CL TypeS 300+ HP With Mods?
Originally posted by Ken Schwartz
Wow, they're sure alot of differences of opinion in this thread. Any common denominators?
Wow, they're sure alot of differences of opinion in this thread. Any common denominators?
What typeR said above, which was the opposite of my examples... could happen!!
I've seen dynos where the headers got 28hp at the wheel, but the intake only about 2 or 3..... but I've also seen dynos where people got MORE then advertised!! The general rule is that you cannot add mod gains together, but there are always exceptions to the rule......
Ok as for the EVO exhaust system "does" it give us CLSers 10 hp, or what? I can remember last year that the norm for an aftermarket exhaust was about 4 horses, but I guess things have changed. Also if it does give the engine an aditional 10 hp is that to the crank or to the wheels?
And about the Jet chip what are the results? how much of a hp gain? And is it to the wheels or to the crank? Also at how much of a sacrifice, gas milage?
Tnx
Juker008
And about the Jet chip what are the results? how much of a hp gain? And is it to the wheels or to the crank? Also at how much of a sacrifice, gas milage?
Tnx
Juker008
Originally posted by mistacanyon
True. Also, stock, that car had a peak 208 HP, which I have yet to see.
True. Also, stock, that car had a peak 208 HP, which I have yet to see.
Somebody here dynoed it at 6hp to the wheels. I think it was blxmjx.
spiro
spiro
Originally posted by Juker008
Ok as for the EVO exhaust system "does" it give us CLSers 10 hp, or what? I can remember last year that the norm for an aftermarket exhaust was about 4 horses, but I guess things have changed. Also if it does give the engine an aditional 10 hp is that to the crank or to the wheels?
And about the Jet chip what are the results? how much of a hp gain? And is it to the wheels or to the crank? Also at how much of a sacrifice, gas milage?
Tnx
Juker008
Ok as for the EVO exhaust system "does" it give us CLSers 10 hp, or what? I can remember last year that the norm for an aftermarket exhaust was about 4 horses, but I guess things have changed. Also if it does give the engine an aditional 10 hp is that to the crank or to the wheels?
And about the Jet chip what are the results? how much of a hp gain? And is it to the wheels or to the crank? Also at how much of a sacrifice, gas milage?
Tnx
Juker008
Originally posted by typeR
jet chip has no "proven " gain and exhausts well comp is supposedly 3-4 but someone bought the mugen and got 13 top to bottom if i remember...
jet chip has no "proven " gain and exhausts well comp is supposedly 3-4 but someone bought the mugen and got 13 top to bottom if i remember...
Juker008
Ok, people are obviously confused about peak horsepower
gains and max horsepower gains.
Peak Horsepower gains is what this thread is talking about.
On a stock TLS, our peak hp at the crank should be 260 @
6100 RPMs. Now you have to put RPMs into the equation.
Peak HP is always the highest HP in the power band.
Max Horsepower gains is what companies advertise.
It's simply the largest gain in HP regardless of where in the
power band it is. It is NOT necessarily the same as Peak HP.
A mod may advertise it gains 20 hp. But if that 20 HP is all
at 3000 RPMs and adds 0 hp at 6100 rpms... then your
peak HP is still 260.
That is why mods are not cumulative, because the advertised
hp gains are not all at the same RPM. People not only need to
ask if the gain is at the wheels or crank... but also what RPM.
And people need to work on their math. Math ownz you.
240 whp with a 23% loss is 311.68 at the crank not 307.69.
whp / (100 - percent loss as whole number) * 100.
gains and max horsepower gains.
Peak Horsepower gains is what this thread is talking about.
On a stock TLS, our peak hp at the crank should be 260 @
6100 RPMs. Now you have to put RPMs into the equation.
Peak HP is always the highest HP in the power band.
Max Horsepower gains is what companies advertise.
It's simply the largest gain in HP regardless of where in the
power band it is. It is NOT necessarily the same as Peak HP.
A mod may advertise it gains 20 hp. But if that 20 HP is all
at 3000 RPMs and adds 0 hp at 6100 rpms... then your
peak HP is still 260.
That is why mods are not cumulative, because the advertised
hp gains are not all at the same RPM. People not only need to
ask if the gain is at the wheels or crank... but also what RPM.
And people need to work on their math. Math ownz you.

