CL-S 6MT v. 03+ Accord V6 6MT, thoughts?
#1
Intermediate
Thread Starter
CL-S 6MT v. 03+ Accord V6 6MT, thoughts?
Well, in my almost 6 month search for a clean CL-S 6MT I have driven quite a few..unfortunately all of them had been in serious, though repaired, wrecks
Though fantastic cars aside from the obvious damage/repair work. Anyway, you might have seen my post above about the one I am thinking about getting out of Michigan...which I am kind of excited about because it shows promise for no cover ups and relatively lower miles.
Anyway, it's been a long time searching for a decent CL-S 6MT and, in the rare case I can't actually find one the runner up for me is the 03+ Accord V6 Coupe 6MT. While not as attractive in some ways they seemed to be a blast to drive...I got to drive one a few days ago, which I was prepared to be unimpressed with, but ended up having so much fun. The only problem, again, BONDO everywhere on the car, 3rd gear synchro GONE, so I had to kind of avoid 3rd gear. Didn't seem modded in anyway, no intake, no headers, but it pulled pretty hard through the entire RPM range. Anyway, just wanted to get some opinions from others that may have driven both, as, right away the Accord did seem noticeably quicker...now faster isn't everything, but, J30A5 v. J32a2, I always thought the J32a2 having so much more torque and a little more hp would seem quicker...then again most of the CL-S's I've driven had massive valve train noise, whereas the Accord I drove was super quiet, so maybe the J32a2 was losing power there.
Anyway opinions, thoughts, all welcome
![Frown](https://acurazine.com/forums/images/smilies/frown.gif)
Anyway, it's been a long time searching for a decent CL-S 6MT and, in the rare case I can't actually find one the runner up for me is the 03+ Accord V6 Coupe 6MT. While not as attractive in some ways they seemed to be a blast to drive...I got to drive one a few days ago, which I was prepared to be unimpressed with, but ended up having so much fun. The only problem, again, BONDO everywhere on the car, 3rd gear synchro GONE, so I had to kind of avoid 3rd gear. Didn't seem modded in anyway, no intake, no headers, but it pulled pretty hard through the entire RPM range. Anyway, just wanted to get some opinions from others that may have driven both, as, right away the Accord did seem noticeably quicker...now faster isn't everything, but, J30A5 v. J32a2, I always thought the J32a2 having so much more torque and a little more hp would seem quicker...then again most of the CL-S's I've driven had massive valve train noise, whereas the Accord I drove was super quiet, so maybe the J32a2 was losing power there.
Anyway opinions, thoughts, all welcome
![Smile](https://acurazine.com/forums/images/smilies/smile.gif)
#2
Former 6 speed crew
Take a look at mine. I have some local interest.
https://acurazine.com/forums/member-cars-sale-49/2003-cl-type-s-6-speed-ssm-stock-great-condition-lower-bucks-county-pa-843268/
Let me know if you have any questions.
I've been traveling a lot recently, so I currently do not have any interior pics. I will have some early next week but I can assure you the interior is perfect!
https://acurazine.com/forums/member-cars-sale-49/2003-cl-type-s-6-speed-ssm-stock-great-condition-lower-bucks-county-pa-843268/
Let me know if you have any questions.
I've been traveling a lot recently, so I currently do not have any interior pics. I will have some early next week but I can assure you the interior is perfect!
#3
Burning Brakes
Take a look at mine. I have some local interest.
https://acurazine.com/forums/showthread.php?t=843268
Let me know if you have any questions.
I've been traveling a lot recently, so I currently do not have any interior pics. I will have some early next week but I can assure you the interior is perfect!
https://acurazine.com/forums/showthread.php?t=843268
Let me know if you have any questions.
I've been traveling a lot recently, so I currently do not have any interior pics. I will have some early next week but I can assure you the interior is perfect!
#5
Registered Member
indeed! i paid $10K two years ago and it only had 62K miles. James, anything over 9500 is simply too much!!
To the OP, I have a friend here in Austin, drives a White 6 speed with parch interior, about 90k miles. I think he is looking to sell and his price will be fair. If interested, let me know and I'll have him reach out to you.
To the OP, I have a friend here in Austin, drives a White 6 speed with parch interior, about 90k miles. I think he is looking to sell and his price will be fair. If interested, let me know and I'll have him reach out to you.
#6
Whats up with RDX owners?
iTrader: (9)
Honestly, I like the 7th gen Accord interior more then the CL. The Accords also hold their value more then the CL.
