View Poll Results: If the next RL or MMC had a V8 would you trade your car for it?
Yes-would trade my RL
19
29.69%
Yes--would trade another car for an RL
2
3.13%
No--would keep my RL/current car
41
64.06%
Would move to another car
2
3.13%
Voters: 64. You may not vote on this poll

Poll: If the MMC or 3G RL had a V8 would you trade?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 11-06-2007, 10:24 AM
  #1  
Senior Moderator
Thread Starter
 
neuronbob's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Cleveland area, OH
Posts: 20,015
Received 4,614 Likes on 2,193 Posts
Poll: If the MMC or 3G RL had a V8 would you trade?

Given the rumors circulating about what will either be an MMC or really the 3G RL, I thought this poll question was appropriate. Please assume for the sake of the question that the RL continues to be class-leading in tech features and has good external and internal styling.

Please also post to explain your answer.
Old 11-06-2007, 10:42 AM
  #2  
2012 Cadillac CTS-V Coupe
 
GoHawks's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Southeast Michigan
Posts: 2,196
Received 95 Likes on 66 Posts
I voted no (for now).

If the MMC occurs in the summer of 2008, I will have had my car for just over two years. Too soon to trade-in as of yet, expecially since I am completely happy with my car thus far.

I'm actually contemplating getting out of my Land Cruiser (with a V8) and going to the MDX, so I'm not completely on the V8 bandwagon.

Now that doesn't mean I wouldn't consider it when I actually might be ready to trade-in my RL around the 5 year mark.
Old 11-06-2007, 10:44 AM
  #3  
Instructor
 
Shotgun's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Huntsville, Alabama
Posts: 241
Received 8 Likes on 8 Posts
Originally Posted by neuronbob
Given the rumors circulating about what will either be an MMC or really the 3G RL, I thought this poll question was appropriate. Please assume for the sake of the question that the RL continues to be class-leading in tech features and has good external and internal styling.

Please also post to explain your answer.
Just had an RDX for three weeks as loaner while my 05 RL was being serviced. Granted the RDX only has a 4 cylinder engine, albeit turbo - when I got back in my RL today it felt downright lethargic!

So yes, I would trade. I've been spoiled by the RDX's "enthusiasm" to run but I want my luxury as well (even though the RDX was indeed luxurious).
Old 11-06-2007, 10:46 AM
  #4  
Burning Brakes
 
Touge's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: NYC | Chofu-shi
Posts: 869
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 2 Posts
A v-8 would definetely have me thinking =). However I doubt it will happen on a MMC.
Old 11-06-2007, 11:00 AM
  #5  
2012 Cadillac CTS-V Coupe
 
GoHawks's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Southeast Michigan
Posts: 2,196
Received 95 Likes on 66 Posts
Originally Posted by GoHawks
I voted no (for now).

If the MMC occurs in the summer of 2008, I will have had my car for just over two years. Too soon to trade-in as of yet, expecially since I am completely happy with my car thus far.

I'm actually contemplating getting out of my Land Cruiser (with a V8) and going to the MDX, so I'm not completely on the V8 bandwagon.

Now that doesn't mean I wouldn't consider it when I actually might be ready to trade-in my RL around the 5 year mark.
I need to proof my posts!!!

EXPECIALLY!

Old 11-06-2007, 11:16 AM
  #6  
Torch & Pitchfork Posse
 
TampaRLX-SH's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Tampa, Florida
Age: 61
Posts: 4,729
Received 1,806 Likes on 793 Posts
Originally Posted by GoHawks
I voted no (for now).

If the MMC occurs in the summer of 2008, I will have had my car for just over two years. Too soon to trade-in as of yet, expecially since I am completely happy with my car thus far.

I'm actually contemplating getting out of my Land Cruiser (with a V8) and going to the MDX, so I'm not completely on the V8 bandwagon.

Now that doesn't mean I wouldn't consider it when I actually might be ready to trade-in my RL around the 5 year mark.


It would have to be a serious leap over the current RL configuration to make me trade out of my 06 RL before 4 years. A MMC would not tempt me.

