Sales Person Question
#41
Originally Posted by jhr3uva90
Congrats to both of you! Acura needs to really promote the RL to guys like you. Technology is the RL's strength and I think they need to play to that strength. What do you guys think?
#42
Three Wheelin'
Thread Starter
I have no idea, although I think the DVD that comes with the car could give you the same information.
#43
Originally Posted by jhr3uva90
I have no idea, although I think the DVD that comes with the car could give you the same information.
#45
I've had my RL for 2 weeks now and love the car. The brand name and advertising is what gets the customers into the dealerships. When I bought my car, there were about 20 of them on the lot. Am I the only person who bought an RL in Ohio this month? They seemed shocked that I was actually thinking about buying one. Like it's the first one they've sold :-)
#46
Three Wheelin'
Thread Starter
That kinda says something about Acura and its dealerships. . .
#48
Three Wheelin'
Thread Starter
I'm sorry, but I blame the dealerships for that one. Do they want to sell those cars? It seems like there's no incentive to sell RL's instead of TSX's or some of the other models.
#49
Is it the dealer's fault that Acura does not create a demand for their supposed "flagship" sedan?
I think it's asking the dealer sales person way too much to convince the customer to buy an RL when they're looking at a TL or lower. I knew the minute I walked in there that I wanted an RL. Most people already know what they want when they get to the dealer.
Ultimately, it's the responsiblity of Acura to create brand awareness.
But at the same time, I love my RL though and IMO was by far the best value combined with the best technology. However, people like us to do not makeup the normal car buyer.
If most spend 50K on a car, they want someone saying "wow" and being impressed. If I would've bought a GS300 or BMW 5 series, I would've had my entire neighborhood all jealous. The RL gets you little attention to people who don't know cars well.
I've had my car for 2 weeks and most people think I am still driving the TL..haha
Have to respectfully disagree with you here. I think the blame is clearly Acura's for not creating brand equity in the RL. You can get away with it at the low end (and they clearly have), but not at the high end!
I think it's asking the dealer sales person way too much to convince the customer to buy an RL when they're looking at a TL or lower. I knew the minute I walked in there that I wanted an RL. Most people already know what they want when they get to the dealer.
Ultimately, it's the responsiblity of Acura to create brand awareness.
But at the same time, I love my RL though and IMO was by far the best value combined with the best technology. However, people like us to do not makeup the normal car buyer.
If most spend 50K on a car, they want someone saying "wow" and being impressed. If I would've bought a GS300 or BMW 5 series, I would've had my entire neighborhood all jealous. The RL gets you little attention to people who don't know cars well.
I've had my car for 2 weeks and most people think I am still driving the TL..haha
Have to respectfully disagree with you here. I think the blame is clearly Acura's for not creating brand equity in the RL. You can get away with it at the low end (and they clearly have), but not at the high end!
#50
As someone who sells Acura's I am really disappointed in the advertising for the car. In the latest Autoweek magazine there is an ad for the car but all they really talk about are features that are pretty much on the TL; there is NO mention of the SH-AWD in the ad!
When you compare the car to the Lexus GS430 (same power in a V8 and NO awd!) with optional Mark Levinson sound, Nav, Moonroof, satellite radio and power rear sunshade the RL is around 8K less!
When you compare the car to the Lexus GS430 (same power in a V8 and NO awd!) with optional Mark Levinson sound, Nav, Moonroof, satellite radio and power rear sunshade the RL is around 8K less!
#52
Three Wheelin'
Thread Starter
I don't know what Acura can do about the sales people, considering that Acura doesn't own any dealerships. They have increased magazine advertising, though. They are probably increasing TV ads as well.
I hope Acura doesn't ignore the current RL like the did the previous one. They are going to debut two new SUVs in at the same time, which will consume a lot of their resources. I hope that doesn't adversely affect the RL.
I hope Acura doesn't ignore the current RL like the did the previous one. They are going to debut two new SUVs in at the same time, which will consume a lot of their resources. I hope that doesn't adversely affect the RL.
#53
In a nutshell, the issue with RL is strictly brand equity! Not the sales people.
The sales people are motivated by what's going to make them the most $ with the least amount of effort. This is not a knock on sales people. I've been one for almost 11 years. It's just how we are :-)
Good sales people don't spend time trying to sell customers on a product that's too difficult to sell. Right now, I consider the RL a very tough sale.
The sales people are motivated by what's going to make them the most $ with the least amount of effort. This is not a knock on sales people. I've been one for almost 11 years. It's just how we are :-)
Good sales people don't spend time trying to sell customers on a product that's too difficult to sell. Right now, I consider the RL a very tough sale.
#54
Three Wheelin'
Thread Starter
True, Acura has a brand equity problem. People who can afford expensive cars don't buy Acuras and vice versa.