Trending Topics
#8
Whats up with RDX owners?
iTrader: (9)
It could work out that way.
Lets look at it from another view -
The CL requires 91 octane or better. The Accord runs on regular. With gas hovering around $4 a gallon, the difference adds up over the course of ownership.
Lets look at it from another view -
The CL requires 91 octane or better. The Accord runs on regular. With gas hovering around $4 a gallon, the difference adds up over the course of ownership.
#10
Instructor
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Birmingham, Al
Age: 42
Posts: 228
Likes: 0
Received 21 Likes
on
11 Posts
The accords hold their value better which is weird IMO, so they cost more to purchase. I didn't like them any better than the CL...in a lot of ways I liked it less. Glad I went with the CL over the Accord.
#11
2003 Accord Coupe V6
iTrader: (2)
Both are great cars, but personally I would go with the accord. It is the better vehicle all around. it rides on a newer platform(shares the 04-08 TL Platform). The CL-S rides on the 6th gen accord platform. Don't get me wrong, I wouldn't hesitate to own a CL-S 6MT as it is a great car. Also the Accord 6MT is more plentiful and should be easier to locate one with lower mileage that has been properly maintained. Good luck!
03-05 Accord J30A4 - Wards 10 Best engines!
06-07 Accord J30A5
03-05 Accord J30A4 - Wards 10 Best engines!
06-07 Accord J30A5
The following users liked this post:
civicdrivr (02-23-2012)
The following users liked this post:
AustinTaper (02-23-2012)
#13
shifting at 7k
iTrader: (4)
They're about even I'd say, I'd probably give the slight nod to the CL. Looks are subjective, and as mentioned above the CLS6 is much rarer. The 7th gen Accord coupe has become somewhat of a chick car too just like the TSX has always been. Here are the #'s:
CLS6
J32A2 (260hp, 232 lb-ft torque)
6-Speed Tranny (with LSD)
Weight: 3500 lbs
V6 Accord 6MT
J30A4 (240hp, 212 lb-ft torque) / J30A5 (244hp, 211 lb-ft torque)
6-Speed Tranny (without LSD)
Weight: 3100+ lbs
So the CL obviously weights more, but has the power to overcome the difference. Yeah..I'd go with the CL.
CLS6
J32A2 (260hp, 232 lb-ft torque)
6-Speed Tranny (with LSD)
Weight: 3500 lbs
V6 Accord 6MT
J30A4 (240hp, 212 lb-ft torque) / J30A5 (244hp, 211 lb-ft torque)
6-Speed Tranny (without LSD)
Weight: 3100+ lbs
So the CL obviously weights more, but has the power to overcome the difference. Yeah..I'd go with the CL.
#14
Senior Moderator
They're about even I'd say, I'd probably give the slight nod to the CL. Looks are subjective, and as mentioned above the CLS6 is much rarer. The 7th gen Accord coupe has become somewhat of a chick car too just like the TSX has always been. Here are the #'s:
CLS6
J32A2 (260hp, 232 lb-ft torque)
6-Speed Tranny (with LSD)
Weight: 3500 lbs
V6 Accord 6MT
J30A4 (240hp, 212 lb-ft torque) / J30A5 (244hp, 211 lb-ft torque)
6-Speed Tranny (without LSD)
Weight: 3100+ lbs
So the CL obviously weights more, but has the power to overcome the difference. Yeah..I'd go with the CL.
CLS6
J32A2 (260hp, 232 lb-ft torque)
6-Speed Tranny (with LSD)
Weight: 3500 lbs
V6 Accord 6MT
J30A4 (240hp, 212 lb-ft torque) / J30A5 (244hp, 211 lb-ft torque)
6-Speed Tranny (without LSD)
Weight: 3100+ lbs
So the CL obviously weights more, but has the power to overcome the difference. Yeah..I'd go with the CL.
hopefully the new legend will come in a coupe version too
#15
Whats up with RDX owners?
iTrader: (9)
Pros for CL
-Factory LSD
-Rarity
-Factory HIDs
-Seats are a bit more comfortable
-Slightly larger displacement
Pros for Accord
-More modern interior
-More modern navigation (if equipped)
-More aftermarket exterior support
-Lighter by about 200lbs
-Runs on 87 octane
-06-08 Sedan available with V6 and 6MT
-Factory LSD
-Rarity
-Factory HIDs
-Seats are a bit more comfortable
-Slightly larger displacement
Pros for Accord
-More modern interior
-More modern navigation (if equipped)
-More aftermarket exterior support
-Lighter by about 200lbs
-Runs on 87 octane
-06-08 Sedan available with V6 and 6MT
#17
Whats up with RDX owners?
iTrader: (9)
3G TL LSD fits, so does the CL LSD.
