive), you will loose "plush" feeling that you have driving lousy OEMs (that is only good side of Michelins).
#5
Intermediate
Thread Starter
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: NY
Age: 38
Posts: 46
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
thnks for the quick replies. i just ordered the turanza's on tirerack and now i got a call from a guy there saying that those tires are not the best for my car because of the load? im not sure of the exact details because my father talked to him but this is what he told me nebody know anything about this?? ne help is appreciated
#6
06 Anthracite TL
I also have the Turanza LS-H all around in the stock size (205-16), and I've been real pleased with them. If they are what you want, don't let yourself be talked out of them- I also got them from the Tirerack.com for ~ $100 each. The wet traction is very good, and they are quiet tires as well. The wet traction of the Michelins was sometimes unpredictable. I would definetely get them again. I have no complaints after ~15K miles on them.
#7
Originally Posted by hartdt
I am considering the Turanza as well, but in an H rating this time. Only think I will get 50K out of the OEM Michelin MXV4s (V rated) so I thought I would try an H this time. I never drive over 85 anyways, and if you have one fixed with a plug or whatnot, the manufacturer no longer warrants the speed rating anyways.
David
David
Good luck in getting good tires.
Trending Topics
#9
Dr. TLS
Originally Posted by Archeat2k
thnks alot for all the help and quick replies guys. I ended up changing the tires to yokohama's Avid V4S. Again thanks for the help
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
TL Dustin
Car Parts for Sale
8
02-15-2005 03:39 PM