The only way n V8 would get checked in my options list was if it had better economy than the current 3.5 V6. More power and torque would be nice, but not at lesser economy. I am at my threshold for economy expectations for a daily driver with this RL.

That said, I also have a policy of considering a new car only after a year or two after introduction. That in mind, likely 2010+ before I am looking to replace my RL.

But with the auto show on Thursday....never say never!
Old 11-06-2007, 11:18 AM
  #7  
Three Wheelin'
 
dwest1023's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: DC
Age: 70
Posts: 1,852
Received 90 Likes on 75 Posts
After test driving many V8's. I feel the RL does not need one, nor would I want one, unless it get the same or better mpg. Right now MPG is my concern. The RL can go as fast as I need it and way faster than what the DC metro area can accommodate. WE are on lease, as others have stated, i ma more than happy with the RL, but once the lease it up, will see what Honda has up it's sleeve.
Old 11-06-2007, 11:33 AM
  #8  
7th Gear
 
shinh777's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Age: 50
Posts: 7
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
it would depend on the specs for the new v-8 engine. If it only has 10-20% more horses and half the gas mileage...no. Now, if they did a v-6 turbo....I probably would trade it in. I love the sound of a turbo.....lol.
Old 11-06-2007, 11:33 AM
  #9  
office monkey
 
Rob L's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Ontario, Canada
Age: 45
Posts: 1,052
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
forgive my ignorance but what is a MMC?
Old 11-06-2007, 11:40 AM
  #10  
2012 Cadillac CTS-V Coupe
 
GoHawks's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Southeast Michigan
Posts: 2,196
Received 95 Likes on 66 Posts
Originally Posted by Rob L
forgive my ignorance but what is a MMC?
Mid Model Change. Basically a freshening of the current model before a complete redesign a few years later.
Old 11-06-2007, 12:40 PM
  #11  
Senior Moderator
Thread Starter
 
neuronbob's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Cleveland area, OH
Posts: 20,015
Received 4,614 Likes on 2,193 Posts
WOW. These results are very interesting. So far, the vast majority would not be wooed by a V8 RL.

To avoid suspense, I was one of the two (so far) who voted for the V8.

However, this would be under all of the following conditions:

a) the car still looks good and wasn't too large (I LOVE the current RL's size and looks, it's perfect!), AND
b) if there was significant increase in torque without a significant loss of mileage, better than what I have added with my CAI and exhaust (13-14 whp more than stock=25-30 more potential crank hp, and yes I know that calculation is spurious....), AND
c) another couple of years elapsed as trading in next summer would be too soon, even for me. Even I don't want to lose money on a trade.
Old 11-06-2007, 12:50 PM
  #12  
Go Big Blue!
 
SpicyMikey's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Orlando, FLA
Posts: 2,700
Received 5 Likes on 4 Posts
No. I would take more then just that. The current engine has enough torque for me off the line. It certainly has enough torque in the 30-50mph range, and more then enough HP.
Old 11-06-2007, 01:13 PM
  #13  
Instructor
 
tasdisr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Cincinnati, Ohio
Age: 71
Posts: 206
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
I would not trade my current RL just for a V8. The current V6 has enough power for me
and the added cost of a V8 would probably add a substantial amount to the sticker price
of the car.
Old 11-06-2007, 01:22 PM
  #14  
Alpha Geek
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: M@$$hole
Age: 64
Posts: 1,212
Received 49 Likes on 38 Posts
Voted no, I don't buy Acuras because I want to go faster than anyone else, I buy them becuase they have the best bang for the buck, and in the RL's case you can get a $50k+ car for much less.
Old 11-06-2007, 01:32 PM
  #15  
Go Big Blue!
 
SpicyMikey's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Orlando, FLA
Posts: 2,700
Received 5 Likes on 4 Posts
Originally Posted by neuronbob
WOW. These results are very interesting. So far, the vast majority would not be wooed by a V8 RL.

To avoid suspense, I was one of the two (so far) who voted for the V8.