#18
Suzuka Master
iTrader: (1)
#19
Senior Moderator
#20
Whats up with RDX owners?
iTrader: (9)
Im running an '06 TL tranny on mine with the crank sensor retro'd in. Been that way for about 7k miles with no issues.
The following users liked this post:
zeta (02-23-2012)
#22
Suzuka Master
iTrader: (1)
![Thumbs Up](https://acurazine.com/forums/images/smilies/thumbsup.gif)
So, I know from your build thread that NVA-AV6 recommended that the '05+ TL 6MT was preferable over the '04 TL-6 because of the potential 3rd/4th syncro set issue with them.
Also, it sounds like the '06 TL tranny you have has the boss(s) that is needed to retro the crank sensor over from the CL bell housing.
I'm inquiring because I have a feeling my driver side diff. bearing is on its way out after 130K. It has the 'play' that NVA-AV6 speaks of in your 'build' thread on page 43.
![Why Me](https://acurazine.com/forums/images/smilies/whyme.gif)
![ugh](https://acurazine.com/forums/images/smilies/ugh.gif)
Thanks again.
/threadjack
#23
Whats up with RDX owners?
iTrader: (9)
Yea, they fixed the synchro issue in the '06. They is no boss per se, he just machined out the area that the crank sensor mounts using a jig he built.
#24
Intermediate
Thread Starter
Thanks for the opinions all you you. Yeah, as far the interior goes, I like the the CL, far better, I HATED the interior and almost the exterior too, of the Accord. You have to understand, I am coming from owning, and I still own, a 95 Legend Coupe LS 6MT, everything is PERFECT in that car, placement of everything is natural, has, looks, class and style, I just want to get something not so rare (as in something with a J series motor and the new 6 speed trans...as Legend 6MT parts are hard to find AND super expensive). I've owned a 98 Accord V6 Coupe before, actually 7 years (longest time owning a vehicle), so I am familiar with it's chassis...I like that the CL still feels late 90's to me, interiors have got so clumsy, and ugly since then (maybe it's just me).
On the contrary to what someone had mentioned...most Accords are TRASHED at this age, CL's not so much...salvaged, yeah, probably more salvaged CL's (because people probably figured they were worth salvaging). Accords seem to almost always be completely modded out and NOT done well, which bugs the hell out of me.
Anyway, I am on the lookout for a black/tan or Anthracite Metallic/black CL-S, that's why is been so difficult I suppose, I really don't like any of the other colors. I was like that with the Legend too. To be honest, IF I every had the money, I would buy a 98 Accord V6 again and swap a J35/6MT into it...IMO, that Accord had the best style ever. But yeah, Black/tan CL-S 6MT or Anthracite/black...someday
On the contrary to what someone had mentioned...most Accords are TRASHED at this age, CL's not so much...salvaged, yeah, probably more salvaged CL's (because people probably figured they were worth salvaging). Accords seem to almost always be completely modded out and NOT done well, which bugs the hell out of me.
Anyway, I am on the lookout for a black/tan or Anthracite Metallic/black CL-S, that's why is been so difficult I suppose, I really don't like any of the other colors. I was like that with the Legend too. To be honest, IF I every had the money, I would buy a 98 Accord V6 again and swap a J35/6MT into it...IMO, that Accord had the best style ever. But yeah, Black/tan CL-S 6MT or Anthracite/black...someday
![Smile](https://acurazine.com/forums/images/smilies/smile.gif)
#25
Whats up with RDX owners?
iTrader: (9)
6G Accord Sedan FTW
Id try to find an anthracite CL. Everyone (myself included) has black.
Id try to find an anthracite CL. Everyone (myself included) has black.
#26
Suzuka Master
iTrader: (8)
http://www.j32a.com/showthread.php?t=5
The following users liked this post:
zeta (02-24-2012)
#27
Whats up with RDX owners?
iTrader: (9)
Yep, forgot to mention that. Just weld a bolt in the hole on the other side of that arm.
#28
I'm not trying to be smart but why are you guys saying the cl can't run on regular? I've put it in my car numerous times a lot actually. Once I started to do some bolt ons I stopped. Now I only run 93 premium. It's not like the car can't run on regular thou lol. My bro has been running regular in my old 02 cl-p for almost the last year without any problems but his car is stock.
