CAI vs SRI (own opinion) sorry if repost
04-02-2008, 11:03 PM
#1
白人看不懂
Thread Starter
Join Date: May 2007
Location: ID
Age: 35
Posts: 216
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
CAI vs SRI (own opinion) sorry if repost
kinda thought about the use of the 2, and the short ram seemed to be a bit more considerate than the CAI.
SRI starts quicker but thats bout it. beginning
end 
CAI takes a bit longer to do its things - hitting higher rpm before it takes part.
but by the time its hitting in, we already got that 260HP and vtec kicking in already.(type s) beginning end
what does everyone else think about this theory?
sorry if repost
SRI starts quicker but thats bout it. beginning
end CAI takes a bit longer to do its things - hitting higher rpm before it takes part.
but by the time its hitting in, we already got that 260HP and vtec kicking in already.(type s) beginning
end what does everyone else think about this theory?
sorry if repost
04-02-2008, 11:50 PM
#2
Moderator Alumnus
I think the theory is 
IMO, if you want the SRI, it will be buzzing like you have a UFO under your hood.
Plus, it's going to be sucking in hot air from the engine any who. I really don't see the point except freeing up a few ponies from a restrictive stock air box. CAI is more plausible. But hey, it's not my car, you do what you want.
IMO, if you want the SRI, it will be buzzing like you have a UFO under your hood.
Plus, it's going to be sucking in hot air from the engine any who. I really don't see the point except freeing up a few ponies from a restrictive stock air box. CAI is more plausible. But hey, it's not my car, you do what you want.
04-03-2008, 01:25 AM
#4
It really is your own opinion!! People will argue this topic over and over again. I have a SRI and see a nice performance increase, but I do have the ufo under the hood! Im sure their are pros and cons for both its really all prefrance.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
lanechanger
Member Cars for Sale
4
10-13-2015 10:56 AM