However, this would be under all of the following conditions:

a) the car still looks good and wasn't too large (I LOVE the current RL's size and looks, it's perfect!), AND
b) if there was significant increase in torque without a significant loss of mileage, better than what I have added with my CAI and exhaust (13-14 whp more than stock=25-30 more potential crank hp, and yes I know that calculation is spurious....), AND
c) another couple of years elapsed as trading in next summer would be too soon, even for me. Even I don't want to lose money on a trade.
I suppose it's not too surprising most are happy with the v6. Some people may have settled for the v6 in order to get the other benefits. However, I think people wanting a v8 simply went somewhere else
Old 11-06-2007, 01:58 PM
  #16  
'06 RL
 
jftjr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 819
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Obviously, if people here had really cared about a V8, they wouldn't have bought an RL in the first place.... I drove V8 cars and considered several when making my RL purchase decision. But I didn't feel that the RL was lacking in any respect, and for the price, it was unbeatable, especially when you consider the quality of the rest of the car.

A V8 would add at least 10K to the cost of the RL, and in the over-50K market (which the RL wants to be in, but really isn't) there's lots of good competition. I wouldn't bother paying another $10K for an RL even if it had 20 more HP.
Old 11-06-2007, 03:25 PM
  #17  
Burning Brakes
 
Rexorg's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Washington DC
Posts: 1,160
Received 19 Likes on 17 Posts
Newer is always better. OK, newer is sometimes better. All right, newer is sometimes worse. Since I bought my '06 RL for the sound system I guess if the '09 has RDS and HD AM radio and a few other techy things I will buy as soon as it is released.
Old 11-06-2007, 04:45 PM
  #18  
Drifting
 
Treblig's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Indiana
Posts: 3,334
Received 218 Likes on 174 Posts
Depends on what it looks like. I would probably also wait for it's second year production run.
Old 11-06-2007, 05:13 PM
  #19  
07 RL (non-tech)w/06 Nav
 
larrynimmo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Cordova, MD
Age: 69
Posts: 533
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
why don't u ask....would you pay the extra 10k that the upgraded very limited production v8 model sell for? Acura would likely sell more new NSX's for over 100k
Old 11-06-2007, 05:33 PM
  #20  
Intermediate
 
klister's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Age: 78
Posts: 47
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Other things are more important

A V-8 may be important as a low volume halo.

However, better exterior styling, an additional transmission speed, better transmission gearing, more torque at lower rpm's, a larger trunk, improved ride etc would all do more to improve the success of the RL.

Launching a V-8 only just as gasoline prices start another large upward spiral would be counter productive. Additionally, as much as I would like to see an MMC soon, rushing to market without appropriate testing would create another disaster. The quality problems and unecessary complexity with the 2005 had as much to do with the sales failure of the RL as anything. The Acura/RL quality image has just now recovered and resale value has not.
Old 11-06-2007, 06:32 PM
  #21  
Burning Brakes
 
Rob144's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: San Diego
Age: 62
Posts: 834
Likes: 0
Received 21 Likes on 20 Posts
I voted no. I tend to keep cars for 8-10 years, so I do my research and decide what car I can live with for that long. A V-8 would not tempt me, in and of itself.

If I wanted a V8, I'd probably start nosing around the LS460, even though the styling doesn't do much for me. I don't want a V8 version of a V6 car, otherwise I'd have gotten an M45 or GS4XX.

Rob144
Old 11-06-2007, 07:39 PM
  #22  
Burning Brakes
 
lland's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Wellington, FL
Posts: 1,075
Received 17 Likes on 14 Posts
Originally Posted by lumpulus
Voted no, I don't buy Acuras because I want to go faster than anyone else, I buy them becuase they have the best bang for the buck, and in the RL's case you can get a $50k+ car for much less.
If the RL was a 50K car, you'd have to pay 50K for it. It is however, a 45K car that competes and often beats cars costing much more.

I bought a new shredder the other day. It was $75 but the list price was $249. Is it a $75 shredder or a $249 shredder?