The following 2 users liked this post by gnuts:
civicdrivr (02-24-2012),
clpassenubye (02-24-2012)
#30
I'm not trying to be smart but why are you guys saying the cl can't run on regular? I've put it in my car numerous times a lot actually. Once I started to do some bolt ons I stopped. Now I only run 93 premium. It's not like the car can't run on regular thou lol. My bro has been running regular in my old 02 cl-p for almost the last year without any problems but his car is stock.
The following 2 users liked this post by brian6speed:
azeezp13 (02-24-2012),
civicdrivr (02-24-2012)
#31
Whats up with RDX owners?
iTrader: (9)
Check the general CL forum for a thread regarding hesitation. All the answers are in there.
#32
Intermediate
Thread Starter
The CL can run on regular, but was designed to use premium fuel. Depending on the burn conditions the engine computer will retard ignition timing to prevent detonation and such...however it's NOT perfect, so you could have detonation happen for very short periods of time, say on a hot day, pushing the car hard on 87. Though mainly, the timing will remain retarded and gas mileage and performance will suffer because of it, whereas the Accord will do fine with either.
#33
Instructor
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Birmingham, Al
Age: 42
Posts: 228
Likes: 0
Received 21 Likes
on
11 Posts
Drivetrain is what sold me on the CL. Love the diff and I wanted as much power as I could get and still have great fuel economy. With the intake and headers, the car is a lot of fun.
The following users liked this post:
civicdrivr (02-25-2012)
#35
Banned
This is exactly why the accord would be harder to sell per your points. The CL-S is rare so it will sell fast and at a higher value than the Accord. It's fast, fuel efficient, nice luxuries & It's comfortable on the highway. Back in 03 I traded my 00 s2k on a new 03 CL-S6. I'd drive from Wilmington, NC to Atlanta to train w/ Delta Airlines. I'd make the 420mile trip with a quarter tank of gas left (came out to 32mpg on a 29mpg car) and the ride was quiet and firm (not harsh). I'd never see one like mine (Aegan Blue Pearl) the whole trip on I-20. My vote based on these things is for the CL.
Last edited by ParaSurfer1979; 02-24-2012 at 11:14 PM.
The following users liked this post:
clpassenubye (02-25-2012)
#36
Yeah I know what you guys mean that's one reason I switched to using premium gas. Oil is more serious though I only use mobil 1 10W-30 advanced full synthetic and only honda filters. I always figured the ecu would compensate for using regular gas, which it does like someone mentioned.
#37
Instructor
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Birmingham, Al
Age: 42
Posts: 228
Likes: 0
Received 21 Likes
on
11 Posts
The timing model that the ECU uses is very sophisticated. It's also fairly aggressive. I'll occasionally hear my car tick when I jump on the throttle quickly after cruising for a while. The ECU very quickly reigns it all in, though. For us east coasters, California 91 is about the equivalent of our 89...so even though they are putting in "premium" even our midgrade is similar or better.
#39
Instructor
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Birmingham, Al
Age: 42
Posts: 228
Likes: 0
Received 21 Likes
on
11 Posts
When I was in college, I worked on the side for APR (see VW/Audi/Porsche tuner) and to calibrate our 91 octane files based on the logs were were seeing from the Cali 91 octane people, we had to drop down to 89 octane to see similar numbers as far as timing correction, etc.
The following users liked this post:
civicdrivr (02-25-2012)
#40
Whats up with RDX owners?
iTrader: (9)
A 2003 Accord Coupe EX-L V6 sold new for $25,900 (MSRP). According to KBB (not the end-all for consumer prices, but Im using the same source for both), it is worth $9,974 with 120,000 miles - suggested retail that is. It retained 39% of its value.
A 2003 Acura CL-S 6MT sold for $30,550 (MSRP). With 120,000 miles, it is worth $9,726 - again, suggested retail. The CL retained 32% of its value.
Im not saying that the CL is crap. If I could go back in time, I wouldnt change a thing. I would still be happy to own a CL. But Im not a fanboy and I will be quick to point out its short-comings.
A few more points:
-The Accord has traction control, even with the 6MT. The CL-S6 does not.
-The Accord is built on a new ACE body structure, and is safer. It received all-around 5 stars from the NHTSA. I cant find crash safety for the CL.
The following users liked this post:
SatinSilverAV6 (02-27-2012)