Is it normal for us to keep up with 4.6L Mustang's??
#41
Quicker than U Think
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Jupiter, FL
Age: 55
Posts: 458
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Thanks Montez, someone else already enlightened me. I thought there was a big diff in performance between the auto and stick, it was my uneducated guess.
What Mustang owners are you thinking of? They are the slowest of the 5.0s from 87 up, but they are quite a bit quicker than the 96-98 GTs. I Heck the other night, I almost beat a 96 Cobra at the track, lost by 2 tenths and I had my worst 60' ever(2.4). Oh well, I'll get him next time(oh, his wasn't great at 2.3X either LOL, but I know I can do better).
i think most mustang owners know that the 94-95 are the slowest mustangs made(87-present).
#44
Senior Moderator
Originally posted by 97Snake
Sweet 1/4 mile times in your sig.![Thumbs Up](https://acurazine.com/forums/images/smilies/thumbsup.gif)
The guy with the stang was telling you some serious horse crap. I don't think I could hit 12.8 with Dr's and as you can see from my sig, I have about every bolt on possible.
Sweet 1/4 mile times in your sig.
![Thumbs Up](https://acurazine.com/forums/images/smilies/thumbsup.gif)
The guy with the stang was telling you some serious horse crap. I don't think I could hit 12.8 with Dr's and as you can see from my sig, I have about every bolt on possible.
![Wink](https://acurazine.com/forums/images/smilies/wink.gif)
Anyway, the guy I spoke with has a 99+ GT and I'm guessing his baseline 1/4 mile was already very low 14s. But I don't know the HP gains of a good intake and "gears" on a 99+ GT. (I havent been into domestics since college in the late 1980s and it's very rare when I actually pickup a performance mag that features Stangs.)
Though I'm an import enthusiast, I never doubt the ease with which Mustangs (and GM F-body cars) gain HP with simple mods. Like JTKZ stated, "It's hard to know what a Mustang will run, because it could be a bone stock mid 15 sec car, or a modded 12 sec ride. You won't know till you race usually." And with import cars, 12seconds = forced induction.
Peace.
#45
TQ > MPG
A 99+ GT 5 speed say with 4.10's, exhaust, all the bolt ons and slicks could maybe touch 12's, but not on average. I would say most full bolt-on + gear 99+ 5 speeds run about 102-103mph, which is probably good for low 13's on slicks.
#46
///M POWER
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: West Bloomfield, MI
Age: 39
Posts: 15,299
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
Originally posted by jtkz13
A 99+ GT 5 speed say with 4.10's, exhaust, all the bolt ons and slicks could maybe touch 12's, but not on average. I would say most full bolt-on + gear 99+ 5 speeds run about 102-103mph, which is probably good for low 13's on slicks.
A 99+ GT 5 speed say with 4.10's, exhaust, all the bolt ons and slicks could maybe touch 12's, but not on average. I would say most full bolt-on + gear 99+ 5 speeds run about 102-103mph, which is probably good for low 13's on slicks.
![Frown](https://acurazine.com/forums/images/smilies/frown.gif)
a mustang is like a box of choclates, you never know what your gonna get
![Big Grin](https://acurazine.com/forums/images/smilies/biggrin.gif)
#47
Originally posted by jtkz13
A 99+ GT 5 speed say with 4.10's, exhaust, all the bolt ons and slicks could maybe touch 12's, but not on average. I would say most full bolt-on + gear 99+ 5 speeds run about 102-103mph, which is probably good for low 13's on slicks.
A 99+ GT 5 speed say with 4.10's, exhaust, all the bolt ons and slicks could maybe touch 12's, but not on average. I would say most full bolt-on + gear 99+ 5 speeds run about 102-103mph, which is probably good for low 13's on slicks.
#48
........w/ those gears and mods its very hard to launch on stock tires.... Yeah it is. Last night I came out of a toll booth and brought the car up to about 4500rpms in 2nd and matted it. I got very sideways, to the point where I had to get off the gas.
I agree with darrinb and PullT. but you'd need to be one hell of a driver to to get the 12's. I haven't seen the ET yet on a full bolt on 99+ w/o some major suspension mods but I have seen 104 mph, so the power is there.
I agree with darrinb and PullT. but you'd need to be one hell of a driver to to get the 12's. I haven't seen the ET yet on a full bolt on 99+ w/o some major suspension mods but I have seen 104 mph, so the power is there.
#49
Originally posted by 97Snake
........w/ those gears and mods its very hard to launch on stock tires.... Yeah it is. Last night I came out of a toll booth and brought the car up to about 4500rpms in 2nd and matted it. I got very sideways, to the point where I had to get off the gas.
I agree with darrinb and PullT. but you'd need to be one hell of a driver to to get the 12's. I haven't seen the ET yet on a full bolt on 99+ w/o some major suspension mods but I have seen 104 mph, so the power is there.
........w/ those gears and mods its very hard to launch on stock tires.... Yeah it is. Last night I came out of a toll booth and brought the car up to about 4500rpms in 2nd and matted it. I got very sideways, to the point where I had to get off the gas.
I agree with darrinb and PullT. but you'd need to be one hell of a driver to to get the 12's. I haven't seen the ET yet on a full bolt on 99+ w/o some major suspension mods but I have seen 104 mph, so the power is there.
3.73s
Nitto 275/40 DRs
TriAx Shifter
o/r H
Flowmaster CatBack
Pulleys
another caveat....these were done at Houston Raceway Park, one of the fastest tracks in the country and in exceptionally outstanding weather on a well prepped track. Both days were in the -2000 DA range...early Feb, 40 degrees, 31 pressure, low humidity
#50
Originally posted by Pull_T
The 98s were rated at 225...everything else is spot on.
Assuming both cars are stock, a race between a 94-98 GT and a CLS is dead even in my book. For the 1/4 all are high 14 second cars.
The 98s were rated at 225...everything else is spot on.
Assuming both cars are stock, a race between a 94-98 GT and a CLS is dead even in my book. For the 1/4 all are high 14 second cars.
#52
Originally posted by quikcls
i disagree pull. i've run many a stangs (i'm talkin 87-98) and haven't lost one yet. and most had at least exhaust work done. ofcourse i'm not claiming any wins against any highly modded ones, haven't had a chance to run one yet.
i disagree pull. i've run many a stangs (i'm talkin 87-98) and haven't lost one yet. and most had at least exhaust work done. ofcourse i'm not claiming any wins against any highly modded ones, haven't had a chance to run one yet.
#53
Originally posted by Pull_T
You got plenty of mods though, right?
You got plenty of mods though, right?
#55
I don't know where you guys get the numbers you do...
Originally posted by moforose3.0
The new gt's have 320 horses, I think you may have a problem with them also.
The new gt's have 320 horses, I think you may have a problem with them also.
'03 Mach1 - 302HP/320ft-lb (not exactly sure on this number)
'03 Cobra -- 390HP/390ft-lb torque
(highly underrated by Ford)
#56
maybe...
Originally posted by Pull_T
Doesn;t really jive.
No way he ran a 12.8 on street tires with just gears and intake unless you consider a blower or a nitrous solenoid "intake" mods...
Doesn;t really jive.
No way he ran a 12.8 on street tires with just gears and intake unless you consider a blower or a nitrous solenoid "intake" mods...
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
MrHeeltoe
1G TSX Tires, Wheels, & Suspension
20
02-23-2023 01:54 PM
MrHeeltoe
2G TSX Tires, Wheels & Suspension
3
09-29-2015 10:43 PM
MrHeeltoe
3G TL Tires, Wheels & Suspension
0
09-28-2015 05:43 PM