phile

I can agree on that.

Rob L

downunder,

dude, never do a real debate because you have weak skills at it.

All phile did was simply point out areas that are obvious cost cutting measures (even if they are only cutting costs by an irrelevant amount) yet you have felt to twist that around and call it a design feature or imply the areas he brought up don't matter because you don't care about them. Well shit, maybe the 4 way seat was a design feature of the RL? Nah, it is a cost cutting feature (which it obviously was) because you feel it is. That is the logic you used and it is flawed beyond belief.

I just don't get how you could have taken philes simple point and stretched out so long and then flipped it to act like everything Infiniti didn't do was a design choice and not a way to chop a few cents off the production costs.

Boggles my mind...

Oh and brigning up higher priced cars as examples is a weak way to debate something...they can have cost cutting areas too ya know...

This reminds me of the guy on another forum who argued with me that audiopilot was ANC and would not accept me telling him he was wrong and even describing what each feature does.

Being stubborn is not a valuable human trait...

petemc

Hi Rob,

Looks like you're not having a good day today...lots of frustration showing

Pete

dseag2

No kidding. I think this argument has gone to ridiculous lengths as it is. These guys have already called it a day. No need to come back and add fuel to the fire.

DownUnder

Rob L,

You’re not worth my time and neither is your nonsensical post so I’ll leave it at that.