LL
Old 11-06-2007, 08:06 PM
  #23  
Racer
 
White92's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Age: 46
Posts: 467
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 2 Posts
If they do it, it won't be a MMC. The RL can't be ordered after 2 more weeks which will be February production.
Old 11-06-2007, 08:43 PM
  #24  
07 RL (non-tech)w/06 Nav
 
larrynimmo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Cordova, MD
Age: 69
Posts: 533
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
February's production run of the RL will be one of the shortest. I have read that the factory is shutting down for major assembly line update. It seems to be common knowledge that the RL will be all new for 2011 debuting in early 2010. Prehaps there will be no 2009 model year.
Old 11-06-2007, 09:07 PM
  #25  
Senior Moderator
Thread Starter
 
neuronbob's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Cleveland area, OH
Posts: 20,015
Received 4,614 Likes on 2,193 Posts
Originally Posted by larrynimmo
February's production run of the RL will be one of the shortest. I have read that the factory is shutting down for major assembly line update. It seems to be common knowledge that the RL will be all new for 2011 debuting in early 2010. Prehaps there will be no 2009 model year.
TampaRL is quoting in our long 3G RL thread that the Saitama factory is shutting down soon for renovations with a nearby brand new factory opening. It's apparently not known which models the new factory will be producing.

Let's keep on topic, though...

A V8 halo car ala Mugen RL would be great as it would certainly get tongues wagging here and elsewhere. I figure that most sales would still be V6--witness my poll's result thus far--but the V8 would attract eyeballs to the model overall.
Old 11-06-2007, 09:32 PM
  #26  
Retired and Loving It
 
Ernie Golfs's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Bakersfield, CA
Age: 75
Posts: 435
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I voted with you Bob. I would definitly trade my 05 RL for a V8 version as long as the MPG didn't take a big hit.
Old 11-06-2007, 09:43 PM
  #27  
Racer
 
White92's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Age: 46
Posts: 467
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 2 Posts
Originally Posted by Ernie Golfs
I voted with you Bob. I would definitly trade my 05 RL for a V8 version as long as the MPG didn't take a big hit.
If they do, it will surely have some sort of VCM.
Old 11-06-2007, 09:51 PM
  #28  
Senior Moderator
 
plastikman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: West Coast
Posts: 1,340
Received 85 Likes on 37 Posts
No, I am just getting used to my RL I have now. I am the type of person who normally trades in their car after 2 years, hell I only had my last TL for just over a year, but I don't have the itch this time. I want to do so many things to my RL and have to say I am satisfied with what I have.
Old 11-06-2007, 10:11 PM
  #29  
'10 A5 & '07 TL
 
henryr01's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: 41.612511,-88.202333
Age: 62
Posts: 95
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I voted a big YES, I'd trade my '05 RL.

Even though I've only had it for 5 months, I love it and want more. More V8, more style, more everything!!
Old 11-06-2007, 11:20 PM
  #30  
Burning Brakes
 
Rob144's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: San Diego
Age: 62
Posts: 834
Likes: 0
Received 21 Likes on 20 Posts
Depending on what the new TL does for 2009, it could render the current RL somewhat obsolete (or redundant). Thus, the RL could be pushed upmarket while the TL attracts a wider range of potential customers (spanning V6 variants of the Infiniti G and M, Lexus ES and GS, BMW 3 & 5 series, and M-B C & S Class, and the new CTS).
The RL would slot in above the TL and span the upmarket variants of the M, GS, 5, M-B S, and CTS.

If the TL hits the right spot, the RL might not be missed for a model year or two.
Old 11-07-2007, 08:51 AM
  #31  
Intermediate
 
carnutpa's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Schwenksville, PA
Age: 65
Posts: 30
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
It would take more than just a bigger engine. I could use a bit more room inside, especially in the rear. I read they are adding about 3 to 5 inches in length and I guess all of that is in the rear seating or trunk. That extra room would be my incentive to buy. Also, it would depend on the interior design. After all, that is where we spend our time. I like the wrap around styling when going from the dash to the doors and also the wood trim. I do not like an all metal trim on the dash (Chrysler did this and look what happened to them). The metal dashboards look like foil to me. Wood looks more luxurious. So a larger car and good interior styling and layout is what I am looking for.
Old 11-07-2007, 01:49 PM
  #32  
Safety Car
 
