Who is the fastest auto and stick on this board?
06-06-2011, 05:27 PM
#42
Whats up with RDX owners?
iTrader: (9)
Oh yea, durp.
You havent posted much lately, I forgot about you. POST SOME VIDS!!
You havent posted much lately, I forgot about you. POST SOME VIDS!!
06-18-2011, 12:06 PM
#45
Cruisin'
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: atl / houston
Posts: 16
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
IIRC, someone on here has a CLS6 that has walked an E92 M3 and TTV8 X5M. Since those are both around 12.8@109 he's got to easily be hitting 110+ traps, so guesstimating low 12's. 
I believe his car is fitted with a custom test pipe.
I believe his car is fitted with a custom test pipe.
06-18-2011, 01:18 PM
#47
I love this guy, lurks for almost 10 years and when he posts he trolls. Thx 4 teh lulz.
06-19-2011, 12:34 PM
#51
http://www.nhra.com/competition/altitude.aspx
maybe not quite a second, but up there though, 0.8....
it's Denver/Morrision btw (has the highest correction factor too)
BTW probably the biggest mod for those times, is the 6-speed swap first, and then being on the
also
maybe not quite a second, but up there though, 0.8....
it's Denver/Morrision btw (has the highest correction factor too)
BTW probably the biggest mod for those times, is the 6-speed swap first, and then being on the
also
Last edited by friesm2000; 06-19-2011 at 12:36 PM.
06-19-2011, 01:29 PM
#52
No offense I read all this post and something tells me this numbers are bogus. I hope non of u guys are actually running those times well mayb except for type R.
WWell literally u wud literally need a new engine or a rocket bolted up to tht chassis to achieve those times and break something in the process.
iits a joke right ???
WWell literally u wud literally need a new engine or a rocket bolted up to tht chassis to achieve those times and break something in the process.
iits a joke right ???
06-19-2011, 01:42 PM
#53
No offense I read all this post and something tells me this numbers are bogus. I hope non of u guys are actually running those times well mayb except for type R.
WWell literally u wud literally need a new engine or a rocket bolted up to tht chassis to achieve those times and break something in the process.
iits a joke right ???
WWell literally u wud literally need a new engine or a rocket bolted up to tht chassis to achieve those times and break something in the process.
iits a joke right ???
06-19-2011, 01:56 PM
#55
Don't know what times this is directed too, but TurboSupra is just a troll and Friesm is just speaking hypothetically dependent on variables which his times shouldn't be considered unless he actually ran the indicated times (yes your elevation sucks, but realistically getting to those high trap speeds in this FWD pig is difficult). Hitting those trap speeds (110+) require far more then a 6 speed swap and boltons. Just to throw my hat in, I barely scratched 110.xx but this was with FI, weight reduction, and a cold night.
even allmotor with is alloutturbo and all that power struggled breaking into the high 12s
Last edited by poisx7; 06-19-2011 at 01:59 PM.
06-19-2011, 02:14 PM
#56
Three Wheelin'
yeah, nobody is posting their dyno numbers or mods with their times. oh, and weather is a huge factor in our cars too
mine was consistant 14.2's @ 98.7 (2.1-2.2 60ft)with 80-90 degree weather and humidity in Florida, shitty 225/45/17 tires and mods are normal bolt-ons(headers, spacers, intake, exhaust, neuspeed race suspension..ext)..hoping for 13's with better tires and weather
mine was consistant 14.2's @ 98.7 (2.1-2.2 60ft)with 80-90 degree weather and humidity in Florida, shitty 225/45/17 tires and mods are normal bolt-ons(headers, spacers, intake, exhaust, neuspeed race suspension..ext)..hoping for 13's with better tires and weather
06-19-2011, 02:52 PM
#57
I dont think you can really consider thinjims car a cl anymore. The problem is most if not all people havnt had the car setup properly for the best times possible. A car setup with all the suspension stuff to eliminate wheel hop, reduce weight from 3500 to under 3000 lbs, sticky tires etc would make a big difference. Just upping the power wont really improve times much.
06-19-2011, 02:56 PM
#58
was this SC or turboed ?? i am assuming to make so much TQ u wud need that much boost which i dont c possible unless some extensive cooling mods at the intake ( nitros) Big aftercooler ??
even allmotor with is alloutturbo and all that power struggled breaking into the high 12s
even allmotor with is alloutturbo and all that power struggled breaking into the high 12s
I was running a HBP on a supercharger + all other supportive mods (Picture gallery HERE).
I think it's safe to say most with the standard setup (HBP Supercharger/Header/Intake) etc have enough POWER to make a 12 second pass. Most of these owners however don't have the supporting suspension components/sticky tires to aid in that department to make that power useful. Getting a high trap speed tells you you're making power, if you actually want to reduce your time, a stiff suspension/sturdy mounts/LW Wheels and sticky tires is critical for this heavy fwd pig.
Anyway bumping this thread was retarded. The answer to the original question is ThinJim and all the people who made strides in the CL are long gone (Scalbert, AllMotor etc).
06-19-2011, 03:55 PM
#60
Three Wheelin'
civicdrvr probably is the fastest 6sp all motor, but he hasnt gone to the 1/4 mile track yet..
and im talking about cars that are on here currently
as far as what was stated before, yes the suspension and wheels and tires make a huge difference on our cars
06-19-2011, 05:29 PM
#61
Don't know what times this is directed too, but TurboSupra is just a troll and Friesm is just speaking hypothetically dependent on variables which his times shouldn't be considered unless he actually ran the indicated times (yes your elevation sucks, but realistically getting to those high trap speeds in this FWD pig is difficult). Hitting those trap speeds (110+) require far more then a 6 speed swap and boltons. Just to throw my hat in, I barely scratched 110.xx but this was with FI, weight reduction, and a cold night.
