gas question

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 05-23-2006, 01:47 AM
  #1  
Instructor
Thread Starter
 
pb06's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 107
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
gas question

First, thanks to those who offered suggestions when I posted earlier about a cl I was considering. I did buy it, and am very happy with it.

I did'nt relaize, however, till I went to gas up that I'd just bought a premium gas car. Given prices right now, that can add up fast.

My question is: Is 91 octane really necessary? What would happen I used 89, for ex.?
Old 05-23-2006, 11:49 AM
  #2  
Pro
 
CLsuperhero's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Age: 41
Posts: 576
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Overtime if you use 89 octane you can create pinging in your engine. It's really not good for it and eventually you'll need serious engine work done. Stick with 91 or up. if you go with 89 make sure you always add an octane booster with it.
Old 05-23-2006, 11:54 AM
  #3  
Skillionare
 
Acutron's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: East Side of MI
Age: 42
Posts: 366
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Originally Posted by CLsuperhero
Overtime if you use 89 octane you can create pinging in your engine. It's really not good for it and eventually you'll need serious engine work done. Stick with 91 or up. if you go with 89 make sure you always add an octane booster with it.
Most def'. Even at this high altitude I still run 91.
Old 05-23-2006, 12:17 PM
  #4  
Red/Ebony CLS 6-Spd
iTrader: (1)
 
resedaruss's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Southern NJ
Posts: 86
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
In my 2003 owner's manual it states that they recommend premium gas, but it also states that it will run on regular with slightly reduced performance.

In meetings I have attended with research chemists at ExxonMobil Research, it is common knowledge that most engine designers (including Honda/Acura) provide engine sensors that detune the engine as necessary to accommodate the octane content of the gas.

Thus, the power and efficiency of the engine is slightly impacted--but the engine sensors won't allow destructive pinging--the spark is retarded in real-time, as conditions warrant, before that happens.
Old 05-23-2006, 12:19 PM
  #5  
'08 MX5 GT 6spd.
 
MarbleGT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: The Lone Star State
Posts: 6,234
Received 1,192 Likes on 485 Posts
you probably wouldnt notice much of a change.
Old 05-23-2006, 12:49 PM
  #6  
Senior Moderator
iTrader: (2)
 
fuzzy02CLS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: South FL
Age: 48
Posts: 16,847
Received 223 Likes on 184 Posts
It's been proven on this board running 87 or 89 while it won't hurt the car, will yeild worse gas milage, & the savings over the corse of a year isn't much at all.
Stick with 91+
Old 05-23-2006, 12:50 PM
  #7  
'08 MX5 GT 6spd.
 
MarbleGT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: The Lone Star State
Posts: 6,234
Received 1,192 Likes on 485 Posts
^^ Well said my man.
Old 05-23-2006, 01:25 PM
  #8  
Drifting
 
evilstorm's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Chicago
Age: 42
Posts: 2,503
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
for the ~$130 you spend more per year it isnt worth to find out.
Old 05-23-2006, 03:17 PM
  #9  
I'm here in spirit...
 
Lord Helmet's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: CO
Age: 47
Posts: 7,607
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Acutron
Most def'. Even at this high altitude I still run 91.
Where in high altitude are you located, Acutron?
Old 05-23-2006, 04:33 PM
  #10  
Acura loyal for 93mo/109k
 
CL'er 1st & 2nd Gen's's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Arlington, TX
Posts: 472
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I would think 91 octane is a must for an S-type, since the compression ratio is 10.5:1

pb06 has a regular CL (non S-type) with a lower ratio of 9.8:1 (same as my plain jane). I have run 2 or 3 tanks of 89 with no noticeable difference. But like evilstorm suggested, when you look at the extra cost over the period of a year, I prefer to stick with the premium.

Old 05-24-2006, 01:15 AM
  #11  
Instructor
Thread Starter
 
pb06's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 107
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Great information. Thanks!
Old 05-25-2006, 03:09 PM
  #12  
Skillionare
 
Acutron's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: East Side of MI
Age: 42
Posts: 366
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Originally Posted by Lord Helmet
Where in high altitude are you located, Acutron?
Beautiful Colorado Springs!
Old 05-25-2006, 03:21 PM
  #13  
I'm here in spirit...
 
Lord Helmet's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: CO
Age: 47
Posts: 7,607
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Acutron
Beautiful Colorado Springs!
For some reason I knew you were in CO.
Old 05-25-2006, 03:33 PM
  #14  
CL6
My only car is a Bus
 
CL6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Republik of Kalifornia
Posts: 3,254
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Your engine won't care. Sure, you might get 2 or 3 mpg worse but who cares? I do mostly highway driving and have no problems. Maybe I'm getting 5% less power but seems fine to me. In hot weather or at high altitudes I'd go with the higher octane. 91 is more important for the smaller, higher compression 4 cylinder engines.
Old 05-25-2006, 04:07 PM
  #15  
Three Wheelin'
 
pits200's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Mt. Lebanon
Age: 44
Posts: 1,837
Received 24 Likes on 21 Posts
Think about what you said CL6, you said you might get 2 - 3 MPG less. You take that over 15 gallons and that would equal anywhere from 30-40 miles less per tank. Now 1 gallon of gas cost $3 dollars and will net you about 25 miles on that 1 gallon. So lets do the math..