But isn't odd how a customer can go to a BMW dealer and the sales person knows all about the 5 Series, yet a customer can go to an Acura dealer and the sales person knows little about the RL? It's like a vicious circle: sales people don't put forth effort to sell the car, people don't buy the car, so sales people don't put forth effort to sell the car.
But isn't odd how a customer can go to a BMW dealer and the sales person knows all about the 5 Series, yet a customer can go to an Acura dealer and the sales person knows little about the RL? It's like a vicious circle: sales people don't put forth effort to sell the car, people don't buy the car, so sales people don't put forth effort to sell the car.
#55
Black
The Acura brand definitely has slipped since the late 1980s.
I read an article in ESPN Magazine today where Barry Bonds used to have a "white Acura Legend." What happened to the value of Acura that no athletes drive these today? Not enough bling?
I think the RL could sell even at $55k if it had larger wheels (bling), harder visual edges, and a V8. Clearly one of these is more difficult to accomplish than the other two...
I read an article in ESPN Magazine today where Barry Bonds used to have a "white Acura Legend." What happened to the value of Acura that no athletes drive these today? Not enough bling?
I think the RL could sell even at $55k if it had larger wheels (bling), harder visual edges, and a V8. Clearly one of these is more difficult to accomplish than the other two...
#56
Three Wheelin'
Thread Starter
I don't any $55K Acura would sell, regardless of what features it has.
And the old Legends got a lot more attention when they were the only Japanese luxury cars around. Things have changed since then. However, the TL (which costs what the Legends used to cost) sells far better than the Legend did. Overall, Acura sells far more units than they did in the 1980s. The RL is the only weak link right now.
And the old Legends got a lot more attention when they were the only Japanese luxury cars around. Things have changed since then. However, the TL (which costs what the Legends used to cost) sells far better than the Legend did. Overall, Acura sells far more units than they did in the 1980s. The RL is the only weak link right now.
#57
Dan at Sunnyside
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: New Hampshire
Posts: 10
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I would like to add another entry from the Acura sales person ranks.
I have been selling Acura for 3 years. Our sales staff in one of the best trained in the region. We do some type of training every week ( walk-around contests, videos,
review articles in automotive publications, etc. ) It can be a big advantage in certain
situations, but in truth, I spend more time competing with other Acura dealers ( mostly
regarding price ) than with other brands.
I find the RL a bit tougher to sell than the other models, in part due to the commision / time ratio that was mentioned earlier ( I make a bit more on an RL, but it is more lucrative to pop out RSX's, MDX Premium models, etc ). Even the TL with Navi is easier to present / sell / deliver than the RL and close to the same commision.
The other reason I personally find the RL more difficult is it just doesn't inspire me. My favorite Acuras are the RSX Type-S and the TSX 6-speed Navi ( and no, I am not 25 years old ). The RL with its load of technology / and gadgets just isn't my kind of car.
I do have customers cross-shopping the the TL and RL. The extra value is there in the RL, but you really have to thoroughly present the entire car and hope that your customer (a ) can hang in there and not get glassy-eyed and / or ( b) they really care about most /all of the extra features, some of which are obvious, but many more of which are subtle and often not visible.
I also have not been impressed with Acura's advertising. I see an Audi Quattro driving up
a ski lift and it gets my attention. The ADD commercials that Acura has are a bit better than
the previous generation, but that is about all I can say for them. The one exception is the
RL print ad which has the RL in a hanging glass garage ( real garage ) overlooking a city
( LA ? ).
I have been selling Acura for 3 years. Our sales staff in one of the best trained in the region. We do some type of training every week ( walk-around contests, videos,
review articles in automotive publications, etc. ) It can be a big advantage in certain
situations, but in truth, I spend more time competing with other Acura dealers ( mostly
regarding price ) than with other brands.
I find the RL a bit tougher to sell than the other models, in part due to the commision / time ratio that was mentioned earlier ( I make a bit more on an RL, but it is more lucrative to pop out RSX's, MDX Premium models, etc ). Even the TL with Navi is easier to present / sell / deliver than the RL and close to the same commision.
The other reason I personally find the RL more difficult is it just doesn't inspire me. My favorite Acuras are the RSX Type-S and the TSX 6-speed Navi ( and no, I am not 25 years old ). The RL with its load of technology / and gadgets just isn't my kind of car.
I do have customers cross-shopping the the TL and RL. The extra value is there in the RL, but you really have to thoroughly present the entire car and hope that your customer (a ) can hang in there and not get glassy-eyed and / or ( b) they really care about most /all of the extra features, some of which are obvious, but many more of which are subtle and often not visible.