=spraying/nitrousso yes a little more then just bolt-ons, and a swap
and yes i have hit those times, not consistently though, launching sucks ass with crap mounts lol (but i have done 14.06 or so on 2 different nights though)
06-19-2011, 05:35 PM
#62
yeah, nobody is posting their dyno numbers or mods with their times. oh, and weather is a huge factor in our cars too
mine was consistant 14.2's @ 98.7 (2.1-2.2 60ft)with 80-90 degree weather and humidity in Florida, shitty 225/45/17 tires and mods are normal bolt-ons(headers, spacers, intake, exhaust, neuspeed race suspension..ext)..hoping for 13's with better tires and weather
mine was consistant 14.2's @ 98.7 (2.1-2.2 60ft)with 80-90 degree weather and humidity in Florida, shitty 225/45/17 tires and mods are normal bolt-ons(headers, spacers, intake, exhaust, neuspeed race suspension..ext)..hoping for 13's with better tires and weather
, i will actually be able to test the XLR8 mounts)wheelhop was my biggest issue for decent 60's with not wanting to break another axle (and if i deflated the tires any, they would grip too well, i get axlehop, and the axle be
, had it happen twice)
06-19-2011, 06:09 PM
#63
And nitrous is teh ghey
06-19-2011, 06:24 PM
#64
I was referencing a 13 second flat run. Using calculations no matter how unfavorable your conditions does not gain you any validity claiming you have a 13 second car. That could be applied to those who can't launch worth a damn getting 2.5+ 60' saying hypothetically if they could cut down they'd run yada yada yada. You must run the time to be able to make the claim.
And nitrous is teh ghey
And nitrous is teh ghey
cause that should be achievable with my current setup, once i can get a decent launch
and as far as the
goes, it works 
06-19-2011, 06:33 PM
#65
so basically you want me to run a 13.8229 (corrected for my altitude, and it's no different then corrected power on dynos, with leveling the playing field) then, when i do get my transmission fixed then?
cause that should be achievable with my current setup, once i can get a decent launch
and as far as the goes, it works
cause that should be achievable with my current setup, once i can get a decent launch
and as far as the
goes, it works Unfortunately for you, due to where you live, you can only hypothetically speak on having your car run a 13.00. Using calculations based on elevations can't and shouldn't be considered. Virtually any forums you visit, the only credible times that will be listed for fastest car for that respective forums will be with those who actually run the claimed time, not the revised calculated time.
This isn't an attack on you, it sucks you're in high elevation but unless you run the time, you didn't run the time.
BTW you missed some great lulz and awesome Demotivational Posters on you know who. If you wanna see them PM me.
Last edited by JBlueCLS6; 06-19-2011 at 06:36 PM.
The following users liked this post:
friesm2000 (06-19-2011)
06-19-2011, 07:42 PM
#66
Once again you are missing my point and dynos could be calibrated to inflate numbers anyway and lie so it shouldn't even be used in this discussion.
Unfortunately for you, due to where you live, you can only hypothetically speak on having your car run a 13.00. Using calculations based on elevations can't and shouldn't be considered. Virtually any forums you visit, the only credible times that will be listed for fastest car for that respective forums will be with those who actually run the claimed time, not the revised calculated time.
This isn't an attack on you, it sucks you're in high elevation but unless you run the time, you didn't run the time.
BTW you missed some great lulz and awesome Demotivational Posters on you know who. If you wanna see them PM me.
Unfortunately for you, due to where you live, you can only hypothetically speak on having your car run a 13.00. Using calculations based on elevations can't and shouldn't be considered. Virtually any forums you visit, the only credible times that will be listed for fastest car for that respective forums will be with those who actually run the claimed time, not the revised calculated time.
This isn't an attack on you, it sucks you're in high elevation but unless you run the time, you didn't run the time.
BTW you missed some great lulz and awesome Demotivational Posters on you know who. If you wanna see them PM me.
(and the only thing i will say though, is that i tried picking the most credible source for the calculations, then just some random website)and give me a sec, and i will pm you
Last edited by friesm2000; 06-19-2011 at 07:44 PM.
06-19-2011, 07:57 PM
#67
06-19-2011, 08:20 PM
#68
Trolling Canuckistan
I dont think you can really consider thinjims car a cl anymore. The problem is most if not all people havnt had the car setup properly for the best times possible. A car setup with all the suspension stuff to eliminate wheel hop, reduce weight from 3500 to under 3000 lbs, sticky tires etc would make a big difference. Just upping the power wont really improve times much.
06-20-2011, 08:38 AM
#70
Senior Moderator
Regional Coordinator
(Mid-Atlantic)
Regional Coordinator
(Mid-Atlantic)
iTrader: (6)
06-20-2011, 09:47 PM
#74
Three Wheelin'
06-21-2011, 01:10 PM
#77
Three Wheelin'
06-22-2011, 07:53 AM
#80
Three Wheelin'
New that is, if you can find one used in good condition, then its worth the money in my opinion...
Or do a 3.5 swap with bolt-ons and get similar numbers...lol
Or do a 3.5 swap with bolt-ons and get similar numbers...lol