15 Gallons at 3.00=$45.00 gets you about 300 Miles per tank estimate for 91+ octane

15 Gallons at $2.90=$43.50 gets you about 270 Miles per tank estimate for 89 or 87 octane

So you save $1.50 initially, but your losing 30 miles. High estimate 30 miles = 1 Gallon

and 1 gallon = $2.90... So your actually losing $1.40.
Old 05-25-2006, 06:51 PM
  #16  
CL6
My only car is a Bus
 
CL6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Republik of Kalifornia
Posts: 3,254
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Let's see. 91 is .30 more per gallon than 87 where I live.

Let's say I buy 15 gallons of 91 gas - $4.50 more

Let's say that, over 15 gallons, I get 30 miles less than with 87 (I presently average about 21 mpg) so this is about 1.5 gallons 'lost' per filling. The difference is about .45. However, the difference when I fill-up is $4.50.

So when you subtract the different gas (.45) from my savings (4.50) I come up with a gain of 4.05.

$4.05 x 4 times per month = $16.20 x 12 months = $194.40

$194.40 = 1 month's 'free' gas.

Seems okay to me! (Or did my math go wrong?)
Old 05-25-2006, 07:09 PM
  #17  
Three Wheelin'
 
pits200's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Mt. Lebanon
Age: 44
Posts: 1,837
Received 24 Likes on 21 Posts
I was taking a more reasonable comparison. I have 3 levels in my area, 87 89 91, some places carry 93. Each level is a 10 cent jump in price. I was comparing the 89 to 91, I dont think anyone would recommend dropping all the way to the low quality grade. For a high compression car like ours, using 87 consistantly over time will cause problems in the engine. But honestly, think of it, $194.40 seems like a good chunk of change as a lump sum, but when you stretch it out over savings for 12 months, it is like .50 cents per day. Thats the whole concept of credit cards, paying up front and stretching it out over time.... Oh well, good luck
Old 05-25-2006, 07:16 PM
  #18  
Three Wheelin'
 
pits200's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Mt. Lebanon
Age: 44
Posts: 1,837
Received 24 Likes on 21 Posts
Wait, you didnt do your math right, I was just thinking about it..... I am an idiot...
Ok,
15 gallons at $3 dollars is $45 bucks
15 gallons at $2.70 is $40.50 plus 1.5 extra gas for the loss is $4.05 more = $44.55
So it only saves .45 cents per FILLUP... Now thats the truth
Old 05-25-2006, 08:00 PM
  #19  
CL6
My only car is a Bus
 
CL6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Republik of Kalifornia
Posts: 3,254
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Yeah I re-worked the math. Looks like it's a break even situation. Weird thing is I always used 91 but recently tried 87 and I swear the mileage went up with 87 but now is down. I need to do a few fill ups of each back to back and see what my mileage is. I was an English major anyway.
Old 05-26-2006, 08:37 AM
  #20  
Three Wheelin'
 
pits200's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Mt. Lebanon
Age: 44
Posts: 1,837
Received 24 Likes on 21 Posts
Its all good, just wanted people to realize that they arent saving much money by going with lower grade gas...
Old 05-26-2006, 01:38 PM
  #21  
Drifting
 
evilstorm's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Chicago
Age: 42
Posts: 2,503
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by pits200
Its all good, just wanted people to realize that they arent saving much money by going with lower grade gas...
and since we drive an acura, i would hope that we can all afford the extra $150 a year
Old 05-26-2006, 03:42 PM
  #22  
Instructor
 
mefromuic's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Chicago, IL
Age: 44
Posts: 116
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Acutron
Most def'. Even at this high altitude I still run 91.
What's the science behind that? Higher altitude, cleaner air? Higher altitude also means less air density which means less oxygen to the car which means less performance.
Old 05-26-2006, 03:57 PM
  #23  
I'm here in spirit...
 
Lord Helmet's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: CO
Age: 47
Posts: 7,607
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by mefromuic
What's the science behind that? Higher altitude, cleaner air? Higher altitude also means less air density which means less oxygen to the car which means less performance.
Maybe someone else can chime in on this to give more info regarding the power loss. All I know is that in high altitude, some cars tend to get better fuel milage. Example: my mom used to have an Eclipse about 10 yrs ago when they moved to CO from FL. once they brought the car out here, it got about 3 more miles to teh gallon. I wonder myself how that works out.