240 whp with a 23% loss is 311.68 at the crank not 307.69.
whp / (100 - percent loss as whole number) * 100.
When I dynoed the Mugen, I received 3HP/3TQ throughout the whole power band. The 6hp was from the EVO exhaust.
Originally posted by Juker008
Eh Migalea,
Is the 6 to the wheels from the Jet chip or the EVO exhaust?
Juker008
Eh Migalea,
Is the 6 to the wheels from the Jet chip or the EVO exhaust?
Juker008
Originally posted by Closer
Ok, people are obviously confused about peak horsepower
gains and max horsepower gains.
Peak Horsepower gains is what this thread is talking about.
On a stock TLS, our peak hp at the crank should be 260 @
6100 RPMs. Now you have to put RPMs into the equation.
Peak HP is always the highest HP in the power band.
Max Horsepower gains is what companies advertise.
It's simply the largest gain in HP regardless of where in the
power band it is. It is NOT necessarily the same as Peak HP.
A mod may advertise it gains 20 hp. But if that 20 HP is all
at 3000 RPMs and adds 0 hp at 6100 rpms... then your
peak HP is still 260.
That is why mods are not cumulative, because the advertised
hp gains are not all at the same RPM. People not only need to
ask if the gain is at the wheels or crank... but also what RPM.
And people need to work on their math. Math ownz you.
240 whp with a 23% loss is 311.68 at the crank not 307.69.
whp / (100 - percent loss as whole number) * 100.
Ok, people are obviously confused about peak horsepower
gains and max horsepower gains.
Peak Horsepower gains is what this thread is talking about.
On a stock TLS, our peak hp at the crank should be 260 @
6100 RPMs. Now you have to put RPMs into the equation.
Peak HP is always the highest HP in the power band.
Max Horsepower gains is what companies advertise.
It's simply the largest gain in HP regardless of where in the
power band it is. It is NOT necessarily the same as Peak HP.
A mod may advertise it gains 20 hp. But if that 20 HP is all
at 3000 RPMs and adds 0 hp at 6100 rpms... then your
peak HP is still 260.
That is why mods are not cumulative, because the advertised
hp gains are not all at the same RPM. People not only need to
ask if the gain is at the wheels or crank... but also what RPM.
And people need to work on their math. Math ownz you.

240 whp with a 23% loss is 311.68 at the crank not 307.69.
whp / (100 - percent loss as whole number) * 100.
Originally posted by spiroh
When I dynoed the Mugen, I received 3HP/3TQ throughout the whole power band. The 6hp was from the EVO exhaust.
When I dynoed the Mugen, I received 3HP/3TQ throughout the whole power band. The 6hp was from the EVO exhaust.
So would u agree that the EVO is the best performing exhaust out there for our cars?
Juker008
Originally posted by Closer
....
And people need to work on their math. Math ownz you.
240 whp with a 23% loss is 311.68 at the crank not 307.69.
whp / (100 - percent loss as whole number) * 100.
....
And people need to work on their math. Math ownz you.

240 whp with a 23% loss is 311.68 at the crank not 307.69.
whp / (100 - percent loss as whole number) * 100.

You get the formula messed up !
Let us see
Crank HP = Wheel HP / [ ( 100 - % loss as whole number ) ] / 100]
So with:
WHP = 240
% loss = 23%
Crank HP = 240 / [(100 - 23) / 100] = 240 / 0.78 = 307.69
Double check, 78 % of 307.69 BHP gets to the wheels = 240 WHP
Get it....!!
If someone verifies that it was the EVO that was dynoed. Yes.
Originally posted by Juker008
Cool Tnx
So would u agree that the EVO is the best performing exhaust out there for our cars?
Juker008
Cool Tnx
So would u agree that the EVO is the best performing exhaust out there for our cars?
Juker008
Originally posted by Nashua_Night_Hawk
I own your Mathz Kid... Check your numbers...
You get the formula messed up !
Let us see
Crank HP = Wheel HP / [ ( 100 - % loss as whole number ) ] / 100]
So with:
WHP = 240
% loss = 23%
Crank HP = 240 / [(100 - 23) / 100] = 240 / 0.78 = 307.69
Double check, 78 % of 307.69 BHP gets to the wheels = 240 WHP
Get it....!!
I own your Mathz Kid... Check your numbers...

You get the formula messed up !
Let us see
Crank HP = Wheel HP / [ ( 100 - % loss as whole number ) ] / 100]
So with:
WHP = 240
% loss = 23%
Crank HP = 240 / [(100 - 23) / 100] = 240 / 0.78 = 307.69
Double check, 78 % of 307.69 BHP gets to the wheels = 240 WHP
Get it....!!
100 - 23 = 77 (not 78)...
so, 240/0.77 = 311.69
and
311.69 * 0.77 = 240.0013
Details....
I am basing my 78% to the wheels base on the average of stock dyno showing: 200-205 WHP.. so the loss is 23% down to 21.15% I picked the average of 22%.
If you go by 23% loss.. you get your 311.69HP if you pick 22% then you get 307.69 HP
Still 22% is a lot of loss! almost 67.69 HP are gone!
If you go by 23% loss.. you get your 311.69HP if you pick 22% then you get 307.69 HP
Still 22% is a lot of loss! almost 67.69 HP are gone!
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
BOOSTED6IX-S
Member Cars for Sale
2
Feb 22, 2016 01:53 PM
BlkTxAcuraTypeS
Member Cars for Sale
3
Oct 18, 2015 08:05 PM
sockr1
Car Parts for Sale
22
Oct 1, 2015 01:31 AM



