CL-S vs Jaguar 3.0 AWD... SMOKED
#1
Burning Brakes
Thread Starter
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: SoCal
Posts: 934
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
CL-S vs Jaguar 3.0 AWD... SMOKED
i was in the valley leaving school a couple of weeks ago and this punk rock looking dude is driving all crazy next to me in a brand new jag with his ugly ass girlfreind next to him, so we pull up ot the next lights and he sweeps over bc i ws behind him so i can get in the next lane,..... long story short... light goes green... he hangs with me first gear,,.,,,then hes yesterdays news after that... awwww
how great that feels......
how great that feels......
#4
i like orange juice
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: San Anto, Tejas
Age: 39
Posts: 7,277
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Dem1K
which 3.0 are we talking here? the X-Type or the S-Type? By the sounds of it, I'm gonna have to say the S-Type
#6
Burning Brakes
Thread Starter
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: SoCal
Posts: 934
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
dem im not kiddding... honestly thats what i read on it but it had 20's so that must of been it.. har har har.. i was actually on tampa, you know that light a little before you get one the 118, it goes a little uphill... it was there.. i do have exhaust maybe that helped and i was alone also...
Trending Topics
#8
Blown LS6!!
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Bellevue, WA
Age: 51
Posts: 1,993
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Dem1K
well then this story doesn't make much sense...the 3.0 X-Type is basically as fast as our car stock (Their stick vs our auto)...eh, I'll give you the benefit of the doubt good race
You're way off...
Car-Stats.com Report for 2002 Jaguar X-Type 3.0
Obtained from C&D February, 2002
0-60: 7.2 Transmission: Manual
1/4 Mile: 15.5
1/4 Speed: 89
#9
Blown LS6!!
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Bellevue, WA
Age: 51
Posts: 1,993
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Actually, here's another - so I guess you were right...
Car-Stats.com Report for 2002 Jaguar X-Type
Obtained from C&D June, 2001
0-60: 6.3 Transmission: Manual
1/4 Mile: 14.9
1/4 Speed: 92
Car-Stats.com Report for 2002 Jaguar X-Type
Obtained from C&D June, 2001
0-60: 6.3 Transmission: Manual
1/4 Mile: 14.9
1/4 Speed: 92
#12
i like orange juice
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: San Anto, Tejas
Age: 39
Posts: 7,277
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by jlspeed29
liloj.. what does "meh" mean..... is it kinda like a shrug?
<---i love jags...so hencing the AWD i knew it was a 3.0 x-type....the v8 s-type is easy 14s...and once you get into an "r" i test drove one..your looking at high 13s
but hey..a kill is a kill
#15
i like orange juice
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: San Anto, Tejas
Age: 39
Posts: 7,277
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by HellaShookOne
a true s type would smoke your ass. I cant imagine what the supercharged is like. I have driven the s type and it has mad power
#16
Neighborhood Superstar
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Lexington, KY
Age: 40
Posts: 19
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by HellaShookOne
a true s type would smoke your ass. I cant imagine what the supercharged is like. I have driven the s type and it has mad power
#18
Dipset All Day, Everyday
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: St. Paul, MN
Age: 41
Posts: 981
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by GMhomerun
Hmm...well, I raced an S-type 4.0 that sounded like it may have had cold air from a dig and I won by about a car and a half and was still pulling on him when I let off. The guy who was driving it was pretty young and headed to a strip club. How do I know he was headed to a strip club? Well, I beat him there. Just my two cents.
ur =
im sorry but I am going to have to call bullshit on that one.
There is no way in the world that you would beat a true S type with your CL. I have raced right next to my mom and she owned me in her S-Type and its the non-supercharged one. Its pushing almost 300 hpz and rox a v-8, with 303 lbz. o torque slammin' out the RWD. Maybe it was an X-Type and you thought it was S-type. But you would get flat out owned. Maybe the driver was on crack
#19
Pit Stop?
Originally Posted by HellaShookOne
ur =
im sorry but I am going to have to call bullshit on that one.
There is no way in the world that you would beat a true S type with your CL. I have raced right next to my mom and she owned me in her S-Type and its the non-supercharged one. Its pushing almost 300 hpz and rox a v-8, with 303 lbz. o torque slammin' out the RWD. Maybe it was an X-Type and you thought it was S-type. But you would get flat out owned. Maybe the driver was on crack
im sorry but I am going to have to call bullshit on that one.
There is no way in the world that you would beat a true S type with your CL. I have raced right next to my mom and she owned me in her S-Type and its the non-supercharged one. Its pushing almost 300 hpz and rox a v-8, with 303 lbz. o torque slammin' out the RWD. Maybe it was an X-Type and you thought it was S-type. But you would get flat out owned. Maybe the driver was on crack
Maybe you're on crack?
#20
Got a Job!
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: NYC (NoLita)
Age: 39
Posts: 4,343
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Minch00
You do realize the S-type is available with the 3.0 V6 yes? I'm not sure why you're saying "true" S-type, a car is a car not dependant on the engine inside. It doesn't matter how much "hpz" it has or what it "rox"
Maybe you're on crack?
Maybe you're on crack?
#22
i like orange juice
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: San Anto, Tejas
Age: 39
Posts: 7,277
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
how did this go from x-types to s-type?
btw, stock s-type(4.0) are low 14s, so a CLS and stype would be close
the v6 on the other hand are mid 15s, thats an easy kill
btw, stock s-type(4.0) are low 14s, so a CLS and stype would be close
the v6 on the other hand are mid 15s, thats an easy kill
#23
Dipset All Day, Everyday
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: St. Paul, MN
Age: 41
Posts: 981
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Minch00
You do realize the S-type is available with the 3.0 V6 yes? I'm not sure why you're saying "true" S-type, a car is a car not dependant on the engine inside. It doesn't matter how much "hpz" it has or what it "rox"
Maybe you're on crack?
Maybe you're on crack?
No shit. Thanx for the big update that an S-Type comes with a v-6.
I say true s-type cause it is way more baller than the CL and because that is the only engine size in a jag worth getting. It was a play on words that I think you took a little too seriously. And you are the one smoking crack if you think that "hpz" don't make a difference, especially in a RWD car. As far as my spelling, Ill spell however the 'FUX' I wanna spell. You dont need to be a dick.
Why would you drop that much on a car and not get the v-8?
Anyways, if you wanna test your theory then someone in the Twin Cities can race me . Ill borrow the Jag and well see which one is "the true s-type"
Any takerz?
#26
i like orange juice
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: San Anto, Tejas
Age: 39
Posts: 7,277
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by HellaShookOne
Why would you drop that much on a car and not get the v-8?
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
RSpyder
Car Parts for Sale
5
09-30-2015 12:46 AM