getakey's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 3,920
Received 421 Likes on 315 Posts
not sure if anyone has posted this link before:
http://www.vtec.net/modelmatrix/
Old 11-07-2007, 01:56 PM
  #33  
Racer
 
gavine's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Age: 56
Posts: 353
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
My choice isn't one of the options....if a V8 was offered when I bought my 06, I would have definitely gotten the V8, however, I will NOT trade my current V6 for a V8. I plan on keeping my RL for at least 10 years so looks like I'll live with my V6 with which I am very happy. I wanted a car with a V8 but, after driving the RL, I was convinced that I didn't really need it.
Old 11-07-2007, 03:58 PM
  #34  
Safety Car
 
getakey's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 3,920
Received 421 Likes on 315 Posts
I agree with gavine in that I am more than satisfied with the V6, but hope to get something new before 10 years go by
Old 11-07-2007, 06:23 PM
  #35  
5Zigen Acura RL
 
Jaysmith2000's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Las Vegas, NV
Age: 54
Posts: 220
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I voted No. The wife is driving the RL now, my daily commuter is a Sky Red Line. Still took the RL to Cali this weekend and LOVE this car on the open highway. Vroom Vroom!
Old 11-07-2007, 08:52 PM
  #36  
Senior Moderator
Thread Starter
 
neuronbob's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Cleveland area, OH
Posts: 20,015
Received 4,614 Likes on 2,193 Posts
Originally Posted by Jaysmith2000
I voted No. The wife is driving the RL now, my daily commuter is a Sky Red Line. Still took the RL to Cali this weekend and LOVE this car on the open highway. Vroom Vroom!
Your wife is driving your modded car? Does she complain about the noise or does she gun the engine as much as possible? (e.g. is your wife mod-savvy?)
Old 11-08-2007, 09:03 PM
  #37  
AcurAdmirer
 
Mike_TX's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Dallas/Ft. Worth, TX
Posts: 3,004
Received 352 Likes on 164 Posts
Been out of town (driving my RL to Vegas, baby ), but I've just voted YES with you, Bob.

The RL is fantastic, and mine just keeps getting faster and quicker, but in my book there's nothing like a V-8 for both low-end grunt and high-rpm power when you need the car to reach down deep and propel you quickly around that big rig on a two-lane road.

What I'd probably do is trade the '07 MDX for it, assuming such a creature appeared as a 2009 MMC (and keep the '06 RL), or trade the '06 RL for one if it's a 2010 model debuting in 2009 (since my RL's lease will be up about then).

Either way, if it's as good a car as the existing one, and has a V-8 as a bonus, you'd almost have to keep me away at gunpoint.

All this assumes, too, that the price doesn't go crazy, the styling is as good as the current one, and the V-8 is a worthy alternative to the current engine. By "worthy" I mean it would need to have enough of a power advantage over the V-6 to merit the upgrade, and that Honda does something wonderful like make it run on regular gas and endows it with reasonably good gas mileage via VCM or some other mechanical magic.

Do that and I'm on board.

.
.
Old 11-09-2007, 10:29 AM
  #38  
Pro
 
RL06tech's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Age: 59
Posts: 706
Received 26 Likes on 23 Posts
I'm a little more competitive and I just love to leave german cars in a cloud of "RICE" dust, I could definitely be game
Old 11-09-2007, 10:53 PM
  #39  
Instructor
 
johnhayd's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: San Francisco East Bay
Posts: 110
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I''m happy with the power and gas mileage of my '06 rl. IF I had a choice between 6 or 8 cylinders when I was buying, I still probably have picked the 6. I'm planning to keep my '06 for about 6 more years before replacing.
Old 11-10-2007, 03:53 AM
  #40  
Senior Moderator
Thread Starter
 
neuronbob's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Cleveland area, OH
Posts: 20,015
Received 4,614 Likes on 2,193 Posts
I hope Acura is monitoring this thread. It sounds as if there would be demand for a nicely styled, technophilic RL with a V8 given good mileage, a good boost in power from the V6, and as an option.

I buy the "V8 as low-selling halo car" argument.


Quick Reply: Poll: If the MMC or 3G RL had a V8 would you trade?



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:00 AM.