Anyone have the answer?
Old 05-26-2006, 04:08 PM
  #24  
Instructor
 
mefromuic's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Chicago, IL
Age: 44
Posts: 116
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Someone posted this calculation before but I couldnt find the post to repost it. The point of wanting to use regular fuel instead of premium is to save money but the math shows that it isnt worth the lack in performance (and probably gas mileage) plus the extra wear on engine due to dirt and knock.

An average person drives around 15,000 miles per year. Lets also assume your car on average gets 22 mpg. Divding 15,000 miles by 22 mpg gives your the amount in gallons of fuel you use per year. Which is 682 gallons. Using these current fuel costs, your savings per year would be:

Premium: $3.19 x 682 = $2176
Middle: $3.09 x 682 = $2107
Regular: $2.99 x 682 = $2039

So if you use regular instead of premium you would save about $137 per year. However middle grade fuel at most gas stations is already 91 octane (which is the min the manual recommends) so if you compare it to that you only save $68 per year. If you figure that you will lose mileage becuase of using the regular fuel, that pretty much offsets it's savings. Not to mention regular fuel are dirtier and will build up on your spark plugs and other components further lowering your performance. Octane becomes an even bigger issue at higher rpms. So if you plan on driving like a grandma, you should have gotten a TL! haha, jk.

Also note that if you drive less than 15,000 miles per year and/or get better than 22 mpg, your savings would be even less!

For me, i worry more about the mpg I get on the CL and what i can do to improve it. I've heard mods actually help the mpg. I'm still doing research.
Old 05-26-2006, 04:21 PM
  #25  
Instructor
 
mefromuic's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Chicago, IL
Age: 44
Posts: 116
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Woops, I only read the first 6 or so posts before reposting.
Old 05-26-2006, 11:51 PM
  #26  
Acura loyal for 93mo/109k
 
CL'er 1st & 2nd Gen's's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Arlington, TX
Posts: 472
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Lord Helmet
Maybe someone else can chime in on this to give more info regarding the power loss. All I know is that in high altitude, some cars tend to get better fuel milage.
Anyone have the answer?
Thinner air = less wind resistance?



With altitude, air density decreases. The computer controlled fuel injection system will automatically decrease the fuel in the mixture to match the air density. You will find that horsepower will decrease, but mileage will actually increase.
Old 05-27-2006, 08:42 AM
  #27  
Skillionare
 
Acutron's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: East Side of MI
Age: 42
Posts: 366
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Originally Posted by Lord Helmet
Example: my mom used to have an Eclipse about 10 yrs ago when they moved to CO from FL. once they brought the car out here, it got about 3 more miles to teh gallon. I wonder myself how that works out.
You out here too Helmet?
Old 05-27-2006, 01:04 PM
  #28  
Instructor
 
mefromuic's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Chicago, IL
Age: 44
Posts: 116
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by CL'er 1st & 2nd Gen's
Thinner air = less wind resistance?



With altitude, air density decreases. The computer controlled fuel injection system will automatically decrease the fuel in the mixture to match the air density. You will find that horsepower will decrease, but mileage will actually increase.
Is there a way to control the computer controlled fuel injection system to get better mileage? I'm willing to give up some hp for some mileage.
Old 05-27-2006, 10:48 PM
  #29  
Acura loyal for 93mo/109k
 
CL'er 1st & 2nd Gen's's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Arlington, TX
Posts: 472
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I think you'd have to chip for that. There have many discussions about chipping, though I never heard of anyone getting a chip to de-tune their car.

Try a search. There are alot of threads. Here's one to get you started.
https://acurazine.com/forums/showthread.php?t=177752
Old 05-28-2006, 11:13 PM
  #30  
I'm here in spirit...
 
Lord Helmet's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: CO
Age: 47
Posts: 7,607
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Acutron
You out here too Helmet?
Castle Rock to be exact. I'm in the Springs on most weekends though. Got some friends down there.
Old 05-30-2006, 02:07 PM
  #31  
Skillionare
 
Acutron's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: East Side of MI
Age: 42
Posts: 366
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Originally Posted by Lord Helmet
Castle Rock to be exact. I'm in the Springs on most weekends though. Got some friends down there.
No Doubt!
Old 05-30-2006, 10:06 PM
  #32  
Balla on a Budget
 
ktgumbo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: San Jose, Cali
Posts: 1,330
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Its only $3 more per tank. DONT BE CHEAP
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
OculiAquilae
3G TL (2004-2008)
62
11-19-2018 02:24 PM
SpraykwoN
ILX
6
09-24-2015 05:20 PM
datadr
5G TLX (2015-2020)
6
09-12-2015 09:12 PM
MyGuti
3G TL (2004-2008)
7
09-12-2015 06:52 PM
ninersfgiantsfan
1G TSX (2004-2008)
1
09-09-2015 01:14 PM



Quick Reply: gas question



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:26 PM.