I also have not been impressed with Acura's advertising. I see an Audi Quattro driving up
a ski lift and it gets my attention. The ADD commercials that Acura has are a bit better than
the previous generation, but that is about all I can say for them. The one exception is the
RL print ad which has the RL in a hanging glass garage ( real garage ) overlooking a city
( LA ? ).
#58
Originally Posted by Bert Kanne
As someone who sells Acura's I am really disappointed in the advertising for the car. In the latest Autoweek magazine there is an ad for the car but all they really talk about are features that are pretty much on the TL; there is NO mention of the SH-AWD in the ad!
When you compare the car to the Lexus GS430 (same power in a V8 and NO awd!) with optional Mark Levinson sound, Nav, Moonroof, satellite radio and power rear sunshade the RL is around 8K less!
When you compare the car to the Lexus GS430 (same power in a V8 and NO awd!) with optional Mark Levinson sound, Nav, Moonroof, satellite radio and power rear sunshade the RL is around 8K less!
Also, since this thread is also discussing features, the lack of rain sensing wipers really gets me and seems to be a ridiculous low cost item for Acura to skimp on.
#59
Originally Posted by jhr3uva90
True, Acura has a brand equity problem. People who can afford expensive cars don't buy Acuras and vice versa.
But isn't odd how a customer can go to a BMW dealer and the sales person knows all about the 5 Series, yet a customer can go to an Acura dealer and the sales person knows little about the RL? It's like a vicious circle: sales people don't put forth effort to sell the car, people don't buy the car, so sales people don't put forth effort to sell the car.
But isn't odd how a customer can go to a BMW dealer and the sales person knows all about the 5 Series, yet a customer can go to an Acura dealer and the sales person knows little about the RL? It's like a vicious circle: sales people don't put forth effort to sell the car, people don't buy the car, so sales people don't put forth effort to sell the car.
#60
Three Wheelin'
Thread Starter
Originally Posted by ilas
Also, since this thread is also discussing features, the lack of rain sensing wipers really gets me and seems to be a ridiculous low cost item for Acura to skimp on.
#61
My only car is a Bus
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Republik of Kalifornia
Posts: 3,254
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
This thread is interesting but basically Acura missed the mark. They tried too hard to make the RL a worldwide 'one size fits all' car. They got greedy raising the price so high. They rolled it out too fast. They didn't do their leasing homework.
There'll be a new RL in 4 years so let's look forward to that!
There'll be a new RL in 4 years so let's look forward to that!
#62
Three Wheelin'
Thread Starter
I don't think Acura had much say in the Legend/RL, except for the MSRP (which I think is too high). If Acura had more say over the development of the car, it would have been manufactured in North America like most of the other Acuras and it would basically be an SUV. I have a feeling that the new MDX, which will debut in a couple of weeks, is the "RL" that Acura really wanted. That's why I'm afraid that Acura will never give this car the promotion it deserves.
Speaking of commericals. . . I think the RL should have commercials similar to the Legend commercials shown in Japan. I have that in another thread, though.
Speaking of commericals. . . I think the RL should have commercials similar to the Legend commercials shown in Japan. I have that in another thread, though.
#63
Originally Posted by jhr3uva90
I'd be willing to pass on the rain sensing wipers if they would give me the cooling seats like in Canada!
#64
Originally Posted by jhr3uva90
I don't think Acura had much say in the Legend/RL, except for the MSRP (which I think is too high). If Acura had more say over the development of the car, it would have been manufactured in North America like most of the other Acuras and it would basically be an SUV. I have a feeling that the new MDX, which will debut in a couple of weeks, is the "RL" that Acura really wanted. That's why I'm afraid that Acura will never give this car the promotion it deserves.
Speaking of commericals. . . I think the RL should have commercials similar to the Legend commercials shown in Japan. I have that in another thread, though.
Speaking of commericals. . . I think the RL should have commercials similar to the Legend commercials shown in Japan. I have that in another thread, though.
#67
Three Wheelin'
Thread Starter
Nope, no babies here!
In case anyone is wondering, I think Acura gave Canadians ventilated seats was to compensate them for not having XM radio. Personally, I think Acura would have done better by omitting the ventilation and dropping the price. I hear the RL is exorbitant in Canada.
In case anyone is wondering, I think Acura gave Canadians ventilated seats was to compensate them for not having XM radio. Personally, I think Acura would have done better by omitting the ventilation and dropping the price. I hear the RL is exorbitant in Canada.
#68
Originally Posted by jhr3uva90
I hear the RL is exorbitant in Canada.
#69
Three Wheelin'
Thread Starter
Does Canada have some kind of special tariff on Japanese-manufactured cars?
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
sockr1
Car Parts for Sale
22
10-01-2015 01:31 AM
brandnewcolony
3G TL (2004-2008)
53
09-12-2015 10:39 AM